October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 1 MEIDEX – Crew Tutorial Calibration of IMC-201 Adam D. Devir, MEIDEX Payload Manager.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Richard Young Optronic Laboratories Kathleen Muray INPHORA
Advertisements

Validation of SCIA’s reflectance and polarisation (Acarreta, de Graaf, Tilstra, Stammes, Krijger ) Envisat Validation Workshop, Frascati, 9-13 December.
Atmospheric Correction Algorithm for the GOCI Jae Hyun Ahn* Joo-Hyung Ryu* Young Jae Park* Yu-Hwan Ahn* Im Sang Oh** Korea Ocean Research & Development.
Presentation on OMPS Nadir Mapper Wavelength Shift Adjustment for Earth-view Measurements.
Parameters to choose the CCD The CCD test bench *Temperature range : -55 to +40°C. *Stabilization : < 0.05°C/hour. *5 temperature probes : CCD and electronics.
METO621 Lesson 18. Thermal Emission in the Atmosphere – Treatment of clouds Scattering by cloud particles is usually ignored in the longwave spectrum.
Pre-launch Characterization of the CERES Flight Model 5 (FM5) Instrument on NPP S. Thomas a, K. J. Priestley b, M. Shankar a, N. P. Smith a, M. G. Timcoe.
Class 8: Radiometric Corrections
Spectroscopy of Saturn
1 Estimate on SOT light level in flight with throughput measurements in SOT sun tests T. Shimizu 1, T. Tarbell 2, Y. Suematsu 3, M. Kubo 1, K. Ichimoto.
Roy Yaniv Department of Geophysics and Planetary Science, Tel Aviv University, Israel Yoav Yair, Open University of Israel, Ra’anana, Israel Colin Price,
Computer Vision Optical Flow
Group S3. Lab Session 5 Following on from our previous lab session decided to find the relationship between Disparity vs Camera Separation. Measured Disparity.
Spectroscopy of Stratospheric Molecular O3
Page 1 1 of 20, EGU General Assembly, Apr 21, 2009 Vijay Natraj (Caltech), Hartmut Bösch (University of Leicester), Rob Spurr (RT Solutions), Yuk Yung.
Lunar Observations of Changes in the Earth’s Albedo (LOCEA) Alexander Ruzmaikin Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology in collaboration.
ESTEC July 2000 Estimation of Aerosol Properties from CHRIS-PROBA Data Jeff Settle Environmental Systems Science Centre University of Reading.
Hyperspectral Satellite Imaging Planning a Mission Victor Gardner University of Maryland 2007 AIAA Region 1 Mid-Atlantic Student Conference National Institute.
October 1 -10, 2014JEM-EUSO Workshop - Toulouse1 Balloon – EUSO Xenon / UV LED Flasher Calibration Evgeny Kuznetsov for UAH / MSFC GLS team University.
D EDICATED S PECTROPHOTOMETER F OR L OCALIZED T RANSMITTANCE A ND R EFLECTANCE M EASUREMENTS Laetitia ABEL-TIBERINI, Frédéric LEMARQUIS, Michel LEQUIME.
1. The MPI MAX-DOAS inversion scheme 2. Cloud classification 3. Results: Aerosol OD: Correlation with AERONET Surface extinction: Correlation with Nephelometer.
Atmospheric Monitoring in the TA experiment
Blue: Histogram of normalised deviation from “true” value; Red: Gaussian fit to histogram Presented at ESA Hyperspectral Workshop 2010, March 16-19, Frascati,
LECTURER PROF.Dr. DEMIR BAYKA AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING LABORATORY I.
CCD Detectors CCD=“charge coupled device” Readout method:
15 October Observational Astronomy Direct imaging Photometry Kitchin pp ,
VI-5475(SamCalValNotes) 1 SAM (Sun and Aureole Measurement) Calibration Prepared for MODIS/VIIRS Science Team Meeting Dennis Villanucci, Andrew LePage.
1 An Observatory for Ocean, Climate and Environment SAC-D/Aquarius HSC - Radiometric Calibration H Raimondo M Marenchino 7th SAC-D Aquarius Science Meeting.
Radiometric Correction and Image Enhancement Modifying digital numbers.
Coordinated Global Measurements of TLE from the Space Shuttle and Ground Stations during MEIDEX Yoav Yair 1, Colin Price, Zev Levin, Peter Israelevitch,
CDE CDR, September 14, 2004 Your Position, Your Name 1 GATS AIM Science Team Meeting January 23-24, 2007 CIPS Calibration Review, Aimee Merkel, Bill McClintock.
1 Leonardo Pinheiro da Silva Corot-Brazil Workshop – October 31, 2004 Corot Instrument Characterization based on in-flight collected data Leonardo Pinheiro.
MEIDEX – MEDITERRANEAN ISRAELI DUST EXPERIMENT - A SPACE, AIR AND GROUND BASED STUDY OF DESERT AEROSOL Z. Levin, J. Joseph, Y. Mekler, P. Israelevich,
BIOPHYS: A Physically-based Algorithm for Inferring Continuous Fields of Vegetative Biophysical and Structural Parameters Forrest Hall 1, Fred Huemmrich.
The Second TEMPO Science Team Meeting Physical Basis of the Near-UV Aerosol Algorithm Omar Torres NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Atmospheric Chemistry.
Slide 1 NATO UNCLASSIFIEDMeeting title – Location - Date Satellite Inter-calibration of MODIS and VIIRS sensors Preliminary results A. Alvarez, G. Pennucci,
Evaluation of OMI total column ozone with four different algorithms SAO OE, NASA TOMS, KNMI OE/DOAS Juseon Bak 1, Jae H. Kim 1, Xiong Liu 2 1 Pusan National.
SPRITE OBSERVATIONS DURING MEIDEX Yoav Yair, Colin Price, Zev Levin and Adam Devir Department of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences, Tel Aviv University,
Analysis of Nonlinearity Correction for CrIS SDR April 25, 2012 Chunming Wang NGAS Comparisons Between V32 and V33 Engineering Packets.
CLN QA/QC efforts CCNY – (Barry Gross) UMBC- (Ray Hoff) Hampton U. (Pat McCormick) UPRM- (Hamed Parsiani)
TOMS Ozone Retrieval Sensitivity to Assumption of Lambertian Cloud Surface Part 1. Scattering Phase Function Xiong Liu, 1 Mike Newchurch, 1,2 Robert Loughman.
SCIAMACHY TOA Reflectance Correction Effects on Aerosol Optical Depth Retrieval W. Di Nicolantonio, A. Cacciari, S. Scarpanti, G. Ballista, E. Morisi,
Validation of OMPS-LP Radiances P. K. Bhartia, Leslie Moy, Zhong Chen, Steve Taylor NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland, USA.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: Initial trade-off: Height-resolved.
ISUAL Design Concept S. Mende. SDR 7 Jun NCKU UCB Tohoku ISUAL Design Concept S. Mende Sprite Example Sprite Image obtained by Berkeley/NCKU 1999.
Photometry and Astrometry: Bright Point Sources May 16, 2006 Cullen Blake.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Schematic representation of the near-infrared (NIR) structured illumination instrument,
1 SBUV/2 Calibration Lessons Over 30 Years: Liang-Kang Huang, Matthew DeLand, Steve Taylor Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI) / NASA.
Integrating LiDAR Intensity and Elevation Data for Terrain Characterization in a Forested Area Cheng Wang and Nancy F. Glenn IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE.
2015 GSICS Annual Meeting, Deli India March 16~20, 2015 Xiuqing Hu National Satellite Meteorological Center, CMA Yupeng Wang, Wei Fang Changchun Institute.
Thomas C. Stone U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ USA GSICS Research Working Group Meeting EUMETSAT 24−28 March 2014 Using the Moon as a Radiometric.
NOAA VIIRS Team GIRO Implementation Updates
V2.0 minus V2.5 RSAS Tangent Height Difference Orbit 3761
Deep Convective Clouds (DCC) BRDF Characterization Using PARASOL Bidirectional Observations Bertrand Fougnie CNES.
Fangfang Yu and Xiangqian Wu
Absolute calibration of sky radiances, colour indices and O4 DSCDs obtained from MAX-DOAS measurements T. Wagner1, S. Beirle1, S. Dörner1, M. Penning de.
VIRTIS Operations at Lutetia
Calibration Status for the GOME Instrument
AC-9/AC-S data analysis from CDOM Lab
Characterization,calibration and traceability for lunar observation
The Successor of the TOU
Lunar reflectance model based on SELENE/SP data
Changchun Institute of Optics Fine Mechanics and Physics
Validating CERES calibration and ADMs Using Data from East Antarctica
Image calibration Geoff Smith, September 2018.
UVIS Calibration Update
Deep Convective Clouds (DCC) BRDF Characterization Using PARASOL Bidirectional Observations Bertrand Fougnie CNES.
Sensor Effects Calibration: correction of observed data into physically meaningful data by using a reference. DN  Radiance (sensor)  Radiance (surface)
Observational Astronomy
MERIS Level 1b processing Ludovic Bourg
Presentation transcript:

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 1 MEIDEX – Crew Tutorial Calibration of IMC-201 Adam D. Devir, MEIDEX Payload Manager

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 2 Calibration of Xybion IMC-201 Camera Parameters  Filters  FOV The Required Radiometric Accuracy for Dust Measurements  Dust Measurements  Radiometric Accuracy – Requirements Radiometric Accuracy – Calibration Aspects  Radiometric Calibration of Xybion IMC-201  Xybion IMC-201 – Absolute Radiometric Camera  Temperature Effect on the Absolute Calibration  Flat Field Calibration  Pixel-to-Pixel Non-uniformity The Moon Calibration An Example  Radiometric Images of the Sky

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 3 The IMC-201 Parameters

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 4 Filters The IMC-201 is equipped with a filter wheel with 6 filters  Filter #1: CWL= 339.7nm, FWHM=4.1nm  Filter #2: CWL= 380.6nm, FWHM=4.4nm  Filter #3: CWL= 472.1nm, FWHM=25.1nm  Filter #4: CWL= 558.2nm, FWHM=26.5nm  Filter #5: CWL= 665.4nm, FWHM=48.3nm  Filter #6: CWL= 855.5nm, FWHM=53.0nm

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 5 The FOV of the IMC-201 The total FOV of the IMC-201 was measured to be o (H) x o (V). The total FOV was measured to be 699 (H) x 481 (V) pixels. The dimensions of each pixel are 0.33mrad (H) x 0.37mrad (V). At flight altitude of 300km, each pixel will cover 0.1 km (H) x 0.11 km (V). The PSF of the IMC-201 was measured to be ~3pixels (see next slide). Correspondingly, from radiometric point-of-view, the minimal area that can be measured (in the nadir) will be ~ 0.3 x 0.3 km 2.

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 6 The FOV of the IMC-201 – The PSF Filter 6

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 7 The Required Radiometric Accuracy for Dust Measurements

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 8 Dust Radiance Dust Radiance as Measured for Rural Aerosols (over sea surface) with OD ~ 0.8, 0.3, 0.2 and 0.1

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 9 Radiometric Accuracy In order to be able to calculate the aerosol parameters from the radiometric measurements of the solar radiance reflected from the dust (above the Mediterranean sea surface), two measurements have to be done:  Measurement of the radiance of the sea surface – free from the dust.  Measurement of the radiance of the dust above the sea.  Both measurements have to be done with accuracy of  1%/. For this we need to have an accurate calibration of the Xybion camera that will enable us to calculate the radiance with that accuracy. The main factors that affect the calibration accuracy are:  Radiometric Calibration – Absolute calibration  Calibration of the Temperature Effects on the Calibration  Flat Field Calibration  Pixel-to-Pixel Non-uniformity

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 10 Radiometric Accuracy – Calibration Aspects

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 11 Absolute Radiometric Calibration The radiometric calibration of the Xybion camera is based on measuring the radiance (R) of an aperture of an integrating sphere (*) with different exposure times – t [msec] and for all filters. The product of the (N x t) is shown as a function of the Level of the video signal of the aperture expressed in gray-level units – GL 0. The polynomial dependence – N x t = f 3 (GL 0 ) allows to show that such fit has a residuals <1% over most of the dynamic range of the camera for all filters. Normalizing this polynomial dependence for all filters shows that the radiometric response of the camera is the same for all filters. (*) An integrating sphere is a device that has a rather large aperture with a constant spectral radiance – N [Watt/str/cm 2 /nm] all over its aperture.

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 12 Radiometric Calibration of Xybion IMC-201

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 13 Xybion IMC-201 – Absolute Radiometric camera

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 14 FilterSlope %/degree Temperature Effect on the Absolute Calibration System sensitivity decreases with an increase in its temperature (this is characteristic of all bi-alkali photo-cathodes. Correctable to 0.5% level after initial warm-up period of ~25 minutes.

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 15 Flat field Calibration by Integrating Sphere Slowly varying component is removed via polynomial surface fit. Residual variations are due to fiber optic and pixel gain variations. Sphere illuminated flat-field response Fitted poly-surface Grayscale is 0.8 – 1.0 Difference of flat-field and fitted surface gives the Pixel-to-pixel correction. Scale is +/- 4% Uncorrected sphere illumination Corrected sphere illumination

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 16 Pixel-to-Pixel Non-uniformity Fitted surface images The 20% variation of the center-to-edge asymmetry is mostly apparent in channel 6 and probably is due to internal scattering. Residual non-uniformity. Fiber bundle variations and pixel gain variations are +/- 4% and are similar for all the channels.

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 17 Pixel-to-Pixel Non-uniformity

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 18 The Moon Calibration

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 19 The Moon Calibration The long-term stability of the calibration was tested. The variations in the stability were found to originate in Gain changes of the MCP (due to the use of unregulated voltage supply) and to aging of the integrating sphere.

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 20 The Moon Calibration In-flight calibration is the only indication that the Xybion calibration was not affected by any deposition on the window of the canister. The MEIDEX payload has no internal calibration sources to be used for such in-flight on-board radiometric calibration of the Xybion camera. The only in-flight calibration options are:  Using calibration sites on the earth (that depend on their exact albedo and the sun attenuation through the atmosphere).  Using moon calibration. Two Moon calibrations made in-fight as part of MEIDEX primary mission (one at the beginning of the mission and one towards its end) will give us the indication that the Xybion calibration was not affected during the mission. Since the moon diameter is rather small (~8.7mrad) and the PSF of the camera (~1mard ) is not very small compared to it, it was decided to test the accuracy of the moon calibration by placing a variable iris (with known angular diameter) in front of the aperture of an integrating sphere.

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 21 The Moon Calibration

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 22 The Moon Calibration

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 23 The Moon Calibration The radiometric calibration of the moon was found to be good. The deviation from normalized response of one are reasonable since:  There was no flat-field correction and especially no pixel-to-pixel correction. Such correction will affect very much the radiometric response of the camera especially for small targets.  There is some jitter in the Run Mode exposure time

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 24 Radiometric Accuracy – An Example

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 25 Filter # Exposure time (msec) Gain (%) CCD Temp. (C o ) Date (mm/dd/yy) Time (hh:mm:ss) Coded data Radiometric Images of the Sky

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 26 Clear Sky Radiance Measurements  Modeled with Rayleigh atmosphere.  Radiance data show SZA dependence in comparisons.

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 27 Sky with small amount of Aerosol  Better SZA agreement is obtained by adding 0.05 optical depth aerosol.  Both measured 340nm and 380 nm radiance values are lower with respect to the model which is consistent with stray light in the calibration.

October 29-30, 2001MEIDEX - Crew Tutorial - Calibration F - 28 END Crew Tutorial – Calibration of IMC-201