RANDRAND CAHPS® Relevance of CAHPS® for Workers’ Compensation Medical Care Donna Farley Senior Health Policy Analyst, RAND Workers’ Compensation Colloquium.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Template: Making Effective Presentation about Your Evidence-based Health Promotion Program This template is intended for you to adapt to your own program.
Advertisements

Exhibit 1 NOTES: Other setting of usual care includes: neighborhood or family health center, free standing surgery center, rural health clinic, company.
NICE Guidance and Quality Standard on Patient Experience
GP AUDIT PROJECT DR C BHATTACHARJEE (GP) AND DR W BENHAM (GP REGISTRAR) YEAR: SUNNYBANK MEDICAL CENTRE Wyke, Bradford.
Barbara M. Altman Emmanuelle Cambois Jean-Marie Robine Extended Questions Sets: Purpose, Characteristics and Topic Areas Fifth Washington group meeting.
How to Evaluate Your Health Literacy Project Jill Lucht, MS Project Director, Center for Health Policy
Maine Quality Forum Advisory Council February 8, 2012 Public Reporting of Patient Experience Survey Data.
Selecting the Right Evaluation Method. Objectives Why should we evaluate? Which activities should we evaluate? When should we evaluate? How should we.
Enhancing Data Quality of Distributive Trade Statistics Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
Holding Health Plans & Providers Accountable for High-Quality, Patient-Centered Care January 23, 2015.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
One Health Plan’s Initiatives to Improve Patient Experiences: What the Physicians Had to Say Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Professor of Medicine, UCLA CAHPS PI, RAND.
Reporting in a World of Multiple CAHPS Measures Mark Schlesinger, Yale University David Kanouse, RAND September 9, 2012.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
SPECA Regional Workshop on Disability Statistics: Dec 13-15, 2006 Purposes of Disability Statistics Jennifer Madans and Barbara Altman National Center.
Proposed Cross-center Project Survey of Federally Qualified Health Centers Vicky Taylor & Vicki Young.
Update on CAHPS ® Surveys AHRQ ANNUAL MEETING Lunch and Learn Session #46 SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 Judith Sangl, ScD AHRQ CAHPS Project Officer.
CAHPS Overview Clinician & Group Surveys: Practical Options for Implementation and Use AHRQ ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 18, 2011 Christine Crofton, PhD CAHPS.
Psychometric Properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey September 11, 2012.
1. Confirming and Supplementing CAHPS® Communication Items Using Feedback from High-Performing Physicians. Ron D. Hays, Ph.D., Professor of Medicine and.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Advancing Excellence in Health Care Developing CAHPS® for People with Mobility Impairments June.
“Reaching across Arizona to provide comprehensive quality health care for those in need” Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administrator Meeting.
Evaluating Florida’s Medicaid Pilots: Early Reactions from Doctors and Patients Joan Alker Senior Researcher Georgetown Health Policy Institute May 7,
MAST: the organisational aspects Lise Kvistgaard Odense University Hospital Denmark Berlin, May 2010.
Center for Children with Special Needs 1 Medicaid managed care for children with special health care needs: Which services need to improve? Jacquie Stock,
1 SARAH HUNTER RAND CORPORATION LAURA STEIGHNER AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH NOVEMBER 16, 2009 National Evaluation of the Demonstration to Improve.
Customers and their expectations Kari-Pekka Martimo PAA.
CAHPS® Survey to Evaluate the Patient’s Experience with the Medical Home Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine RAND Health Program November 18,
HCAHPS Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems.
Nursing Excellence Conference April 19,2013
CMS CAHPS Surveys: Public Reporting
Unit 10. Monitoring and evaluation
Unit 1 – Preparation for Assessment LO 1.1&1.2&1.3.
1 The Patient Perspective: Satisfaction Survey Presented at: Disease Management Colloquium June 22, 2005 Shulamit Bernard, RN, PhD.
Quality Through the Eyes of the Patient: State-of-the-Art Concepts Paul D. Cleary, Ph.D. April 10, 2001 Quality Through the Eyes of the Patient: State-of-the-Art.
1 Webinar: Challenges in Clinical Training Ben Wallace, Executive Director, Clinical Training Reform Health Workforce Australia.
Overview of Evaluation Designs. Learning objectives By the end of this presentation, you will be able to: Explain evaluation design Describe the differences.
HS /18/04 Patient Reports and Ratings of Health Care Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Patient Reports and Ratings of Health Care Ron D. Hays, Ph.D.
Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene WB&A Market Research Executive Summary THE 2003 MARYLAND MEDICAID MANAGED CARE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY.
Ben Amick, Ph.D. Worker Injury National Survey University of Texas.
Overview of CAHPS ® and the National CAHPS ® Database Assessing Patients’ Experiences with Care: Using CAHPS ® as a Standardized Quality Metric Dale Shaller,
CONDUCTING A PUBLIC OUTREACH CAMPAIGN IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Conducting a Public Outreach Campaign.
MN Community Measurement Jim Chase Executive Director February 14, 2007
Are Positive Experiences with Health Care Bad for Health? June 14, 2015 (AcademyHealth) Minneapolis Convention Center 1301 S. 2nd Avenue, Minneapolis,
CAHPS Clinician & Group Survey 2.0 Update Ron D. Hays RAND, Santa Monica, CA UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Assessing Patient Satisfaction Ron D. Hays UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research RAND Health Program AUA Foundation Summer.
CAHPS PATIENT EXPERIENCE SURVEYS AHRQ ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 2012 Christine Crofton, PhD CAHPS Project Officer.
1 SUPPORTING PEDAGOGICAL CHANGE IN NMR SCHOOLS PROJECT Briefing of NMR secondary schools 11 February, 2010 Jean Russell, Graeme Jane, Graham Marshall.
CAHPS® Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Ernest Moy Center for Quality Improvement & Patient Safety.
Lessons from the United States: Evaluating Employment Services is Neither Easy Nor Cheap November 7, 2009 Sheena McConnell Peter Schochet Alberto Martini.
1 Evaluation of Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Initiatives Meredith B. Rosenthal, PhD February 24, 2009.
Les implications pour l’autonomisation d’un projet d’amélioration de qualité conduit par les usagers Barbara D’Avanzo, Angelo Barbato, Fabrizio Mauriello.
Assessing Patient-Centered Medical Homes from the Patient’s Perspective: Developing the CAHPS ® PCMH Survey Patricia (Trish) Gallagher, PhD Center for.
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
CAHPS®: Information from the Consumer Perspective Liz Goldstein, Ph.D. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Reliability Ability to produce similar results when repeated measurements are made under identical conditions. Consistency of the results Can you get.
SimpsonView Graph # 1 OUTLINE What States Are Doing Now What Is Available Now Mechanisms to Influence Quality Choosing a Strategy What Should Be Available.
Levels of Review of Research and Quality Improvement Walter Kraft, MD Associate Director, Office of Human Subjects Protection Department of Pharmacology.
Reporting on Patients' Experiences with Primary Care: Resources and Examples Lise Rybowski The Severyn Group September 18, 2011 Presented at the AHRQ 2011.
The Hospital CAHPS Program Presented by Maureen Parrish.
Module 9 Monitoring and Evaluation Tuesday, Oct 14, 2013 Ngo Thi Loan and John Carter.
Demonstrating Institutional Effectiveness Documenting Using SPOL.
LibQUAL+ TM Library Survey LIBQUAL+ “ Only customers judge quality – all other measures are irrelevant”
The United Kingdom experience in data collection and statistics on disability Ian Dale Head of Disability Analysis Department for Work and Pensions Steel.
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Measuring Results and Impact Evaluation: From Promises into Evidence
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Presenter: Kate Bell, MA PIP Reviewer
Presentation transcript:

RANDRAND CAHPS® Relevance of CAHPS® for Workers’ Compensation Medical Care Donna Farley Senior Health Policy Analyst, RAND Workers’ Compensation Colloquium May 1, 2003

2 RANDRAND CAHPS® Goal of Presentation To explore how customer satisfaction for worker’s compensation medical care can draw upon experiences with the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans (CAHPS)®.

3 RANDRAND CAHPS® CAHPS Is a Consumer Assessment Survey and Reporting System Purpose: to provide consumers information on health plan and provider performance as judged by other consumers who used them. Complete survey and reporting package »Thoroughly tested surveys »Sampling and survey administration protocols »Guidance for comparative reports of survey results Used across the country for various populations and health care settings

4 RANDRAND CAHPS® The CAHPS Reporting Dimensions Global ratings (on a 0 to 10 scale) »Rating of primary doctor or nurse »Rating of health plan Reports of consumers’ experiences (composites) »Getting needed care (4 items) »Getting care without long waits (4 items) »How well doctors communicate (4 items) »Courtesy and respect by office staff (2 items) »Health plan customer service, information (3 items)

5 RANDRAND CAHPS® Formats to Report CAHPS Scores Stars Plan 1** Plan 2** Plan 3** Plan 4*** Plan 5ns Dimension: Courtesy, respect, and helpfulness of medical office staff Bars 0% 100% Sometimes, never UsuallyAlways

6 RANDRAND CAHPS® The First CAHPS Cycle: The Basic Surveys and Reports Designed and tested surveys and reports Tested implementation of the survey protocols and reporting formats in field demonstrations Modified the survey and report template based on lessons from the demonstrations Assessed the effects of CAHPS information on actual health plan choices made by consumers

7 RANDRAND CAHPS® How We Tested CAHPS Products Laboratory experiments – simulated health plan choices by consumers »Commercial: CAHPS scores versus costs »Medicaid: CAHPS scores versus benefits Field demonstrations – CAHPS survey and report implemented by sponsors »Large private employers »Medicaid programs »States as employers

8 RANDRAND CAHPS® Lessons About CAHPS Products from the Demonstrations The CAHPS survey »Covers the most important topics »The expertise behind survey was far more than sponsors could do on their own »Off-the-shelf questionnaires and protocols for sampling and data collection were valued »Concerns about high costs to field the survey Reporting of CAHPS scores »Opinions differed on whether and how to report »Consensus that report should be short and clear »Distribute CAHPS reports with other information

9 RANDRAND CAHPS® What Effects Does CAHPS Have? Efficacy versus Effectiveness The effectiveness of an intervention depends on — »its efficacy in the treated population and »the proportion of the target population reached for treatment We tested CAHPS effects on consumer plan choices »Laboratory studies used to estimate efficacy »Field demonstrations used to estimate effectiveness under “real world” conditions.

10 RANDRAND CAHPS® Efficacy Findings from the Laboratory Studies Participants more likely to choose health plans that performed better on CAHPS. Medicaid beneficiaries traded off transportation or dental benefits for plans with higher ratings. Commercial plan enrollees considered CAHPS ratings and costs separately in choices. Provided evidence of the efficacy of CAHPS information under controlled conditions.

11 RANDRAND CAHPS® Effectiveness Findings from the Demonstrations CAHPS information influenced plan choices only under certain circumstances; effects were small. Effects limited to the subset of consumers who actively study the information they are provided. Even for these consumers, the information may make a difference only when »differences in ratings among plans are large, »ratings are discordant with previously held beliefs about plan quality, and »the reports are easy to read and understand.

12 RANDRAND CAHPS® The Second CAHPS Cycle: Building Upon CAHPS 1 Products Strengthening evidence base for effective reports Developing tools for quality improvement activities to improve performance on CAHPS Modifying survey to cover three levels – health plan, provider group, individual provider (with results rolled up or down) Expanding survey and report to other settings and populations

13 RANDRAND CAHPS® Consumer Satisfaction for Workers’ Compensation Medical Care How will information on consumer satisfaction (consumer assessment) be used for workers’ compensation medical care? »Feedback to workers’ compensation plans and providers on their performance »Information for survey sponsors to select and monitor plans and providers »Information to workers for choice of a workers’ compensation plan or provider »Comparisons of plans’ and providers’ performance to each other and other benchmarks

14 RANDRAND CAHPS® Drawing Upon CAHPS for Collecting and Reporting Workers’ Assessments Determine what information is to be collected »Aspects of care important to consumers »Information needed by the survey sponsors »Information needed for quality improvement Develop and test items and survey as a whole Design sampling and data collection protocol Determine strategy for reporting survey results – what is reported, to whom, in what format Many aspects of the CAHPS contents and lessons on implementation are relevant to this setting