Technical Support for Exceptional Event Analysis for Volcano Impacts on PM2.5 in Hawaii using the Exceptional Event Decision Support System (EE DSS)EE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving the View of Air Quality from Space Jim Crawford Science Directorate NASA Langley.
Advertisements

Exceptional Events Elements of an Effective Demonstration Darren Palmer US EPA Region 4.
FASTNET Report: 0409RegHazeEvents04 Eastern US Regional Haze Events: Automated Detection and Documentation for 2004 Contributed by the FASNET Community,
How Will Georgia-Florida Wildfires Affect Regional Air Quality Planning? Wes Younger Georgia Environmental Protection Division.
PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Michael Koerber Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.
Diurnal Variability of Aerosols Observed by Ground-based Networks Qian Tan (USRA), Mian Chin (GSFC), Jack Summers (EPA), Tom Eck (GSFC), Hongbin Yu (UMD),
Aerosol Pattern over Southeastern Europe Rudolf B. Husar and Janja D. Husar CAPITA, Washington University, St. Louis, MO Conference on Visibility, Aerosols,
The Zambezi River Valley and surrounding areas, July, 2011.
Fusion of SeaWIFS and TOMS Satellite Data with Surface Observations and Topographic Data During Extreme Aerosol Events Stefan Falke and Rudolf Husar Center.
Transpacific transport of pollution as seen from space Funding: NASA, EPA, EPRI Daniel J. Jacob, Rokjin J. Park, Becky Alexander, T. Duncan Fairlie, Arlene.
 Provides integrated online access to:  Monitoring data: from over 3 dozen networks  Modeling data: from a variety of modeling scenarios  Emissions.
Adam N. Pasch 1, Ashley R. Russell 1, Leo Tidd 2, Douglas S. Eisinger 1, Daniel M. Alrick 1, Hilary R. Hafner 1, and Song Bai 1 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc.,
Chapter 2: Satellite Tools for Air Quality Analysis 10:30 – 11:15.
Prepared by Hilary Hafner, Daniel Alrick, ShihMing Huang, and Adam Pasch Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma, CA Presented at the 2010 National Air Quality.
Missouri Air Quality Issues Stephen Hall Air Quality Analysis Section Air Pollution Control Program Air Quality Applied Sciences Team (AQAST) 9 th Semi-Annual.
Aircraft spiral on July 20, 2011 at 14 UTC Validation of GOES-R ABI Surface PM2.5 Concentrations using AIRNOW and Aircraft Data Shobha Kondragunta (NOAA),
Presenting Evidence to Justify Data Exclusion as an Exceptional Event Ideas based on how EPA has recently documented events to support regulatory decisions.
Visualization, Exploration, and Model Comparison of NASA Air Quality Remote Sensing data via Giovanni Ana I. Prados, Gregory Leptoukh, Arun Gopalan, and.
CAPITA CAPITA PM and Ozone Analysis A. PM2.5 National Maps B. Visibility (PM2.5) trends C. Natural (out of EPA jurisdiction) Events D. US-Canada Ozone.
FROM AIR POLLUTION TO GLOBAL CHANGE AND BACK: Towards an integrated international policy for air pollution and climate change Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University.
Developing a High Spatial Resolution Aerosol Optical Depth Product Using MODIS Data to Evaluate Aerosol During Large Wildfire Events STI-5701 Jennifer.
Observation-Based Quantification of the PM and Ozone at the US-Global Boundary CAPITACAPITA, Washington University Rudolf B. Husar, PI In Cooperation with.
The Asian Dust Events of April 1998 Prepared by: R. B. Husar, D. Tratt, B. A. Schichtel, S. R. Falke, F. Li D. Jaffe, S. Gassó, T. Gill, N. S. Laulainen,
Exceptional Event Decision Support System (EE DSS) Illustration for PM2.5 Exceedances The EE DSS is a screening tool for EE flagging. It uses the regulatory.
“Just in Time’ Science Support to Air Quality Management Tropospheric Aerosols: Science and Decisions in an International Community A NARSTO Technical.
DataFed Support for EPA’s Exceptional Event Rule R.B. Husar Washington University in St. Louis Presented at the workshop: Satellite and Above-Boundary.
The Pattern and Transport of Ozone in the Missouri Region Rudolf Husar and Bret Schichtel CAPITA Washington University April 9, 1997 Prepared for a briefing.
PM Network Assessment: Speciated Network Planning Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis,
Presenting Evidence to Justify Data Exclusion as an Exceptional Event Ideas based on how EPA has recently documented events to support regulatory decisions.
Exceptional Events Meredith Kurpius US EPA Region 9.
Regional Scale Air Pollution Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA 6 th Int. Conf.
An Integrated Systems Solution to Air Quality Data and Decision Support on the Web GEO Architecture Implementation Pilot – Phase 2 (AIP-2) Kickoff Workshop.
Integration of Multi-Sensory Earth Observations for Characterization of Air Quality Events E. M. Robinson Advisor, R. B. Husar 2010 Masters of Science.
Spatial Pattern of PM2.5 over the US PM2.5 FRM Network Analysis for the First Year: July 1999-June 2000 Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf.
Assessment of aerosol plume dispersion products and their usefulness to improve models between satellite aerosol retrieval and surface PM2.5  Chowdhury.
PM Event Detection from Time Series Contributed by the FASNET Community, Sep Correspondence to R Husar, R PoirotR Husar, R Poirot Coordination Support.
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION INFLUENCES ON AEROSOL CONCENTRATIONS AND VISIBILITY DEGRADATION IN THE UNITED STATES Rokjin J. Park, Daniel J. Jacob,
Timothy Logan University of North Dakota Department of Atmospheric Science.
The BIG Picture Earth Observing Systems (EOS) and the Global Earth Observing System of Systems (GEOSS) Dorsey Worthy U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development.
Network Assessment Based on Daily Max Ozone Concentration Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf B. Husar and Stefan R. Falke Center for Air.
The Federated Data System, DataFed ESIP Winter MeetingESIP Winter Meeting, Jan 10, 2013, Washington DC Rudolf Husar, Washington University, St. Louis Presented.
Support by Inter-RPO WG - NESCAUM Performed by CAPITA & Sonoma Technology, Inc F ast A erosol S ensing T ools for N atural E vent T racking FASTNET Project.
Network Assessment Based on Compliance Monitoring (Deviation from NAAQS) Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf B. Husar and Stefan R. Falke.
Technical Details of Network Assessment Methodology: Concentration Estimation Uncertainty Area of Station Sampling Zone Population in Station Sampling.
Aerosol Characterization Using the SeaWiFS Sensor and Surface Data E. M. Robinson and R. B. Husar Washington University, St. Louis, MO
Monitoring volcanic haze from space: the Bárðarbunga fissure eruption OMI Science Team Meeting 31 August – 2 September 2015, KNMI, de Bilt Image: VIIRS.
Ozone as a Function of Local Wind Speed and Direction: Evidence of Local and Regional Transport Rudolf B. Husar and Wandrille P. Renard CAPITA, Center.
INTEGRATING SATELLITE AND MONITORING DATA TO RETROSPECTIVELY ESTIMATE MONTHLY PM 2.5 CONCENTRATIONS IN THE EASTERN U.S. Christopher J. Paciorek 1 and Yang.
CAPITA Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis.
Proposal Outline The Influence of Weather and Climate Events on Dust, Smoke and Sulfate Events R. Husar, PI Response to EPA STAR RFA Extreme Event Impacts.
A&WMA International Specialty Conference, May 10-14, 2010, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China Leapfrogging Opportunities for Air Quality Improvement Air Pollution.
Concepts on Aerosol Characterization R.B. Husar Washington University in St. Louis Presented at EPA – OAQPS Seminar Research Triangle Park, NC, April 4,
Transpacific transport of anthropogenic aerosols and implications for North American air quality EGU, Vienna April 27, 2005 Colette Heald, Daniel Jacob,
August 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Characterizing PM23 Spatial Patterns Urban spatial patterns: explore PM concentrations in urban settings. Urban/Rural.
Exceptional Air Pollution Events: Exceedances due to Natural/Non-recurring Events R. B. Husar, Washington U.; R.L Poirot, Vermont Dep. Env. Cons.; N. Frank,
Aerosol Pattern over Southern North America Tropospheric Aerosols: Science and Decisions in an International Community A NARSTO Technical Symposium on.
Assessment of the Speciated PM Network (Initial Draft, November 2004 ) Washington University, St. Louis CIRA/NPS VIEWS Team.
Integration of Satellite and Surface Observations during Exceptional Air Quality Events R.B. Husar, Washinton University N. Frank, US EPA R. Poroit, State.
Response to the Bohnecamp memo Rudy Husar Kari Hoijarvi, Washington University, St. EE Detection – Which monitors.
Pinal County Air Quality July 23, 2007 PM 10 Exceptional Event.
Atmospheric Lifetime and the Range of PM2.5 Transport Background and Rationale Atmospheric Residence Time and Spatial Scales Residence Time Dependence.
Concepts on Aerosol Characterization R.B. Husar Washington University in St. Louis Presented at EPA – OAQPS Seminar Research Triangle Park, NC, April 4,
Natural PM Events: Dust and Smoke Background and Rationale Smoke from C. American Forest Fires PM10 over the Eastern U.S. during the smoke event The Asian.
Fire, Smoke & Air Quality: Tools for Data Exploration & Analysis : Data Sharing/Processing Infrastructure This project integrates.
Air Quality: Exceptional Event DSS (Husar)
High Wind Blowing Dust April 29, 2011 Exceptional Event
Kenneth Craig, Garnet Erdakos, Lynn Baringer, and Stephen Reid
WESTAR Recommendations Exceptional Events EPA response
Calculation of Background PM 2.5 Values
Presentation transcript:

Technical Support for Exceptional Event Analysis for Volcano Impacts on PM2.5 in Hawaii using the Exceptional Event Decision Support System (EE DSS)EE DSS Informal background presentation to EPA Region 9 and Hawaii Det. Health September 19, 2013 Telecon Rudolf Husar Washington University, St. Louis, MO

Response to the Bohnecamp memo Rudy Husar Kari Hoijarvi, Washington University, St. EE Detection – Which monitors are candidate violators of PM2.5 NAAQS? – What days have values above the PM2.5 NAAQS? EE Documentation – What are the other sources of PM2.5 near the monitor(s) Do they impact the monitors on exceedance days? Can one illustrate the effect of other sources vs. the volcano? – What are the conditions when volcano impacts on EE monitors? What is the volcanic source/emission strength? What are the met. conditions/pathways of volcanic impacts on EE monitors? Are these consistent for most events? – Are the tools and methods adequate to document the above? Are existing surface & satellite observations and modeling tools available? Can those be combined/integrated for robust EE documentation? How/when is this to be done? (C. Bohnencamp memo)

Candidate for violating Daily PM2.5 NAAQSDaily PM2.5 NAAQS None of the Hawaii monitors are candidates of daily PM2.5 NAAQS violations Candidates for violating Yearly PM2.5 NAAQSYearly PM2.5 NAAQS Kona and Hove(?) on Hawaii are candidates of yearly PM2.5 NAAQS violations Candidate stations for violating daily or yearly PM2.5 NAAQS

What days have values above the PM2.5 NAAQS? Time series for Kona on standard DataFed BrowserDataFed Browser For the average PM2.5 = 14.2 ug/m3 Potentially, any sample over 12 ug/m3 is violating and a candidate for EE flag Average = 14.2

What days have values above the PM2.5 NAAQS? Based on AQS PM2.5 data for 2011 and 2012 There are 704 daily samples. Of these 477 samples or 68% are > 12 ug/m3 (black dots). If all 477 were successfully flagged, the monitor average would be 8.5 ug/m3 be 8.5 ug/m3 – too many flagged Compliance could be reached if samples with concentration above 17.5 ug/m3 (168 samples) were successfully flagged Extrapolated to three years, , there will be at least ~ 250 days to be flagged at Kona.

What days have values above the PM2.5 NAAQS? For Kona ( ), determined by the Hawaii EE DSS Screening ToolHawaii EE DSS Screening Tool There are other strategies for flag-day selection from the pool of 477 that is above 12 ug/m3. Another approach is based on spatial anomaly, i.e. deviation from the neighboring sites. Using that criteria would require flagging 174 days, compared to 168 days. Given the many (over ~250) days to be flagged, choosing a good flag sampling and flag documentation strategy is a key task for the collaborating workgroup.

Other sources of PM2.5 impacting the EE monitor(s) Background PM2.5 – oceanic aerosol A possible source of background spikes is Asian dust reaching HI – suggested by the NRL NAAPS model These should be considered as ‘other sources’. The Hawaii background PM2.5 is quite uniform at ~ 6 ug/m3 But spikes up to 12 ug/m3 can occur near-simultaneously at all monitors. Aggregate of 6 background monitors

Distinguishing volcano vs background PM2.5 sources Spatial anomaly: Excess over the fluctuating background PM2.5 concentration Red line is the spatial anomaly: Excess PM2.5 at KONA over the spatially uniform but time-varying background Spatial analysis could help distinguishing background and volcanic PM2.5 Background ~ 6 ug/m3

OMI Satellite Columnar SO2 Seasonal averages, The SO2 concentration is highest at the volcano – in the vicinity of the EE sources The transport is mostly toward the West with the trade winds

MODIS satellite measurements of volcano aerosol (sulfate) Seasonal averages of AOD, High AOD downwind of Hawaii, the volcano source. No evidence for other major sources Seasonally the volcano aerosol plume is more in the Spring and Summer Plume transport is with the trade winds

OMI satellite measurements of columnar NO2 Seasonal averages, Indicates the high anthropogenic emissions in Oahu. No NO2 signal over Hawaii

Why is the PM2.5 impact so far away from the SO2 source? SO2-Sulfate conversion takes time and distance OMI SO2 Column Concentration MODIS AOD PM Column Satellite measurements of SO2 and AOD Average , June, Jul August SO2 highest near the source Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) highest downwind Possibly accelerated in fog/clouds -> VOG

Aspects of volcanic emission transport: Conceptual Stagnating, mixing ‘pool’ in the wake of the island Routine wind data in EE DSS Surface Winds: Measurements (hourly) NOGAPS model (6 hourly, vertical profiles

Hawaii EE Documentation Tool Surface WindsOMI satellite SO2 MODIS AQUA Image MODIS Terra MODIS AOT Bad data All the analysis was performed using different modules in the Hawaii version of the EE Decision Support System. The Hawaii system documentation is marginal at best .

EE DSS Integration with VMAP: Vog Measurement and Predication System and other systems?VMAP Collaboration with other science teams would also be desirable