Addressing Teacher Dispositions at the community college Level

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Advertisements

An Overview of Service Learning: Building Bridges, Making Connections
Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
Department of Education Professional Education Unit Assessment System September 2008.
REICH COLLEGE OF EDUCATION SPRING SEMESTER 2008 Opening Meeting WELCOME.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Teaching and Learning – All About Students.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
Conceptual Framework What It Is and How It Works Kathe Rasch, Maryville University Donna M. Gollnick, NCATE October 2005.
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
EPortfolio Assessment Pilot. Agenda Purpose of the ePortfolio assessment pilot CSD use of ePortfolio English department use of ePortfolio Future applications.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 2009 PROJECT DIRECTOR’S CONFERENCE WASHINGTON, D.C. DONNA M. SOBEL, PH.D. ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO.
The CS4Alabama CE21 Project Goals Alabama participation in current CS AP has been very low (with 220k HS students; 5200 US History and 120 Latin AP exams):
Maryland Technology Grant “ Our goal is to ensure that all Maryland teacher candidates are proficient in integrating technology in the classroom for teaching.
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Measuring Dispositions Dr. Sallie Averitt Miller, Associate Dean Office for Assessment and Accreditation Columbus State University GaPSC Regional Assessment.
Using Groups in Academic Advising Rebecca Ryan Associate Director Cross-College Advising Service University of Wisconsin-Madison With special.
TEACHING FOR CIVIC CAPACITY AND ENGAGEMENT : How Faculty Align Teaching and Purpose IARSLCE 2011 | CHICAGO Jennifer M. Domagal-Goldman | November 3, 2011.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Technology Standards in Teacher Education Proficiencies and Assessment Ellen Hoffman Eastern Michigan University MDE Workshop October 10, 2003.
Navigating Murky Waters The Challenge of Assessing Preservice Teacher Dispositions Dr. Anne B. Bucalos and Dr. Christine G. Price Bellarmine University.
Siena Heights University Graduate Teacher Education REFLECTIVE PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO OF CONTINUOUS PROGRESS for Ima Student Last updated: Fall 2009.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
The College of Saint Rose School of Education Department of Literacy and Special Education Teacher Candidate Assessment.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Sultan Qaboos University College of Education Course: Instructor:
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
 Exploring and extending ideas leading to an original or interpretive product or performance.
Implementing an Ability Based Education System Colleen Keyes Dean of Academic Affairs Dr. David England Director of Institutional Effectiveness.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
LEARNER CENTERED APPROACH
College of Education & Human Development Fall 2010 Be sure you have signed in and picked up handouts Welcome ULM Student Teachers.
Integrate English as a Second Language (ESL) strategies into the teacher preparation program for all students the semester prior to student teaching. Require.
Career Academic Technical Institute (CATI) Division of Career-Technical Education TN State Department of Education 25th NACTEI New Orleans, 2005.
Conceptual Framework Presentation, 2006, Slide 1 The Conceptual Framework for Programs that Prepare Professionals Who Work in Schools What - Why - and.
College of Education Graduate Programs
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Preparing to meet competency and accreditation standards in the US: Perspectives of a social work program administrator July, 2015 Emiko A. Tajima, PhD.
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Council for the Accreditationof EducatorPreparation Standard 1: CONTENT AND PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014.
Preparing Teacher Candidates for CCSS in Mathematics: The Sequel Reuben S. Asempapa Ohio University AACTE Webinar December 15, 2015.
Learning Assessment Techniques
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
What It Is and How It Works
ED 690: Reflecting, Writing, and Reviewing the PDP
Assist. Prof.Dr. Seden Eraldemir Tuyan
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING
NCATE 2000 Unit Standards Overview.
Valley City State University Conceptual Framework
Valley City State University Conceptual Framework
THE JOURNEY TO BECOMING
NJCU College of Education
FRAMEWORK OF EVALUATION QUESTIONS
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
Diversity Experience. Evaluating Preservice Teachers’ Knowledge of the HLPs and Culturally Responsive Teaching.
Presentation transcript:

Addressing Teacher Dispositions at the community college Level Glenda Hernandez Baca, Ph.D. Montgomery College, Maryland

Outcomes and Agenda Introductions Identify definitions for teacher dispositions Discuss importance of teacher dispositions Review models on teacher dispositions in teacher education programs Discuss pilot study at Montgomery College Develop and share ideas for implementing teacher dispositions at the college level Share tips for teaching and assessing dispositions at the community college level.

Introductions Turn to two others close to you and share the following: Name Institution Position What you would like to learn about teacher dispositions

What are “teacher dispositions?” Values, commitments, and professional ethics that influence behaviors and are guided by beliefs and attitudes related to values (NCATE, 2003) To act in an ethical manner based on an explicit or implicit code of conduct through the development of characteristics of a professional and a model of professionalism every day (Kramer, 2003).

Why are teacher dispositions important? There is a direct correlation between effective teaching and the dispositions of the teacher (Notar, Riley & Taylor, 2009). They are significantly related to CHANGE his/her mode of behavioral functioning in order to adapt to situational constraints (Yeh, 2002). It is increasingly being taught and evaluated at the four-year institutions and in the field of education (Ellis & McElvey, 2005).

Models of Teacher Dispositions Admissions Requirements- The dispositions are evaluated in one specific course such as field experience Across Setting Evaluations- not based on limited pieces of evidence-St. Norbert College, Wisconsin Open to Department faculty- Faculty complete a disposition evaluation IF there is a concern

Teacher Dispositions at Montgomery College About the pilot study: Fall 2010 @ Takoma Park/Silver Spring Campus Pre and post-surveys ED101- Foundations of Education and ED140- Introduction to Special Education Purpose: To determine if we should implement teacher disposition teaching and assessment in the AAT. To lean more about students’ perspectives and knowledge about teacher dispositions. Number of students: ED101= 14 ED140= 28 Total =42 Participant description: Diversity in age, experience, program choice, racial, ethnic and linguistic backgrounds.

What students know about teacher dispositions Most students (92%) in ED101 had not heard of teacher dispositions and did not know the definition of the term. More students in ED140 knew something about teacher dispositions (33% vs. 8% in ED101) and what it meant. ED140 responses were more specific to opportunity and growth. ED101 expressed more concerns with subjectivity.

How students feel about teacher dispositions It would give them an opportunity to better prepare themselves to become better teachers. Can work and address concerns early Learn more skills Concerns: Subjectivity Specific areas (punctuality, attendance, being shy, etc.)

Other Findings On a scale from 1 – 5, where 1 is the lowest and 5 is the highest, how important do you consider teacher disposition is to teacher effectiveness and student success? 14% of students chose 3 19% of students chose 4 67% of students chose 5 **slights differences between ED101 and ED140 100% of students felt teacher dispositions should be evaluated at the AAT level.

Outcome of study Developed a new disposition evaluation based on student feedback and collaborative effort between campus education faculty. Included LEA (Montgomery County Public Schools) Started using the evaluation in the Field Experience Course at the midterm point and for finals.

Future Steps Implement it at the college-wide level: Introduce it to all faculty and adjuncts Develop clear goals and expectations for how it will be taught and assessed. Address formal and administrative policy issues: How what we are going to do with the information What will happen to students who need significant and extensive supports in developing teacher dispositions?

Your Turn! With 2-3 others, identify TWO concerns for TEACHING teacher dispositions at the community college level along with TWO possible solutions to the concerns. Also, identify TWO concerns in ASSESSING teacher dispositions at the community college level along with TWO possible solutions to those concerns.

Tips to Consider Teaching Dispositions When and how will you teach about it? Be clear and specific Embed it throughout your program (not just in one class) Consider specific goals and outcomes Provide sample of your disposition list to your students Will it be consistent throughout your department?

Tips to Consider Disposition Evaluation: Research the possible disposition “domains” and select what it is important for you, your students and your program. Consider subjectivity and consistency How will you address this? Is your assessment instrument clear? When and how will you implement this? What will be done at the administrative level if there is a serious issue or concern?

References Ellis, C. I. & McElvery, R. (2005). Teacher disposition and preservice teachers. (ERIC document Reproduction) National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (2002). NCATE unit standards. Retrieved from http://wwww.ncate.org/standard/unit/stds.htm Notar, C.E., Riley, G.W., & Taylor P. W. (2009). Dispositions: Ability and assessment. International Journal of Education E4 (1), 32-39. Yeh, Y. (2002). Preservice teachers’ thinking styles, dispositions, and changes in their teacher behaviors. Paper presented at the 2002 Interenational Conference on Computer Education.