Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) ACMP Conference Juneau, AK 2007.
Advertisements

Railway Grade Separations Issues. Railway Grade Separations 1.Introduction Qualifications/experience to undertake bridge planning for railway grade separations:
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
36 CFR 218.  Moves projects documented in an Environmental Assessment (EA)/Decision Notice (DN) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/Record of Decision.
Floyd County Board of Commissioners Special Town Hall Meeting Topic: Update on status of Georgetown WWTP.
Environmental Compliance Negotiating our way through the process…
Demonstration Using the GIS Inventory for Environmental Professionals John Jediny Deputy Associate Director for NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
CAMPUT 2015 Energy Regulation Course Donald Gordon Conference Centre Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Role of Tribunal Staff, Interveners and Independent.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
MEA Class EA Requirements to support a new Sewage Treatment Facility May, 2013.
Start the slide show by clicking on the "Slide Show" option in the above menu and choose "View Show”. or – hit the F5 Key.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
FC C Federal Communications Commission Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Prepared by TOWER CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION SYSTEM DEMONSTRATION January 31,2005.
Compliance with the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and Steps Toward Developing Good Regulatory Practices Bryan O’Byrne Trade Compliance Center.
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
NSW Department of Education & Training NSW Public Schools – Leading the Way SELECTION PANEL PROCEDURES FOR SCHOOL TEACHERS 2009 Procedural.
Federal Data Collection Clearance and Comment Process February 2006.
Procedures for Applying for an Alternative Oyster Culture Permit Oyster Advisory Committee April 18, 2013 ________________________________________.
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Division Working Through The S106 Process FY 2015 CDBG Applicant Workshop December 4 th, 2014Meg.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
Productive SB 18 Consultation Michelle LaPena, Esq. LaPena Law Corporation 2001 N Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA (916)
Planning appeals Peter Ford Head of Development Management Planning Committee Training – 30 th July 2015.
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Superstructure and Bridge Replacements in Regions 2 & 9 Design-Build Project (PIN , D900022) Herkimer,
Initial Referrals NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Department November 24 th, 2008.
Streamlined Environmental Requirements for Distributed Antenna Systems (DAS) and Small Cells.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
1 Smart Schools Bond Act Completing the Smart Schools Investment Plan
1 C E T A S Triage Presentation, Date Project Name Project location (city, county) ODOT Key Number:
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Rabbanai T. Morgan Current as of 26 January 2006 Protests.
Tier I: Module 5 CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program Element 4: Verification & Certification.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
STATE AND LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION GRANT PROGRAM 1 December 6, 2012.
Environmental Assessment in British Columbia Forum of Federations Conference September 14, 2009.
Section 4(f)/6(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
1 Historic Preservation Webinar "Reporting Through PAGE and to PMC"
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
1 Waste Discharge Authorization Application - British Columbia WG6 Application Process WG Document Review presented by Helga Harlander October x, 2008.
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
How Tribes Can Influence State Title V Permits Virgil Frazier Southern Ute Indian Tribe Virgil Frazier Southern Ute Indian Tribe.
CEAA 2012 EA PROCESS OPTIONS OCTOBER 15, 2012
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
Federal Aviation Administration ARP SOP No SOP for CATEX Determinations Effective Date: Oct. 01, 2014 February 2016.
Suzanne Derrick Technical Director – Cultural Resources FCC Section 106 Process and the Archeology of Tower Siting Panelist Presentation May 4, 2016.
Railroad Towers ISSUES AND UPDATES FOR TOWERS PROPOSED IN RAILROAD RIGHTS OF WAY.
Energy Policy Act – 2005 West-Wide Energy Corridors.
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Governor’s Office of Emergency Services 1 The Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Application and Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) Training.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
FCC’s NEPA Process Overview of NEPA Overview of NEPA Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Nuts and bolts.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
HIPAA Training Workshop #3 Individual Rights Kaye L. Rankin Rankin Healthcare Consultants, Inc.
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
The Wireless Infrastructure NPRM/NOI, WT Docket No
Communications Protocols: The Good Faith Process
OFFICE OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Pedestrian Survey.
May 8, 2018 Marion Werkheiser, Cultural Heritage Partners
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
Presentation transcript:

Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More Information: Jill Springer, Deputy Federal Preservation Officer

Background In May 2014, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) issued a Program Comment to tailor Section 106 review of Positive Train Control (PTC) infrastructure. The full Program Comment is available through a link on the ACHP website: The Program Comment excludes some specified PTC infrastructure from standard Section 106 review, and streamlines such review for other PTC infrastructure. Railroads must use the FCC Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) to ensure that Tribal Nations are appropriately included in the process. The Program Comment provides direction on how and when monitoring may be appropriate/required, and establishes more definitive timeframes for Section 106 review. The following slides walk through the Program Comment requirements and introduce a flow chart illustrating the review process.

Yes: Proceed Proceed IS PTC ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: A wayside pole or infrastructure element within 500’ of signal equipment 25’ or taller; an existing catenary bridge or mast 25’ or taller; or above ground utility lines or infrastructure within 100’ of RR ROW centerline, not within an identified historic property’s boundary? OR A wayside antenna of less than 10’ on existing RR infrastructure that is not an identified historic property? OR A wayside pole or infrastructure element within the yard track and not within 500’ of an identified historic property? Yes: Excluded! 1) Initiate TCNS and e106 notice as excluded. 2) Upload map and explanation of exclusions to TCNS and e106 (submit hard copy upon request). No: Initiate TCNS/e106 notification and Follow Program Comment Section VII Review Process. Section VII Review Process 1)Cultural Resource professional prepares overlay map of non-excluded PTC locations, showing boundaries of NR listed or previously determined eligible properties within ¼ mile. 2)Identify the locations of excluded PTC poles. 3)For non-excluded poles, label the overlay map with any alternative locations identified to avoid or minimize adverse effects. 4)Include a photograph of the types of proposed pole/infrastructure and specify the installation techniques proposed and the fill material source (if applicable). 5)Submit documentation via e-106 (SHPO) and TCNS (interested Tribes) for thirty day review. 6)Inform relevant local and federal government agencies and public. No SHPO/Tribal Response within 30 days SHPO/Tribe requests add’l information/fees/monitoring 1)30 day clock continues 2)Info/monitoring require justified cause Agreement Reached Refer to FCC for 10-day review, consultation and decision Agreement not reached FCC Determines Exceptional Circumstances Wayside Pole/Infrastructure Proceeds in Accordance with FCC Requirements. Project Proceeds Railroad prepares map showing proposed locations for PTC poles <75’ (& associated infrastructure) planned in RR rights of way within a single county, showing PTC Base Stations & indicating fill material source (if anticipated). Cultural Resource professional conducts reasonable/good faith effort historic properties search and reviews against Section V Exclusions; prepares overlay maps with boundaries of NR listed or previously determined eligible historic properties for non-excluded poles. SHPO/Tribal Concurrence or Executed, Filed Adverse Effect Agreement (FCC) If on Tribal Land If on Private/ Other If on Federal Land Tribe decides if PC applies No: Refer to FCC Landholding agency is not required to consult on PTC effects: Proceed APPLYING THE POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL PROGRAM COMMENT FOR SECTION 106 REVIEW S/THPO Objects Refer to FCC

If on Tribal Land If on Private/ Other If on Federal Land Tribe decides if PC applies No: Refer to FCC Yes: Proceed Land managing agency not required to consider effects. Notify agency and Proceed Proceed APPLYING THE POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL PROGRAM COMMENT FOR SECTION 106 REVIEW Step 1: Determine whether the infrastructure is proposed on Tribal, Federal or Private Land. Most consultations will be with the State Historic Preservation Office, unless the infrastructure is proposed on Tribal lands, where the Tribal Nation decides whether to follow the Program Comment. The Program Comment relieves other Federal Agencies from Section 106 obligations with respect to PTC infrastructure that is covered under the Program Comment.

APPLYING THE POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL PROGRAM COMMENT FOR SECTION 106 REVIEW Railroad prepares map showing proposed locations for PTC poles less than 75’ high and associated infrastructure that is planned in railroad rights of way within a single county, showing PTC Base Stations and indicating fill material source (if anticipated). Cultural Resource Professional conducts reasonable/good faith effort historic properties search and prepares overlay with boundaries of NR listed or previously determined eligible historic properties. Step 2: Hire a Cultural Resource Professional and develop the required mapping. Many states require archaeologists to hold a state permit or license in order to conduct the records searches required to identify historic properties. Such searches must almost always be performed in the SHPO office or in the State Archives. Historic properties are those formally determined eligible for listing, or those listed, in the National Register of Historic Places. Note: Cultural resource professionals should confirm with the SHPO staff that they have access to the most current eligibility information, as the most recent determinations may be in processing and not yet on file.

Step 3: Confirm Exclusions. IS PTC ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: A wayside pole or infrastructure element within 500’ of signal equipment 25’ or taller; an existing catenary bridge or mast 25’ or taller; or above ground utility lines or infrastructure within 100’ of RR ROW centerline, not within an identified historic property’s boundary? Section V A (1) OR A wayside antenna of less than 10’ on existing RR infrastructure that is not an identified historic property? Section V A (2) OR A wayside pole or infrastructure element within the yard track and not within 500’ of an identified historic property? Section V A (3) Railroads identify the excluded infrastructure locations, Cultural Resource Professional confirms that no identified historic properties near the infrastructure disqualify the exclusion at each location. Excluded infrastructure must be identified on mapping, and the applicable Section V exclusion must be specified for each location. Note: Batching excluded infrastructure submissions separately will facilitate SHPO and Tribal clearances and allow reviewing offices to focus review efforts on non-excluded batches. Cultural Resource Professional reviews maps to confirm Section V Exclusions. APPLYING THE POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL PROGRAM COMMENT FOR SECTION 106 REVIEW

Excluded Infrastructure: Wayside poles or infrastructure elements within 500’ of signal equipment 25’ or taller; an existing catenary bridge or mast 25’ or taller; or above ground utility lines or infrastructure within 100’ of RR ROW centerline, not within an identified historic property’s boundary; OR Wayside antennae of less than 10’ on existing RR infrastructure that is not an identified historic property; OR Wayside poles or infrastructure elements within the yard track and not within 500’ of an identified historic property. 1)Initiate TCNS/e106 notice as Excluded PTC; and 2) Upload mapping and explanation of exclusions to TCNS and e106 (also provide hard copy upon request) No SHPO or Tribal Objection: Section 106 complete after 30-day review period ends APPLYING THE POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL PROGRAM COMMENT FOR SECTION 106 REVIEW SHPO/Tribe Objects within 30-day review period: Notify the FCC Railroad consults with SHPO/ Tribe and resolves concern FCC resolves, usually within 10 days A SHPO or Tribal Nation may identify a pole as ineligible for an exclusion because it is within the boundaries of a historic property about which a railroad was previously unaware. SHPO/Tribal concerns about excluded poles will not be considered outside of the 30-day period except in extraordinary circumstances. Step 4A: Excluded Infrastructure.

Initiate TCNS and e106 notification and Follow Program Comment Section VII Review Process for Non-excluded PTC Infrastructure. PREPARE SUBMISSION: 1)Develop overlay maps for non-excluded PTC sites showing the boundaries of NR listed or determined eligible properties within ¼ mile. 2)Identify the locations of excluded PTC poles (if any in batch) on map. 3)For non-excluded poles, identify any alternative PTC locations considered possible to avoid or minimize adverse effects. 4)Specify the type of proposed pole/infrastructure, provide photographs, and describe installation techniques and the fill material source. SUBMIT DOCUMENTATION FOR 30-DAY REVIEW: 1) Upload via e-106 for SHPO and FCC access 2) Provide hard copy forms to SHPOs upon request 3) Upload via TCNS for Tribal Nations access ALERT LOCAL AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND THE PUBLIC. APPLYING THE POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL PROGRAM COMMENT FOR SECTION 106 REVIEW Step 4B: Non-Excluded Infrastructure.

POSSIBLE OUTCOME #1: SHPO and Tribal Nations Concur on No Adverse Effect or Agree on Adverse Effect Agreement and Execute and File Agreement with the FCC Federal Preservation Officer Section VII Review Process for Non-Excluded PTC Infrastructure APPLYING THE POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL PROGRAM COMMENT FOR SECTION 106 REVIEW Section 106 is Complete Project Proceeds (in Accordance with Adverse Effect Agreement, if Applicable, and upon completion of NEPA/other regulatory requirements) Environmental Assessment is required if Section 106 process resulted in Adverse Effect Agreement

POSSIBLE OUTCOME #2: No SHPO/Tribal Response (or no Substantive Response) within 30 days, Railroad refers to FCC (as Reason 1) Section VII Review Process for Non-Excluded PTC Infrastructure The non-responsive SHPO and/or Tribal Nation will have no further opportunity to participate in review unless the FCC decides otherwise and informs all parties within 10 business days. APPLYING THE POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL PROGRAM COMMENT FOR SECTION 106 REVIEW Tribes that have not posted a project-specific reply in TCNS can be referred through link in TCNS. FCC Determines Exceptional Circumstances and Advises Railroad on Next Steps SHPOs and Tribes that have posted a reply in TCNS can be referred via to Project Proceeds in Accordance with FCC Requirements Include copies or summaries of any communications with SHPO/Tribe that are not in TCNS or e106

POSSIBLE OUTCOME #3: SHPO and/or Tribe Raises Substantive Concern(s) within 30 days Section VII Review Process for Non-Excluded PTC Infrastructure Railroad Reaches Agreement with SHPO/Tribe (if Adverse Effect Agreement executed, must be filed with FCC) Agreement not reached within the 30- day timeframe FCC Determines Exceptional Circumstances, Advises Railroad on Next Steps Project Proceeds in Accordance with FCC Requirements APPLYING THE POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL PROGRAM COMMENT FOR SECTION 106 REVIEW No Agreement= Refer to FCC Reason 3: FCC Consults 10 (or more) business days to Resolve Railroad refers to FCC (as Reason 2) and continues to consult with SHPO/Tribe for 10 more business days SHPOs and Tribes that have replied through TCNS can be referred via to Tribes that have not posted a reply in TCNS can be referred via TCNS

Yes: Proceed Proceed IS PTC ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: A wayside pole or infrastructure element within 500’ of signal equipment 25’ or taller; an existing catenary bridge or mast 25’ or taller; or above ground utility lines or infrastructure within 100’ of RR ROW centerline, not within an identified historic property’s boundary? OR A wayside antenna of less than 10’ on existing RR infrastructure that is not an identified historic property? OR A wayside pole or infrastructure element within the yard track and not within 500’ of an identified historic property? Yes: Excluded! 1) Initiate TCNS and e106 notice as excluded. 2) Upload map and explanation of exclusions to TCNS and e106 (submit hard copy upon request). No: Initiate TCNS/e106 notification and Follow Program Comment Section VII Review Process. Section VII Review Process 1)Cultural Resource professional prepares overlay map of non-excluded PTC locations, showing boundaries of NR listed or previously determined eligible properties within ¼ mile. 2)Identify the locations of excluded PTC poles. 3)For non-excluded poles, label the overlay map with any alternative locations identified to avoid or minimize adverse effects. 4)Include a photograph of the types of proposed pole/infrastructure and specify the installation techniques proposed and the fill material source (if applicable). 5)Submit documentation via e-106 (SHPO) and TCNS (interested Tribes) for thirty day review. 6)Inform relevant local and federal government agencies and public. No SHPO/Tribal Response within 30 days SHPO/Tribe requests add’l information/fees/monitoring 1)30 day clock continues 2)Info/monitoring require justified cause Agreement Reached Refer to FCC for 10-day review, consultation and decision Agreement not reached FCC Determines Exceptional Circumstances Wayside Pole/Infrastructure Proceeds in Accordance with FCC Requirements. Project Proceeds Railroad prepares map showing proposed locations for PTC poles <75’ (& associated infrastructure) planned in RR rights of way within a single county, showing PTC Base Stations & indicating fill material source (if anticipated). Cultural Resource professional conducts reasonable/good faith effort historic properties search and reviews against Section V Exclusions; prepares overlay maps with boundaries of NR listed or previously determined eligible historic properties for non-excluded poles. SHPO/Tribal Concurrence or Executed, Filed Adverse Effect Agreement (FCC) If on Tribal Land If on Private/ Other If on Federal Land Tribe decides if PC applies No: Refer to FCC Landholding agency is not required to consult on PTC effects: Proceed APPLYING THE POSITIVE TRAIN CONTROL PROGRAM COMMENT FOR SECTION 106 REVIEW S/THPO Objects Refer to FCC