GASB 68 From the Employer’s Perspective © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC Laura Self, Manager Columbia, South Carolina.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of New Pension Accounting Requirements Under GASB Statements No. 67 and No. 68 September 2013.
Advertisements

Developing a Sound Sampling Methodology © Elliott Davis Decosimo, PLLC Melody Reed, CRCM, CFSA March 9, 2015.
Changes in Accounting and Reporting for Pensions Presented to House Appropriations Committee _____________________________________.
Reporting Pensions Under GASB 68 KASBO - Spring /7/2014.
1 GASB 68 Accounting and Reporting for Pensions an Amendment of GASB Statement No. 27 Presented by: Kevin S. Wong, CPA Gilbert Associates, Inc.
THE NEW PENSION ACCOUNTING AND ITS IMPACT ON FUNDING CSFMO Oakland, California February 21,
League of Minnesota Cities Fiscal Futures Policy Committee August 28, 2013 Presented by: Dave DeJonge, Assistant Executive Director, PERA.
2 The miracle just got bigger!! 5 Everything you never wanted to know about Pension Accounting and Auditing and never intended to ask but are forced.
Florida Government Finance Officers Association Webinar GASB’s New Pension Standards December 18, 2014.
GASB Pension Standards: An Educational Overview PEBA Retirement Division GFOA Fall Conference October 12,
Pat Robertson Executive Director September 2014 GASB Pension Standards Update.
Pension Accounting Update: Putting Theory into Practice
Changes in Accounting and Reporting for Pensions Presented to Senate Finance Committee _____________________________________.
Auxiliary Organizations GASB Statement No. 68 Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions Sheralin Klinthong, Associate Director, FS / SFSR Chancellor’s.
California Society of Municipal Finance Officers Pension Accounting and Financial Reporting: A Work in Progress The views expressed in this presentation.
GASB Technical Update Mark Thomas KPMG LLP Year-End GAAP Training April 18, 2014.
April 8, Statement No. 65, Items Previously Recorded as Assets and Liabilities Statement No. 67, Financial Reporting for Pension Plans-an amendment.
GASB 68 Employer Training Presenters: Shelley Johnson Foster & Foster System Actuary for LASERS and TRSL Artie Fillastre LASERS Chief Financial Officer.
GASB’S REVISED PENSION STANDARDS: What Arizona’s Governmental Employers Need for 2015 DONNA MILLER, ARIZONA OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL NANCY BENNETT,
TECHNICAL UPDATE (Auxiliary Organizations) Mark Thomas KPMG LLP Year-End GAAP Training May 28, 2014.
Upcoming GASB Changes 1 Presented by Darla Iverson Glenna Musselman Chief Financial Officer Senior Accountant Presented by Darla Iverson Glenna Musselman.
Copyright © 2014 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. GASB Statements 67 & 68 – Audit & Budget Committee Discount Rate and Allocation of Assets/Liabilities.
Well, Now That That's Over... What We Learned and What to Communicate About Pension Auditing Year 1 is ____ V Plan V NSAA 2015 Annual Conference June 10,
GASB Standards on Pensions
Precision Experience Assurance The New Pension Standards GASB Statements 67 and 68 Milestone Professional Services, CPE Day September 13, 2013, Kissimmee.
1 Your Tilted Balance Sheet – GASB 68 Overview Presented by: Kevin S. Wong, CPA Gilbert Associates, Inc. September 12, 2013.
Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota An Overview of GASB 68 for Cost-Sharing Plans Dave DeJonge Assistant Executive Director, PERA.
City of Hallandale Beach Professional/Management Retirement Plan Actuarial Review March 17, 2014.
GASB Pension Reporting Update Minnesota Society of CPAs: School District Audit Conference June 2, 2014 Presented by: Dave DeJonge, Assistant Executive.
Inside the New GASB Pensions Standards Municipal Analysts Group of New York February 15, 2013 Thad Calabrese, Assistant Professor, NYU Dean Michael Mead,
Primary colors R 0 G 39 B 118 R 0 G 161 B 222 R 60 G 138 B 46 R 114 G 199 B 231 R 201 G 221 B 3 R 146 G 212 B 0 August 11, 2014 Michael J. de Leon, FCA,
Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota GASB 68 Audit Issues for Cost-Sharing Plans Presented by Jim Riebe, PERA Principal Accounting Officer.
GASB 68 & 71, PERS and the Impact on Mississippi Entities
2015 BAW Conference GASB 68 Implementation: Are we there yet? Ashley Brindle.
Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota GASB 68 Implementation September 24, 2015 Presented by: Dave DeJonge, PERA Interim Executive Director,
Presented by: G.S. Curran & Co. GASB 68 FOR COST SHARING EMPLOYERS OF THE ASSESSORS’ RETIREMENT FUND.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada 1 Chapter 21: Completing the Audit.
Unit 6 Seminar Accounting for Postemployment Benefits.
KDE Finance Officer Workshop GASB 68 New reporting requirement that will affect this year’s audit. It is highlighted in the audit contract. Purpose.
Joint Presentation of the Auditor of Public Accounts and the Virginia Retirement System GASB 68 Implementation Virginia Association of School Business.
GASB Pension Reporting Update Minnesota Association of School Business Officials (MASBO) Presented by: Dave DeJonge, Assistant Executive Director, PERA.
Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota GASB 68 Webinar: Employers’ Road Map to Successful Implementation July 23, 2015 Presented by the Public.
James Marta CPA, CGMA, ARPM Ken Hearnsberger, Finance Manager NBSIA Matt Nethaway, CPA 1.
Covered Employer Training Program Introduction to the Retirement Systems FY 2016.
GASB 67 & 68 Disclosures Implementing and Auditing GASB’s New Pension Standards.
Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota Calculating Employer’s Proportionate Share of Collective Pension Amounts Presenter: Jim Riebe Principal.
Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Financial Resources and Governmental Relations School Accounting Manual Update June 2015.
Governmental Accounting and Standards Board Pension Accounting Changes September 10, 2013.
Prepared by Aon Hewitt Retirement and Investment Consulting Presentation to Iowa School Districts Changes in Postemployment Benefit Accounting July 2015.
Presented by: Chris Pembrook, CPA, MBA, CGAP, Cr.FA Frank Crawford, CPA @fcrawfordcpa.
Presentation Headline GASB 68 Pension Disclosures for PSRS/PEERS Employers 1.
Granite Shoals, Texas Audit Presentation September 30, 2016
GASB 77: Tax Abatement Disclosures
pension accounting and passdown schedules
Jeff Markert, KPMG LLP June 11, 2014
GASB 67 and 68 and PERA’s Schedule of Employer Allocations
University Planning and Budget
Financial Audit Presentation Year Ended June 30, 2015
GASB 68-Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions
FINANCIAL AUDITS AND gasB UPDATES WHAT IS NEW AND HOW TO BE PREPARED
GASB Implementation Report – Colorado PERA
Other Post Employment Benefits
GASB Pension Statements - Colorado pera
GASB 75 Employer Reporting Other Postemployment Benefits (OPEB)
Beth Wright Managing Director
October 2018 BAR Sabra Sand and Grace Jimenez
GASB 67 and 68: Pension Fund Reporting
Pension Regulations Presented by David Maccoux, CPA, Shareholder
GASB Update Colorado pera
Presentation transcript:

GASB 68 From the Employer’s Perspective © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC Laura Self, Manager Columbia, South Carolina

This material was used by Elliott Davis Decosimo during an oral presentation; it is not a complete record of the discussion. This presentation is for informational purposes and does not contain or convey specific advice. It should not be used or relied upon in regard to any particular situation or circumstances without first consulting the appropriate advisor. No part of the presentation may be circulated, quoted, or reproduced for distribution without prior written approval from Elliott Davis Decosimo. © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC

Objectives -Provide An Illustration of GASB 68 Implementation -Review Employer Implementation Considerations -Review Disclosure Requirements -Review Resources and Guidance Available © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC

Example of first year implementation steps -Using data for Clemson University (30300) -Most recent PEBA data (unaudited) is used Can be found at -Assumption made for FY 2015 retirement contributions -Applicable pages from PEBA follow – SCRS, PORS and FY 2014 contributions © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC

Illustration (Using Clemson University Data) -Data obtained from PEBA: -***Note: Represents all actual ER contributions made in FY14 including service purchases (amount may vary slightly from amount presented in “Employer Contributions” schedule presented by PEBA in prior page attachment). PEBA will provide this amount on the final, audited NPL worksheet. -Estimated FY 2015 contributions of $26,207,480 © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC NPL ChangeDef OutDef InNetPensionFY 14 6/30/20136/30/2014FY13 to FY14 Liab ExpInvest ExpDef Out/In ExpenseContributionsDifference SCRS 466,538, ,817,506 18,721,127 12,689,264 37,754,281 25,065,017 31,386,916 25,031,158 6,355,758 PORS 5,543,730 5,119, , , , , , ,998 34, ,082, ,937,240 19,145,123 12,825,887 38,346,672 25,520,785 31,834,829 25,444,156 6,390,673

Illustration (continued) -Journal Entries – Year 1 © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC DRCR AUnrestricted Net Position 472,082,363 Net Pension Liability 472,082,363 To record beginning pension liability at 6/30/14 (NOTE: measurement date of beginning pension liability is 6/30/13) BNet Pension Liability*** 25,459,168 Unrestricted Net Position 25,459,168 To reclass contributions made during the measurement period (actual FY14 contributions which were recognized as an expense in FY14) CDeferred Outflow 26,207,480 Pension Expense 26,207,480 To record/reclassify contributions made after the measurement date of 6/30/14 (FY15 contributions) assuming they were recorded in FY15 to Pension Expense when made

Illustration (continued) -Journal Entries – Year 1 © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC DRCR DNet Pension Liability 25,520,785 Deferred Outflows 12,825,887 Deferred Inflows 38,346,672 To record deferred outflows/inflows at the measurement date (6/30/14) to be recorded at 6/30/15 EPension Expense 31,834,829 Net Pension Liability 31,834,829 To record proportionate share of pension expense for the measurement period (7/1/13-6/30/14) recorded in FY15

Illustration (continued) -T Accounts – Year 1 Corresponding to journal entries on previous pages © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC Net PensionUnrestricted LiabilityNet Position 114,950,612 A 472,082,363 A B 25,459,168 B D 25,520,785 E 31,834, ,937, ,672,583 Deferred OutflowsCash C 26,207,480 C D 12,825,887 39,033,367 26,207,480 Deferred InflowsPension Expense D 38,346,672 E 31,834,829 38,346,672 31,834,829

Employer Implementation Considerations -Census data will be examined more closely than in the past by the retirement system, the plan auditors and the employer auditors Review processes and controls over significant elements of census data Large (“individually important”) employers may be selected by the plan auditor for additional testing of census data; the selection of large employers will likely rotate each year © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC

Employer Implementation Considerations, continued -Employer and their auditor can use the plan auditor’s report on schedules to provide sufficient audit evidence Review plan auditor’s report and any related opinion modifications Evaluate whether plan auditor has necessary competence and independence -Employer auditor will gain understanding of controls over census data and will also audit the census data (sample) provided to the plan © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC

Employer Implementation Considerations, continued -Employer and their auditor should verify and recalculate amounts in schedules specific to employer Verify/reconcile employer amounts used in allocation percentage (numerator) Recalculate allocation percentage of employer Recalculate allocation of pension amounts based on allocation percentage of employer -Once plan provided information is verified, employers will have their financial reporting components © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC

Employer Implementation Considerations, continued -Employer will need to track the following components -Differences between actual and expected experience (for example, terminations, mortality, etc.) -Changes in assumptions -Differences between projected and actual earnings -Changes in employer’s proportionate share of contributions -Employer contributions subsequent to measurement date -Difference between actual contributions and proportionate share -Employer will need to maintain amortization schedules for their proportionate share © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC

Disclosure Requirements -Employers must disclose the following: Description of the plan and benefits provided Significant assumptions employed in the measure of net pension liability, description of benefit changes and changes in assumptions, assumptions related to discount rate, employer’s share of pension had discount rate been 1% higher and lower -Much of this information will be lifted from PEBA’s financial statements (Note 8 for their 6/30/2014 financial) © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC

Disclosure Requirements -Employers must disclose the following: The balances of deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources presented by source The net amount of deferred outflows and inflows that will be recognized as pension expense and the amount of deferred outflows that will reduce net pension liability – for each of the next 5 years and in aggregate thereafter The employer’s percentage of net pension liability, how it was determined, and any change in the percentage since the previous measurement date © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC

Disclosure Requirements -Required Supplementary Information: Schedule of employer’s proportionate share of net pension liability -Last 10 years required (or years available until 10 years are available) Schedule of employer’s contributions for last 10 years © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC

Disclosure Requirements -The Comptroller General’s office will be developing a disclosure template in the next few months -In addition to information in the notes to PEBA’s financial statements, PEBA will also provide basic information about the plan © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC

Guidance Available -GASB 67 Implementation Guide -GASB 68 Implementation Guide -Two White Papers Government Employer Participation in Agent Multiple- Employer Plans: Issues Related to Information for Employer Reporting Agent Multiple-Employer Plans: Issues Associated with Testing census Data in an Audit of Financial Statements -Four Audit Interpretations -GASB Implementation Toolkit © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC

Questions? © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC

Laura Self: Website: Elliott Davis Decosimo ranks among the top 30 CPA firms in the U.S. With seventeen offices across seven states, the firm provides clients across a wide range of industries with smart, customized solutions. Elliott Davis Decosimo is an independent firm associated with Moore Stephens International Limited, one of the world's largest CPA firm associations with resources in every major market around the globe. For more information, please visit our elliottdavis.com. © Elliott Davis Decosimo, LLC