A Phase III trial of 5-FU/l-leucovorin/ irinotecan (FOLFIRI) versus irinotecan/S-1 (IRIS) as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

516 (32723) Phase III trial comparing AC (x4)taxane (x4) with taxane (x8) as adjuvant therapy for node-positive breast cancer: Results of N-SAS-BC02.
I I. B.- T R E A T M E N T P L A N: DOCETAXEL 75 mg/m2 40 mg/m2 THORACIC RT (66 Gys: 180 cGy/d) CISPLATIN 40 mg/m2 Days E V A L U A.
CM A pooled safety & efficacy analysis examining the effect of performance status on outcomes in 9 first line treatment trials of 6,286 patients.
Facon T et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 2.
1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Randomized phase III study of S-1 alone versus S-1 + cisplatin in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer ( The SPIRITS trial ) SPIRITS: S-1 plus cisplatin.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
Intergroup trial CALGB 80101
RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL COMPARING FOLFIRINOX (5FU/LEUCOVORIN, IRINOTECAN AND OXALIPLATIN) VS GEMCITABINE AS FIRST-LINE TREATMENT FOR METASTATIC PANCREATIC.
Capecitabine versus Bolus 5-FU/Leucovorin as Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer: X-ACT Trial Results James Cassidy, MD Colorectal Cancer Update Think Tank.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
Results of Docetaxel Plus Oxaliplatin (DOCOX) +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Metastatic Gastric and/or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: Results.
Poster #382 XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomized phase III trial of first-line XELOX vs. FOLFOX-4 for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC): Updated.
Targeting VEGF for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Herbert Hurwitz Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Results of the X-PECT Study: A phase III randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of perifosine plus capecitabine (P-CAP) vs. placebo plus capecitabine.
*University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
N. Boku, S. Yamamoto, K. Shirao, T. Doi, A. Sawaki, W. Koizumi, H. Saito, K. Yamaguchi, A. Kimura, A. Ohtsu Gastrointestinal Oncology Study Group of Japan.
This house believes that FOLFIRINOX is the best treatment for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma Pro Marc YCHOU Montpellier.
NHL13: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Study of Rituximab as Maintenance Treatment versus Observation Alone in Patients with Aggressive B ‐ Cell Lymphoma.
Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD
Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing FOLFIRINOX (F: 5FU/Leucovorin [LV], Irinotecan [I], and Oxaliplatin [O]) versus Gemcitabine (G) as First-Line Treatment.
T Andre, E Quinaux, C Louvet, E Gamelin, O Bouche, E Achille, P Piedbois, N Tubiana-Mathieu, M Buyse and A de Gramont. Updated results at 6 year of the.
BASED ON PROTOCOL VERSION 1 SEPTEMBER 2012 A new study evaluating an investigational drug to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal.
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
MAX: International multi-centre randomised phase II/III study of capecitabine (Cap), bevacizumab (Bev) and mitomycin C (MMC) as first-line treatment for.
0 Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer NCCTG Intergroup Phase III Trial N0147 Jocelin Huang, Daniel J Sargent,
MABEL – a large multinational study of cetuximab plus irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on irinotecan H Wilke, R Glynne-Jones, J Thaler,
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
XELOX vs. FOLFOX4: survival and response results from XELOX-1 / NO16966, a randomized phase III trial of first-line treatment for patients with metastatic.
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Cmab might have therapeutic benefit in Japanese patients with KRAS p.G13D mutant colorectal cancer. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design.
ECCO ESMO 2011 GI Cancer Updates TAS102 and BSC vs. Placebo and BSC Reviewer: Dr. Scott Berry Date posted: October 2011.
The Combination of Bevacizumab (Bev) with capecitabine/irinotecan (CapIri/Bev) or capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CapOx/Bev) is highly active in advanced colorectal.
Preliminary Results from a Phase II study of FOLFIRI and Bevacizumab as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (Abstract #3579) S. Kopetz,
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
Kang Y et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract LBA4007.
Phase II trial of irinotecan/docetaxel for advanced pancreatic cancer with randomization between irinotecan/docetaxel and irinotecan/docetaxel plus C225,
Phase II trial of chemotherapy with high-dose FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Niall C. Tebbutt International randomised phase III study of capecitabine, bevacizumab, and mitomycin C in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 8-12, 2015
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
P.A. Tang 1, S. J. Cohen 1, G. Bjarnason 1, C. Kollmannsberger 1, K. Virik 1, M. J. MacKenzie 1, J. Brown 1, L. Wang 1, A. Chen 2, M. J. Moore 1 1 Princess.
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Reviewer: Dr Scott Berry Date posted: June 21, 2007 CAPEOX vs. FOLFOX4 +/- Bevacizumab: survival results from NO16966, a randomized.
Phase I/II study of oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 plus oral Leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer T. Yoshino 1, W. Koizumi 2,
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
Single-agent nab-Paclitaxel Given Weekly (3/4) as First-line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (An International Oncology Network Study, #I )
Y-K Kang, A Ohtsu, E Van Cutsem, SY Rha, A Sawaki SR Park, H-Y Lim, J Wu, B Langer, MA Shah on behalf of AVAGAST investigators AVAGAST: a randomized, double-blind.
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
A cura di Filippo de Marinis
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
*University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
CREATE-X: Adjuvant Capecitabine in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
Trifluridine/Tipiracil (TAS-102) Improves Survival in Patients With Metastatic CRC and Mild Renal/Hepatic Impairment: Subgroup Analysis of RECOURSE CCO.
BRAF mutant mCRC patients – What would you recommend? FOLFIRINOX/Bev
First efficacy and safety results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomised 2x2 factorial phase III trial of XELOX vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab or placebo in first-line.
Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil-based (neo-)adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: safety results of a randomized phase III.
Randomized phase III study of irinotecan (IRI) versus weekly paclitaxel (wPTX) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) refractory to combination chemotherapy.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Cetuximab with chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS studies according to KRAS.
KRAS status and efficacy in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with FOLFIRI with or without cetuximab: The.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin, CPT-11: Use and Sequencing (MRC FOCUS)
Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) +/- cetuximab for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the.
Presentation transcript:

A Phase III trial of 5-FU/l-leucovorin/ irinotecan (FOLFIRI) versus irinotecan/S-1 (IRIS) as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer Ken Kato, Kei Muro, Hirofumi Yasui, Akihito Tsuji, Shinichi Sameshima, Hideo Baba, Taroh Satoh, Tadamichi Denda, Kenji Ina, Kenichi Sugihara On behalf of the FIRIS study group FIRIS study

Background S-1(tegafur,CDHP,Oxo) is an oral “DPD inhibitory fluoropyrimidine (DIF)” widely used for various solid tumors in Japan. Several phase II studies of irinotecan plus S-1 combination therapy (IRIS) have shown promising efficacy and safety for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This phase III trial was conducted to examine whether IRIS is non-inferior to FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy for mCRC.

DPD CDHP Neuro- toxicity Liver and Tumor (CYP 2A6) 5-FU Oxo Tumor GI tract Bone marrow FdUMP Antitumor activity GI toxicity Myelo- toxicity Tegafur OPRT DegradationPhosphorylation F-β-Ala Biochemical action of S-1 OPRT, orotate phosphoribosyltransferase S-1 = Tegafur + CDHP + Oxo

FIRIS Study Design Stratification factors: ・ PS (0/1) ・ Prior chemotherapy (with/without L-OHP) ・ Institution Metastatic CRC Age 20-75y 2 nd line PS 0-1 No prior Irinotecan FOLFIRI (n=213) Irinotecan: 150 mg/m 2 d1, 15 l-LV: 200mg/m 2 d1, 15 5-FU: 400mg/m 2 bolus d1, 15 5-FU: 2,400mg/m 2 46 hr civ d1,2, &d15,16 repeated every 4 wks FOLFIRI (n=213) Irinotecan: 150 mg/m 2 d1, 15 l-LV: 200mg/m 2 d1, 15 5-FU: 400mg/m 2 bolus d1, 15 5-FU: 2,400mg/m 2 46 hr civ d1,2, &d15,16 repeated every 4 wks IRIS (n=213) Irinotecan: 125mg/m 2 d1, 15 S-1: mg*/body d1-14 repeated every 4 wks IRIS (n=213) Irinotecan: 125mg/m 2 d1, 15 S-1: mg*/body d1-14 repeated every 4 wks R n=426 *According to body surface area, BSA =1.5, 120 mg/day Accrual :

Endpoints and Statistical considerations Primary objective –Progression free survival Secondary objectives –overall survival, response rate, toxicity and cost. Sample size –With 400 patients, this had 80% power to detect non-inferiority of IRIS vs. FOLFIRI, defined by the upper limit of the 95% CI for the HR of ≤1.333

Main inclusion criteria Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma Inoperable mCRC No prior Irinotecan Failure to 1st line chemotherapy for mCRC or relapse during or within 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy Age ECOG PS 0,1 Adequate organ functions No prior radiotherapy for mCRC Written informed consent

Baseline characteristics FOLFIRI (n=213) IRIS (n=213) Male / Female 123/90120/93 Median Age, years (range) 63 (32-75) 61 (29-75) ECOG PS 0/1 160/53158/55 Histologic Type Well differentiated Moderately differentiated Poorly differentiated Other Undetermined Prior Chemotherapy with oxaliplatin Yes/No 128/85 129/84 Number of metastatic sites 1/≥2 92/120 88/124

Proportion of patients Progression-Free Survival (months) No. pts at risk FOLFIRI IRIS PFS (ITT population) FOLFIRI IRIS FOLFIRI IRIS (n=213) (n=213) Progression, n Median, months Adjusted HR (95% CI) to Upper limit below < (non inferiority margin) p=0.039

Survival Time (months) Proportion of patients 92 No. patients at risk FOLFIRI IRIS OS (ITT population) FOLFIRI IRIS (n=213) (n=213) Events, n Median, months Adjusted HR (95% CI) to FOLFIRI IRIS Median-follow-up time:12.9

Response rate (of the patients who had >1 measurable lesion) RECIST1.0 (investigator assessed) (%) FOLFIRI (n=174) IRIS (n=181) 16.7% (95%CI : ) 18.8% (95%CI : )

FOLFIRI (n=211)IRIS (n=210) Grade 3-4 Adverse eventNo.% % Neutropenia Leukopenia Hemoglobin Thrombocytopenia Diarrhea Fatigue Febrile neutropenia Mucositis / Stomatitis Adverse events (safety analysis population) CTC-AE v3.0

Subgroup analysis : PFS P value for interaction ECOG PS Prior chemotherapy with oxaliplatin 257Yes 257 Moderate differentiated adeno. 21 Poorly differentiated adeno Histologic type 122 Well differentiated adeno. 169No 24 Other 252<65 Age 183Female 243Male Sex No. of Patients Subgroup ITT population 426 IRIS betterFOLFIRI better

Progression-Free Survival (months) FOLFIRI n= M IRIS n= M L-OHP(+) PFS Survival Time (months) Progression-Free Survival (months) Survival Time (months) Proportion of patients L-OHP(-) PFS L-OHP(+) OS L-OHP(-) OS PFS and OS according to prior CTx (with or without L-OHP) HR ( ) FOLFIRI n=128 IRIS n=129 FOLFIRI n=85 7.8M IRIS n=84 6.0M FOLFIRI n=85 IRIS n=84 HR ( ) HR ( ) HR ( ) mPFS

Cost analysis GroupMedian cost per cycle* FOLFIRI\214,092 (€1,647) IRIS\134,774 (€1,037) * Included only medical direct cost

Conclusions This is the first phase III trial demonstrated the non-inferiority of an oral FU derivative combination with irinotecan compared to FOLFIRI. Toxicities of both groups were manageable. IRIS can potentially replace FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy for mCRC.

Participant institutions Aichi Cancer Center Hospital Shizuoka Cancer Center National Cancer Center Hospital Kochi Health Sciences Center Gunma Cancer Center Kumamoto University Kinki University School of Medicine Chiba Cancer Center Nagoya Memorial Hospital Shikoku Cancer Center Saitama Cancer Center Osaka Medical College Hospital National Kyushu Cancer Center Osaka City General Hospital Gunma University Hospital Hokkaido University Hospital Kyoto Medical Center Keio University Hospital Kansai Rosai Hospital Tokyo Medical and Dental University This study was sponsored by TAIHO and Daiichi Sankyo Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital Showa University Toyosu Hospital Minoh City Hospital Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital Toyama University Hospital Kagoshima Medical Center Tonan Hospital Kanagawa Cancer Center Niigata Cancer Center Hospital Saku Central Hospital Hyougo Cancer Center Hiroshima University Hospital Tomakomai Nisshou Hospital Aichi Cancer Center Aichi Hospital Nagoya Medical Center Kobe University Hospital Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital Yokohama City University Hospital Kitasato University Hospital Board members Steering Committee –Kenichi Sugihara –Yoshito Komatsu –Yasuhiro Shimada –Hiroya Takiuchi –Narikazu Boku –Masahiko Watanabe Independent Data Monitoring Committee –Yu Sakata –Yasuo Ohashi –Nobuyuki Yamamoto Independent Central Review Committee –Atsushi Ohtsu –Yasuaki Arai –Junji Tanaka Medical Adviser –Ichinosuke Hyodo Statistical Adviser –Satoshi Morita FIRIS Study Group