Science Objectives & Investigation Methodology Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Nathalie A. Cabrol NASA Ames.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Research Proposal Requirements and Networking Workshop ESTEC, Noordwijk, 13 September 2004.

Advertisements

Academic Writing Writing an Abstract.

Fluorescence Imaging Site C Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Shmuel Weinstein Kim Warren-Rhodes Charlie Cockell.

Lunar Advanced Science and Exploration Research: Partnership in Science and Exploration Michael J. Wargo, Sc.D. Chief Lunar Scientist for Exploration Systems.

Enables future missions such as autonomous geology, life seeking and polar exploration ROBOTIC SEARCH FOR ANTARCTIC METEORITES NASA and CARNEGIE MELLON.

Susanne Biundo, Karen Myers, Kanna Rajan How is Planning & Scheduling Changing the World?

The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 59 Performance.

PPA 501 – Analytical Methods in Administration Lecture 2c – The Research Proposal.

Enables future missions such as autonomous geology, life seeking and polar exploration ROBOTIC SEARCH FOR ANTARCTIC METEORITES NASA and CARNEGIE MELLON.

Click to highlight each section of the article one by one Read the section, then click once to view the description of it If you want to read it, you.

POST WEBSITE OVERVIEW Area 8 Training Managers Workshop Computer Services Bureau 4/5/2012.

Satellite Imagery, Access and Interpretation Training Workshop in Partnership with BAAQMD Santa Clara, CA September 10 – 12, 2013 Applied Remote SEnsing.

Satellite Imagery ARSET Applied Remote SEnsing Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Introduction to Remote Sensing and Air Quality Applications.

Tide coordinated shoreline mapping using THEOS /ALOS imagery Apisit Kongprom Geo-Informatics Scientist Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development.

Taking stock and moving on Dissertation workshop Friday 28th November, 2008.

Carnegie Mellon Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Science Planner Science Observer Life in the Atacama Design Review December 19, 2003.

Preparing a Successful SHRM Foundation Grant Application Lynn McFarland, Ph.D. August 23, 2012.

NASA AIST Sensor Web PI Meeting II Wrap up Topics Karen Moe Advanced Information Systems Technology Program NASA, Earth Science and Technology Office.

Main stepsMain steps 1.Find relevant literature 2.Read and while reading, write down the main concepts, variables, relationships, methods, and other important.

Atlanta Board of Education AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” February 14, 2011.

Mars 2020 Project Matt Wallace Deputy Project Manager August 3, 2015.

April nd IBTrACS Workshop 1 Operational Procedures How can we build consistent, homogeneous, well- documented climate quality data?

Autonomous Rovers for Polar Science Campaigns 1. Why Develop Polar Rovers? Reduce logistics costs Less infrastructure Broader safety & weather windows.

Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon SCIENCE OPS [contributions from Peter, Trey, Dom, Kristen, Kristina and Mike] Life.

Science Investigation Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nathalie A. Cabrol NASA Ames.

ASTEP Life in the AtacamaCarnegie Mellon Limits of Life in the Atacama: Investigation of Life in the Atacama Desert of Chile Communication System Design.

Researching & Writing a Literature Review Karen Ciccone NCSU Libraries.

FOR 500 The Publication Process Karl Williard & John Groninger.

Solar Energy and Zoë power Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 James Teza Carnegie Mellon University.

NASA Earth Observing System Visualization Tools ARSET - AQ Applied Remote SEnsing Training – Air Quality A project of NASA Applied Sciences Introduction.

Life in the Atacama Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop July 14-16, 2004 Carnegie Mellon University.

“Life in the Atacama” 2013 Rover Field Campaign in Chile Autonomous Analysis of Robotic Core Materials by the Mars Microbeam Raman Spectrometer (MMRS)

PROPOSED 2018 Joint Rover Mission Plans for Proposed 2018 NASA & ESA Joint Rover Mission Landing Site Selection Matt Golombek Mars Exploration Program.

Site B Introduction Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Pre-landing analysis Derived hypotheses Daily planning & program.

Ground-Truth Strategy Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Edmond A. Grin NASA Ames.

1 Science Definition Team Meeting National Aerospace Institute Hampton, VA Dec 1-3, 2015.

Carnegie Mellon Rover Concept of Operation Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop David Wettergreen The Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon.

1 Toward Autonomous Kilometer-Scale Site Survey by Planetary Rovers David R. Thompson Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University NASA.

ESA Harwell Robotics & Autonomy Facility Study Workshop Autonomous Software Verification Presented By: Rick Blake.

Rover and Instrument Capabilities Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Michael Wagner, James Teza, Stuart Heys Robotics Institute, Carnegie.

Learning for Physically Diverse Robot Teams Robot Teams - Chapter 7 CS8803 Autonomous Multi-Robot Systems 10/3/02.

Science Methods & Approach Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nathalie A. Cabrol NASA Ames.

Remote Operations Methods & Plan Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nathalie A. Cabrol NASA Ames.

Mobile Node for Wireless Sensor Network to Detect Landmines Presented by : Jameela Hassan.

Site C Introduction Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Pre-landing analysis Derived hypotheses Daily planning & program.

REMOTE SCIENCE INTERFACE DURING THE LIFE IN THE ATACAMA 2003 EXPEDITION Peter Coppin Remote Experience and Learning Lab STUDIO for Creative Inquiry Carnegie.

Autonomy: Executive and Instruments Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nicola Muscettola NASA Ames Reid Simmons Carnegie Mellon.

Autonomous Rover Spectroscopy with Dozens of Targets / iSAIRAS 2008 / Caldeón, Thompson, Wettergreen 1 Autonomous Rover Reflectance Spectroscopy with Dozens.

Crystal Reinhart, PhD & Beth Welbes, MSPH Center for Prevention Research and Development, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Social Norms Theory.

上海天文台 Shanghai Astronomical Observatory CVN in Chang’e-3 lunar exploration mission ZHENG Weimin Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese.

Scarab Autonomous Traverse Carnegie Mellon December 2007 David Wettergreen.

Spectral Observations and Ground-truthing at Site C Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Jeff Moersch U. Tennessee.

FASTER SPACE EU CONFERENCE February /06/2016 In FASTER, a European consortium of six partners from five member states develops and demonstrates.

Life in the Atacama, Design Review, December 19, 2003 Carnegie Mellon Life in the Atacama Field Experiments 2004 David Wettergreen The Robotics Institute.

Mission Planning Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Paul Tompkins Carnegie Mellon.

Fluorescence Imaging Site B Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Shmuel Weinstein Kim Warren-Rhodes Greg Fisher.

Lunar and Planetary Sciences Conference, March Autonomous Rover Detection and Response Applied to the Search for Life Via Chlorophyll Fluorescence.

1 Predictive Exploration for Autonomous Science David R. Thompson AAAI Doctoral Consortium 2007 Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon University.

How to Write a Scientific Paper

Trey Smith, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University

1st Year Field Campaign:

The Extended Project The extended project is an opportunity for you to pursue an academic area of study of your choosing on your own terms.

Project and Workshop Objectives

National Robotics Initiative

Navigation Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Dominic Jonak Carnegie Mellon.

Swarm Robotics in Space Exploration

EPQ Learner Outcomes identify, design, plan and complete an individual project, applying a range of organisational skills and strategies to meet.

IEEE ICRA 2005 Planetary Rover Workshop April 22, 2005

PDS4 Geometry Model Project

Presentation transcript:

Science Objectives & Investigation Methodology Life in the Atacama 2005 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Nathalie A. Cabrol NASA Ames

Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop 1NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon Introduction Topic: Science Objectives & Methods Outline: 2004 The plan and what was accomplished Pre-mission exploration strategies and post- field test adjustment for Issues Difference between targeted sampling and regional mapping? Ground-Truthing and Sampling Info archival

Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop 2NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon Summary of Mission Goal: The Plan

Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop 3NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon Summary of Achievements (1) 41 locales listed; 24 unique locales investigated Total science traverses: Site B: ~ 6 km -- to be confirmed by E.T (all manual) Site C: ~ 23.5 km -- to be confirmed by E.T (13.9/12.5) Outstanding and first time demos for future missions (e.g., MSL and Sample Return): During the same sol (014): Successful return to a locale (040) of high-science value; Return ~150 m to LS after one week of investigation. The original plan was to allow 2 sols to get back accurately to a site.

Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop 4NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon Summary of Achievements (2) ~ Longest science traverse during ops: ~1.2 km; 3.3 km autonomous traverse (post-science ops); 0% autonomy at Site B; 83% autonomy at Site C after the camera were working; Mean autonomy at Site C: 59% Overall autonomy (Site B + Site C): 47%

Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop 5NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon Summary of Achievements (3)

Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop 6NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon Summary of Achievements (4-1)

Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop 7NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon Summary of Achievements (4-2)

Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop 8NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon Summary of Achievements (4-3)

Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop 9NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon Summary of Achievements (5)

Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop 10NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon Searching for Life: Where do we Stand? Uncertain diagnosis Increased confidence in diagnosis Increased level of confidence of RSTs

Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop 11NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon Pre-Mission Exploration Strategy Regional Mapping: Along a traverse from A to B, rover stops every determined n-meters, deploys a set number of instruments and always acquire same type of data Targeted Sampling: Thorough investigation of science targets of interest identified in the scene.

Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop 12NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon Post-Mission Exploration Strategy Adjustments (1) The demonstration of the ability to go back accurately to a distant site of science interest with the rover is opening new possibilities in terms of robotic astrobiology investigation strategy. For the 05’ campaign, we suggest a new strategy that will provide the best of the two “worlds” of the current targeted sampling and regional mapping: Tentative definitions: Regional Mapping Reconnaissance Survey Targeted Sampling Focused Investigation

Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop 13NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon Post-Mission Exploration Strategy Adjustments (2) AB RM A TS RS AB

Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop 14NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon Pros of the Reconnaissance Strategy: Maximize the use of rover mobility to cover long- range fast; Grasp quickly the main characteristics of an area; Allow time for the S.T to “digest” the information, thus; Decrease the chances of missing sites of high- science payoff; Still allows to perform regional mapping; Improve quality of samples and increase our ability to make educated conclusions Post-Mission Exploration Strategy Adjustments (3) -- ADDED VALUE Nathalie Cabrol:

Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop 15NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon Requirement: Robust demonstration of ability to go back to a specific site: Using way points, ground and satellite imagery; (this year demo) Develop technology that would allow the rover to follow its tracks back; Other methods? Post-Mission Exploration Strategy Adjustments (4)

Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop 16NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon Issues to be discussed Difference between targeted sampling and regional mapping? Ground-Truthing and Sampling Info archival Other?

Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop 17NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon Post-Mission RST Duties and Timeline

Life in the Atacama 2005 Science/Technology Workshop 18NASA Ames Research Center / Carnegie Mellon 04’ RFE LITA Science Publications 5 LPSC Abstracts (to be submitted 01/13) 11 projects of JGR papers about the 04’ Campaign + 2 papers from Mckay’s group (deadline for 1st drafts : 04/01/05) 1 Science report (in progress) Already accepted: Wettergreen et al., ICRA First experiments in the robotic investigation of life in the Atacama desert of Chile. Other?