Traffic Barrier Guidelines Section 3.0 Potential Roadside Obstacles Hands-On Workshop III July 2013 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ADA Requirements Well-designed sidewalks meet ADA requirements:
Advertisements

Preparing a Curb Ramp Project December 15, Tiers of Project Types Non-Signalized Curb Ramp Reconstruction - Typically utilizing standard plans.
Draft Temporary Pedestrian Access Route (TPAR) Guidance
Barrier Warrants. Potential Hazards –Bridge Abutments/Piers/Approach Railing –Large Drainage Structures –Non-Breakaway Sign and Luminaire Supports –Embankments.
Barrier Design Principles. Principle 1: Distance from Roadway Place Guardrail As Far From Traveled Way As Practical.
Sign, Signal, and Luminaire Supports, Utility Poles, Trees, and Similar Roadside Features notes RDG Chapter 4.
Transportation Asset Management for Ancillary Assets
“You Could Learn a Lot About Guardrail From a Dummy…
Earthwork Operations & Equipments
Welcome to the Plumb Lane 2 nd Community Workshop November 28, 2011.
TRAILS AS TRANSPORTATION Design & Construction Michael J. Kubek, P.E. Ohio Department of Transportation, District 12 Production Administrator.
Cross Section Design Spring 2015.
Architectural CAD I – IM230
Appurtenances HDM Ch. 10.
Maintenance of Traffic (MOT)
Overview of 2009 MUTCD. Tom McDonald, PE Safety Circuit Rider Iowa LTAP.
US Highway 17 (Center Street) Sidewalk Feasibility Study Town of Pierson, Florida.
Draft Lighting Policy Ted Swansegar Cell:
INTRODUCTION This chapter presents guidance on the application of geometric design criteria to facilities functionally classified as collector roads and.
Chap 4 Cross Section Elements (pp.4-1 – 4-66 ) The following topics (pages) are covered in this lecture: Pavement (p.4-1 – 4-7) Pavement (p.4-1 – 4-7)
Design of Open Channels and Culverts CE453 Lecture 26
Design of Open Channels and Culverts
EXAM 2 REVIEW. 1. Drainage problem (25 pts) Below you see a cross-section of a ditch. It runs parallel to a 200-acre field consisting of permanent pasture.
INTRODUCTION This chapter presents guidance on the application of geometric design criteria to facilities functionally classified as local roads and streets.
Part 3 – Markings. Dotted (not broken) lane lines shall be used for non-continuing lanes:  Lane drops  Auxiliary lanes  Deceleration lanes  Acceleration.
Learning Outcomes Identify safety issues unique to local and rural areas. Identify common challenges to improving road safety. Explain why road agencies.
CROSS SECTION ELEMNTS Roadway - The portion of a highway, including shoulders for vehicular use. Traveled way - The portion of the roadway for the.
3R Standards Resurfacing, Restoration, & Rehabilitation Ch. 7 1.
Cross Sections CE 453 Lecture 22 Iowa DOT Design Manual Chapter 3.
Typical Sections All graphics taken from Ch 3 of HDM CTC 440.
Safety Audit Components Safety assessment for risk Management.
February 2013 TOLLWAY MANUALS AND STANDARDS PRESENTATIONS 1.
Detours – Selection and Design Highways & Engineering Conference March 2, 2006.
Programming/BudgetEngineering.. Current WisDOT Policy and Guidelines : mega/mg-budget-est-mgmt.pdf
1 The roadside Hossein Naraghi CE 590 Special Topics Safety March 2003 Time spent: 12 hrs.
2002 AASHTO ROADSIDE DESIGN GUIDE A CONCISE OVERVIEW.
1-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS. 1-2 Introduction Highway Traffic Fatalities Trend.
Alameda Creek Bridge Replacement Scoping Meeting March 4, 2014.
Rich Crossler-Laird ODOT Roadway Section 2010 ODOT Roadway Conference Urban Design – Break Out Session.
Interchange Design Wes Mayberry Transportation Engineering Intern
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 26 Schedule.
Fall 2014 Most of the Material taken from: Roadside Design Guide (2011) published by AAHSTO.
Urban Storm Drain Design: Typical urban roadway characteristics
Vegetation Control For Safety Russ Johnson – Maintenance Supervisor - WSDOT Don Petersen – Safety/Design Engineer - FHWA.
Use of Mobile Technology for Landslide and Geo-Hazard Rating Matrix Kamran Majidzadeh, PhD, PE Nikhil Khedekar, PhD, PE Nikhil Khedekar, PhD, PEProjectGrid.com®
Session 3 Grading Requirements for Guardrail End Treatments.
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Module 5 Work Zone Plan Sets Module 5 Work Zone Plan Sets Traffic Control Plan Development Course.
Roadside CE 453 Lecture 23. Sideslopes – Foreslope (Backslope) Design 1.Considerations: Stability and Vehicle Recovery a.if slope “>” 3:1 use barrier.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 101 Wyoming DOT Place guardrail when there is a fill slope of.
Bridget Malinowski February 2013 ROADWAY TRAFFIC CONTROL & COMMUNICATIONS MANUAL 1.
Recent Guideline Changes 1 Recent AT Guideline Changes Existing Documents New Technical Documents Bridge Structure Design Criteria Bridge Design Bulletins.
Traffic Barrier Guidelines Tracy Borchardt February
ROADWAY DESIGN CRITERIA
I-495 NORTHERN SECTION SHOULDER USE PROJECT State Project No , P101, C501 CITIZEN’S INFORMATION MEETING UPC NOVEMBER 19, 2013.
CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Highway Design Criteria Overview April 24, 2006 David R. Dougherty, P.E.
Traffic Barrier Guidelines Other Considerations Hands-On Workshop III July
Basic Hydrology & Hydraulics: DES 601
Traffic Barrier Guidelines Other Considerations Workshop V September-October 2015.
An Introduction to Contracts and Design Guides Presented by: David Lake, P.E. Roadway Designer Nevada Department of Transportation.
Tollway Barrier Guidelines Examples Workshop V September-October 2015.
Complete Streets Training Module 10 – Street Elements: Design & Safety Considerations for Context-Based Solutions.
John Farsatis February 2013 GUIDELINES FOR ROADWAY ILLUMINATION 1.
Tollway Barrier Guidelines Examples Hands-On Workshop III July
Session 3 Grading Requirements for Guardrail End Treatments.
ROAD HAZARD ASSESSMENT
From Channelization, Islands and Turning Roadways (p ~ p
Roadside Safety Design
Safety Audit Components
3R Standards Resurfacing, Restoration, & Rehabilitation Note: Need to update based on revisions to Ch 7 of HDM (freeway and non-freeway now covered in.
Presentation transcript:

Traffic Barrier Guidelines Section 3.0 Potential Roadside Obstacles Hands-On Workshop III July

Potential Roadside Obstacles (cont.) Design Options: 1.Remove obstacle 2.Relocate obstacle 3.Reduce impact severity 4.Shield obstacle 5.Delineate obstacle 2

Design Process – Begins at Concept Roadside safety MUST be part of the design process from the start. Examples of common issues:  Embankment Side Slopes  Drainage Structures  Drainage  Gutter  Bridge Design BWA Scope/Work Load Reduced 3

Potential Roadside Obstacles Gutters and Curbs Embankments Sign Supports Bridge Piers, Parapets, Abutments & Bridge Cones Noise Abatement Wall Drainage Structures Ditches Riprap Roadway Lighting ITS Systems Utility Poles Trees Bodies of Water Rock Cuts 4

Type G-3 Gutters 5

Type G-2 Gutters 6

Gutters and Curbs ( Article 3.2) 7 Type “C” Curb Ramp Toll Plaza Only

Gutters and Curbs ( Article 3.2) Gutter may be used with or without guardrail. Guardrail may be used with or without gutter. The need for each is determined independently. Do not use guardrail to shield improperly placed gutter. Guardrail used with gutter shall be at correct offset. 8

Embankments (Article 3.3) Roadside Geometry and Terrain Features, Section of the AASHTO Guide. 9

Embankments (Cont) 10 Recoverable Foreslope – 1:4 (V:H) and flatter Non-Recoverable Foreslope – Between 1:3 (V:H) (inclusive) and 1:4 (V:H) (exclusive) Critical Foreslope – Steeper than 1:3 (V:H)

Vehicle on Critical Foreslope

Comparative Risk Warrants for Embankments (RDG Fig. 5-1b) 12

Preferred Typical Section – Starting Point 13 Barn-roof foreslope using 1:6 allows easier: Placement of signs and light poles Transition to a bridge abutment & bridge cone.

Sign Supports (Article 3.4) Overhead Sign Truss – Cantilever Type Overhead Sign Truss – Span Type 14

Bridge (Article 3.5) Pier Abutment Cone Economical bridge designs usually result in the location of bridge piers, abutments, and parapets within mainline or ramp clear zones. Parapets 15

Noise Abatement Wall (Article 3.6) Non-Crashworthy Noise Wall Crashworthy Noise Wall 16 Not preferred for new installations

NAW Preferred Installations Place Wall Near ROW, Beyond Clear Zone 17

NAW Preferred Installations When along roadway – install crashworthy NAW with snow storage (no guardrail for face of wall) 18

Drainage Structure – Safety End Treatment Direction of Traffic Pipe Runners to match adjacent slope 19

Drainage Structures (Article 3.7) Issues: Headwall not flush with embankment Pipe too short Headwall too close to roadway Steep slope just above headwall Skew 20

Drainage Structures- Corrected 21

Drainage Structure- Issues Issues-Culvert End Treatment Headwall & pipe runners too steep in embankment slope, non traversable Headwall not flush with embankment; obstruction 22

Drainage Structure- Corrected 23

Ditches (Article 3.8) Drainage Channels, Section of the AASHTO Guide. 24

Roadway Lighting (Article 3.10) 25

Standard H1 – Grading Requirements 26

Standard H1 – Grading Requirements 27

Breakaway Light Pole Bases 28

Roadway Lighting (Article 3.10) Controllers and Transformers 29

Communication Systems and ITS Devices (Article 3.11) NID RWIS CCTV Camera Non-Breakaway 30

Bodies of Water (Article 3.14) Bodies of water greater than 2’ in depth must be shielded. Locate detention basins well outside the clear zone. 31

Questions? 32

33