USING SELF-MANAGEMENT WITH PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT AS A TIER-3 INTERVENTION Ashley Lower, B.S., Richard Young, Ph.D., Leslie Williams, Ed.S., Lynnette Christensen,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Connecting Classrooms to Systems of School-wide PBS
Advertisements

Understanding Challenging Behavior
Justin Boyd & Jessica Turtura University of Oregon School Psychology Program March 8, 2010.
References: Tough Kid Social Skills, Skillstreaming Curricula Question 4: Can teachers implement CW-FIT with high levels of fidelity? Yes % of CW-FIT.
NOW HEADED PBIS: Where Are We NOW? Where Are We HEADED ? Emily Hill Kelly McCrohan Edgewood Elementary PBIS Coaches.
Mentoring Across Tiers Christina Jordan, M.Ed Wayne Hickman, Ed. D Rebecca Piermattei, M.S.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Why M.O.R.E. is better! The Action Plan for the Mentoring in Ohio for Reading Excellence Program at Elmwood Local Schools at Elmwood Local Schools December.
A Project GATORSS: Social Skills Assessment and Intervention for Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders Maureen A. Conroy, Ph.D., Jennifer M. Asmus,
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
Direct Behavior Rating: An Assessment and Intervention Tool for Improving Student Engagement Class-wide Rose Jaffery, Lindsay M. Fallon, Sandra M. Chafouleas,
WHAT IS THE CHILD TRYING TO COMMUNICATE WITH HIS BEHAVIOR? Carolina Center for ABA and Autism Treatment, Inc. 1 Treating Behavior based on Function.
The Effects of CW-FIT on Preschool Behavior Utah Multi-Tiered System of Supports and Effective Practices Conference June 18, 2014 KRYSTINE JOLSTEAD, ED.S.
Staff Development ED 571: School and Home-Based Programs for Children with Autism.
Parent Tutoring (PT) An Individualized Tier 3 Intervention for Students with Reading Problems Study 1 Duvall, Delquadri, Elliott & Hall (1992) Study 2.
OBSERVATIONS For SLD Eligibility Make sure you sit with your school’s team.
Home-School Notes: How to Establish a Home- School Daily Report Card Alyssa Dretchen, B.A. Seton Hall University Futures Task Force on Family-School Partnerships.
Question 1: What are teacher, parent, and student perceptions of a school-wide praise note intervention? Question 2: How do parents, students, and teachers.
Creating an RTI Culture at the Building Level in Order to Make Sound Eligibility Decisions Oak Hills Local School District Cincinnati, Ohio UC Summer Institute.
Sustainability: Tier II Interventions. Overview of Session 1.Essential Features of Tier II (10min) 2.Review of Common Tier II Interventions (10min) 3.Tier.
Progress Monitoring for Tier 2
Positive Behavior Supports
Quick Sort Matrix 1 Check-In Check-Out Check & ConnectSocial Skills Group Organizational Skills Newcomers Club Adult Attention XXXXX Peer Attention XX.
Implementing First Step to Success: A Tier 2 Behavioral Intervention Helen Jarvis – Reading Specialist Morgan Kraus - Classroom Teacher Bartley Elementary,
Growing the Green: Focusing on Universal Interventions Joan Ledvina Parr PBIS Team Leaders and Coaches Meeting November 13, 2008.
2014 GEORGIA ASSOCIATION FOR POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT CONFERENCE KATHLEEN B. COOK UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA SELF-MONITORING STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING CLASSROOM.
Chapter 6 Application of Withdrawal Design. A-B-A Design The Study: Teaching Socially Valid Social Interaction Responses to Students with Severe Disabilities.
Training and Supporting Teachers to Implement Effective Classroom Management Practices Teri Lewis-Palmer Emma Martin University of Oregon.
Single Subject Research (Richards et al.) Chapter 8.
Printed by INTRODUCTION PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING Ann F. Filer, M/Ed., BCBA John Ward-Horner, Ph.D., BCBA-D Robert K Ross, EdD., BCBA-D.
Parents Encourage Pupils (PEP) A Targeted Tier 2 Intervention for Students “At Risk” for Reading Difficulties Shuck, Ulsh, & Platt (1983) See PEP Handout.
Tier 2 PBIS: Check-In / Check-out
Low Intensity Strategies: A Look at Instructional Choice.
Antecedent Task to difficult: When asked to write paragraphs, essays, answer questions in writing; student struggles with spelling and sentence construction.
NOW HEADED PBIS: Where Are We NOW? Where Are We HEADED ? Emily Hill Kelly McCrohan Edgewood Elementary PBIS Coaches.
Inclusion: Effective Practices for All Students, 1e McLeskey/Rosenberg/Westling © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 5-1 ADHD.
Training Individuals to Implement a Brief Experimental Analysis of Oral Reading Fluency Amber Zank, M.S.E & Michael Axelrod, Ph.D. Human Development Center.
Investigating the Step Size in a Progressive-Ratio Schedule of Reinforcement for Young Children Diagnosed with Autism Kathryn R. Haugle, Stephany Reetz,
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Playground Settings and the Impact of Recess on Classroom Attention Christine Peterson, B.A., M.S.E. Psychology Department Human Development Center University.
Measuring Fidelity in Early Childhood Scaling-Up Initiatives: A Framework and Examples Carl J. Dunst, Ph.D. Orelena Hawks Puckett Institute Asheville,
Self-Regulated Strategy Development for Students with Asperger Syndrome: A Discussion May 13, 2011 Min-Chi Yan.
Manipulating the Classroom for Student Success Jorge Preciado, Ph.D. Deborah Hudson, Ph. D.
Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports Family & Community Team Member Network Meeting Thank you for coming! Please make yourself comfortable.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
Garrett Elementary Accountability Report Kids are our Business! October 14,
HIGH SCHOOL BEHAVIOR EDUCATION PROGRAM Amy Campbell.
Supporting Effective Inclusion through the Use of Evidence-based Practices for Preschoolers with ASD ANN SAM, PH.D. ANN COX, PH.D.
Insert School Picture Elementary. Acknowledgments Staff PBIS Team Principal Etc..
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Tier 2/3 Advanced Behavior Supports: Session 2 KENTUCKY.
For students who don’t respond to the Intensified Level 1 Intensified Level II Behavioral Intervention Package for Some 1.
Matching Students to Tier 2 Interventions and Ensuring Active Ingredients are Implemented Reviewing Tier II Interventions.
Julie Neuser.  Investigate the affects of direct instruction with visual supports on students’ ability to initiate interaction with others in the special.
Using Self-Regulation for Students with ADHD By: Cristin Carroll.
Use of Mobile Devices During Instructional Programming for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Review of the Literature Fran Vitale, M.A. & Joshua.
Task Engagement Program (TEP) Chapter 9 Rebecca Clark Becky Cheatham.
Behavioral Intervention Plan (BIP) By: Carrie Batschi & Haley McLean.
Low Intensity Strategies: A Look at Instructional Choice.
THEATRICAL INSTRUCTION DURING LITERACY WILL DECREASE BEHAVIORS AND INCREASE ENGAGEMENT FOR ELEMENTARY STUDENTS WITH EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE "ALL STUDENTS.
Tier 2 Intervention Iredell Statesville School District
For more information contact:
Evaluation of The Incredible Years Teacher Classroom Management Program in a Norwegian school setting: Changes in children’s behavior (preliminary results)
By Rebecca Hartzell, MA & Candace Gann, Phd
Rebecca Feathers, University of Tennessee
Engaging Families during the assessment process
ABAB Design Ethical considerations
CICO: Check-In Check-Out
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) for Parents and Community
Measuring the ‘Intervention Footprint’: Issues of Planning, Documentation, & Follow-Through Jim Wright
Presentation transcript:

USING SELF-MANAGEMENT WITH PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT AS A TIER-3 INTERVENTION Ashley Lower, B.S., Richard Young, Ph.D., Leslie Williams, Ed.S., Lynnette Christensen, M.S., Paul Caldarella, Ph.D.

STUDY PURPOSE AND QUESTION Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of three tiers of intervention on increasing the total engagement and decreasing the disruptive behaviors of two elementary school students. Research Question: Does a Tier-3 peer-matching self-management intervention improve the behavior of students with classroom behavioral problems, when Tier-1 and Tier-2 interventions were not effective?

CW-FIT GAME (TIER-1) Prior to implementation: · Teachers were trained in how to use the CW-FIT game · Teachers taught four 15 minute lessons to introduce each skill used in the CW-FIT game to their class Daily Procedure: · Teacher gave a brief reminder of the skills to the class · Teacher announced the goal for the day as well as the reward · The teacher proceeded with regular instruction during the game · Every time the timer went off, the teacher gave points to each team that was using the skills, and praised or gave feedback to each team · All teams who earned the points by the end of the game were given the reward just following the game (Wills et al., 2010)

SELF-MANAGEMENT INTERVENTION · Student obtained self-management card while peer obtained MotivAider · Student and peer reviewed goals, and peer started the MotivAider · Each time the MotivAider vibrated: · Peer prompted student to mark the card · Peer marked the card and matched with the student · Peer praised/encouraged the student · Peer marked the points earned on the card · End of the session: Teacher checked the card, praised the student, and delivered their reward · At school: Teacher ed the parents their child’s daily performance and points earned · At hone: Parents praised their child’s positive behavior, gave them a home reward, and sent a message back to the teacher with information regarding the parent/child interaction

METHODS Participants: Two male students (Shane, a third grader and Ricardo, a fourth grader) were recruited from a local elementary school. The mother, the teacher and one peer from each class were involved in this study. Shane was a third-grade education student with disruptive and acting out behaviors Ricardo was a fourth-grade special education student with characteristics of an individual on the Autism Spectrum. He exhibited high rates of off-task and disruptive behaviors One peer from each class The teacher from each classroom The mothers of both Shane and Ricardo Classrooms: Two general education classrooms (one third grade and one fourth grade) where the CW-FIT game was already being implemented. Independent Variable: Peer-Matching Self-Management Intervention Dependent Variables: Percent of Engagement and Frequency of Disruptions Experimental Design: Single-Subject Reversal Design with modifications

Shane Ricardo MOOSES DATA

SELF-MANAGEMENT CARD

TREATMENT FIDELITY

RESULTS CW-FIT (Tier-1 phase) resulted in some behavioral improvement Self-Recording (Tier-2 phase) showed no improvement Peer-Matching Self-Management Intervention (Tier-3 phase) resulted in significant improvement for Shane, but marginal improvement for Ricardo Treatment Fidelity was excellent for Shane, problematic for Ricardo Social Validity data: All participants: Enjoyed the intervention and found it helpful for the students Students: Enjoyed matching with their peer and earning rewards Parent 1: Loved the program Parent 2: Felt the program helped her stay on-task and realize the importance of giving quality attention

DISCUSSION CW-FIT was effective for the majority of students in both classes Self-Recording phase benefited some students needing extra support Self-Recording phase did not benefit Shane and Ricardo Self-Management was effective when used with fidelity (Shane) Self-Management was not effective without fidelity (Ricardo) Self-Management was effective with school psychologist (Ricardo)