Xavier Forns, MD Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic IDIBAPS and CIBREHD Barcelona, Octubre 2013 Tratamiento de poblaciones especiales Curso de Residentes AEEH.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Future Directions in HCV Therapy Eric Lawitz, MD, AGAF,CPI Medical Director, The Texas Liver Institute Clinical Professor of Medicine University of Texas.
Advertisements

Management of Chronic Hepatitis C in 2013
Edited by Morris Sherman MD BCh PhD FRCP(C) Associate Professor of Medicine University of Toronto Protease Inhibitors in Chronic Hepatitis C: An Update.
F/C AETC Faculty HIV/HCV Thursday, June 26, 2014 | 1:30-2:30pm (EDT) Facilitator/Didactic Presenter Dushyantha T. Jayaweera MD, MRCOG (UK), FACP University.
Direct Acting Antivirals: What are they
How to manage non responders Lawrence Serfaty Service d’Hépatologie, UMR S 893 Hôpital Saint-Antoine, UPMC, Paris Clinical case 1.
C.H.B. HCV PRE AND POST-LIVER TRANSPLANTATION Professor Didier SAMUEL Centre Hépatobiliaire, Inserm Unit 785, Paris XI University Hopital Paul Brousse,
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin to Prevent Post-Transplant HCV Recurrence Phase 2 Curry MP, et al. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:100-7.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir in Treatment-Experienced GT1 with Cirrhosis SIRIUS Phase 2 Treatment Experienced Bourliere.
Controversies: Lead in or no lead in ? PRO Controversies: Lead in or no lead in ? PRO Lawrence Serfaty Hôpital Saint-Antoine Paris 5th Paris Hepatitis.
Slide 1 of 8 From MG Peters, MD, at Los Angeles, CA: April 22, 2013, IAS-USA. IAS–USA Marion G. Peters, MD John V. Carbone, MD, Endowed Chair Professor.
How to optimize the treatment of HCV-4 patients? Nabil Antaki MD, FRCPC Aleppo, Syria Paris, January 30, 2012.
Case Discussion: Redefining Best Practices in HCV Management in the Transplant Setting This activity is supported by an independent educational grant from.
HCV EASL CPG 2011: what is (still) new? Antonio Craxì GI & Liver Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S. University of Palermo, Italy
Predictors of response with boceprevir and telaprevir combined with pegylated interferon and ribavirin Paul Y Kwo, MD Professor of Medicine Medical Director,
Kwo PY. NEJM 2014;371: CORAL-I  Design OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV Open label Phase II years Chronic HCV infection, genotype 1 Liver transplantation.
ALLY-1  Design  Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml) in genotype 1 DCV 60 mg qd + SOF 400 mg qd + RBV DCV 60 mg qd + SOF 400 mg qd + RBV Not randomised.
Alessio Aghemo First Division of Gastroenterology Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Università degli Studi di Milano 5 th Paris.
Response Guided Therapy Fabien Zoulim Hepatology Department & INSERM Unit 1052, Lyon University Lyon, France.
No prior therapy with PI
CURRY  Design Open-label CURRY Study: SOF + RBV for HCV with liver cancer before transplantation ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection Any genotype HCV RNA.
COSMOS SOF + SMV + RBV SOF + SMV Randomisation 2 : 1 : 2 : 1* Open-label * Randomisation was stratified on genotype (1a or 1b) in both cohorts, IL28B in.
Maria Buti Hospital General Universitario Vall Hebron Barcelona-. Spain Relapser or Non Responder? Chronic Hepatitis C.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Daclatasvir + Sofosbuvir in Genotype 3 ALLY-3 Study Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced Nelson DR,
How to optimize treatment of G1 patients? Prof. G. K. K. Lau 2012.
NS5A and polymerase inhibitors Mark Sulkowski, MD Professor of Medicine Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland
Randomisation* 2 : 1 Double blind *Randomisation was stratified on genotype (1a or 1b or other) and IL28B genotype (CC, CT or TT) N = 133 N = 260 W24W48.
How to manage G1 relapsers and non-responders George V. Papatheodoridis, MD Associate Professor in Medicine & Gastroenterology 2nd Department of Internal.
Future treatment of patients with HCV cirrhosis Marc Bourlière Dept of Hepato-gastroenterology 5 th Paris Hepatitis Conference Saint Joseph Hospital, Marseille.
SMV SOF 400 Open-label OPTIMIST-2 Study: SMV + SOF for genotype 1 and cirrhosis W12  Objective –Superiority of SVR 12 (HCV RNA historical control.
UNITY-1 DCV/ASV/BCB No randomisation Open-label UNITY-1 Study: daclatasvir/asunaprevir/beclabuvir in genotype 1 without cirrhosis  Design W12 ≥ 18 years.
Reddy KR. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:27-35 ATTAIN SMV + TVR placebo + PEG-IFN + RBV TVR + SMV placebo + PEG-IFN + RBV Randomisation* 1 : 1 Double-blind.
Clinical case Laurent CASTERA 5th PHC, Paris, January Service d’Hépatologie Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris-7, Clichy, France.
SIRIUS Placebo LDV/SOF + placebo Randomisation* 1 : 1 Double-blind SIRIUS Study: LDV/SOF ± RBV for genotype 1 and cirrhosis with non response to prior.
 Treatment regimens –Co-formulated ombitasvir (OBV)/paritaprevir (PTV)/rironavir (r) : 25/150/100 mg QD = 2 tablets –Dasabuvir (DSV) : 250 mg bid  Objective.
SOLAR-2 LDV/SOF + RBV Randomisation of the 7 groups 1 : 1 Open-label SOLAR-2 Study: LDV/SOF + RBV in decompensated and post-liver transplant with genotype.
SOLAR-1 LDV/SOF + RBV Randomisation* of the 7 groups 1 : 1 Open-label SOLAR-1 Study: LDV/SOF + RBV in advanced liver disease  Design W12W24 ≥ 18 years.
SOF/VEL 400/100 mg qd N = 75 W24 SOF/VEL > 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 to 6 Naïve or treatment-experienced No prior treatment with NS5A or.
No randomization N = 59 W12W24 Arm B : compensated cirrhosis N = 31 N = 29 Arm C : compensated cirrhosis Arm A : No cirrhosis AGATE-II Study: OBV/PTV/r.
SMV + DCV + SOF Open label Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 or 4 Treatment-naïve or pre-treated with PEG-IFN ± RBV Portal hypertension or liver decompensation.
Triple Therapy Today Phase III Results in G1 Relapsers and Non Responders – Telaprevir 5 th Paris Hepatitis Conference Paris, 30. January 2012 Stefan Zeuzem.
Forns X. J Hepatology 2015; 63: C-SALVAGE Study: grazoprevir + elbasvir + RBV in genotype 1 with failure to PI-based regimen –NS3 and NS5A RAVs.
Asselah T. AASLD 2015, Abs. 714 Randomisation 1:1 Open-label years HCV genotype 4 HCV RNA ≥ 1,000 IU/ml Naïve or pre-treated with PEG-IFN + RBV (Part.
 Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), with 95% CI, next observation carried backward DCV + SOF + RBV Randomised* 1:1 Open-label ALLY-3+ study: DCV.
Open-label W24 ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection All genotypes HCV RNA ≥ 10,000 IU/ml Liver transplantation months earlier Child Pugh ≤ 7 and MELD.
 Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), with 95% CI, by ITT, descriptive analysis OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV No randomisation Open-label CORAL-I Study cohort.
Dore G. J Hepatol 2016; 64:19-28 MALACHITE TVR + PEG-IFN + RBV Randomisation Open-label years HCV genotype 1 HCV RNA > 10,000 IU/ml Naïve (MALACHITE-I)
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Daclatasvir + Asunaprevir + Peg/RBV in Genotype 1 and 4 HALLMARK-QUAD Study Phase 3 Treatment-Experienced Jensen.
36 year old HCV+ woman, Risk factor: occasional IVDU 15 years ago First treatment with PEG-IFN/RBV in 2002 –only qualitative PCR available : positive at.
Trends in Treatment of Recurrent Hepatitis C After Liver Transplantation Kate Forgan-Smith KA Stuart 1,4, C Tallis 1,4 GA Macdonald 1,3,4, J Fawcett 2,3.
Massimo Puoti Dept. of Infectious Diseases AO Ospedale Niguarda Cà Granda Milan, Italy ELPA Symposium: COMPASSIONATE USE IN HEPATITIS C What patients populations.
Liver transplantation for HCV infection R3 양 인 호 /Prof 김 병 호.
Daniel Dhumeaux, Henri Mondor hospital Créteil, France HCV compassionate use programme The French experience Amsterdam, April.
No HBV or HIV co-infection
R2. 임형석 / Pf. 김병호. I NTRODUCTION Chronic hepatitis C infection 130~150 million worldwide 7 genotypes genotype 1 predominates(about 70% in USA): most difficult.
LDV/SOF Randomisation * 1:1 Open-label ≥ 20 years, Japanese Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 HCV RNA ≥ IU/ml Treatment-naive, or pre-treated Compensated.
Genotype 1 HCV infection Stable immunosuppressive therapy
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Daclatasvir + Sofosbuvir in Genotype 3 ALLY-3 Study
Design Randomisation 1 : 1 Open-label W16 W24 > 18 years
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
No cirrhosis or compensated cirrhosis** No HBV or HIV co-infection
ARV-trial.com RUBY-I Study, cohort 2: ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir + RBV for HCV genotype 1 with renal impairment Design Open label W12.
LEAGUE-1 study: daclatasvir + SMV + RBV for genotype 1
Elbasvir + Grazoprevir + Ribavirin in PI-experienced HCV GT1 C-SALVAGE
ARV-trial.com IMPACT Study: SMV + DCV + SOF in HCV genotype 1 with decompensated liver disease Design Open label ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype.
GS-US Study: SOF/VEL + GS-9857 in genotype 1 - Phase II
Phase 2b Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
CONCERTO-4 Study: SMV + PEG-IFNa-2b + RBV for genotype 1
Presentation transcript:

Xavier Forns, MD Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic IDIBAPS and CIBREHD Barcelona, Octubre 2013 Tratamiento de poblaciones especiales Curso de Residentes AEEH

Patient survival in HCV-positive and HCV-negative individuals. ONT/ RETH ( ) Hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

65-year old patient with HCV-related liver cirrhosis An US examination reveals 2 HCC (3,5+1 cm diameter) After extensive evaluation the patient is included in the waiting list for liver transplantation. Treatment of hepatitis C in the waiting list of liver transplantation Genotype 1b IL28 CT; Viral load IU/mL Previous therapy with PegIFN and RBV in 2008: partial responder (> 2 log decrease in VL at week 12).

Should we treat this patient in the waiting list? Bilirubin 1 mg/dL, albumin 39 g/dL, platelets No ascites, transient elastography 19 kPa. What treatment would you propose? a) PegIFN + RBV b) PegIFN+RBV+PI (telaprevir/boceprevir) Treatment of hepatitis C in the waiting list of liver transplantation

Triple therapy in patients with cirrhosis (CUPIC): efficacy Increased on treatment virological response with PR + BOC/TPV Hezode et al EASL % patientns with HCV-RNA < LOD 49% 51% 62% 81% 77% 58% BOC (n=190) TVR (n=295) % 16% Cirrhotic patients (CUPIC) relapsers/partial responders Week 4 Week 8 Week 12 Week 16

Probability of bacterial infections ,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 P < 0.01 Child B–C(n = 57) Child A (n = 45) Time (days) Risk of life-threatening side effects: bacterial infections (SBP, SB) Carrion JA,et al. J Hepatol Safety of antiviral therapy in patients awaiting liver transplantation

Patients, n (% patients with at least one event)Telaprevir n=295 Serious adverse events (SAEs)*160 (54.2%) Premature discontinuation Due to SAEs 139 (47.1%) 63 (21.3%) Death Septicemia, Septic shock, GI Bleeding, Encephalopathy, others 7 (2.1%) Infection (Grade 3/4)27 (9.1%) Hepatic decompensation (Grade 3/4)15 (5.1%) Boceprevir n= (51%) 80 (42.1%) 27 (14.2%) 3(1.6%) 8 (4.2%) 9 (4.7%) CUPIC French Cohort: safety analysis Hezode et al EASL 2013 FactorORIC 95%p Platelets < /mm33,111,3-7,70,009 Albumin < 3,5 g/dl6,332,6-15< 0,0001

Triple therapy in patients in the waiting list for liver transplantation Treatment: PegIFN alfa2a RBV mg/d + Telaprevir 1125/12 h LT Viral load (IU/mL) Time (weeks) Ramirez et al, Am J Transpl 2009 Risk of relapse post-LT Clinical and virological outcome Viral load (IU/mL) Hemoglobin level (g/dL) RBV to 600 mg/d TVP PR LT

Treatment in patients awaiting LT: risk of resistance Years after end of therapy % 71% 62% 59% V36M T54S R155K Any mutation Cumulative rate of reversion to wild-type (%) Weeks after end of therapy Vierling et al EASL 2010 Selection of PIs resistance strains may compromise treatment after LT in case of severe hepatitis C recurrence

Wk Sofosbuvir 400 mg QD + RBV SVR12 CONTAINMENT: Sofosbuvir + RBV Prior to Liver Transplant  HCV Patients on LT list due to HCC –Expected transplant within 3-12 months  Primary efficacy endpoint : SVR12 post-LT LT Treat up to time of LT or maximum of 24 weeks ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT DAA and prevention of hepatitis C recurrence

66-year old patient with hepatitis C recurrence after LT Transient elastography (12 months after LT) 10 kPa. Liver biopsy: F3 Treatment of hepatitis C in the liver transplant setting Should we treat the patient? How? 1) PegIFN-RBV 2) PegIFN-RBV + PI

Carrion JA, et al. Gastroenterology 2007; Effect of SVR on disease progression HVPG (mmHg) p = p = p = NO (n = 26) YES (n = 11) Sustained virological response Berenguer M, et al. Am J Transpl Patient survival in SVR (n = 33) vs NR (n = 56) P= Follow-up since LT (days) Outcomes and response to antiviral therapy after LT

Immunosuppression: tacrolimus 2 mg/d (levels 7 ng/mL) Treatment of hepatitis C in the liver transplant setting Bilirubin 1 mg/dL, AST 243 IU/L, GGT 323 IU/L, Br 1,6 mg/dL, Hb 12,6 g/L, platelets , neutrophils 2300 If we use a PI, use telaprevir or boceprevir?

Absorption Metabolism P-glycoprotein: absorption excretion of substrates CYP3A4: CsA and tacrolimus Protease inhibitors (PI): substrates and inhibitors CsA reduce to ~ 1/4 (200 mg/d to 50 mg/d) TAC reduce to ~ 1/30 (2 mg/d to 0.5 mg/week) Telaprevir: first day IS dosing CsA reduce to ~ 1/2 (200 mg/d to 100 mg/d) TAC reduce to ~ 1/8 (4 mg/d to 0.5 mg/d) Boceprevir: first day IS dosing Check every other day during first week of triple therapy (or until steady state) Back to baseline dose after IP interruption (check weekly for at least 1 month) Coilly et al, Liver Int 2013 Safety and efficacy of triple therapy in the LT setting

Viral load (IU/mL) Hemoglobin level (g/dL) RBV 600 mg/d Transfusion and EPO 4 Fs 10 kPa Fs 6,3 kPa Treatment of hepatitis C in the liver transplant setting RBV 400 mg/d Tarcolimus 2 mg/d a 0,4 mg/dTarcolimus 0,4 mg/d a 2,5 mg/d PR PR+ BOC

Coilly et al EASL 2013; Verna et al EASL 2013 Safety and efficacy of triple therapy in the LT setting Baseline characteristicsFrench cohort n=98 Median age (years)50 F2-F4 (%) FCH (%) Time to LT (months)37 Naïve /Non response/relapse (%)48/37/15 CsA vs TAC (%)41/53 Genotype 1a vs 1b30/70 Telaprevir vs Boceprevir58/42 USA cohort n= /40/13 41/57 55/38 88/12

Coilly et al EASL 2013 French cohort Efficacy of triple therapy in the LT setting Week 12 EVR % patientns with HCV-RNA < LOD 61% 82% BOC TVR % 88% Week 48 EOT n=41n=57 n=17n=16 USA cohort Week 4 RVR % patientns with HCV-RNA < LOD 63% % Week 48 EOT n=43 Verna et al EASL % Week 52 SVR4 n=43

Coilly et al EASL 2013; Verna et al EASL 2013 Safety and efficacy of triple therapy in the LT setting Frequency and type of side effectFrench cohort n=98 Serious adverse events leading discontunuation21% Anemia requiring EPO Anemia requiring Transfusion 95% 43% Rejection8% Renal failure16% Death6,3% USA cohort n=102 11% 79% 46% 4% 34% 6%

Patients awaiting LT (HCV) Child-Pugh < 8 (MELD < 18) Genotype 2,3 o 4 Peg-IFN + RBV a Genotype 1 Peg-IFN + RBV+/- TVP/BOC a,b Child-Pugh ≥ 8 (MELD ≥ 18) No treatment Consider clinical trial IFN-free (DAA) a Naive, relapsers and partials (in nulls lead-in phase) b Do not add PI if portal hypertension and albumin < 35g/L HCV recurrence Follow-up, individualize therapy (or wait for DAA) Mild progression of recurrence Liver Stiffness < 8.7 kPa F ≥ 2 and HVPG ≥ 6 mmHg Liver Stiffness > 8.7 kPa G2 or G3 Peg-RBV G1 Peg-RBV+/- IP Crespo et al Gastroenterology, 2012

HCV-infected patient with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis 6 months post-LT Daclatasvir 60 mg/d + Sofosbuvir 400 mg/d (24 weeks) Fontana et al AASLD 2012 IFN-free regimen in HCV-infected LT recipients

Viral Hepatitis Unit Liver Transplantation Unit