A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fiscal Guidelines/ Budget and Program Revisions NC Committee on Dropout Prevention Procedures Manual 2010.
Advertisements

COOPERATIVE PARTNERSHIPS & RESOURCING OPTIONS Michigan Rehabilitation Services Michigan Association On Higher Education And Disability Cooperative Partnerships.
PLENARY SESSION Financial Management and Accountability Accountability and Grants Management: Connecting the Dots U.S. Department of Labor, ETA, Region.
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
Page 1 Discretionary Grant Administration. Page 2  Overview of ED financial policies  Managing budget  Avoiding audit problems  Identifying key resources.
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
INDIRECT COST BASICS Presented by Gene Fornecker, CPA DPI School Finance Auditor.
Grant Guidance Changes
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
Documenting Cash and In-Kind Match Project Director Training & Annual Meeting.
Match and Maintenance of Effort BE A FI$CAL $.T.A.R.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES. Presenters:  Madelyn Johnson, Auditor, U.S. Department of Education, OIG, Dallas Regional Office,
Overview of Statewide AT Program Fiscal and Contract Management.
BE A FI$CAL $.T.A.R. Allowable Costs. ESTABLISHMENT PROJECTS – CONSTRUCTION EXPENDITURES Presenters: Sandy DeRobertis, VR Program Specialist, SMPID VR.
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Prepare + Prevent + Respond + Recover + Mitigate What is the match? 1.
BE A FI$CAL $.T.A.R. Match and Maintenance of Effort.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
Bureau of Rehabilitation Services (BRS) Department of Rehabilitation Services (DORS) Understanding the State Plan for Vocational Rehabilitation and Supported.
1 COST SHARING CReATE ver. 04/13 © 2013 Florida State University. All rights reserved Objective: To understand the requirements related to cost sharing.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) edgar.html.
PROGRAM INCOME / IN-KIND ASSISTANCE / IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION
BRIEF LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF THE REHAB ACT Smith Fess Act – – Considered the beginning of the Public VR Program – Allocated monies for vocational.
Solving the Matching Dilemma Session 32 Tuesday, May 24, 2011 National Extension and Research Officers Administrative Conference Anchorage, Alaska.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
“Establishing Internal Financial Controls” Presented by: Fred Thomas, Bureau Chief of Administration.
CONTRACTS & GRANTS PROCESS AT A RESEARCH UNIVERSITY FSU ALUMNI CENTER MAY 7, 2015 Post Award Processes Angie Rowe Associate Director – Sponsored Research.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
Fishery Management Councils Executive Director Session Grants Rimas T. Liogys Director, Grants Management Division February 25, 2009.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
BTOP OVERSIGHT WASHINGTON D.C. MAY 2012 U.S. DOC Inspector General Recovery Act Oversight Task Force 1.
Grant Financial Management U.S. Department of Commerce Officer of the Inspector General 1.
Page 1 Discretionary Grants Administration David J. Downey Office of the Deputy Secretary Risk Management Service.
United States Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration N. Didra Nunn-Manpower Development Specialist.
BE A FI$CAL $.T.A.R. Match and Maintenance of Effort.
INTERREG IVA 2 Mers Seas Zeeën Crossborder Cooperation Programme Part-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Legal framework:
The University Corporation Cost Sharing Sponsored Programs The University Corporation Research, Investments and Commercial Services California State University,
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Cost Sharing James Trotter Quality Standards Manager Sponsored Projects Administration.
COST SHARE Neta Fernandez Director, Grants and Contracts.
Let’s Talk Cost Sharing Sherrelle Vaughn Sponsored Programs Accounting and Reporting July 17, 2012.
June 3, 2007NTIA PSIC Public Meeting1 How to Avoid Audit Problems: Matching Share and Cost Principles National Telecommunications and Information Administration.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Financial Management  Subgrantees shall use fiscal control and fund accounting procedures to insure proper distribution of and accounting for Federal.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
Health Resources and Services Administration HIV/AIDS Bureau Policy Clarification Notices 15-03: Clarification Regarding the RWHAP and Program Income and.
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services United States Department of Education Program Review and Best Practices: Who, What, When, Where,
OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Managing Your Grants 101 Terry Jackson – OSEP Shedeh Hajghassemali – OSEP July 22, 2008.
Indian Health Service Grants Management Grants 101- Fundamentals.
Match and Maintenance of Effort BE A FI$CAL $.T.A.R.
Maximizing Multiple Funding Sources Belinda Rinker, Senior Policy Analyst Office of Head Start Developing a recipe for high.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
Office Of Sponsored Programs Allowable Costs. What is 2 CFR Chapter 1 and 2 parts 200 Subpart E (OMB Uniform Guidance)? A document that contains Principles.
Division of Adult Education and Literacy U.S. Department of Education Washington, DC.
Community Development Block Grant Final Admin Rule & CDBG-R Closeouts September 18, 2012 Presenter: James Höemann.
The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) and the Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) Program WIOA Regional Forums October 2016.
Section 3 Overview, Section 3 Business Registry, and Reporting System
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
The Council Budget Understanding the Budget Process
Rehabilitation Services Administration
Supported Employment Part 2: Program and Policy
The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) and the Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) Program WIOA Regional Forums October 2016.
The University of Texas at Arlington
COS RESEARCH ADMINISTRATORS MEETING
Presentation transcript:

A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

SOURCES OF MATCH SOURCES OF MATCH Marc Protsman Chief Financial Officer Ohio Rehabilitation Services Administration (614) ? Adrienne Grierson Financial Management Specialist, U.S. Department of Education, Rehabilitation Services Administration, (202) Financial Resources Management

OVERVIEW General Requirements Allowable Sources Specific Match Requirements:  Third-Party Cooperative Arrangements with Other Public Agencies  Establishment, Development, or Improvement of a Public or Non-Profit CRP  Private Contributions Unallowable Sources Maximizing the Benefits/Avoiding the Risks

General Requirements State VR agencies must expend at least 21.3 % (or at least 50% for construction) of the total expenditures made under the VR State plan in order to meet the non-Federal share requirement of the VR program (34 CFR (a) and (b)). Expenditures must be for allowable VR program costs incurred by the VR grantee. This includes allowable costs borne by non-Federal grants or by cash donations from private third parties (34 CFR 80.24(a)(1)).

General Requirements (con’t) Allowable costs under the VR program are those expenditures incurred for the provision of VR services or for the administration of the VR program (34 CFR 361.3). The non-Federal expenditures used for match purposes must be for allowable VR program costs or obligations incurred by the end of fiscal year in which the grant was awarded.

Calculating Match… Federal VR allotment to the state = $10,000,000 $10,000,000 is equal to 78.7 percent of total VR expenditures of $12,706,480, which is the total amount available for the VR program in your State. State Match is 21.3 percent of $12,706,480 or $2,706,480 from all allowable sources. $2,706,480 equals the state’s share of program expenditures

Allowable Sources of Match The state VR agency may use allowable VR expenditures from a variety of non-Federal sources so long as certain requirements are satisfied. The primary source of non-Federal expenditures for the VR program are those incurred under the State plan with State and local funds appropriated by the State or local government for the VR program.

Sources of additional allowable VR expenditures: 1. Those allowable VR expenditures incurred by another State or local public agency pursuant to a third-party cooperative arrangement (34 CFR ); 2. Those allowable VR expenditures incurred with funds contributed by a private entity, deposited into the state VR agency’s account, and earmarked for meeting, in whole or in part, the agency’s non-Federal share of establishing or constructing a CRP (34 CFR (b)(3)(i)); Allowable Sources of Match (con’t)

3. Those allowable VR expenditures incurred with funds contributed by a private entity, deposited into the state VR agency’s VR account, and earmarked for meeting, in whole or in part, the agency’s non- Federal share for any purpose (except establishment of a CRP) under the State plan for a particular geographic area within the State (34 CFR (b)(3)(ii)); Allowable Sources of Match (con’t)

4. Allowable expenditures incurred with funds contributed by a private entity, deposited into the state VR agency’s VR account, and earmarked for meeting, in whole or in part, the agency’s non- Federal share for any other purpose under the State plan, so long as the donor, or any entity with whom it shares a financial interest, does not benefit from that contribution (34 CFR (b)(3)(iii)).

Allowable Sources of Match (con’t) Private Entity Contributions: A private entity contributing funds would not be considered as receiving a benefit from that contribution if the State VR agency awarded funds to that entity under the State’s regular competitive procedures (34 CFR (b)(3)(iii)).

Allowable Sources of Match (con’t) 5. Allowable VR expenditures borne by non-Federal grants (34 CFR 80.24(a)(1)); Example: The Marriott Corporation awards a grant to the VR agency to expand its OJT program for individuals with significant disabilities. All allowable VR program expenditures and obligation incurred by the VR agency with the use of those grant funds could be counted towards satisfying the State’s VR match requirement;

Allowable Sources of Match (con’t) 6. Allowable VR expenditures borne by Federal grants that meet the exceptions set forth at 34 CFR 80.24(b)(1) and (2). Exceptions set forth at 34 CFR 80.24(b)(1) and (2): Except as provided by Federal statute, a cost sharing or matching requirement may not be met by costs borne by another Federal grant. This prohibition does not apply to income earned by a grantee or subgrantee from a contract awarded under another Federal grant (34 CFR 80.24(b)(1)).

Allowable Sources of Match (con’t) For the purpose of this section, general revenue sharing funds distributed under 31 U.S.C (Local Government Fiscal Assistance Fund) are not considered Federal grant funds (34 CFR 80.24(b)(2)).

Third-Party Cooperative Arrangements with Other Public Agencies For the third-party cooperative arrangement to be a valid source of match certain requirements must be met: a. The services provided by the cooperating public agency must not be the typical or customary services that the agency provides in the ordinary course of business. The services must be new services with a VR focus or they must be existing services provided by that agency that have been modified to have a VR focus (34 CFR (a)(1)); Specific Match Requirements

Specific Match Requirements (con’t) b. The services provided by the cooperating public agency pursuant to the third-party arrangement are only available to VR program applicants and consumers (34 CFR (a)(2)); c. The VR agency must maintain administrative supervision over the expenditures incurred and the staff providing the services under the cooperative (34 CFR (a)(3)); and d. The services provided under the cooperative arrangement must comply with all State plan requirements (34 CFR (a)(4)).

Specific Match Requirements (con’t) Establishment, Development, or Improvement of a Public or Non-Profit CRP In order for a state VR agency to engage in activities to establish, develop, or improve a public or non-profit CRP and use non- Federal expenditures incurred by those activities to satisfy its match requirement under the VR program, the agency must first satisfy the following pre-planning requirements:

Specific Match Requirements (con’t) a. The state VR agency must have written policies that set forth the nature and scope of services that will be provided to groups of individuals with disabilities, and the criteria that will be used to determine the provision of those services (34 CFR (b)(1)); and b. Establishment activities must have been identified as a need in the state agency’s triennial needs assessment and the state VR agency must have included in its State plan a discussion of the strategies it would use to meet that need (34 CFR ).

Specific Match Requirements (con’t) If the agency has satisfied the pre-planning requirements, it must then satisfy the following requirements in order for the agency to use non-Federal expenditures incurred for these activities towards its match requirement under the VR program:

a. The activities proposed must fit within the definition of establishment, development, or improvement of a CRP at 34 CFR 361.5(b)(17), the establishment, development, or improvement of a facility for a CRP at 34 CFR 361.5(b)(18), or the construction of a facility for a CRP at 34 CFR 361.5(b)(12); and b. The activities must be designed to provide VR services to state VR agency consumers and applicants. c. CRP is a program that provides one or more VR services to individuals with disabilities to enable those individuals to maximize their opportunities for employment, including career advancement (34 CFR 361.5(b)(9)). Specific Match Requirements (con’t)

Private Contributions Although generally private donors cannot benefit from their contributions towards the state VR agency’s non-Federal share under the VR program, the one exception is when the donor is awarded the funds under the State’s regular competitive procedures (34 CFR (b)(3)(iii)). As with any other service provided and paid for with VR funds, the services provided under those contracts must be allowable VR services for the state agency’s consumers and applicants.

Specific Match Requirements (con’t) Interagency Transfers Non-federal funds transferred to the VR agency by another state or local public agency can be used as a source of match for the VR program, so long as the VR agency maintains control over the determination of eligibility, the provision of services and the allocation and expenditure of the funds. Though interagency transfers are no longer specifically identified as a source of match since the 1997 Amendments to the VR program regulations, they still can be used for this purpose in accordance with Departmental guidance (Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 60 Fed. Reg , (December 15, 1995); Final Regulations, 62 Fed. Reg. 6307, 6332 (February 11, 1997)).

Unallowable Sources of Match VR agencies are not permitted to use the following towards meeting its non-Federal share requirement under the VR program: 1. The value of third-party in-kind contributions (34 CFR (b)(2)); 2. Non-Federal expenditures that benefit in any way the donor of a contribution, except as provided in 34 CFR (b)(3)(iii); 3. Program income (34 CFR (c)(4));

Unallowable Sources of Match (con’t) 4. Costs borne by another Federal grant, unless permitted by Federal statute (34 CFR 80.24(b)(1)); however, general revenue sharing funds distributed by the U.S. Department of Treasury under 31 USC 6702 (Local Government Fiscal Assistance Fund) do not constitute Federal funds for purposes of this requirement; and 5. Costs used to meet the matching requirement of another Federal grant (34 CFR 80.24(b)(3)).

For every $21.30 the state invests in its VR program, it will be able to draw $78.70 in federal funds, because of matching. This is almost a 1 to 4 ratio, and represents a great return on investment to states. If the state does not have the state appropriation or common state expenditures to use as match, in order to avail itself of federal monies; the state may be tempted to pursue other allowable sources of match. Maximizing the Benefit/ Avoiding the Risks

In pursuing sources of match primarily to generate the state expenditures: The agency must insure that it meets all the requirements related to those other allowable sources of match; and The agency does not allow any source of match compromise or exert undue influence over the program (e.g., serving a disproportional number of persons with certain type of disability, violating its OOS, becoming obligated to private contributors).

Maximizing the Benefit/ Avoiding the Risks RSA reviews sources of match and supporting documentation during the scheduled Section 107 Monitoring review. RSA is required to recover monies not expended properly, and may implement its procedures to recover the funds. If generating matching funds is an agency’s primary motivation for pursuing third-party cooperative agreements; establishment, development or improvement of CRPs; or private contributions, the agency should check with RSA first to ensure that all of the related program requirements are being

361.3 – Allowable Costs – Program Income IL -related expenditures are not allowable under the VR program and may not be paid for with VR funds VR funds are not used solely for the administration of the VR program and for the provision of VR services Program income is not reported completely and accurately RSA Monitoring Findings Related to Sources of Match

For more information… Matching Requirements 34 CFR Matching or cost sharing 34 CFR Authorized Activities 34 CFR Third-party cooperative arrangements involving funds from other public agencies 34 CFR Statewide assessment; annual estimates; annual State goals and priorities; strategies; and progress reports 34 CFR Scope of vocational rehabilitation services for groups of individuals with disabilities 34 CFR (b)(1) Applicable definitions 34 CFR 361.5(b)(9),(b)(12), and (b)(17-18) Program Income 34 CFR Local Government Fiscal Assistance Fund 37 U.S.C. §6702 RSA-TAC Sources of Non-Federal Share for the Vocational Rehabilitation Program

QUESTIONS?