The present publication was developed under grant 84.373X100001 from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. The views.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Learning Program Greenwich Public Schools Setting the Standard for Excellence in Public Education Grade Two Fall/Winter Score Interpretation Procedures.
Advertisements

1 K-2 Smarter Balanced Assessment Update English Language Arts February 2012.
1 of 22 DLM Science Alternate Assessment Additional Training Module 8.
DC CAS Kickoff Tamara Reavis Director Standards, Assessment, and Accountability.
Elementary Principals CCSS Update Robyn Seifert & Rita Reimbold April 10, 2013.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Consortium Patti Whetstone Center for Educational Testing and Evaluation University of Kansas The present publication.
Score Reporting for Interim and Summative Assessments: Claims & Targets Nancy Thomas Price, Comprehensive Assessment System Coordinator.
KRISTEN BURTON ERIN FAASUAMALIE Future of Alternate Achievement Standards and Assessment in Wisconsin Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Principles of High Quality Assessment
Overview of the Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment System
Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Consortium The present publication was developed under grant X from the U.S. Department of Education,
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
1 New York State Mathematics Core Curriculum 2005.
 Inclusion and the Common Core State Standards  Inclusion and State Assessment  Inclusion and Teacher Evaluation  Results Driven Accountability 
SMARTER BALANCED QUESTION TYPES OVERVIEW TEXT TXT EXT Assess a broad range of content. Scoring is objective, fast, and inexpensive to score. Difficult.
MATHEMATICS KLA Years 1 to 10 Understanding the syllabus MATHEMATICS.
1 College and Career Readiness Instruction and Assessment for Pre-intentional and Pre-symbolic Communicators The present publication was developed under.
Boot Camp Spring  Choose a class and complete a Context for Learning for this class. (It can be the same class as the literacy tasks, but YOU MUST.
NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Launching the Common Core State Standards We need to prepare our students for 21 st Century Learning in an information age with technology innovations.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
New Jersey Principals and Supervisors Association Legislative Conference March 21, 2014 New Jersey Department of Education.
Evaluating Student Growth Looking at student works samples to evaluate for both CCSS- Math Content and Standards for Mathematical Practice.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Parent Information Session Colchester Public Schools 1.
1 6-8 Smarter Balanced Assessment Update English Language Arts February 2012.
Overview of English language arts (ELA) assessment Vaughn G. Rhudy, Ed.D., NBCT Assessment Coordinator Stacey Murrell, Ed.D. Interim.
ASSESSMENT SUMMARY. Public Service Announcement.
Common Core State Standards
The present publication was developed under grant X from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. The views.
Standards Development Process College and career readiness standards developed in summer 2009 Based on the college and career readiness standards, K-12.
DECEMBER 2013 Dynamic Learning Maps: Claims and Conceptual Areas and Common Core Essential Elements Update The present publication was developed under.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
Dynamic Learning Map Update Lansing, Michigan April 17, 2013 afternoon session Daryl Mellard Sue Bechard Michelle Shipman Judith Gross The present publication.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
THINK / PUZZLE / EXPLORE Think about what you may have read as part of the pre-reading activity for this workshop as well as what you already know about.
K-3 Formative Assessment Process: The Five Domains of Learning Welcome! This webinar will begin at 3:30. While you are waiting, please: Locate the question.
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON MIDDLE LEVEL PRINCIPALS WINTER MEETING -- JANUARY 24, 2015 Leveraging the SBAC System to Support Effective Assessment Practices.
Introducing the Common Core Standards In June 2010, NJ adopted the new Common Core State Standards for Math and Language Arts Currently, 45 states have.
+ ELA and Mathematics Common Core Natick MA Public Schools Kindergarten to grade
Test Security Considerations in the Dynamic Learning Maps System: Consortium Perspective Meagan Karvonen The present publication was developed under grant.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
WALNUT HIGH SCHOOL CAASPP INFORMATION NIGHT How to Understand Your Child’s report
Alaska Measures of Progress (AMP) Summative Assessment Framework 1.
State Board of Education Presentation Jeffrey Hauger, Ed.D. Peggy McDonald, Ed.D. Elizabeth Celentano, M.Ed. January 11, 2016 NEW JERSEY DYNAMIC LEARNING.
TEACHING WITH A FOCUS ON LEARNERS One model of Differentiation: Sousa and Tomlinson (2011) Differentiation and The Brain. Purpose: Understanding Text Complexity.
Smarter Balanced 103: Item Types and Instructional Implementation Rachel Aazzerah Science & Social Science Assessment Specialist
DLM Alternate Assessment Test Administration Webinar March 2016.
KLC Meeting Explore the two samples provided considering the following questions: What are some of the possible similarities you see in how you.
California Common Core State Standards for School Counselors.
Common Core State Standards and Assessments of Student Mastery 1.
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 7
The New Illinois Learning Standards
Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Consortium
Amy Clark, Meagan Karvonen, Russell Swinburne Romine, & Brooke Nash
Assessment Information
State Board of Education Presentation Jeffrey Hauger, Ed.D.
Lindsay Ruhter, Lori Andersen, & Allison Lawrence
Using the 7 Step Lesson Plan to Enhance Student Learning
K-2 Smarter Balanced Assessment Update
Presentation transcript:

The present publication was developed under grant X from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. The views expressed herein are solely those of the author(s), and no official endorsement by the U.S. Department should be inferred. Designing Validity into an Alternate Assessment Neal Kingston, PhD Angela Broaddus, PhD, Meagan Karvonen, PhD Center for Educational Testing and Evaluation, University of Kansas Karen Erickson, PhD Center for Literacy & Disability Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Moderator: Susan Weigert, PhD, OSEP

Overview of Evidence Centered Design

Five Layers of ECD Domain analysisDomain modelingConceptual assessment frameworkAssessment implementationAssessment delivery 3

Domain Analysis Descriptions of the knowledge domain being assessed Situations or activities that evoke the relevant concepts and skills Common misconceptions Instructional strategies 4

Domain Modeling Identify focal knowledge and skills Identify potential tasks for assessing focal knowledge and skills Describe characteristics and variable features of assessment tasks 5

Conceptual Assessment Framework Student models – proficiencies the assessment aims to address Task models – how students will respond in an assessment situation to indicate their knowledge Evidence models – how observations collected from tasks offer evidence about what students know 6

Assessment Implementation Task/testlet development Scoring rules Measurement models 7

Assessment Delivery Tests administered to students Tests scored Reports generated and interpreted 8

Overview of the DLM Maps, Claims, Conceptual Areas, and Essential Elements

Learning Map Claims Conceptual Areas Essential Elements

Learning Map 11

Models need to specify claims… (Gong, 2012) 12

DLM Claims English Language Arts – Claim 1 Students will comprehend text in increasingly complex ways Mathematics – Claim 1 Students will demonstrate increasingly complex understanding of number sense. 13

Conceptual Areas Conceptual areas are comprised of nodes that represent the development of related cognitive processes. Conceptual areas contain: – nodes that have been identified as the targets for Essential Element, and – nodes preceding and extending beyond the targets. 14

ELA.C1.1 Determine Critical Elements of Text 15

English Language Arts Claims and Conceptual Areas 16

English Language Arts Claims ELA.C1 Students can comprehend text in increasingly complex ways. ELA.C2 Students can produce writing for a range of purposes and audiences. ELA.C3 Students can communicate for a range of purposes and audiences. ELA.C4 Students can engage in research/inquiry to investigate topics and present information. 17

ELA.C1 Students can comprehend text in increasingly complex ways. ELA.C1.1 Determine Critical Elements of Text ELA.C1.2 Construct Understandings of Text ELA.C1.3 Integrate Ideas and Information from Text 18

ELA.C2 Students can produce writing for a range of purposes and audiences. ELA.C2.1 Use Writing to Communicate ELA.C2.2 Integrate Ideas and Information in Writing 19

ELA.C3 Students can communicate for a range of purposes and audiences. ELA.C3.1 Use Language to Communicate with Others ELA.C3.2 Clarify and Contribute in Discussion 20

ELA.C4 Students can engage in research/inquiry to investigate topics and present information. ELA.C4.1 Use Sources and Information ELA.C4.2 Collaborate and Present Ideas 21

Mathematics Claims M.C1 Number Sense: Students demonstrate increasingly complex understanding of number sense. M.C2 Geometry: Students demonstrate increasingly complex spatial reasoning and understanding of geometric principles. M.C3 Measurement, Data and Analysis: Students demonstrate increasingly complex understanding of measurement, data, and analytic procedures. M.C4 Algebraic and functional reasoning: Students solve increasingly complex mathematical problems, making productive use of algebra and functions.

Claim M.C1 – Number Sense Students demonstrate increasingly complex understanding of number sense. M.C1.1Understand number structures (counting, place value, fraction) M.C1.2Compare, compose, and decompose numbers and sets. M.C1.3Calculate accurately and efficiently using simple arithmetic operations

Claim M.C2 - Geometry Students demonstrate increasingly complex spatial reasoning and understanding of geometric principles. M.C2.1Understand and use geometric properties of two- and three- dimensional shapes M.C2.2Solve problems involving area, perimeter, and volume.

M.C3 – Measurement, Data, and Analysis Students demonstrate increasingly complex understanding of measurement, data, and analytic procedures. M.C3.1Understand and use measurement principles and units of measure M.C3.2Represent and interpret data displays

M.C4 – Algebraic and Functional Reasoning Students solve increasingly complex mathematical problems, making productive use of algebra and functions. M.C4.1Use operations and models to solve problems M.C4.2Understand patterns and functional thinking

EE Concept Maps take content to assessment design Identify claim, conceptual area, CCSS, and Essential Element Identify key vocabulary Describe and define a range of skill development Describe and define misconceptions Identify prerequisite and requisite skills Identify sensitivity and bias barriers Identify accessibility issues

Essential Element Concept Map 28

Feelings of Characters ELA.EE.RL.3.3 Identify the feelings of the characters in a story Embedded and/or Conclusion Both Embedded

Fractions M.EE.3.NF1-3 Differentiate a fractional part from a whole

Dissecting the EECM

Framework Claim Conceptual Area Common Core State Standard Essential Element Essential Question – “Does” versus “Can” Use “Does the student…?” when asking a comprehension question. Use “Can the student…?” when asking a performance question. – Questions focus on EE, address linkage node

Vocabulary Concepts Words

Nodes Initial (a) Distal (b) Proximal (c) Target (d) Successor (e) Supporting Nodes

Questions/ Misconceptions Questions to Ask – What additional skills does the student need to reach the next node? Misconceptions and Errors – What is preventing the student from reaching the next node?

Next EE/Accessibility/ Barriers Next EE Accessibility Barriers Testlet Access

Instructionally Relevant Testlets

TESTLET DEVELOPMENT

Testlet Development Process Follows a rolling sequence in conceptual areas, driven by EECM development One item writer develops a set of testlets

Testlet Sets Initial Precursor Target Successors Connect the map… Behavior Testlet a …to the items developed. Distal Precursor Proximal Precursor Behavior Testlet b Testlet c Testlet d Testlet e

Structure of a Testlet Begins with engagement activity ELA: Text presented in segments with questions embedded and at conclusion Math: series of questions or problems related to single topic

SAMPLE TESTLETS

TESTLET ADMINISTRATION

DISCUSSION

Questions 1.What features must be in place for alternate assessments to be instructionally relevant and not just embedded? 2.What factors might support teachers in making full use of an assessment like DLM? 3.What are the important research questions to be asked about instructionally relevant alternate assessments?

THANK YOU! For more information, please go to: