GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 STATUS OF EXPLORER AND NAUTILUS INFN – LN Frascati, LN Gran Sasso, Sez. Roma 1, Roma 2 and Genova Universities “La Sapienza”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIGRA6 - Villa Mondragone 11 Sept.2002 BREAKING THE BANDWIDTH BARRIER IN RESONANT G.W. DETECTORS IN RESONANT G.W. DETECTORS MASSIMO BASSAN Università.
Advertisements

LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration GWDAW December 16, 2005 All-Sky Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO S4.
September 21, 2005Virgo Status – ESF Workshop1 Status of Virgo B. Mours.
GWDAW 11 - Potsdam, 19/12/ Coincidence analysis between periodic source candidates in C6 and C7 Virgo data C.Palomba (INFN Roma) for the Virgo Collaboration.
Participants: C-1:Cryogenic last-stage suspensions (interferometers) (F.Ricci-G.Frossati) Objectives: -Design new suspension elements for the last stage.
GWDAW9 – Annecy December 15-18, 2004 A. Di Credico Syracuse University LIGO-G Z 1 Gravitational wave burst vetoes in the LIGO S2 and S3 data analyses.
Bounding the strength of gravitational radiation from Sco-X1 C Messenger on behalf of the LSC pulsar group GWDAW 2004 Annecy, 15 th – 18 th December 2004.
WP-M3 Superconducting Materials PArametric COnverter Detector INFN_Genoa Renzo Parodi.
Design and performance of the Dual detector with large area capacitive readout 4 rd ILIAS-GW Meeting, October 8 th – 9 th 2007, Tuebingen Paolo Falferi.
GWDAW-8 (December 17-20, 2003, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) Search for burst gravitational waves with TAMA data Masaki Ando Department of Physics, University.
Final Thoughts and Highlights Barry C. Barish Caltech Amaldi-6 Okinawa 24-June -05 LISA.
G.A.Prodi - INFN and Università di Trento, Italy International Gravitational Event Collaboration igec.lnl.infn.it ALLEGRO group:ALLEGRO (LSU)
Mechanical amplifiers for the DUAL detector: lumped and distributed element design 3 rd ILIAS-GW Meeting, October 26 th – 27 th 2006, London Paolo Falferi.
ILIAS meeting Mallorca 2005 V. Fafone Viviana Fafone INFN - LNF Future plans for resonant detectors
Oct 2006 g.modestino1 Experimental results correlating GW detector data and Gamma Ray Bursts Giuseppina Modestino LNF ROG Collaboration INFN – LN Frascati,
Auriga, Explorer and Nautilus Eugenio Coccia INFN Gran Sasso and U. of Rome “Tor Vergata” GWADW Elba 2006.
Status of Virgo Gabriele Vajente INFN Pisa and Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa On behalf of the Virgo Collaboration 11 th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis.
ILIAS GW Meeting Mallorca - October 23-24, 2005Luca Taffarello Status of the commissioning of the AURIGA detector Luca Taffarello (INFN Sezione di Padova)
Paik-1 Search for Gravitational Waves Ho Jung Paik University of Maryland and Seoul National University January 12, 2006 Seoul, Korea KIAS-SNU Physics.
Annecy/Dec'04 1 ALLEGRO:status Dec 2004 Warren Johnson, Bill Hamilton, Peter Zhang, Andrew Weber, Damon Nettles, Jon Hanson, Mark Burgamy, Jordan Weaver.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
STATUS of BAR DETECTORS G.A.Prodi - INFN and University of Trento International Gravitational Event Collaboration - 2 ALLEGRO– AURIGA – ROG (EXPLORER-NAUTILUS)
Paris, July 17, 2009 RECENT RESULTS OF THE IGEC2 COLLABORATION SEARCH FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVE BURST Massimo Visco on behalf of the IGEC2 Collaboration.
Resonant mass detectors Pia Astone 4 th Amaldi conference Perth July 8-13, 2001.
Status of LIGO Data Analysis Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Dec.
LIGO-G Z LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 Upper Limits on the Rate of Gravitational Wave Bursts from the First LIGO Science Run Edward Daw Louisiana.
Analysis techniques for data from resonant-mass detectors Pia Astone SPIE conference, Waikoloa, Hawaii,
Searching for gravitational radiation from Scorpius X-1: Limits from the second LIGO science run Alberto Vecchio on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
Silvia Poggi - GW burst detection strategy in non-homogeneus networks Detection strategies for bursts in networks of non-homogeneus gravitational waves.
Coincidences in gravitational wave experiments Pia Astone 4 th Amaldi conference Perth July 8-13, 2001.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
Ultra-cryogenics for advanced resonant detectors (C2) G.Frossati Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory Leiden, The Netherlands Second ILIAS-GW Meeting.
INTERPRETATION of IGEC RESULTS Lucio Baggio, Giovanni Andrea Prodi University of Trento and INFN Italy or unfolding gw source parameters starting point:
First results by IGEC2 6 month of data of AURIGA-EXPLORER-NAUTILUS May 20 - Nov 15, 2005 IGEC2 was the only gw observatory in operation search for transient.
LIGO-G M GWDAW, December LIGO Burst Search Analysis Laura Cadonati, Erik Katsavounidis LIGO-MIT.
The AURIGA experiment: updates and prospects BAGGIO Lucio ICRR on behalf of AURIGA collaboration The AURIGA detector re-started data taking in Dec 2003,
Toward a 3rd generation European Gravitational Wave Observatory Dual R&D: presented by Massimo Cerdonio INFN Section and Department of Physics Padova how.
Solution of the Inverse Problem for Gravitational Wave Bursts Massimo Tinto JPL/CIT LIGO Seminar, October 12, 2004 Y. Gursel & M. Tinto, Phys. Rev. D,
ILIAS WP1 – Cascina IGEC – First experience using the data of 5 bar detectors: ALLEGRO, AURIGA, EXPLORER NAUTILUS and NIOBE. – 1460.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
Giovanni Andrea Prodi University of Trento and INFN Italy 2 nd GWPW, Penn State, Nov.6 th, 2003 IGEC observations in : exchanged data multiple.
LIGO-G D Status of Stochastic Search with LIGO Vuk Mandic on behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration Caltech GWDAW-10, 12/15/05.
LIGO-G Data Analysis Techniques for LIGO Laura Cadonati, M.I.T. Trento, March 1-2, 2007.
LIGO- G D Experimental Upper Limit from LIGO on the Gravitational Waves from GRB Stan Whitcomb For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Informal.
1 Laura Cadonati, MIT For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS meeting Tampa, FL April 16, 2005 LIGO Hanford ObservatoryLIGO Livingston Observatory New.
Gravitational wave astronomy: a facilities overview Barry C. Barish Caltech AAS San Diego 13-Jan-05 LISA.
Data analysis for impulsive sources with resonant g.w. detectors Pia Astone ROG collaboration Villa Mondragone International school of Gravitation and.
The 9th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis Workshop (December 15-18, 2004, Annecy, France) Results of the search for burst gravitational waves with the TAMA300.
S. Frasca INFN – Virgo and “La Sapienza” Rome University Baton Rouge, March 2007.
Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational.
ILIAS WG1 - April 7 th, 2005 G.W. ANTENNA NAUTILUS LNF - FRASCATI G.W. ANTENNA EXPLORER CERN - GENEVA Bar Al 5056 M = 2270 kg L = 2.97 m Ø = 0.6 m A =
TAUP 2007, Sendai, September 12, 2007 IGEC2 COLLABORATION: A NETWORK OF RESONANT BAR DETECTORS SEARCHING FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVES Massimo Visco on behalf.
GWDAW11 – Potsdam Results by the IGEC2 collaboration on 2005 data Gabriele Vedovato for the IGEC2 collaboration.
LIGO-G Z 23 October 2002LIGO Laboratory NSF Review1 Searching for Gravitational Wave Bursts: An Overview Sam Finn, Erik Katsavounidis and Peter.
ROG MAT Group: Bassan M., Minenkov Yu., Rocchi A., Simonetti R. – Roma2, INFN Fafone V., Quintieri L. – LNF ILIAS – GW Meeting report May 2004.
The first AURIGA-TAMA joint analysis proposal BAGGIO Lucio ICRR, University of Tokyo A Memorandum of Understanding between the AURIGA experiment and the.
Status of AURIGA AURIGA Sept 21 st 2005 Massimo Cerdonio INFN Section and Department of Physics University of Padova,
GW – the first GW detection ! Is it a start of GW astronomy ? If “yes” then which ? «Счастлив, кто посетил сей мир в его минуты роковые !...» Ф.Тютчев.
Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 IGEC 2 REPORT International Gravitational Events Collaboration ALLEGRO– AURIGA – ROG (EXPLORER-NAUTILUS)
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
Amplitude and time calibration of the gw detector AURIGA
1 Particle interaction with resonant detectors:
Bounding the strength of gravitational radiation from Sco-X1
Coherent wide parameter space searches for gravitational waves from neutron stars using LIGO S2 data Xavier Siemens, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
MiniGRAIL “Extreme Make-over” Giorgio Frossati
GW Data Analysis (from an experimentalist’s point of view)
Stochastic background search using LIGO Livingston and ALLEGRO
Renzo F. Parodi INFN-Genova
Stochastic gravitational wave and its spectral property
Presentation transcript:

GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 STATUS OF EXPLORER AND NAUTILUS INFN – LN Frascati, LN Gran Sasso, Sez. Roma 1, Roma 2 and Genova Universities “La Sapienza” and “Tor Vergata” Rome, L’Aquila, Geneve CNR – IFSI and IFN Roma CERN - Geneve Massimo Visco for ROG Collaboration

GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 G.W. ANTENNA NAUTILUS LNF - FRASCATI G.W. ANTENNA EXPLORER CERN - GENEVA Bar Al 5056 M = 2270 kg L = 2.97 m Ø = 0.6 m A = 915 T = 2.5 K Cosmic ray detector Bar Al 5056 M = 2270 kg L = 2.91 m Ø = 0.6 m A = 935 Hz T=130 mK - dilution refrigerator Cosmic ray detector

GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004

DATA TAKING DURING THE LAST 14 YEARS EXPLORER NAUTILUS h from to 4· h from to 3·

GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 EXPLORER was upgraded in After a tune-up period, it has been on the air since 2000 with a duty cycle close to 85%, excluding 6 months in 2002 and 3 months at the beginning of From March 2004 it has been working with an effective temperature around 4 mK corresponding to h = 5 · The sensitivity can be increased modifying the electrical field in the transducer. This year we will not to interrupt the data taking during the winter closure of the CERN. EXPLORER STATUS

GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 It has worked in the past run from 1999 to March The duty-cycle in 2001 was about 80% and the effective temperature smaller then 5 mK corresponding to h = 6 · After a hardware upgrade, NAUTILUS has resumed operations in March In this phase it is working at 3.5 K with a duty cycle larger then 85 %. The effective temperature is around 1 mK corresponding to h ~ 3 · Further improvement is possible changing the experimental parameters. NAUTILUS STATUS

GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 EXPERIMENTAL CONFIGURATION Small gap capacitive transducer Al 5056 m t = 0.75 kg t = 916 Hz C t = 11 nF E = 2.6 MV/m Superconducting matching transformer Lo=2.86 H Li=0.8  H K=0.8 High coupling dc-SQUID M s = 10 nH  n = 3 ·10 -6  o/  Hz L0L0 LiLi

GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 ROG GROUP TRANSDUCER Antenna Resonating disk Teflon insulators Pb washers Gap 10  m “ROSETTE” SHAPED 12 cm

GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 The transducer mounted on the antenna

GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 Old readout New readout WIDENING THE BAND Increasing the Bandwidth of Resonant Gravitational Antennas: The Case of Explorer PRL 91, 11 (2003)

GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 EXPLORER and NAUTILUS December 11th, 2004 (-1/2)

GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 DATA TAKING DURING 2004 EXPLORER NAUTILUS 5 · ·10 -19

GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 NAUTILUS OPERATIONS DURING October 2004 Liquid Helium Refillings Duty Cycle  85 %

GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 EXPLORER OPERATIONS DURING October 2004 Liquid Helium Refillings Duty Cycle  85 % Liquid Nitrogen Refilling

GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004GAUSSIANITY EXPLORER NAUTILUS 12 hours of data on Sept 4 th, 2004

GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 SEARCH FOR VARIOUS SOURCES CONTINUOUS: – From the GC, 95.7 days EXPLORER h c = 3 10 –24 - frequency interval  Hz (P.Astone et al. Phys. Rev. D 65, ,2002 ) –From all the Sky, 2 days EXPLORER h c = 2 10 –23 - frequency interval  Hz (P.Astone et al., proceedings GWDAW 2002 – ROG – A. Krolak and collab.) –New analysis in progress STOCHASTIC SOURCES: –Crosscorrelation of EXPLORER and NAUTILUS data over 10 hours in a band of 0.1Hz in  GW (920.2 Hz) < 60. (P.Astone, et al., Astron. and Astrophys, 351, , (1999).) –The common bandwidth now can reach 10 Hz: a new upper limit  1 is possible

GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 BURST SIGNALS: GW detectors Together with the other detectors of IGEC collaboration: no GW bursts above h  corresponding to 0.01M ⊙ in the GC (International Gravitationl Event Collaboration, Phys. Rev. D 68, (2003)). P.Astone et al.: “Study of coincidence between resonant gravitational wave detectors”, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 18, , (2001). P.Astone et al.: “Study of the coincidences between the gravitational wave detectors EXPLORER and NAUTILUS in 2001”, Classical and Quantum Gravity 19, (2002). The analysis of the data taken by the two experiments during 2003 and 2004 is in progress. The data are available for coincidence analysis with the other experiments. GW -  ray detectors Analysis over 47 GRB (BeppoSAX) (95% probability):no signals with h>6.5· for a time delay within  5 s, and with h>1.2· for a time delay within  400 s.(P. Astone et al, Physical Review D, 66, ). Analysis of 387 GRB (BeppoSAX and BATSE) upper bound of h=2.5· in a time window of 10s (astro-ph/ ) GW – cosmic ray detectors Search for small signals (P.Astone et al.,Physical Review Letter, 84, (2000)14-17) Detection of unexpected large signals (P.Astone et al, Phys. Letters B 499, Feb ) (P.Astone et al, Physics Letters B (2002)).

GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, Explorer 2003 Expected Explorer 2002 >600 P m 2 Nautilus 2003 Nautilus Nautilus 1998 Nautilus 2000 T<1 K Ev/day integral distribution Events amplitude - Sqrt(K) Correlation between cosmic rays and signals in the antennas

GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 TIME RESOLUTION AND EVENTS FROM COSMIC RAYS - EXPLORER 2003 Selection of small events 4 <SNR (amplitude) <6  =5.7 ms

GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 MINIGRAIL – NEW RUN November 2004 New cryogenic run with 3 capacitive transducers and SQUID read-out. Ø 68 cm ton 3kHz T=72mK

GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 MINIGRAIL Strain sensitivity (Hz) -1/2