WVDOH Experience... thus far.  Public-Private Partnerships = PPP=3P = P3 ... Most folks in industry refer to them as P3, so that’s what I go with.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Civil Rights Business Development Program Overview Metro State Aid Training 3/2/11.
Advertisements

Innovative Transportation Finance March 2, 2010 Presented by: Brad Larsen Director of Traditional & Innovative Finance Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Risk Management in Public-Private Partnerships TRB 88 th Annual Meeting January 14, 2009 Thomas W. Pelnik III, P.E. Director, Innovative Project Delivery.
A framework for organising and financing infrastructure provision Jan-Eric Nilsson, VTI.
I-4 Ultimate with Lanes Project Central Florida 1 May 21, 2013.
AN OVERVIEW OF PROJECT FINANCE IN PRIVATE-PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS FINANCE 101 T ERRI S MALINSKY Managing Director B.C.
Company LOGO Performance- or Output-Based Procurement (PBP): Basics and Applications in Bank Projects Patricia Baquero
THE PRACTICE OF TOLLING Theory in Motion May 7, 2013 Michael Copeland Yagnesh Jarmarwala Justin Winn.
Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona Public Private Partnerships March 8, 2007 Shawn Dralle Managing Director.
An Overview of the Chicago Skyway Transaction Joseph Seliga Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP Northern Border Finance Conference Chicago, Illinois May 15, 2007.
Basic Investing- Bonds A debt investment in which an investor loans money to an entity (corporate or governmental) that borrows the funds for a defined.
1 NEDPower Mount Storm Wind Farm Project Update 10/20/2009.
Recent Developments in Transportation Public-Private Partnerships in the United States Rick Geddes Associate Professor Department of Policy Analysis &
What is the ADF Partial Risk Guarantee? Partial Risk Guarantees (PRGs), also known as political risk guarantees, cover private lenders and investors against.
+ Proposed Lockwood Targeted Economic Development District 2015 Yellowstone County.
1. Virginia’s Public-Private Transportation Act (PPTA) Northern Border Finance Workshop December 11, 2006 Thomas W. Pelnik III, P.E. Director, Innovative.
Public Private Partnerships P3s What the Public Sector Considers When Selecting the Right Private Partner Jose A. Galan - Division Director Miami-Dade.
Comparison of International P3 Model, Corp and Hybrid Lease The Great Debate:
Patrick DeCorla-Souza, P3 Program Manager, FHWA
Chapter 2 Project Financing Dr. Nabil I El Sawalhi Associate Professor of Construction Management AEPM 21.
Using Value for Money Analysis to Evaluate Highway Public-Private Partnership Projects ARTBA P3 Conference Washington, DC, July 15-17, 2015 Patrick DeCorla-Souza,
Public Works Contracting Marsha Reilly Office of Program Research House of Representatives recommended.
Preliminary Financial Analyses February 2011 Presented by: David C. Miller Managing Director The PFM Group I-95 (Rest Area) Access Project.
Innovative Finance for 183A Bill Chapman CFO, Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority Bill Chapman CFO, Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority.
Transportation Funding Act HB Up date Radney Simpson, Assistant State Transportation Planning Administrator Presented to Georgia Association of Metropolitan.
Procurement and Construction Management and Oversight What Board Members Need to Know Jerry Smiley, AICP 24 July 2013.
Solving Challenges Others Cannot Virginia’s Public Private Partnership Law Toyo University Tokyo, Japan Christopher D. Lloyd September 29, 2008.
How a Value for Money Analysis is Integral to Your P3 Project Allan T. Marks Partner Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy LLP July 20, 2015.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
American Model. Public-Private Partnerships Public Development Private Development Public-Private Partnerships PrivatizationSubsidization.
Completing the State Aid Payment Request (SAPR). Tips Each spring check on the State Aid Finance web page for the current version of the State Aid Pay.
SPECULATING ABOUT THE FUTURE OF SURFACE TRANSPORTATION Presentation by C. Kenneth Orski Editor/Publisher of Innovation Briefs New York Metropolitan Transportation.
1. Concession Agreements The Focus Georgia Conference Thomas W. Pelnik III, P.E. Director, Innovative Project Delivery Division April 26, 2007.
When is it Debt? NCGFOA 2011 Annual Summer Conference July 18, 2011.
TOLL FACILITY RECEIPTS & DISBURSEMENTS (FHWA 539 FORM) ~ TRAINING SESSION Highway Information Seminar October, 2012.
KEY PROVISIONS OF THE DRIVE* ACT H.R. 22, as passed by the Senate on July 30, 2015 *Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy Thomas.
Legislative Opportunities and Impediments - The Virginia Experience Virginia Public Private Partnerships ATRA TECHNIX Program Phil Bomersheim “Activist”
Public-Private Partnership Program 2015 Update 2015 American Council of Engineering Companies ACEC – Los Angeles Chapter Luncheon, July 8, 2015.
Public-Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act 2002 (PPEA) Joe Damico.
Tolling and Pricing Opportunities Under the Federal-aid Highway Program January 2006.
Jefferson Parkway Public Highway Authority Bidder Information Conference December 14, 2010.
ITS Georgia | June What is the role of ITS in the emerging public/private partnership transportation market in Georgia? ITS Georgia Monso_Julia.
Overview of PPI’s in Georgia April 26, 2006 Earl Mahfuz, Treasurer.
North East Lincolnshire Council delivering change through partnership ( Physical Regeneration, Property and Technical Services Partnership) Planning in.
Public-Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act.
S.H. 121 – Dallas, Texas Case Study Presentation National Summit on Future Transportation Funding and Finance Strategies April 11, 2007 Michael Morris,
Solving Challenges Others Cannot Statutory Frameworks for Public Private Partnerships NCPPP/AGC Conference Phoenix, AZ Christopher D. Lloyd January 27,
MAKING IT HAPPEN. TRB 88 th Annual Meeting Risk Management in Public-Private Partnerships January 14, 2009 Statutory and Public Policy Approaches to PPP.
Atlantic Connection 2011 Roundtable Discussion Public Private Partnerships: What's in it for my Government?" 6th Annual Economic & Financial Development.
LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR UNSOLICITED PROPOSALS FLORIDA COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS OCTOBER 3, 2013 Lee A. Weintraub, Esq. Becker & Poliakoff,
Oct Project Fund- An Instrument to Finance Infrastructure Projects Two Case Studies.
IFTA Annual Business Meeting Virginia Beach, VA August 17, 2011 Federal Highway Administration.
Presented by: Peter Loughlin September 23, THE PAST YEAR September 30, 2009 Program Expired Short Term Extensions – GF Transfers $8b in 08, $7b.
 Contract by Public Authority for provision of asset and/or services  With private entity  Private finance used to fund asset/service  Long-term in.
Trade Transportation Activities Report Bill Frawley, TTI 2012 Border to Border Transportation Conference South Padre Island, TX November 14, 2012.
In Numbers Strength COLORADO TRANSPORTATION FUNDING.
Intercity Passenger Rail: Legislative Policy Recommendations Astrid Glynn Chair ASC Intercity Passenger Rail Legislative Team AASHTO Standing Committee.
Budget Workshop Capital Improvement Plan Presentation on Public Private Partnership and Strategy for Municipal Complex, HWY 50, and Coast to Coast Trail.
Community Crossings Matching Grant Fund Program Kathy Eaton-McKalip
Review of 2016–2021 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and 2016 Budget Assumptions Financial Administration and Audit Committee April 14,
© 2014 HDR Architecture, Inc., all rights reserved. © 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. © 2014 HDR, all rights reserved.
One East Broward Blvd., Suite 1800
Using Public-Private Partnerships to Move More People The Story of HOT Lanes in Northern Virginia January 30, 2017 Morteza Farajian, Ph.D.
BOT LAW (R.A. No. 6957, as amended by R.A. No. 7718)
Finance and Risk Public-Private Partnerships
Completing the State Aid Payment Request
The Oregon Approach to Innovation in Infrastructure
August 28, 2018 Darryl VanMeter, P.E. Assistant P3 Division Director
The Role of Private Sector in Capital Budgeting
How Small Developers and EPC Contractors Can Add PPA Financing to their Arsenals John Langhus, VP Business Development Midwest Solar Expo 2019 New Energy.
Presentation transcript:

WVDOH Experience... thus far

 Public-Private Partnerships = PPP=3P = P3 ... Most folks in industry refer to them as P3, so that’s what I go with.

 A contractual agreement between a public agency and a private sector entity that allows for greater private participation in the delivery and financing of transportation projects.

Design Build Finance Operate Maintain

“ Greenfield” projects  Involve the development of new infrastructure. Most transportation P3’s are Greenfield. “ Brownfield” projects  Operate, maintain, preserve, or improve existing infrastructure. Generally limited to long-term operations and maintenance contracts or lease concessions. Blended “Greenfield- Brownfield” projects  Example: adding additional high-occupancy toll lanes to an existing highway to increase capacity

 Changing economic conditions  Delayed federal transportation reauthorization bill  Declining value of fuel taxes  Reluctance to increase fuel taxes  Growing infrastructure needs

 WV Code Chapter 17 Article 27  Went into effect July 1, 2013  Construction contracts shall be awarded to the lowest qualified responsible bidder.  Unsolicited proposals may be submitted, but the DOH has no obligation to accept or even consider them.  State Road Fund money may be used if project is >$20 million and contained in six-year plan.  Current legislation is set to expire June 30, 2017

Access to private capital Reduce costs borne by DOTs Accelerate project delivery Shift project risk Spur innovation Provide for more efficient management

 Project was to grade and drain a partially controlled access facility on new location from east of Wyoming CR 12/1 to Mullens (1.72 miles) including the Mullens Connector (1.08 miles)  Awarded to the Bizzack/TRC team on , who was the low bidder in the amount of $45.25 Million (Engineer’s Estimate was approx. $63.27 Million)

 Page 11 of the Agreement (Contract) states: “Proposer is to provide Gap Financing for this project. Gap Financing, for the purposes of this agreement, is defined as the incurrence of a temporary financial obligation on the part of the CONTRACTOR resulting from DOH’s payment period extending beyond the project completion date. Payments will be made monthly based upon the project’s CPM schedule and performance. Payments will be limited to a maximum amount of $ 1,600, per month. Payments are contingent upon satisfactory progress and will cease if project is behind schedule. Payments will resume upon reaching CPM schedule adherence in accordance with the 2010 Standard Specifications, as amended by the 2014 Supplemental Specifications.”

 Final payment will not be made until the project is deemed complete. Completion will be based on DOH acceptance of final grade, drainage structures, and sediment and erosion control features.  Completion anticipated in Fall 2017.

 Design, construct, and finance a facility on new location from WV 869 in Putnam County to CR 40 in Mason County, a distance of approximately 14.6 miles  Grade and drain only.  The Bizzack/TRC team was again the low bidder at $ Million.  Monthly payments are in the amount of $4.9 Million.  Payment period of approximately 3 years

 Corridor H section 1 from Kerens to the US 219 connector – scheduled for October 20, 2015 letting. Anticipated payout will be $4.5 M/month  Wellsburg Bridge  Corridor H sections 2 & 3  Building & Grounds Project (New County Headquarters at 7 facilities; 2 new Substations)

 Long-term concessions can improve asset management-the same party that constructs the project is responsible for long- term operation. This creates incentives to build a higher quality facility that is easier to maintain.

 P3s can be valuable options for states seeking innovative approaches and funding to repair existing and build new infrastructure projects. However, they are only one piece of the funding puzzle. They are best suited to large scale projects that have ongoing maintenance needs.

P3s can offer alternative project delivery methods or financing mechanisms, but in the long term do not provide new money for infrastructure. Revenues to repay the private investment must come from the same source of public financing: tolls, fees, or taxes.

 If the private sector provides financing, it will need to cover costs and also make a return on its investment, either from a revenue generated by the facility (such as tolls) or from public sector compensation.

P3 Defined Detailed description of the graphic P3 Options fall into three categories; options fall along a continuum from Public Responsibility to Private Responsibility. New Build Facilities (Private Contract Fee Services, Design Build, Design Build Operate Maintain, Design Build Finance, and Design Build Finance Operate Maintain Concession) and Existing Facilities (OM Concession, Long Term Lease). Public-private partnerships (P3s) are contractual agreements formed between a public agency and a private sector entity that allow for greater private sector participation in the delivery and financing of transportation projects. This section of the FHWA P3 website identifies and defines some of the more common types of P3 arrangements. There are many different P3 structures, and the degree to which the private sector assumes responsibility - including financial risk - differs from one application to another. Additionally, different types of P3s lend themselves to the development of new facilities and others to the operation or expansion of existing assets. These relationships are depicted in the diagram above. Select any P3 option from the diagram to learn about distribution of roles and responsibilities between the public and private sectors for that specific P3 option.