One-with-Many Design: Estimation David A. Kenny June 22, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Questions From Yesterday
Advertisements

Specification Issues in Relational Models David A. Kenny University of Connecticut Talk can be downloaded at:
University of Connecticut
Perceptions of and by Women in a Military Setting: The One-with-Many Design Deborah A. Kashy Michigan State University.
University of Connecticut
Dyadic Analysis: Using HLM
Contextual effects In the previous sections we found that when regressing pupil attainment on pupil prior ability schools vary in both intercept and slope.
Multilevel modelling short course
Within families: family-wide and child-specific influences on childrens socio-emotional development Jennifer Jenkins, Jon Rasbash, Tom OConnor.
To go further: intra- versus interindividual variability.
{ Multilevel Modeling using Stata Andrew Hicks CCPR Statistics and Methods Core Workshop based on the book: Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using.
Test of Distinguishability
Seven Deadly Sins of Dyadic Data Analysis David A. Kenny February 14, 2013.
An Introduction to the Social Relations Model David A. Kenny.
Hierarchical Linear Modeling: An Introduction & Applications in Organizational Research Michael C. Rodriguez.
Patterns of Actor and Partner Effects
Statistical Analysis Overview I Session 2 Peg Burchinal Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill.
Random effects as latent variables: SEM for repeated measures data Dr Patrick Sturgis University of Surrey.
Nested Example Using SPSS David A. Kenny January 8, 2014.
Social Relations Model: Estimation Indistinguishable Dyads David A. Kenny.
1 SSS II Lecture 1: Correlation and Regression Graduate School 2008/2009 Social Science Statistics II Gwilym Pryce
Social Relations Model: Estimation Distinguishable Dyads
Objectives (BPS chapter 24)
APIM with Distinguishable Dyads: SEM Estimation
Dyadic designs to model relations in social interaction data Todd D. Little Yale University.
Sept. 29 th, 2005 Investigating Learning over Time Mingyu Feng Neil Heffernan Longitudinal Analysis on Assistment Data.
Business Statistics - QBM117 Interval estimation for the slope and y-intercept Hypothesis tests for regression.
APIM with Between- and Within Dyads Outcomes David A. Kenny December 11, 2014.
Longitudinal Data Analysis: Why and How to Do it With Multi-Level Modeling (MLM)? Oi-man Kwok Texas A & M University.
The Two-intercept Approach in Multilevel Modeling with SPSS
3nd meeting: Multilevel modeling: introducing level 1 (individual) and level 2 (contextual) variables + interactions Subjects for today:  Intra Class.
Introduction to Multilevel Modeling Using SPSS
Multilevel Modeling: Other Topics
Inference for regression - Simple linear regression
1 MULTI VARIATE VARIABLE n-th OBJECT m-th VARIABLE.
Chapter 13: Inference in Regression
G Lecture 5 Example fixed Repeated measures as clustered data
Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM): A Conceptual Introduction Jessaca Spybrook Educational Leadership, Research, and Technology.
Introduction Multilevel Analysis
Illustrating DyadR Using the Truth & Bias Model
Growth Curve Models Using Multilevel Modeling with SPSS David A. Kenny January 23, 2014.
Multilevel Linear Models Field, Chapter 19. Why use multilevel models? Meeting the assumptions of the linear model – Homogeneity of regression coefficients.
One-with-Many Design: Introduction David A. Kenny June 11, 2013.
Multilevel Linear Modeling aka HLM. The Design We have data at two different levels In this case, 7,185 students (Level 1) Nested within 160 Schools (Level.
Actor-Partner Interdependence Model or APIM
HLM Models. General Analysis Strategy Baseline Model - No Predictors Model 1- Level 1 Predictors Model 2 – Level 2 Predictors of Group Mean Model 3 –
Multilevel Modeling: Other Topics David A. Kenny January 7, 2014.
Latent Growth Modeling Byrne Chapter 11. Latent Growth Modeling Measuring change over repeated time measurements – Gives you more information than a repeated.
28. Multiple regression The Practice of Statistics in the Life Sciences Second Edition.
General Linear Model.
Stuff I Have Done and Am Doing Now David A. Kenny.
Social Relations Model: Multiple Variables David A. Kenny.
Sharon Wolf NYU Abu Dhabi Additional Insights Summer Training Institute June 15,
Social Relations Model Designs David A. Kenny June 17, 2013.
Social Relations Model: Estimation (Indistinguishable) David A. Kenny.
Definitions in Dyadic Data Analysis David A. Kenny February 18, 2013.
1 Statistics 262: Intermediate Biostatistics Regression Models for longitudinal data: Mixed Models.
Actor-Partner Interdependence Model or APIM. APIM A model that simultaneously estimates actor and partner effects on an outcome variable The actor and.
Two Crossed Random Factors
APIM with Distinguishable Dyads: MLM Estimation by Interactions
Effects of Self-Monitoring on Perceived Authenticity in Dyads
Nested Example Using SPSS
APIM with Distinguishable Dyads: MLM Estimation (in development)
APIM with Indistinguishable Dyads: MLM Estimation
Repeated Measures Analysis Using Multilevel Modeling with SPSS
APIM with Indistinguishable Dyads: SEM Estimation
Defining, Measuring, and Dealing with Nonindependence
A New Approach to the Study of Teams: The GAPIM
Social Relations Model: Estimation of Relationship Effects
Presentation transcript:

One-with-Many Design: Estimation David A. Kenny June 22, 2013

2 What You Should Know Introduction to the One-with-Many Design

3 The One-with-Many Provider-Patient Data

4 Terminology  People l Focal person (the one) l Partners (the many) Source of Data l Focal persons (1PMT) l Partners (MP1T) l Both (reciprocal design: 1PMT & MP1T)

5 Analysis Strategies Multilevel analysis Indistinguishable partners Many partners Different numbers of partners per focal person Confirmatory factor analysis Distinguishable partners Few partners Same number of partners per focal person

6 Multilevel Analyses: Nonreciprocal Design Each record a partner Levels Lower level: partner Upper level: focal person Random intercepts model (nonindependence) Lower level effects can be random

Data Analytic Approach for the Non- Reciprocal One-with-Many Design FocalIDPartIDDV Estimate a basic multilevel model in which There are no fixed effects with a random intercept. Y ij = b 0j + e ij b 0j = a 0 + d j Note the focal person is Level 2 and partners Level 1. MIXED outcome /FIXED = /PRINT = SOLUTION TESTCOV /RANDOM INTERCEPT | SUBJECT(focalid) COVTYPE(VC). Could add predictors here.

8 SPSS Output Covariance Parameters Fixed Effects So the actor variance is.791, and ICC is.791/( ) =.395

Fixed Effects: Nonreciprocal Design Can add to the model Focal person characteristics Would be actor if 1PMT design Would be partner if MP1T design Partner characteristics Would be partner if 1PMT design Would be actor if MP1T design Can be random: The coefficient may vary by focal person Important to make zero interpretable 9

10 Reciprocal One-with-Many Design Sources of nonindependence More complex…

11 Sources of Nonindependence in the Reciprocal Design Individual-level effects for the focal person: Actor & Partner variances Actor-Partner correlation Relationship effects Dyadic reciprocity corelation

12 Data Analytic Approach for Estimating Variances & Covariances: The Reciprocal Design Data Structure: Two records for each dyad; outcome is the same variable for focal person and partner. Variables to be created: role = 1 if data from focal person; -1 if from partner focalcode = 1 if data from focal person; 0 if from partner partcode = 1 if data from partner; 0 if from the focal person

13 Data Analytic Approach for Estimating Variances & Covariances: The Reciprocal Design A fairly complex multilevel model… MIXED outcome BY role WITH focalcode partcode /FIXED = focalcode partcode | NOINT /PRINT = SOLUTION TESTCOV /RANDOM focalcode partcode | SUBJECT(focalid) covtype(UNR) /REPEATED = role | SUBJECT(focalid*dyadid) COVTYPE(UNR).

14 Example Taken from Chapter 10 of Kenny, Kashy, & Cook (2006). Focal person: mothers Partners: father and two children Outcome: how anxious the person feels with the other Distinguishability of partners is ignored..

15 Output: Fixed Effects The estimates show the intercept is the mean of the ratings made by the mother (focalcode estimate is 1.808). The partcode estimate indicates the average outcome score across partners of the mother which is smaller than mothers’ anxiety. This difference is statistically significant. Estimates of Fixed Effects a Parameter EstimateStd. ErrordftSig. 95% Confidence Interval Lower BoundUpper Bound focalcode partcode a. Dependent Variable: outcome.

16 The relationship variance for the partners is.549. (Role = -1) and for mothers (Role = 1) is.423. The correlation of the two relationship effects is.24: If the mother is particularly anxious with a particular family member, that member is particularly anxious with the mother. Var(1) (focalcode is the first listed random variable) is the actor variance of mothers and is.208. Var(2) is the partner variance for mothers (how much anxiety she tends to elicit across family members) and is.061. (p =.012; p values for variances in SPSS are cut in half). Estimates of Covariance Parameters a Parameter EstimateStd. ErrorWald ZSig. 95% Confidence Interval Lower BoundUpper Bound Repeated MeasuresVar(1) Var(2) Corr(2,1) focalcode + partcode [subject = focalid] Var(1) Var(2) Corr(2,1) a. Dependent Variable: outcome.

17 Output: Nonindependence The ICC for actor is.208/( ) =.330 and the ICC for partner is.061/( ) =.100. The actor partner correlation is.699, so if mothers are anxious with family members, they are anxious with her.

Fixed Effects: Reciprocal Design Two ways to think about fixed effects Standard way Focal person characteristics (fx) Partner characteristics (px) APIM way (the same variable must be measured for the focal person and partners) Actor characteristics (ax) Partner characteristics (ptx) 18

Fixed Effects: Reciprocal Design /FIXED = focalcode partcode fX*focalcode fX*partcode pX*focalcode pX* partcode| NOINT or /FIXED = focalcode partcode aX*focalcode aX*partcode ptX*focalcode ptX*partcode| NOINT Note: fX*focalcode = aX*focalcode fX*partcode = ptX*partcode pX*focalcode = ptX*focalcode pX*partcode = aX*partcode 19

Conclusion Thanks to Deborah Kashy Reading: Chapter 10 in Dyadic Data Analysis by Kenny, Kashy, and Cook 29