What universities want from publishing Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Open Access at the University of Glasgow William J Nixon Enlighten Service Development Manager University of Latvia 227th June 2011.

Advertisements

Improving School Leadership: Contexts and Success For them, conventional wisdom is not convenient truth. Keynote for OECD Workshop Brussels, February 1-2,

Institutional Repositories The work of SHERPA Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.

Open Access Institutional Repositories in UK Universities Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.

ACHIEVING OPEN ACCESS TO UK RESEARCH : THE WORK OF THE JOINT INFORMATION SYSTEMS COMMITTEE Frederick J. Friend OSI Open Access Advocate JISC Consultant.

Opening Access to Southampton Research ______ Institutional Repositories for Research Visibility: Time to Deposit Jessie Hey and Pauline Simpson ESM Faculty.

Southampton University Research e-Prints: e-Prints Soton School of Medicine Discussion 19 Jan 2005 Pauline Simpson Elizabeth.

IMPROVING ACCESS TO ACADEMIC CONTENT : JISC working for UK teaching and research Frederick J. Friend OSI Open Access Advocate JISC Consultant Honorary.

EASE Workshop "Two Roads to Open Access" Open Access Repositories in practice Bill Hubbard SHERPA Manager University of Nottingham.

Briefing Session - UKSG 2005 Institutional repositories in practice - a view from SHERPA Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.

Creating an institutional e-print repository Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.

Institutional Repositories and Self-Archiving Crisis? What Crisis? Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.

Open Access - Where are we so far? Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.

Institutional repositories and SHERPA Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.

Creating an institutional e-print repository Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.

Repositories, Learned Societies and Research Funders Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.

Consortium within a consortium: the basis for the York service model Elizabeth Heaps (University Librarian) Elizabeth Harbord (Head of Collection Management)

The library as a virtual research environment Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.

Institutional Repositories and the SHERPA Project Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.

The SOAS Repository Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.

CPD25 Building Open Access Institutional Repositories Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.

Scientific publications: Free for all? A summary of implications for institutional repositories Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.

Why self-archive? Elizabeth Harbord Head of Collection Management.

E-Publishing School of Modern Languages AwayDay May 2005 Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.

Creating Institutional Repositories Stephen Pinfield.

Publication and Deposition in an Eprint Repository Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.

Practical Issues for Institutional Repositories Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.

SHERPAs work on Institutional Repositories Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.

Paying for Open Access? institutional funding streams and OA publication charges Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.

Nottingham ePrints School of Biosciences School Board Meeting Nov 2005 Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.

Enlighten: Glasgows Universitys online institutional repository Morag Greig University Library.

Opening Access to Research or what the institutional repository can do for you Centre for Geospatial Science Sir Clive Granger Building Monday, 24 th September.

Making Your Research Open Access: What you need to know National Biomedical Research Unit in Hearing 15 th November 2010 Willow Fuchs Centre for Research.

Opening Access to Research or what the institutional repository can do for you Bill Hubbard SHERPA Manager University of Nottingham.

Building Repositories of eprints in UK Research Universities Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.

Repository Development: where are we now and where are we going? Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham.

Professor Dave Delpy Chief Executive of Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Research Councils UK Impact Champion Competition vs. Collaboration:

Depositing Data for Archiving Libby Bishop ESDS Qualidata, University of Essex Changing Families, Changing Food Meeting University of Sheffield 15 March.

University Library W(h)ither the big deal Is e-journal purchase about to fragment? Martin Gill Faculty Team Leader Arts and Social Sciences Faculty Team.

Opening access and closing the risk: delivering the mandate for e-theses deposit 10 th International Symposium on Electronic Theses and Dissertations Uppsala.

CURRENT ISSUES Current contents Over 3,000 items open access, 42% reports and working papers, 21% journal articles, 21% conference items, 7% book chapters,

Institutional Repositories: Laying Foundations for a New Era of Scholarly Communication? Jessie Hey Online Information London, UK 1 Dec 2004 A practical.

The Journey to Excellence package Part 1: The concept of excellence and the 10 dimensions Part 2: Examples of each dimension Part 3: How good is our school?

Y OPEN? ISSUES IN OPEN ACCESS FOR GENERATION Y SCIENTISTS Ollie Bridle October 2012, Radcliffe Science Library.

Disseminating your research using ORA and Symplectic Sally Rumsey Bodleian Libraries.

JISC Collections 04 September 2014 | Presentation to PRATT-SILS MA Summer School | Slide 1 JISC Collections.

A lecturer’s perspective Social media & social work Martin Webber 12 th Maudsley Workshop.

The benefits and pitfalls of using social media to inform learning and teaching Crowd-sourcing, blogging and blagging Martin Webber 6 th Excellence in.

Document Repositories and the copyright issue Marc Goovaerts Hasselt University Library ODIN-PI TRAINING OSTENDE, May 2008.

Electronic publishing: issues and future trends Anne Bell.

IT Services Open Access Research Data November 2013 update 1.

E-prints: the Nottingham Experience Stephen Pinfield and Mike Gardner.

SHERPA: institutional repositories Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.

Daniela Nastasie, PhD BEng(Hons) AALIA Senior Metadata Librarian Repository and Archive Metadata Services UniSA Library Open Access Publishing and UniSA.

PfM Survey 2012 Results & Analysis Update Stephen Parrett (SIG Committee Member) APM Portfolio Management SIG AGM – 14 June

DAEDALUS Project William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.

Chapter 9 Developing an Effective Knowledge Service

Open Access publishing for the Humanities Sparc Europe UK Roadshow 26 November 2014, St Andrews Eelco Ferwerda OAPEN Foundation.

Introduction to ESDS International Celia Russell Economic and Social Data Service MIMAS April 14 th 2004 University of Manchester Delivering the World:

Open access, institutional repositories and UBIR 21 November 2008 – Sarah Taylor Open access, institutional repositories and UBIR The University of Bolton.

Licensing Evolution ICOLC October 2006 – Rome Lorraine Estelle.

Full Disclosure How Authors and Readers Really Feel about ETDs Gail McMillan Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 8th International Symposium.

Taking the tool forward: Service Improvement Author: Ali Ewing, Principal Lecturer Learning and Teaching July 2011 The University of Northampton Park Campus,

| 1 Commercial Scholarly publishing In the world of open access Derk Haank Edinburgh CEO Springer 11 April 2005 Science+ business media.

The National Food and Health Agenda Imogen Sharp Health Improvement and Prevention Department of Health.

Bibliometrics at the University of Glasgow Susan Ashworth.

Brand issues for Authors and Publishers Pippa Scoones

Dissemination Working Group

Dual Nature of Universities

The impact of metrics on scholarly publishers, research organisations and libraries Intro self Considering traditional metrics (views, downloads, citations)

Presentation transcript:

What universities want from publishing Stephen Pinfield University of Nottingham

What universities want from publishing do ?

The simple answer Universities: –do research –do teaching Want publishing to support and further their research and teaching

What universities want from publishing

Universities: complex organisations Devolved structure Consultative (democratic?) processes Corporate strategy and local reality Suspicion of the centre Discipline differences Individual / research group oriented Person culture

Different universities UK: –Russell Group –Other old universities –New universities USA: –Ivy League –etc.

What universities want from publishing

Want? Desire, wish for –instinctive wants –informed wants Need, ought to have Academics: innovative in their ideas, conservative in their work practices

What universities want from publishing

Publishing? Wide range of possibilities: –from: formal publication in peer-reviewed journal –to: informal dissemination Different factors –discipline differences –paper - electronic –etc.

So… Differences within and between universities mean different wants in relation to publishing Different wants reflect different levels of understanding on what is desirable and/or possible There are different ideas of what publishing is and what it is for

Universities and publishing Universities as: Producers Purchasers Consumers

Producers: context Publish or perish Get cited or get out The RAE is what counts (in the UK)

Producers Rapid dissemination Wide dissemination Visibility Impact Peer endorsement No risks IPR-friendly policies Freedom to self-archive Freedom to re-use Document preparation?

Purchasers Affordability Flexibility –in pricing –in licences Transparency Integratability Wide access Perpetual access Usage statistics

Consumers Quality Quality markers / branding Ease of access –desk-top –on / off-campus –wide range of publishers –easy authentication –current / archive Navigability Post-publication indicators Value added features?

Achieving a balance Tensions –e.g. rapid dissemination v. quality Subscription-based status-quo –strong on quality, branding, document preparation etc. –at the expense of access, impact, affordability etc. Open-access: publishing, self-archiving

Open access: strengths Producers Rapid dissemination Wide dissemination Visibility Impact Peer endorsement No risks IPR-friendly policies Freedom to self- archive Freedom to re-use Document preparation? Purchasers Affordability Flexibility in pricing in licences Transparency Integratability Wide access Perpetual access Usage statistics Consumers Quality Quality markers / branding Ease of access desk-top on/off-campus wide range of publishers easy authentication current / archive Navigability Post-publication indicators Value added features?

Do universities want open access? Universities want: –Impact –Affordability –Quality –Access Can open access deliver?

Time for change Things have to change with the times - the established system isnt perfect and change might be a good thing. Anonymous respondent to the JISC/OSI Journal Authors Survey, 2004