Locating the solar source of 13 April 2006 Magnetic Cloud K. Steed 1, C. J. Owen 1, L. K. Harra 1, L. M. Green 1, S. Dasso 2, A. P. Walsh 1, P. Démoulin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
Advertisements

Trend of the magnetic helicity flux during the formation and the destabilization of flux ropes F. Zuccarello 1, S.L. Guglielmino 1, P. Romano 2 and F.P.
An overview of the cycle variations in the solar corona Louise Harra UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics Mullard Space Science.
Interaction of coronal mass ejections with large-scale structures N. Gopalswamy, S. Yashiro, H. Xie, S. Akiyama, and P. Mäkelä IHY – ISWI Regional meeting.
Erupting flux rope, rising X-ray source and CME on 16 April 2002 C. Goff 1, L. van Driel-Gesztelyi 1,2,3, L. K. Harra 1, S. A. Matthews 1, and C.H. Mandrini.
Active Region Evolution and the Removal of Magnetic Helicity by CMEs Len Culhane Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London.
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
1 Diagnostics of Solar Wind Processes Using the Total Perpendicular Pressure Lan Jian, C. T. Russell, and J. T. Gosling How does the magnetic structure.
Prediction of Central Axis Direction of Magnetic Clouds Xuepu Zhao and Yang Liu Stanford University The West Pacific Geophysics Meeting, Beijing, China.
Relationship Between Magnetic Clouds and Earth-Directed CMEs: Space Weather Research in Stanford Solar Group Xuepu Zhao The Second International Space.
Coronal Ejecta in October - November of 2003 and predictions of the associated geomagnetic events 1 Big Bear Solar Observatory, New Jersey Institute of.
The May 1,1998 and May 12, 1997 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Sung-Hong Park Space Weather Research Laboratory New Jersey Institute of Technology Study of Magnetic Helicity and Its Relationship with Solar Activities:
Photospheric Sources of Very Fast (>1100km/s) Coronal Mass Ejections Recent studies show that only very fast CMEs (> 1100 km/s) are capable of producing.
The May 1997 and May 1998 MURI events George H. Fisher UC Berkeley.
Magnetic Structures of Active Regions and their Link to Coronal Mass Ejections Vasyl Yurchyshyn, Big Bear Solar Observatory, Big Bear City, CA 92314,
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Long-term development of solar corona in build-up to the SEP events of 21 April 2002 and 24 August 2002 A. J. Coyner, D. Alexander,
The Solar Wind.
Long-term Helicity Evolution in AR 8100 A. The relative magnetic helicity content of the coronal field B. The magnetic helicity injected by photospheric.
NoRH Observations of Prominence Eruption Masumi Shimojo Nobeyama Solar Radio Observatory NAOJ/NINS 2004/10/28 Nobeyama Symposium SeiSenRyo.
Using the evolution of dimming regions to probe the global magnetic field topology A new interpretation of the 12 th May 1997 event G. Attrill 1, M. Nakwaki.
SUB-GROUP 1: Surface Solar Magnetic Fields  The central question: Can we infer the orientation of Bz of an ICME at 1 AU by focusing on the study of the.
SHINE SEP Campaign Events: Detailed comparison of active regions AR9906 and AR0069 in the build-up to the SEP events of 21 Apr 2002 and 24 Aug 2002 D.
Lessons for STEREO - learned from Helios Presented at the STEREO/Solar B Workshop, Rainer Schwenn, MPS Lindau The Helios.
SH 51A-02 Evolution of the coronal magnetic structures traced by X-ray and radio emitting electrons during the large flare of 3 November 2003 N.Vilmer,
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
The Space Weather Week Monique Pick LESIA, Observatoire de Paris November 2006.
Direct Spatial Association of an X-Ray Flare with the Eruption of a Solar Quiescent Filament Gordon D. Holman and Adi Foord (2015) Solar Seminar on July.
Coronal and Interplanetary Magnetic Fields in October-November 2003 and November CMEs Vasyl Yurchyshyn Big Bear Solar Observatory,
CME Propagation CSI 769 / ASTR 769 Lect. 11, April 10 Spring 2008.
Pulsed Flows Along a Cusp Structure Observed with SDO/AIA B. J. Thompson 1, P. Démoulin 2, C. H. Mandrini 3, M. L. Mays 1, L. Ofman 4, S. L. Savage 1,
CASS/UCSD ILWS 2009 SMEI 3D reconstructions of density behind shocks B.V. Jackson, P.P. Hick, A. Buffington, M.M. Bisi, J.M. Clover, S. Hamilton Center.
Origins of Solar Minimum CMEs with ICMEs Yan Li 1 B. J. Lynch 1, J. G. Luhmann 1, A. Thernisien 2, A. Vourlidas 2, E. Kilpua 3, L. Jian 4, A. B. Gavin.
SEP Event Onsets: Far Backside Solar Sources and the East-West Hemispheric Asymmetry S. W. Kahler AFRL Space Vehicles Directorate, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico,
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs A. Asai 1 ( 浅井 歩 ), T.T. Ishii 2, K. Shibata 2, N. Gopalswamy 3 1: Nobeyama.
Correlation of magnetic field intensities and solar wind speeds of events observed by ACE. Mathew J. Owens and Peter J. Cargill. Space and Atmospheric.
1 P. C. Liewer, E. M. DeJong, J. R. Hall, JPL/Caltech; K. E. J. Huttunen, Y. Li, J. Luhmann, B. Lynch, UCB/SSL; Angelos Vourlidas & R. A. Howard, NRL;
Shine 2004, A. Sterling CME Eruption Onset Observations: Dimmings Alphonse C. Sterling NASA/MSFC/NSSTC.
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
A tool for improved space weather predictions: the CME expansion speed. Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie Katlenburg-Lindau Germany Instituto Nacional.
17 th November, 2005STEREO/Solar-B Workshop 1 Related Solar Imaging and Near-Earth In-situ Observations of an ICME A. N. Fazakerley 1, L.K. Harra 1, J.L.
Multi-Point Observations of The Solar Corona for Space weather Acknowledgements The forecasting data was retrieved from NOAA SWPC products and SIDC PRESTO.
Detecting, forecasting and modeling of the 2002/04/17 halo CME Heliophysics Summer School 1.
GROUND-LEVEL EVENT (GLE)
SIDC Space Weather briefing
A New Methodology to Predict the Axial ICME Magnetic Field at 1 AU
TYPICAL PROFILES AND DISTRIBUTIONS OF PLASMA AND MAGNETIC FIELD PARAMETERS IN MAGNETIC CLOUDS AT 1 AU Luciano Rodriguez[1], Jimmy J. Masias-Meza[2], Sergio.
Solar Wind Transients and SEPs
Anemone Structure and Geo-Effective Flares/CMEs
Corona Mass Ejection (CME) Solar Energetic Particle Events
Anemone Structure of AR NOAA and Related Geo-Effective Flares and CMEs
SIDC Space Weather briefing
Solar and Heliospheric Physics
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
Correlation between halo coronal mass ejections
Ju Jing, Vasyl B. Yurchyshyn, Guo Yang, Yan Xu, and Haimin Wang
Ron Moore and Alphonse Sterling
SOHO images of eruptive flares (left) on Nov. 6, 2004
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
Filament/Prominence Eruption Corona Mass Ejection (CME)
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
SIDC Space Weather Briefing
CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS
Presentation transcript:

Locating the solar source of 13 April 2006 Magnetic Cloud K. Steed 1, C. J. Owen 1, L. K. Harra 1, L. M. Green 1, S. Dasso 2, A. P. Walsh 1, P. Démoulin 3 and L. Van Driel-Gesztelyi 1,3,4 1 UCL - Mullard Space Science Laboratory 2 University of Buenos Aires, Argentina 3 Observatoire de Paris, France 4 Konkoly University, Budapest, Hungary

|B| nT Bx nT Proton Density #/cc SW Speed km/s Proton Temp Kelvin 13 April 2006 MC: Observational Evidence By nT Bz nT Time after 12:00 UT 12 Apr 2006 Forward fast shock Sheath ICME ejecta - MC: ~16:00 UT (13 April 2006) – 01:15 UT (14 April 2006) - Enhanced B - Decrease in variability of B - Smooth, coherent rotation of Bx, By and Bz - Bipolar signature in By - Low proton temp - counterstreaming, suprathermal electrons Duration ~ 9 hrs Counterstreaming electrons The magnetic cloud is LEFT-HANDED negative sign of helicity

Locating the Solar Source of the Ejecta Launch Window: 9 – 11 April average measured speed of ejecta at 1 AU: ~ 520 km/s - distance travelled: ~ 1 AU - calculated propagation time: 80 h - calculated launch time: 12:00 UT 10 April allows for acceleration/deceleration of the ejecta as it propagates away from the Sun No obvious CME signatures - flares, dimmings, etc. - makes the source region of the magnetic cloud more difficult to determine

Survey of Possible Source Regions Three active regions on the limb, one active region on the disk ALSO: Small northern hemisphere active region emerges - not large enough to develop sunspots or be allocated a NOAA AR number At 12:00 UT 10 April 2006 (estimated launch time): An EUV brightening is observed at 05:47 UT 10 April 2006 in AR10869 at 195 Å (T = 1.5 x 10 6 K) AR10869: possible solar source of the ICME?

Other Association Criteria Magnetic helicity signs of possible source regions - magnetic “tongues” - For positive twist, the leading polarity appears elongated and extends southward of the following polarity. The mirror image is true for a negative sign of twist. - A positive twist is expected in southern hemisphere ARs like AR10869 Leading polarity (negative) flux emerges along the southern side of the following (positive) polarity fluxpositive sign of helicity (right-handed) Within the launch window, it was found that only the small, northern hemisphere active region was likely to have a negative sign of helicity (left- handed) The leading (positive) polarity extends northward of the following (negative) polarity during the early emergence phase negative sign of helicity

Locating the Solar Source Disappearing Filaments A number of active region and quiescent filaments are observed in Hα within the launch window One quiet Sun filament is located in the northern hemisphere (which is expected to have a negative sign of helicity) - this filament is NOT seen to erupt within the launch window! Coronagraph Observations A faint, partial halo CME was observed at ~06:00 UT 10 April 2006 by LASCO - extending towards the south west - linear speed ~ 183 km/s - estimated onset time ~ 04:00 UT 10 April 2006 This is the only halo/partial halo CME recorded in the LASCO CME catalog within the launch window – also independently verified A lack of eruption signatures on the disk corresponding to this CME have led us to conclude that this was a BACK-SIDED EVENT

SOLAR SOURCE: Northern Hemisphere AR At ~ 09:30 UT 11 April 2006: - a cusp is observed by EIT (195 Å) - formation of post- eruption loops is observed by TRACE (171 Å) Cusp-shaped coronal loops signature of eruption AR is situated on the boundary of a coronal hole - expected to erupt more readily than if it were situated in the quiet Sun Cusp

Linking the Coronal Eruption and the MC LOCATION: eruption occurs close to disk centre TIMING: eruption occurs within the expected launch window SIGN OF HELICITY: the magnetic helicity sign of the magnetic cloud and the solar source are in agreement It is predicted that the ACE spacecraft crossed the western leg of the MC, in agreement with the eastern position of the source region with respect to the central meridian The magnitude of the FLUX within the magnetic cloud does not exceed the calculated flux within the active region The location of the source region near to the central meridian at the time of the eruption, together with its close proximity to a coronal hole explains the presence of a high speed solar wind stream following the magnetic cloud

SUMMARY A magnetic cloud was observed by ACE on 13 April 2006 Solar source: an eruption from a small, northern hemisphere active region at ~ UT on 11 April 2006 A number of pieces of evidence link the coronal eruption and this magnetic cloud: - location - timing - sign of helicity - spacecraft trajectory through the flux rope - flux - high speed solar wind flow following the MC This event highlights the complexities associated with locating the solar source of an ICME observed near Earth, and serves to emphasise that it is the combination of a number of physical characteristics and signatures that is important for successfully tying together the Earth-end and the Sun-end of an event.