March 15, 2005 1 Meeting the Future Together The Garfield County Cumulative Impacts Study Introduction & Overview Energy Advisory Board March 15, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
Advertisements

Back to the Drawing Board Summary of the work of the Human Services Redesign Committee from May 2012 forward.
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
OIL AND GAS AND GARFIELD COUNTY Presented To – CLUB 20 Spring Meeting March 20, 2004 Presented By - Doug Dennison, Oil & Gas Auditor.
American Solar Transformation Initiative Program Overview Tyler Espinoza, Senior Project Manager, Optony Inc. Ben Foster, Senior.
A Brief Overview of Emergency Management Office of Emergency Management April 2006 Prepared By: The Spartanburg County Office of Emergency Management.
EISWG The Environmental Information Services Working Group of the NOAA Science Advisory Board Raymond J. Ban April 22, 2009.
Non-Tariff Barriers in the Trade of Transport Services – Final Report TPT 02/2002T Steering Committee on More Competitive Transportation (including infrastructure)
Mattoon Community Unit School District #2 MCUSD# Tax Levy Presentation Presented: Tuesday, October 9, 2007 Board Action: Tuesday, November 13, 2007.
LOCAL REGULATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE QUICK TELECONFERENCE American Bar Association Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Climate Change, Sustainable.
‘A Regional Approach to Crunch Time’ Contextual Setting Demand for skilled workers Ageing population Migration Pressure from other sectors (eg Mining)
Ontario Petroleum Institute Ontario Petroleum Institute Brief 2015 Ontario Pre-Budget Consultation January 28, 2015.
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
Boston’s Payment in Lieu of Tax Program: A Review of the Program’s Development, Implementation and Results Ronald W. Rakow, Commissioner City of Boston.
Proposal to Town Board March 2,  Background  Concept  Financing  Economic Benefits  Marketing Plan  Fundraising and Sponsorship  Clarence.
EMerger Collaborative Merger Integration & Management Solution April 2001 v1.0.
Alachua County Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan Alachua County Board of County Commissioners Meeting April 27, 2010.
BBC Research & Consulting 3773 Cherry Creek North Drive, # 850 Denver, Colorado January 5, 2006 EAB Progress Briefing.
1 Chapter Officer Roles & Responsibilities. 2 Chapter Officers/Leadership Team Serving on the Chapter Leadership Team is a privilege as well as a responsibility.
CHAPTER SIX TRADE UNIONISM. Objectives of this chapter Explore the definition and purpose of trade unions Explore why people choose to join/not join trade.
Bringing Global Thinking to Local Sustainability Efforts: A Collaborative Project for the Boston Metropolitan Region James Goldstein and Chella Rajan Tellus.
Planning for a Vibrant Community. Introduction Planning is a process that involves: –Assessing current conditions; envisioning a desired future; charting.
Overview of the IT 3 Initiative CONFIDENTIAL Discussion Document September 2008.
COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY DEVELOPING A STRATEGY FOR REGION 6 Region 6 Planning Commission 903 East Main Street Marshalltown, IA
Bamyan Draft Tourism Development Policy The Fifth Expert Working Group for the Preservation of the Bamyan Site (Aachen, Germany, December 2006 Dr.
2013 Annual Strategic Action Plan Evaluation. Overview Background Role of SAP Implementation Evaluation process Council feedback Enhancement of SAP.
Beech Grove, Indiana TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Heather R. James, Ice Miller LLP April 18, 2013.
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
National Policy and Strategy for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 15 March, 2004.
Roles and Responsibilities in Municipal Land Use.
Documenting the Participation of Fishing Vessel Crew Members in Alaska’s Commercial Fisheries Documenting the Participation of Fishing Vessel Crew Members.
July 2012 The Economic Impact of Tourism in Clark County, Ohio.
Clean, Green, and on the Same Team! How Economic and Workforce Development are Partnering to Serve an Emerging Regional Industry.
Sunshine Coast Regional District Development Cost Charges July 3, 2014 Infrastructure Services Committee Bob Twerdoff.
Armenia 2010 National Energy Balance and Proposed Energy Balance System USAID EC-LEDS Program Dr. Robert BAUMGARTNER Dr. Besim ISLAMI Tetra Tech Yerevan,
Aboriginal Entrepreneurs Conference & Tradeshow The National Aboriginal Economic Development Board Monday October 24, 2011.
MUSEUM SELECT COMMITTEE REPORT Presented by Bill Profili on behalf of the Committee: Bill Profili Vince Profili Dave Butler Council Representative: Mayor.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
Region 1 Training Workshop Crowne Plaza Albany – 1-2 August 2008 Session 1A Strategic Planning Arthur W. Winston Chair, R1 Strategic Planning Committee.
Presentation to the NWT Chamber of Commerce AGM April 3, 2012 Norman Wells Chamber Report.
Skagit Regional TDR Project AN INTRODUCTION TO TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS.
Action Plan For the formulation or review of a National Policy on ICT and Education JANUARY 2007 Belize.
Report to the Legislature Required by Senate Bill 2202 (due January 1, 2002) Board Briefing June 13, 2001 Agenda Item 5 Attachment 1.
13 th – 15 March, 2006 New Perspectives in Real Estate Development In Port of Spain Welcome.
MUNICIPAL SERVICE REVIEWS. Spheres of Influence and Municipal Service Reviews Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg.
Parramatta Economic Development Board Meeting of 9 June, 2004.
Subgroup Recommendations on Draft Economic Development Goals & Objectives November 17, 2004.
Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015 Freight Master Plan.
The Greening of Oregon’s Workforce. 18 Months of Green Jobs Research Oregon Workforce Investment Board March 11, 2011.
Sectoral Operational Programme “INCREASE OF ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS” October 2005 MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND TRADE.
2060 Florida Transportation Plan Florida Model Task Force Meeting November 10, 2009.
Planes, Trains & Automobiles Oil & Gas Conference Fort Nelson, BC 2011.
1 Meeting the Future Together Update on The Garfield County “Socio-Economic” Impacts Study Energy Advisory Board April 7, 2005.
NAMA potential of Vietnam Vuong Xuan Hoa Institute of Meteorology, Hydrology and Environment Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Climate Change.
Neighborhood Planning Process Lacoochee/Trilby Neighborhoods.
CLEER works to accelerate the transition to a clean energy economy, increase energy independence and reduce the impacts of climate change. (from 2008.
PERU: STATE OF THE HOUSING INDUSTRY IHA Secretariat.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP – APRIL 12, Strategic Action Plan Evaluation Results.
TOGETHER, WE WILL MAKE A CHANGE 1. Pillars of Action ▶ Lead by example. ▶ Measure and analyze. ▶ Market development. ▶ Increase access and participation.
Community Choice Aggregation Demonstration Project Marin County Base Case Feasibility Analyses Overview April 5, 2005.
The Crash Course for Municipal Planning Commission Members in Cumberland County 1.
EMPOWERMENT THROUGH EDUCATION Business Retention and Expansion Task Force Workshop Joe Lucente Assistant Professor and Extension Educator OSU Extension.
2015 CLARENDON TOWN PLAN Barbara Noyes Pulling Rutland Regional Planning Commission.
Understanding the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP 2010 Rev 2)
ADDRESSING A EMERGING PROBLEM … ADDRESSING A EMERGING PROBLEM … MARICOPA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS Meeting on October 18, 2004 REGIONAL WORKFORCE HOUSING.
12.2 Conduct Procurements The process of obtaining seller responses, selecting a seller and awarding the contract The team applies selection criteria.
Impact Fee Advisory Committee November 10, 2016
Tripartite SADC-EAC-COMESA Initiative and Free Trade Area Negotiations
Stronger Economies Together (SET)
Stronger Economies Together (SET)
Presentation transcript:

March 15, Meeting the Future Together The Garfield County Cumulative Impacts Study Introduction & Overview Energy Advisory Board March 15, 2005

March 15, What is the GARCO CIS and why are we doing it? It’s a two-year study effort to identify and quantify all the factors that will drive Garfield County’s growth over the next years. We’re conducting the CIS because: –Garfield County is one of the fastest growing counties in Colorado and has been called the US natural gas equivalent of the Persian Gulf –Just like any private company, the County and our municipalities need accurate data in order to continue to provide a solid level of services efficiently to our residents and industries alike –The results will be valuable to us as we do our jobs but also valuable to each of you and to all the businesses in the County as they plan for the future

March 15, What information will the CIS provide? A detailed description of the current economy of Garfield County and what drives it Current population and demographic analyses for Garfield County Projections of economic activity and growth in Garfield County over the next years Projections of job levels in Garfield County over the next years Projections of population growth in Garfield County over the next years An inventory and description of current local government services levels (for the County and cities) Projections of what will be required to maintain Garfield County’s currently positive levels of services to its taxpayers and citizens An analysis of the impacts of growth on county and municipal finances Development of a tool kit that provides a view of the influences on local land values and the tools that help land owners

March 15, How much will the CIS cost; who will pay for it; who will do the research? The CIS will cost in total about $500,000, with roughly $150,000 being spent this year and the rest in 2006 Costs will be paid through the increased tax base generated in part by energy and other development. The study will be conducted by 1-2 teams of economic, modeling and infrastructure research and analysis consultants The research team will be chosen using Garfield County’s normal procurement process, with the EAB serving an advisory role

March 15, Will the CIS focus on the energy industry? No. The CIS will focus on the three primary economic drivers of Garfield County’s economy: –General growth such as primary and second home development (resulting from a range of economic stimuli) –Growth related to energy development –Growth related to non-energy industrial and commercial growth

March 15, How and when will the CIS be conducted? The CIS will be conducted over the next 20 months in 3 parts: –Phase One (April to October 2005): The land values enhancement study This study will examine how local industries affect the values of various types of land and will develop a tool kit to help minimize negative impacts –Phase Two (April to December 2005): Choosing and calibrating an economic/employment/ population model During the remainder of 2005, the CIS will identify a preferred projection model (e.g., employment based, economic based) and will calibrate it to the economy of Garfield County and the region. The model also will produce a set of multipliers that will help Garfield County understand how different economic sectors relate to each other

March 15, Phase Three Phase Three (October 2005 – December 2006): Running the model and completing the facilities and services impact analysis –Phase Three will be composed of two separate activities. The first will be running the Garfield County model and producing a set of employment and population projections. That will occur in –The second activity will be the conduct of a services and infrastructure analysis that will apply the employment and population projections to local county and city service levels to create estimates of service and infrastructure demands on local government. This effort will begin in late 2005 with a survey of service levels. The primary analysis work, however, will be conducted in –Garfield County will require consultants to prepare an Excel spreadsheet form of the model to allow the county to sensitivities without additional consultant expense.

March 15, What will be the role of the EAB? The Garfield County Energy Advisory Board will play a significant role by: –Reviewing the overall design of and plan for the CIS –Reviewing the Scope of Work for each CIS study –Reviewing the list of consultants to whom the RFPs will be sent –Reviewing the proposals that come back from the bidders –Reviewing model outputs –Receiving regular updates and tracking progress –Reviewing the final products of the CIS –Acting as a liaison with the communities represented –Communicating CIS progress to the Garfield County Board of County Commissioners

March 15, How will the EAB fulfill its role? Through 4 volunteer committees First meetings over the next days Committees may include non-EAB members to ensure the broadest possible input from Garfield County residents The committees are: –Land Committee (multi-stakeholder membership) – Functions: Advise on the land values enhancement study Assist in creating a tool box to remove institutional barriers (e.g., problems with mortgage financing) and provide valuable planning information to minimize impacts from any land use that might temporarily reduce property values Review study design and outputs

March 15, Second & Third Committees CIS Technical Committee (multi-stakeholder membership) – Functions (relative to the economic/employment/population model): –Review and input into all CIS design issues prior to presentation to the full EAB –Review all outputs and progress reports prior to presentation to the full EAB –Assist in the preparation of presentations to the EAB and lead all discussions Services and Infrastructure Committee (multi-stakeholder membership)– Functions (relative to the services and infrastructure study): –Review the services and entities to be surveyed –Review the final survey of service/infrastructure levels –Review model outputs –Lead discussions/presentations at the EAB and with local governments and NGOs about service needs

March 15, Industry Committee Industry Data Committee (membership limited to industry representatives) Functions: –Develop procedures (including methods for handling CBI) for securing the industry input (from each industry sector) required to provide the modelers good projection data –Hire an independent technical consultant to gather the data, make it consistent, aggregate it and feed it back in a usable form to the modeling consultants –Work with all companies to ensure at least 80% participation in data provision