Case studies Saila Antila, PhD WHO consultant Training workshop on Pharmaceutical Quality, Good Manufacturing Practice & Bioequivalence, Kiev 3.-7.10.2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design of Bioequivalence Studies Alfredo García – Arieta, PhD
Advertisements

Regulation documentation requirements
Presentation of BE data in a product dossier Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
Pharmacokinetics as a Tool
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Statistical Considerations for Bioequivalence.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Introduction to the Discussion of Bioequivalence.
Selected bioavailability and pharmacokinetic calculations Dr. Osama A. A. Ahmed.
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 1 Regulatory Requirements.
 Modified drug release dosage forms:  These dosage forms are designed to release drugs in a controlled manner, at a predetermined rate, duration and.
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
Hanoi, WORKSHOP ON PREQUALIFICATION OF ARV: BIOEQUIVALENCE Introduction to the Discussion of Bioequivalence Study Design and Conduct Presented.
Artemisinin combined medicines, Kampala, February |1 | Training workshop on regulatory requirements for registration of Artemisinin based combined.
WHO Prequalification Program Workshop, Kiev, Ukraine, June 25-27,2007.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
Interchangeability and study design Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
Documentation of bioequivalence Drs. J. Welink Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October 2009.
Practical Pharmacokinetics
Bioequivalence Studies Dr Sanet Aspinall, PhD Managing Director AddClin Research Pretoria 20 March 2009.
regulatory requirements
Toxicokinetic Calculations
Gokaraju Rangaraju College of Pharmacy
Week 6- Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
WHO Workshop on Assessment of Bioequivalence Data Addis Ababa, 31. August – 3. September Frequent Deficiencies Dr. Henrike Potthast
PHARMACOKINETICS 1. Fate of drugs in the body 1.1 absorption
Non-linear Pharmacokinetics Arthur G. Roberts. Linear Pharmacokinetics AUC dose K Cl dose [Drug] plasma time ln[Drug] plasma time Increasing Dose.
Regulatory requirements Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
1 Axcan Public Presentation for the FDA Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology Advisory Committee Meeting July 23, 2008.
SYSTEMIC ABSORPTION AS THE MOST ACCURATE AND SENSITIVE METHOD OF DETERMINING BIOEQUIVALENCE OF GENERIC TOPICAL PRODUCTS Chris Hendy Ph.D. Novum Pharmaceutical.
Bioavailability Dr Mohammad Issa.
Issues in Generic Substitution: Safety/Efficacy, Cost Savings and Supply Robert J. Herman, MD, FRCPC Professor, Department of Medicine University of Calgary.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
WHO Workshop on Assessment of Bioequivalence Data Addis Ababa, 31. August – 3. September 2010 Artemisinin-based Products Dr. Henrike Potthast
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
Training Workshop: Training of BE Assessors Kiev, October 2009 Frequent Deficiencies Dr. Henrike Potthast Training workshop: Training.
Brett-Smith, ATAC, 2/24/02 Stavudine Extended Release (Zerit ® XR; d4T XR) Stavudine Prolonged Release Capsules ATAC Meeting 2/24/02.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Gastrointestinal Drugs: An Overview
The Pharmaceutical Composition Methodology described in this presentation has been developed to improve controlled drug delivery through site specific.
Multiple dosing: intravenous bolus administration
Bioequivalence Dr Mohammad Issa Saleh.
1 Single-dose kinetics Plasma [Drug] curve Upon administration [drug] plasma reaches a max Then begins to decline as the Drug is eliminated Cp max = max.
WHO Prequalification Programme June 2007 Training Workshop on Dissolution, Pharmaceutical Product Interchangeability and Biopharmaceutical Classification.
Bioavailability Dr. Basavaraj K. Nanjwade M. Pharm., Ph. D Department of Pharmaceutics Faculty of Pharmacy Omer Al-Mukhtar University Tobruk, Libya.
Grade Statistics without Bonus with Bonus Average = 86 Median = 87 Average = 88 Median = 89 Undergraduates Average=88 MS Average=92.
Using Product Development Information to Address the Bioequivalence Challenges of Highly-variable Drugs Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office.
Examples of deficiencies in submitted data Drs. J. Welink Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October.
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence L 10,11.  Bioavailability is a measurement of the rate and extent (amount) to which the active ingredient or active.
WHO Prequalification Programme June 2007 Training Workshop on Dissolution, Pharmaceutical Product Interchangeability and Biopharmaceutical Classification.
Modified release products. Considerations in the evaluation of modified release products Requirements for preparing extended release products. The bioavailability.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
Interchangeability and study design Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
Effect of Four Different Meal Types on the Population Pharmacokinetics of Single Dose of Rifapentine in Healthy Male Volunteers Simbarashe P. Zvada 1,
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
INTRODUCTION TO PHARMACOKINETICS M. Kršiak Department of Pharmacology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Charles University in Prague,
Tanzania, August 2006 Dr. Barbara Sterzik, BfArM, Bonn 1 Bioequivalence dossier requirements for the prequalification project WHO Training Workshop.
Pharmacodynamics, Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Encenicline, a Selective α7 Nicotinic Receptor Partial Agonist, in Single Ascending-dose.
- Pharmaceutical Equivalence Study
PHARMACOKINETICS Allie punke
Bioavailability of a drug from an immediate-release tablet containing 50 mg of drug given at 0, 4, and 8 hours compared to a single 150-mg drug dose given.
Dissolution testing and in vitro in vivo correlation of conventional and SR preparations Formulation development and optimization is an ongoing process.
Applications of Pharmacokinetics
HHM 5014 NUTRACEUTICAL FORMULATION TECHNOLOGY
Clinical Pharmacokinetics
Selected Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetic Calculations
Pharmacologic Principles (Lilley, p. 16)
Bioequivalence trials: design, evaluation, regulatory requirements
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring chapter 1 part 1
Multiple ORAL Dosing Objectives
REFERENCE: APPLIED CLINICAL Slideshow by: lecturer HADEEL DELMAN
Presentation transcript:

Case studies Saila Antila, PhD WHO consultant Training workshop on Pharmaceutical Quality, Good Manufacturing Practice & Bioequivalence, Kiev

Case study 1 Characteristics of drug X half-life, conventional preparations: 4-6 h half-life from modified release preparations: hours food decreases absorption of the drug innovator’s SPC: steady state concentrations are reached by the fourth day of the treatment

Case study 1 Modified release tablet The applicant has performed single dose, randomised, 2-period, cross-over study in fed state multiple dose, randomised, 2-period, cross-over study in fed state –first treatment period 4 days –second treatment period 3 days

Case study 1 Pharmacokinetic parameters, single dose, fed state TreatmentAUC 0-t (ng*h/ml) AUC 0-inf (ng*h/ml) C max (ng/ml) Test186 ± ± ± 3.9 Reference187 ± ± ± 4.1 Ratio (90 % CI) 96.8 ( ) 92.3 ( ) 97.2 ( )

Case study 1 Pharmacokinetic parameters, multiple dose, fed state Treat- ment AUC 0-τ (ng*h/ml) C min (ng*h/ml) C max (ng/ml) Fluctua -tion Test189 ± ± ± ± 48 Referenc e 190 ± ± ± ± 42 Ratio (90 % CI) 91.7 ( ) 80.1 ( ) ( ) ( )

Case study 1 Weaknesses of the documentation study in fasting state is missing the second treatment period is too short  according to the originators SPC steady state is achieved by the fourth treatment day

Case study 2 Characteristics of drug Y active metabolite R- & S-enantiomers linear pharmacokinetics multiple strengths (0.5, 1 mg, 2 mg, 4 mg) antipsychotic agent

Case study 2 Immediate release capsule The applicant has performed one single dose study with 1 mg capsule

Case study 2 Pharmacokinetic parameters, single dose, fasting state, parent drug TreatmentAUC 0-t (ng*h/ml) AUC 0-inf (ng*h/ml) C max (ng/ml) Test4630± ± ±340 Reference4670± ± ± 350 Ratio (90 % CI) 0.93 ( ) 0.93 ( ) 0.89 ( )

Case study 2 Pharmacokinetic parameters, single dose, fasting state, metabolite TreatmentAUC 0-t (ng*h/ml) AUC 0-inf (ng*h/ml) C max (ng/ml) Test1461± ± ±240 Reference1560± ± ± 250 Ratio (90 % CI) 0.94 ( ) 0.94 ( ) 0.89 ( )

Case study 2 for safety reasons single dose study with 1 mg is accepted since linear pharmacokinetics, enantiospecific methods are not needed

Case study 3 Characteristics of drug Z bioavailability % linear pharmacokinetics at doses mg multiple strengths (1 mg and 2 mg)

Case study 3 Enteric coated capsule single dose study with 2 mg capsule performed in fasting state

Case study 3 Pharmacokinetic parameters, single dose, fasting state TreatmentAUC 0-t (ng*h/ml) AUC 0-inf (ng*h/ml) C max (ng/ml) Test 3490± ± ±460 Reference 3670± ± ±480 Ratio (90 % CI) ( ) ( ) ( )

Case study 3 Weaknesses of the documentation study in fed state is missing