Coupling Heterogeneous Models with Non-matching Meshes by Localized Lagrange Multipliers Modeling for Matching Meshes with Existing Staggered Methods and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD
Advertisements

Radially Polarized Spherical Piezoelectric Acoustic Transducer.
Coupling Heterogeneous Models with Non-matching Meshes
Finite element method Among the up-to-date methods of stress state analysis, the finite element method (abbreviated as FEM below, or often as FEA for analyses.
Mechanics of Machines Dr. Mohammad Kilani
AERSP 301 Finite Element Method
The Asymptotic Ray Theory
Earthquake Seismology: The stress tensor Equation of motion
Parameterizing a Geometry using the COMSOL Moving Mesh Feature
Cht. IV The Equation of Motion Prof. Alison Bridger 10/2011.
Some Ideas Behind Finite Element Analysis
Chapter 17 Design Analysis using Inventor Stress Analysis Module
Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering
Iterative Solvers for Coupled Fluid-Solid Scattering Jan Mandel Work presentation Center for Aerospace Structures University of Colorado at Boulder October.
MCE 561 Computational Methods in Solid Mechanics
III Solution of pde’s using variational principles
MANE 4240 & CIVL 4240 Introduction to Finite Elements
Velocities and Static Force
Finite Element: Theory, Applications & Implementation Presented By: Arthur Anconetani Barbara Gault Ryan Whitney.
Spring Topic Outline for Physics 1 Spring 2011.
Implementation of 2D FDTD
STATIC EQUILIBRIUM [4] Calkin, M. G. “Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics”, World Scientific, Singapore, 1996, ISBN Consider an object having.
Dr. Wang Xingbo Fall , 2005 Mathematical & Mechanical Method in Mechanical Engineering.
University of Colorado - Dept of Aerospace Engineering Sci.ences & Center for Aerospace Structures CISM Lectures on Computational Aspects of Structural.
Force Analysis of Machinery
School of Civil EngineeringSpring 2007 CE 595: Finite Elements in Elasticity Instructors: Amit Varma, Ph.D. Timothy M. Whalen, Ph.D.
A PPLIED M ECHANICS Lecture 02 Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
Finite Element Method.
A PPLIED M ECHANICS Lecture 01 Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
1 My Summer Vacation Integral Equations and Method of Moment Solutions to Waveguide Aperture Problems Praveen A. Bommannavar Advisor: Dr. Chalmers M. Butler.
1 20-Oct-15 Last course Lecture plan and policies What is FEM? Brief history of the FEM Example of applications Discretization Example of FEM softwares.
The Finite Element Method A Practical Course
Point Source in 2D Jet: Radiation and refraction of sound waves through a 2D shear layer Model Gallery #16685 © 2014 COMSOL. All rights reserved.
University of Colorado - Dept of Aerospace Engineering Sci.ences & Center for Aerospace Structures CISM Lectures on Computational Aspects of Structural.
11.3 Principle of Virtual Work for a System of Connected Rigid Bodies Method of virtual work most suited for solving equilibrium problems involving a system.
11/11/20151 Trusses. 11/11/20152 Element Formulation by Virtual Work u Use virtual work to derive element stiffness matrix based on assumed displacements.
A STUDY OF THE DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF A FRACTURED TUNNEL TO PLANE WAVES Pei-cheng Xu SwRI, SanAntonio,Texas Sept. 7, 2000.
Illustration of FE algorithm on the example of 1D problem Problem: Stress and displacement analysis of a one-dimensional bar, loaded only by its own weight,
The elastic wave equationSeismology and the Earth’s Deep Interior The Elastic Wave Equation  Elastic waves in infinite homogeneous isotropic media 
HEAT TRANSFER FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION
Chapter 11 Angular Momentum. Angular momentum plays a key role in rotational dynamics. There is a principle of conservation of angular momentum.  In.
Quantum Mechanical Cross Sections In a practical scattering experiment the observables we have on hand are momenta, spins, masses, etc.. We do not directly.
EMLAB 1 3D Update Equations with Perfectly Matched Layers.
CHAP 3 WEIGHTED RESIDUAL AND ENERGY METHOD FOR 1D PROBLEMS
Discretization Methods Chapter 2. Training Manual May 15, 2001 Inventory # Discretization Methods Topics Equations and The Goal Brief overview.
A Non-iterative Hyperbolic, First-order Conservation Law Approach to Divergence-free Solutions to Maxwell’s Equations Richard J. Thompson 1 and Trevor.
Finite Element Solution of Fluid- Structure Interaction Problems Gordon C. Everstine Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Div. Bethesda, Maryland
Seismology Part V: Surface Waves: Rayleigh John William Strutt (Lord Rayleigh)
Chapter 14 Systems of Particles.
Rigid Body Dynamics CSE169: Computer Animation
Partial Derivatives Example: Find If solution: Partial Derivatives Example: Find If solution: gradient grad(u) = gradient.
Work and Energy January 30, 2009 Michael F. McGraw, Ph.D.
Finite Element: Theory, Applications & Implementation Presented By: Arthur Anconetani Barbara Gault Ryan Whitney.
M. Khalili1, M. Larsson2, B. Müller1
Geology 5640/6640 Introduction to Seismology 30 Jan 2015 © A.R. Lowry 2015 Read for Mon 2 Feb: S&W (§2.4); Last time: The Equations of Motion.
1 Variational and Weighted Residual Methods. 2 Introduction The Finite Element method can be used to solve various problems, including: Steady-state field.
ME451 Kinematics and Dynamics of Machine Systems Dynamics of Planar Systems November 4, 2010 Chapter 6 © Dan Negrut, 2010 ME451, UW-Madison TexPoint fonts.
1 CHAP 3 WEIGHTED RESIDUAL AND ENERGY METHOD FOR 1D PROBLEMS FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS AND DESIGN Nam-Ho Kim.
MESB 374 System Modeling and Analysis Translational Mechanical System
Finite Element Method in Geotechnical Engineering
Mathematical & Mechanical Method in Mechanical Engineering
Figure 1. Spring characteristics
Manipulator Dynamics 1 Instructor: Jacob Rosen
Figure 1. Spring characteristics
Introduction to Seismology
Materials Science & Engineering University of Michigan
GENERAL VIEW OF KRATOS MULTIPHYSICS
Continuous Systems and Fields
Figure 1. Spring characteristics
Atilla Ozgur Cakmak, PhD
Presentation transcript:

Coupling Heterogeneous Models with Non-matching Meshes by Localized Lagrange Multipliers Modeling for Matching Meshes with Existing Staggered Methods and Silent Boundaries Holly Lewis & Mike Ross Center for Aerospace Structures University of Colorado, Boulder 20 April 2004

Topics of Discussion n Refresh Memory n PML n Lagrange Multipliers for Dam- Sandstone Interface n Future Work n Lagrange Multipliers for Fluid- Structure Interface and associate issues

A Picture is Worth 1,000 Words Multi-physic system Modular Systems Connected by Localized Interaction Technique (Black Lines)

Plan of Attack n Generate a benchmark model u Use current available methods u Matching meshes n Generate a model with localized frames u Maintain matching meshes n Generate a model with localized frames u With nonmatching meshes

Benchmark Model Refresher Fluid (Spectral Elements) Soil (Brick Elements) Output: Displacements of Dam & Cavitation Region Assume: Plane Strain (constraints reduce DOF) Only looking at seismic excitation in the x-direction Linear elastic brick elements Dam (Brick Elements) Silent Boundary

A Quick Note on Perfectly Matched Layers n The main concept is to surround the computational domain at the infinite media boundary with a highly absorbing boundary layer. u Outgoing waves are attenuated. Wave amplitude n This boundary layer can be made of the same finite elements. n Formulation of the matrices are the same method for both computational domain and the boundary layer u There are just different properties

A Quick Note on Perfectly Matched Layers (PML) n Going from the frequency domain to the time domain is a real pain!!! n Can be done see “Perfectly Matched Layers for Transient Elastodynamics of Unbounded Domains.” U. Basu and A. Chopra

Localized Frame Concept n Frames are connected to adjacent partitions by force/flux fields u Mathematically: Lagrange multipliers “gluing” the state variables of the partition models to that of the frame. u Lagrange multipliers at the frame are related by interface constraints and obey Newton’s Third Law.

Localized Lagrange Multipliers n Analysis by three modules n Sequance: u Earthquake hits -> structural displacements u Interface Solver u Fluid & Structural Solver in Parallel

Localized Lagrange Multipliers Applied to Dam and Sandstone Interface uBuB uDuD uSuS D s Dam Sandstone

Variational Principles and Lagrange Multipliers n Lagrange Method to derive the equilibrium equations of a system of constrained rigid bodies in Newtonian Mechanics Formulation. 1- Treat the problem as if all bodies are entirely free and formulate the virtual work by summing up the contributions of each free body. 2- Identify constraint equations and multiply each by an indeterminate coefficient. Then take the variation and add to the virtual work of the free bodies to yield the total virtual work of the system. 3- The sum of all terms which are multiplied by the same variation are equated to zero. These equations will provide all the conditions necessary for equilibrium.

Localized Lagrange Multipliers Applied to Dam and Sandstone Interface 1- Subsystem Energy Expressions (Variational Formulation) 2- Identify Interface Constraints 3- Total Virtual Work = 0 (  Stationary)

Localized Lagrange Multipliers Applied to Dam and Sandstone Interface

Midpoint Integration Rule: Rearrange in terms of velocity and acceleration at half time step

Localized Lagrange Multipliers Applied to Dam and Sandstone Interface Examine Eqn (21) with midpoint rule: Apply Same Concept to Eqn (22) to get a displacement of the sandstone at the half time step

Localized Lagrange Multipliers Applied to Dam and Sandstone Interface Look at Eqn (23) with the above eqns for the displacements: Apply the same concept to Eqn (24). Then use Eqn (25) and the two above equations to input into Matrix form

Localized Lagrange Multipliers Applied to Dam and Sandstone Interface

Basic Concept: Step 1: Solve for ’s using previous three equations. Step 2: In parallel solve for the displacements at the next time step using: Step 3: Update the variables and generate the necessary time step-dependent vectors.

Localized Lagrange Multipliers Applied to Dam and Sandstone Interface Dam Crest Displacement with Lagrange Multipliers Dam Crest Displacement with Monolithic Model

Set Sail for the Future n Find bug in the Dam-Sandstone Interface n Develop structure-fluid interaction via localized interfaces with nonmatching meshes. n Develop structure-soil interaction via localized interfaces spanning a range of soil media. n Develop a localized interface for cavitating fluid and linear fluid. n Develop rules for multiplier and connector frame discretization. n Implement and assess the effect of dynamic model reduction techniques.

Fluid Structure Interaction with Lagrange Multipliers n Same Concept as with Dam- Sandstone Interface n Separate the two systems n Apply interface Constraint n However, remember the displacement of the fluid is expressed in terms of the gradient of a scalar function

Fluid Structure Interaction with Lagrange Multipliers n Can the interface constraint be written? n What happens with the gradient?

Fluid Structure Interaction with Lagrange Multipliers n Another concern is the variational formulation of the fluid system. u If you remember we ended up with fluid equations of the form: n Can the variation of the fluid be written?

Fluid Structure Interaction with Lagrange Multipliers ????????????????

Acknowledgments n NSF Grant CMS n Professor Felippa & Professor Park n Mike Sprague (Professor Geer’s Ph.D student, now a post-doc in APPM) n CAS (Center for Aerospace Structures) CU