CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) Multigrid accelerated numerical methods based on implicit scheme for moving.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Instructor: André Bakker
Advertisements

Fluent Overview Ahmadi/Nazridoust ME 437/537/637.
Dominic Hudson, Simon Lewis, Stephen Turnock
CFD II w/Dr. Farouk By: Travis Peyton7/18/2015 Modifications to the SIMPLE Method for Non-Orthogonal, Non-Staggered Grids in k- E Turbulence Flow Model.
University of Southampton Southampton, UK
EULER Code for Helicopter Rotors EROS - European Rotorcraft Software Romuald Morvant March 2001.
Andreas Krumbein > 30 January 2007 MIRACLE Final Meeting, ONERA Châtillon, Folie 1 Navier-Stokes High-Lift Airfoil Computations with Automatic Transition.
1 Pressure-based Solver for Incompressible and Compressible Flows with Cavitation Sunho Park 1, Shin Hyung Rhee 1, and Byeong Rog Shin 2 1 Seoul National.
External Convection: Laminar Flat Plate
Modeling Wing Tank Flammability Dhaval D. Dadia Dr. Tobias Rossmann Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Piscataway, New Jersey Steven Summer Federal.
..perhaps the hardest place to use Bernoulli’s equation (so don’t)
RANS predictions of a cavitating tip vortex 8th International Symposium on Cavitation Tuomas Sipilä*, Timo Siikonen** *VTT Technical Research Centre of.
Pharos University ME 352 Fluid Mechanics II
Numerical Uncertainty Assessment Reference: P.J. Roache, Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering, Hermosa Press, Albuquerque.
Introduction to numerical simulation of fluid flows
Coupled Fluid-Structural Solver CFD incompressible flow solver has been coupled with a FEA code to analyze dynamic fluid-structure coupling phenomena CFD.
Steady Aeroelastic Computations to Predict the Flying Shape of Sails Sriram Antony Jameson Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics Stanford University First.
Parallel Mesh Refinement with Optimal Load Balancing Jean-Francois Remacle, Joseph E. Flaherty and Mark. S. Shephard Scientific Computation Research Center.
1 CFD Analysis Process. 2 1.Formulate the Flow Problem 2.Model the Geometry 3.Model the Flow (Computational) Domain 4.Generate the Grid 5.Specify the.
AIAA SciTech 2015 Objective The objective of the present study is to model the turbulent air flow around a horizontal axis wind turbine using a modified.
Lecture Objectives: Review discretization methods for advection diffusion equation Accuracy Numerical Stability Unsteady-state CFD Explicit vs. Implicit.
Wind Modeling Studies by Dr. Xu at Tennessee State University
Lecture Objectives Review SIMPLE CFD Algorithm SIMPLE Semi-Implicit Method for Pressure-Linked Equations Define Residual and Relaxation.
Jean-Charles Matéo-Vélez, Frédéric Thivet, Pierre Degond * ONERA - Centre de Toulouse * CNRS - Mathématiques pour l'Industrie et la Physique, Toulouse.
AIAA th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on MAO, 09/05/2002, Atlanta, GA 0 AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINITIES Serhat Hosder,
A. Spentzos 1, G. Barakos 1, K. Badcock 1 P. Wernert 2, S. Schreck 3 & M. Raffel 4 1 CFD Laboratory, University of Glasgow, UK 2 Institute de Recherche.
Introduction Aerodynamic Performance Analysis of A Non Planar C Wing using Experimental and Numerical Tools Mano Prakash R., Manoj Kumar B., Lakshmi Narayanan.
2D unsteady computations for COSDYNA > Tony Gardner > Folie 1 2D unsteady computations with deformation and adaptation for COSDYNA Tony Gardner.
Recent and Future Research for Bird-like Flapping MAVs of NPU Prof. B.F.Song Aeronautics School of Northwestern Polytechnical University.
C M C C Centro Euro-Mediterraneo per i Cambiamenti Climatici COSMO General Meeting - September 8th, 2009 COSMO WG 2 - CDC 1 An implicit solver based on.
Wind Energy Program School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Computational Studies of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:
August 14 th, 2012 Comparison of compressible explicit density-based and implicit pressure-based CFD methods for the simulation of cavitating flows Romuald.
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Solving Euler Equations Andrey Andreyev Advisor: James Baeder Mid.
Mass Transfer Coefficient
Andreas Krumbein > 6 October th ONERA-DLR Aerospace Symposium - ODAS 2006, ONERA, Centre de Toulouse, Folie 1 e N Transition Prediction for 3D Wing.
2004Fluid Mechanics II Prof. António Sarmento - DEM/IST u Contents: –1/7 velocity law; –Equations for the turbulent boundary layer with zero pressure gradient.
Order of Magnitude Scaling of Complex Engineering Problems Patricio F. Mendez Thomas W. Eagar May 14 th, 1999.
Using the Segregated and Coupled Solvers
Lecture Objectives Review Define Residual and Relaxation SIMPLE CFD Algorithm SIMPLE Semi-Implicit Method for Pressure-Linked Equations.
© Saab AB Transonic store separation studies on the SAAB Gripen aircraft using CFD Ingemar Persson and Anders Lindberg Stockholm,
Chapter 7 External Convection
CFD Applications for Marine Foil Configurations Volker Bertram, Ould M
HEAT TRANSFER FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION
Compressor Cascade Pressure Rise Prediction
Modeling of the Unsteady Separated Flow over Bilge Keels of FPSO Hulls under Heave or Roll Motions Yi-Hsiang Yu 09/23/04 Copies of movies/papers and today’s.
CE 1501 Flow Over Immersed Bodies Reading: Munson, et al., Chapter 9.
CFD Study of the Development of Vortices on a Ring Wing
Wind Energy Program School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Computational Studies of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:
Lecture Objectives: Review discretization methods for advection diffusion equation –Accuracy –Numerical Stability Unsteady-state CFD –Explicit vs. Implicit.
School of Aerospace Engineering MITE Numerical Simulation of Centrifugal Compressor Stall and Surge Saeid NiaziAlex SteinLakshmi N. Sankar School of Aerospace.
AIAA th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on MAO, 09/05/2002, Atlanta, GA 0 AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINTIES Serhat Hosder, Bernard.
Code verification and mesh uncertainty The goal is to verify that a computer code produces the right solution to the mathematical model underlying it.
Lecture Objectives: - Numerics. Finite Volume Method - Conservation of  for the finite volume w e w e l h n s P E W xx xx xx - Finite volume.
1 Tutorial. 2 Solution Process 1.Gather Information 2.Create the Computational Grid 3.Set the Boundary Conditions 4.Set the Initial Conditions 5.Set the.
Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology STUDY OF EFFECT OF GAS INJECTION OVER A TORPEDO ON FLOW-FIELD USING CFD.
A V&V Overview of the 31st Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics
CHAPTER 2 - EXPLICIT TRANSIENT DYNAMIC ANALYSYS
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling
Numerical Investigation of Turbulent Flows Using k-epsilon
Blade Design for Modern Wind Turbines
Fluent Overview Ahmadi/Nazridoust ME 437/537/637.
Convergence in Computational Science
The application of an atmospheric boundary layer to evaluate truck aerodynamics in CFD “A solution for a real-world engineering problem” Ir. Niek van.
AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINITIES
AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINTIES
Convergence in Numerical Science
Objective Numerical methods Finite volume.
Practical Course SC & V Discretization II AVS Dr. Miriam Mehl
AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINTIES
Accurate Flow Prediction for Store Separation from Internal Bay M
Presentation transcript:

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) Multigrid accelerated numerical methods based on implicit scheme for moving control volumes for WT flows simulating E.Kazhan, I.Kursakov, A.Lysenkov

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) 2

3 Explicit approximation – convective & diffusion fluxes – turbulent model source terms convection: Godunov-Kolgan-Rodionov(Russian TVD) diffusion: central-difference approximation sources: local-implicit scheme stable only with CFL ≤ 1

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) Implicit scheme. Smoother 4 Roe linearization«explicit» part Linear system: Next step value:

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) Linearization 5

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) Localization 6 Example: 1-D Euler (for simplification) Gauss-Zeidel

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) Zonal approach 7 P0P0 Zone separation: main (inviscid) area - explicit scheme thin layer near wall - implicit scheme Zonal approach: Ignoring small-scale processes in boundary layer, assuming them as quasi-steady Correct global-scale processes description Global-scale processes predominate the behavior of boundary layer Explicit scheme area Implicit scheme area Implicit scheme: Large computation time per step CFL can be larger than 1 Effective only with huge CFL Results: incorrect description of global-scale processes

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) Explicit-implicit combination 8 ExplicitImplicit

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) Calculation speed-up: multigrid 9 Fine grid High solution accuracy Low convergence speed Coarse grid Low solution accuracy High convergence speed

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) RANS in rotating frame 10 - axis of rotation - rotating rate This system can be solved, but there are difficulties in the calculation of the far field at long distance to the axis of rotation Additional terms appear in the sources No change of flows

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) RANS on rotating mesh 11 For rotation around the axis X: Additional terms are entered into the calculation of flows associated with the flow due to the grid rotation. In the source term is the correction to the Coriolis force. The flow through the rotating mesh faces An amendment to the Coriolis force Special thanks to Dr. V.Titarev

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) Solver modifications for solutions on rotating mesh 12 The solution of the Riemann problem of the discontinuity decay on moving mesh Modification of the boundary conditions:  slip condition - given by the rotation rate  impermeability condition – condition is stated for  the "Riemann" condition – mesh rotation rate is taken into account in determining the flow direction Time step correction for the explicit scheme Roe matrixes are modified for implicit scheme

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) Features of the implicit scheme on rotating meshes 13 The matrix of the Roe matrix eigenvalues: Rotating rate ​​ is accounted in the stabilizing matrixes

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) 14

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) Implicit smoother test case 15 Boundary layer on plate M = 0.8 Re = 22.8×10 6 NACA 0012 M = 0.8 α = 0° Re = 9×10 6 CPU time Acceleration : 27 times Acceleration : 20 times COMGLEI (Combination of Global and Local tau type with Explicit and Implicit schemes)

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) Multigrid test case 16 Onera M6 wing M = α = 3.06° Re = 11.72×10 6 Residual Friction drag coefficient Lift coefficient Fivefold solution convergence acceleration

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) Rotating mesh test case Computation PSP Precision on most considered regimes – %

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) 18

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) The thrust reverser impact on aircraft aerodynamics 19 velocity Lift “Jump” in Lift magnitude due to the flow structure reconfiguration

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) The thrust reverser impact on aircraft aerodynamics 20 Higher pressure zones Landing devices impacts on the reversed jets propagation Calculations considered landing devices allow determining the high loads zones

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) WT modeling 21 Brand new estimation of corrections for CL_max caused by the WT walls are obtained

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) Propeller characteristics calculation approach application 22 WT Т-104 Propeller test rig VP-107 Obtaining the integral characteristics of propeller: thrust, torque Propeller and airframe interference Experimental data corrections :  Calculation of the shaft cone and propeller blades interference  Calculation of the influence of the experimental setup elements on the propeller characteristics  Reynolds number influence

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) Propellers calculation features 23 Flow separation Mesh refinement at the blade end is required The maximum propeller thrust mode is alike the flow separation regime. Separation from the propeller blades should be well predicted.

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) Conclusion 24 1.Combined method based on the Godunov-Kolgan-Rodionov is proposed. 2.Acceleration: «Boundary layer on plate» ‑ 27 times; «Profile NACA0012» – up to 20 times; 3. Use of the multigrid approach demonstrates that the convergence of the solution is fivefold accelerated. 4. The solvers developed in this work allow to solving the wide class of stationary problems of computational aerodynamics.

CENTRAL AEROHYDRODYNAMIC INSTITUTE named after Prof. N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI) 25