Sec 2-3 Concept: Deductive Reasoning Objective: Given a statement, use the laws of logic to form conclusions and determine if the statement is true through.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Deductive Reasoning. Objectives I can identify an example of inductive reasoning. I can give an example of inductive reasoning. I can identify an example.
Advertisements

Bell Work 1) Find the value of the variables 2)Write the conditional and converse of each biconditional, and state if the biconditional is true or false.
2-4 Rules of Logic What is deductive reasoning?
Targets Use the Law of Detachment. Use the Law of Syllogism. Lesson 2-3: Deductive Reasoning TARGETS.
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.
Inductive vs Deductive Reasoning
Bell Ringer.
The Logic of Geometry. Why is Logic Needed in Geometry? Because making assumptions can be a dangerous thing.
2.3: Deductive Reasoning p Deductive Reasoning Use facts, definitions and accepted properties in logical order to write a logical argument.
Review! It’s Go Time!.
Laws of Logic. Deductive Reasoning Uses the following to form logical arguments. Facts Example: All humans breath air. Definitions Example: Two lines.
Section 2.3 Deductive Reasoning.
Splash Screen. Lesson Menu Five-Minute Check (over Lesson 2–3) Then/Now New Vocabulary Example 1: Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Key Concept: Law of.
Warm Up Week 7 1) Write the equation for the line that goes through the point and slope: ( 2, -9 ) and m = 3.
Section 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. Types of Reasoning:
Write the following in biconditional form. p: The sun is out. q: It is day time. The sun is out iff it is day time.
2.4 DEDUCTIVE REASONING Playing the game of logic well.
Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.
Chapter 2 Lesson 3 Objective: To use the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism.
 ESSENTIAL QUESTION  How can you use reasoning to solve problems?  Scholars will  Use the Law of Syllogism  Use the Law of Detachment UNIT 01 – LESSON.
2.4 Ms. Verdino.  Biconditional Statement: use this symbol ↔  Example ◦ Biconditional Statement: The weather is good if and only if the sun is out 
Lesson 2-4 Deductive Reasoning Deductive reasoning- uses facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions Law of Detachment: If p.
From conclusions by applying the laws of logic. Symbolic Notation Conditional statement If p, then qp ⟶q Converseq⟶p Biconditional p ⟷ q.
Section 2-2: Conditional Statements. Conditional A statement that can be written in If-then form symbol: If p —>, then q.
Section 2-5: Deductive Reasoning Goal: Be able to use the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism. Inductive Reasoning uses _________ to make conclusions.
WARM UP. DEDUCTIVE REASONING LEARNING OUTCOMES I will be able to use the law of detachment and syllogism to make conjectures from other statements I.
Do Now. Law of Syllogism ◦ We can draw a conclusion when we are given two true conditional statements. ◦ The conclusion of one statement is the hypothesis.
Over Lesson 2–3 5-Minute Check 1 A.Hypothesis: 6x – 5 = 19 Conclusion: x = 4 B.Hypothesis: 6x – 5 = 19 Conclusion: x  4 C.Hypothesis: x = 4 Conclusion:
2.3 Deductive Reasoning Geometry. Standards/Objectives Standard 3: Students will learn and apply geometric concepts. Objectives: Use symbolic notation.
Difference between inductive and deductive reasoning.
Deductive Reasoning Geometry Chapter 2-3 Mr. Dorn.
Section 2.3: Deductive Reasoning
2.3 Deductive Reasoning p. 87 Reminders Statement Conditional statement Converse Inverse Contrapositive Biconditional Symbols p → q q → p ~p → ~q ~q.
Section 2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. Definition: Conjecture an unproven statement that is based on observations or given information.
2.3 Deductive Reasoning. Symbolic Notation Conditional Statements can be written using symbolic notation. Conditional Statements can be written using.
Splash Screen. Over Lesson 2–3 5-Minute Check 1 A.Hypothesis: 6x – 5 = 19 Conclusion: x = 4 B.Hypothesis: 6x – 5 = 19 Conclusion: x  4 C.Hypothesis:
Deductive Reasoning LESSON 2–4. Lesson Menu Five-Minute Check (over Lesson 2–3) TEKS Then/Now New Vocabulary Example 1: Real-World Example: Inductive.
LG 1: Logic A Closer Look at Reasoning
Chapter 2: Reasoning & Proof Conditionals, Biconditionals, & Deductive Reasoning.
Essential Question: What is deductive reasoning?
Splash Screen.
1. Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of. “If
Section 2.3 – Deductive Reasoning
Logic.
Section 1.8: Statements of Logic
LESSON 2–4 Deductive Reasoning.
Splash Screen.
Applying Deductive Reasoning
Deductive Reasoning Deductive Reasoning – Reasoning that uses facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions. Law of Detachment.
Sec. 2.3: Apply Deductive Reasoning
Logic Lesson 2-2: Logic.
Splash Screen.
2.4 Deductive Reasoning.
2.3 Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures
Warmup Write the two conditionals(conditional and converse) that make up this biconditional: An angle is acute if and only if its measure is between 0.
2-3 Deductive Reasoning Objectives:
Drawing and Supporting Conclusions
LESSON 2–4 Deductive Reasoning.
1. Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of. “If
EXAMPLE 1 Use the Law of Detachment
2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning
2-4 Deductive Reasoning 8th Grade Geometry.
Splash Screen.
Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning
2-4 Deductive Reasoning Deductive Reasoning: Using facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions. Law of Detachment: A form.
Angles, Angle Pairs, Conditionals, Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Goal 1: Using Symbolic Notation Goal 2: Using the Laws of Logic
EXAMPLE 1 Use the Law of Detachment
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Sec 2-3 Concept: Deductive Reasoning Objective: Given a statement, use the laws of logic to form conclusions and determine if the statement is true through completion of daily work

a. Diego bought a pretzel Example 1: Use the true statements to determine whether the conclusion is true or false. Explain your reasoning If Diego goes shopping, then he will buy a pretzel If the mall is open, then Angela and Diego will go shopping If Angela goes shopping, then she will buy a pizza The mall is open a. Diego bought a pretzel TRUE! Since the mall is open, Angela and Diego go shopping and therefore, Diego buys a pretzel

Since the mall is open, Angela and Diego went shopping Example 1 cont.: Use the true statements to determine whether the conclusion is true or false. Explain your reasoning If Diego goes shopping, then he will buy a pretzel If the mall is open, then Angela and Diego will go shopping If Angela goes shopping, then she will buy a pizza The mall is open b. Angela and Diego went shopping TRUE! Since the mall is open, Angela and Diego went shopping

c. Angela bought a pretzel Example 1 cont.: Use the true statements to determine whether the conclusion is true or false. Explain your reasoning If Diego goes shopping, then he will buy a pretzel If the mall is open, then Angela and Diego will go shopping If Angela goes shopping, then she will buy a pizza The mall is open c. Angela bought a pretzel FALSE! Since the mall is open, Angela and Diego went shopping, therefore, Angela bought a pizza

d. Diego had some of Angela’s Pizza Example 1: Use the true statements to determine whether the conclusion is true or false. Explain your reasoning If Diego goes shopping, then he will buy a pretzel If the mall is open, then Angela and Diego will go shopping If Angela goes shopping, then she will buy a pizza The mall is open d. Diego had some of Angela’s Pizza FALSE! Since the mall is open, Angela and Diego went shopping, therefore, Diego bought a pretzel

Example 2: Deductive Reasoning B.

Example 3: Write the symbolic statement in words. p: the sky is cloudy q: it is raining 1. ~p The sky is not cloudy 2. ~q It is not raining 3. p→q If the sky is cloudy, then it is raining 4. ~p→~q 5. q→p 6. ~q→~p If the sky is not cloudy, then it is not raining. If it is raining, then the sky is cloudy If it is not raining, then the sky is not cloudy 7. p↔q The sky is cloudy if and only if it is raining.

p q q r r p LAW OF SYLLOGISM Example 4: Determine if statement (3) follows from statements (1) and (2) by the Law of Detachment or the Law of Syllogism. If it does, state which law was used. If it does not, write invalid. p q If you are a teenager, then you are always right If you are always right, then people will listen to you If you are a teenager, then people will listen to you q r r p Law of Detachment: If p→q is a true conditional statement and p is true, then q is true Law of Syllogism: If p→q and q→r, then p→r LAW OF SYLLOGISM

p q true Law of Detachment p: true q: must be true Example 4 Continued: Determine if statement (3) follows from statements (1) and (2) by the Law of Detachment or the Law of Syllogism. If it does, state which law was used. p q true If an angle is acute, then it is not obtuse <ABC is actue <ABC is not obtuse p: true q: must be true Law of Detachment: If p→q is a true conditional statement and p is true, then q is true Law of Syllogism: If p→q and q→r, then q→r Law of Detachment

Today’s Work