2015 edition >>>Faculty & Staff >>>Faculty Appointment & Review >>>Tenure.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QU Academic Promotion Policies Prof. Nitham M. Hindi November 26, 2008.
Advertisements

Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.
2013 edition >>>Faculty & Staff >>>Faculty Appointment & Review >>>Tenure.
Proposed Revisions to Section 5 (Review & Evaluation of Faculty Performance) of the Faculty Handbook Spring, T&P Oversight Committee Office.
Promotion and Tenure Planning Workshop Spring 2013 Susan S. Williams Vice Provost for Academic Policy and Faculty Resources.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
Promotion and Tenure at Ohio University Martin Tuck PhD Associate Provost for Academic Affairs.
Rank and Tenure Forum University Committee on Rank & Tenure April 20, 2015 Dr. Laura Barritt, Chair –
Senior Appointments Committee J. M. Friedman, MD, PhD.
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH RPT Workshop March 28, :30 p.m. – 3:30 p.m. Intermountain Network Scientific CC (INSCC) Building, room 110.
The Tenure and Promotion Application Process. Each candidate is responsible for compiling the materials for his/her application with the assistance of.
Information Session Application for Tenure academic year Faculty of Arts & Science – June 2011.
Kim Gingerich, Assistant to V-P, Academic & Provost Lisa Weber, Administrative Secretary, Dean of Science Marie Armstrong, Associate University Secretary.
Promotion and Tenure Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion
Guidelines for the Preparation of Tenure Dossiers Kevin McLaughlin Dean of the Faculty October 14, 2014.
Tenure and Promotions: File preparation December 2, 2010 – Faculty of Science and Engineering York University 2010.
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System.
Promotion Process A how-to for DEOs. How is a promotion review initiated? Required in the final probationary year of a tenure track appointment (year.
>>>Faculty & Staff >>>Faculty Appointment & Review >>>Tenure Guidelines 2011 edition.
>>>Faculty & Staff >>>Faculty Appointment & Review >>>Tenure Guidelines 2008 edition.
QU Academic Promotion Policies Prof. Nitham M. Hindi December 20, 2010.
Lynn Hollen Lees Vice Provost for Faculty. Promotion Timelines Pre-Submission Submission.
Tenure and Promotion Timeline and Process University of Oklahoma, Spring 2016 Simin Pulat Vice Provost for Faculty Development.
Staff Promotion and Tenure Workshop Wednesday, April 13, 2016 Melissa Crawford Office of Faculty Development and Advancement Binder Review.
FACULTY PROMOTION REVIEW Faculty hired in former UK Personnel System or prior to 2004 in a Community College Grandfathered under Format.
An Overview of the Promotion & Tenure Process UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY NEW FACULTY ORIENTATION AUGUST 20, 2015 KATIE CARDARELLI, PHD ASSOCIATE DEAN FOR ACADEMIC.
The Promotion and Tenure Process at Alabama State University.
COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES PROMOTION AND TENURE DOSSIER ASSEMBLY WORKSHOP FALL 2016.
Guidelines for the Preparation of Tenure Dossiers Kevin McLaughlin Dean of the Faculty September 7, 2016.
University p&t forum Introductions April 24, 2017.
College of Arts & Sciences Promotion and tenure Dossier assembly workshop spring 2017.
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2016.
>>>Faculty & Staff >>>Faculty Appointment & Review >>>Tenure.
Tenure and Recontracting August 29, 2017
College of Arts & Sciences Promotion and tenure Dossier assembly workshop fall 2017.
Remarks on the Tenure and Promotion Process
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
2017 Workshop Tenure and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview
We’re going to follow the chronological order of the process.
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2017.
What You Can Do Right Now! For Late Stage Faculty
>>>Faculty & Staff >>>Faculty Appointment & Review >>>Tenure Guidelines.
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Guidelines for the Preparation of Tenure Dossiers
Tenure and Recontracting February 7, 2018
Tenure and Recontracting August 27, 2018
College of Arts & Sciences Promotion and tenure Dossier assembly workshop fall 2018.
2018 edition TCVPA Website Faculty Appointment & Review (column)
What You Can Do Right Now! For Late Stage Faculty
Tenure and Recontracting February 6, 2018
2016 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Policy and Procedures Overview
Promotion/Tenure Portfolio
Portfolio for Tenure & Promotion
Tenure and Recontracting October 6, 2017
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
College of Arts & Sciences Lecturer Promotion Dossier assembly workshop fall 2018.
Kazmer Promotion: UMass Process
What You Can Do Right Now! For Late Stage Faculty
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Tenure and Recontracting February 26, 2019
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
>>>Faculty & Staff >>>Faculty Appointment & Review >>>Tenure.
Promotion Tenure and Reappointment
Deb Franko Senior Vice Provost for Academic Affairs January 24, 2019
Preparing for the Midcourse (third- or fourth-year) Review
Tenure and Promotion: Crossing the Finish Line
Presentation transcript:

2015 edition >>>Faculty & Staff >>>Faculty Appointment & Review >>>Tenure Guidelines

DOSSIER FORMS √ Provost’s copy is skeletal: reports of votes administrators’ letters curriculum vitae external letters basic information section annual reports ballot comments

DOSSIER FORMS √Unit copy is comprehensive √ College’s version adds in Appendix: Appendices present any information deemed important to your case unit procedures

___ 30. TEN, APPENDIX: BALLOT COMMENTS (Section Title Page) ___ 31. Typed, unsigned Ballot Comments, or Statement indicating that No Comments Were Provided CVPA ONE PDF on flash drive - ONE Hard Copy – ORIGINAL LETTERS IN FOLDER ___ 1 ‐ 31. Copy of Master Form, Parts 1 ‐ 31 ___ 32.ELEVEN, APPENDIX: UNIT GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES (Section Title Page) ___ 33.Copies of relevant unit and area guidelines For tenure and promotion UNIT ELECTRONIC OR PRINT, AS STIPULATED BY UNITPROCEDURES ___ 1 ‐ 33.Copy of Master Form, Parts 1 ‐ 29, plus Copy of CVPA Materials, Parts 32 ‐ 33 (ballot comment section is blank) ___ 34.TWELVE, APPENDIX:_specify_ (Section Title Page) ___ 35.Materials required for unit consideration; repeat as necessary; retain in School only DOSSIER CONTENTS ___ 19.Items 3a ‐ 3i (OP32.01, Attachment B, pg. 6 ‐ 7) ___ 20. SIX, TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS (Section Title Page) ___ 21.Candidate Statement (one page) ___ 22. 5th ‐ Year Summary of Peer Evaluation of Teaching (if applicable) ___ 23.Student Ratings, Qualitative and Quantitative together, 1 pg. PER YEAR under consideration OR 1 pg. each for all yrs’ Quantitative Summary & representative Qualitative comments ___ 24.SEVEN, RESEARCH AND CREATIVE SCHOLARSHIP (Section Title Page) ___ 25.Candidate Statement on Research (one page) ___ 26.EIGHT, PROFESSIONAL SERVICE (Section Title Page) ___ 27.Candidate Statement on Professional Service (one page) Outreach ___ 28.NINE, ANNUAL FACULTY REPORTS (Section Title Page) ___ 29.In chronological order: Annual Faculty Reports with Administrator Evaluations; Peer Evaluations/Guidance Committee Reports; Midterm Review Materials PROVOST – PDF on flash drive - (MASTER FORM) ___ 1.Title Page (Section Title Page) ___ 2.Table of Contents (Section Title Page) ___ 3.Declaration of OP Version (OP32.01, Attachment B, pg. 3) ___ 4. Tally Cover Sheet (OP32.01, Attachment B, pg. 3) ___ 5.Ballot Statement Witnessed (Unit form) ___ 6.ONE, DEAN'S LETTER (Section Title Page) ___ 7.Blank page for dean's letter ___ 8.Candidate Statement of Access to contents (Unit form) ___ 9.TWO, UNIT RECOMMENDATION (Section Title Page) ___ 10.Blank page for chair or director's letter ___ 11. Fifth ‐ year review / guidance committee report (if applicable) ___ 12. THREE, CURRICULUM VITAE (Section Title Page) ___ 13.C.V. with ratings for research and creative scholarship ___ 14. FOUR, EXTERNAL LETTERS (Section Title Page) ___ 15.Biosketches of writers, all to fit on one to two pages (Unit administrator) ___ 16.External letters of evaluation, re ‐ numbered to fit section (e.g. 4 ‐ 3, 4 ‐ 4. etc.) ___ 17.FIVE, BASIC INFORMATION (Section Title Page) ___ 18. Letter of Appointment (OP32.01, Attachment B, 3,pg. 6)

TITLE PAGES & SECTIONS Available on CVPA website, download

TABLE OF CONTENTS Available on CVPA website, download

DOSSIER RESOURCES Format Table Section Title Pages Checklists Available on CVPA website, download

BASIC INFORMATION SECTION

BASIC INFORMATION SECTION CONTAINS: Letter of Appointment Teaching Load, last 4 semesters SUMMARIES of teaching evaluations External letters & biosketches Summary statements: teaching research service OP32.01, Attachment

BASIC INFORMATION, TEACHING Statement (one page) Student Evaluations, Quantitative & Qualitative ONE PAGE / YEAR being considered OR One page Quantitative, One page Qualitative (covering all years) Peer Evaluations (5-yr summary if available) Unit Administrator takes responsibility (if task is delegated, director initials) (edit section for length) SUMMARY of teaching effectiveness

EXTERNAL LETTERS

LETTERS OF REFERENCE Include only “official” solicited letters At least 3 letters from “Peer Institutions” Writers should have no “substantive relationship” with candidate Biosketch is required for each letter writer Administrator is required to provide biosketches Administrator must explain any substantive relationships All biosketches together fit on one page preceding letters

“PEER INSTITUTIONS” In 2010, the Provost stipulated that at least three external letters of evaluation must originate from Peer Institutions. Candidates should recommend several potential evaluators whose institutional affiliations fulfill this criterion. Peer Institutions have been defined as those appearing on the list of athletic conference affiliates available in the university’s strategic plan Making It Happen. Members of the American Association of Universities are also considered to be Peer Institutions. Aspirational peers (e.g., Oxford University) can be included.

“SUBSTANTIVE RELATIONSHIPS” In 2010, these were defined as dissertation advisory chairs, former instructors of graduate coursework, close collaborators in research, etc. External evaluators should be encouraged to disclose relationships with the candidate. The unit administrator must justify any substantive relationships within the biosketch section.

THE CURRICULUM VITAE

THE C.V. IN THE DOSSIER Curriculum vitae = life’s education Show relative weight of responsibilities changes over time consistency of achievement for mandatory decision: be comprehensive

CURRICULUM VITAE, 1 Provide all important information from Annual Reports (but not Digital Measures printout) RESEARCH – administrator ranks by number SERVICE TEACHING Courses by semester (number & title) Number of students Service on graduate committees Activities considered to be related to teaching …during your career at Tech

CURRICULUM VITAE, 2 Basic Information section duplicates some but not all Specific categories vary by field Cross reference if necessary Avoid duplication of information Can summarize pre-Tech activities Order within sections Reverse Chronological Order Provide Dates of Activities

COLLEGE REVIEW

PRISTINE DOSSIERS… …facilitate committee consideration Download and Use!!! Candidate Checklist Give Format-Checker List to appropriate staff After faculty vote, give director the Unit Administrator Checklist

COLLEGE REVIEW PROCESS  Unit Vote  Unit Administrator’s letter  Curriculum vitae  External evaluators  Annual reports & assessments Committee know you Committee knows your DOSSIER

COLLEGE REVIEW PROCESS: PAC  Four members (two each unit, not home unit)  One observer from home unit  Observer leaves prior to voting  Subcommittees issue independent vote Personnel Actions Committee T&P Subcommittees

COLLEGE REVIEW PROCESS: SUBCOMMITTEE  Can invite visitors to question  Must invite visitors, if negative vote is expected in mandatory-year cases

REVIEW PROCESS TIMELINE

 Meetings scheduled during summer  Unit actions early to mid-September  Dossiers arrive at college mid-October Dossiers are checked for form Dossiers are “officially accepted”

REVIEW PROCESS TIMELINE  CVPA meetings late in October  CVPA chair reports recommendation to dean  Dean decides & writes letter  Dossiers to Provost, late November Dean’s letter edited into Provost PDF Provost PDF (copy) sent to you You verify that only change is the letter

REVIEW PROCESS TIMELINE  Provost’s review December-January  Recommendation to President  Recommendation to Board of Regents Each decision is independent Only BOR can grant tenure BOR usually acts by March meeting

bona fortuna!