1 SECTION 337 INVESTIGATIONS Managing Intellectual Property IP In China April 30, 2013 New York, New York.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fordham IP Law & Policy Conference: "ITC and Patents" April 29, 2011.
Advertisements

Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law Name / Date 1 Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law Competition.
1 Patent Infringement Litigation Before the U.S. International Trade Commission By Timothy DeWitt 24IP Law Group USA 12 E. Lake Dr. Annapolis, MD
Alternatives to IP Litigation July 13, 2012 Dan R. Gresham.
IP Border Detention with a Patent Topping Jasper Helder Severin de Wit.
1 Combating Counterfeit Goods in the United States Robert A. Lipstein Crowell & Moring, LLP February 18, 2004 Copyright 2004 Crowell & Moring LLP.
© 2011 Dean A. Pelletier Protecting Economic Drivers Because All Roads Lead To The U.S. January 14, 2011 The NAMM Show Anaheim,
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Dispute Settlement and Effective Enforcement of IP.
© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising The Global Law Firm for Israeli Companies Dispute Resolution in the United States.
1 COPYRIGHT © 2007 West Legal Studies in Business, a part of The Thomson Corporation. Thomson, the Star logo, and West Legal Studies in Business are trademarks.
Acupressure: The Role of Market Forces in China’s Emerging Copyright Enforcement Environment October 4, 2012 Eric Priest University of Oregon School of.
Patent Law A Career Choice For Engineers Azadeh Khadem Registered Patent Attorney November 25, 2008 Azadeh Khadem Registered Patent Attorney November 25,
What Are Your Products Doing Online? Presented by Anthony V. Lupo Sarah E. Bruno Arent Fox LLP Washington, DC | New York, NY | Los Angeles, CA August 20,
Chapter 2: Court Systems and Jurisdiction
§ 337 Investigations  Shortcomings of district court litigation in dealing with infringing imports  Nature of § 337 investigations  Popularity of §
Import Relief to Domestic Industry. - Free trade - Combating unfairly traded imports (subsidized, dumped in the United States) U.S. Trade Policy.
Types of Courts American Government. Standing  In order for a case to be heard in our legal system, the plaintiff must have standing to sue  This means.
What is law? Rights Duties Remedies. Types of Laws, etc. [Substantive vs. procedural] Civil vs. Criminal Public vs. Private International vs. Domestic.
CS 5060, Fall 2009 Digital Intellectual Property Law u Class web page at: u No textbook. Online treatise at:
C OMPETITION LAW IN NIGERIA Daniel Bwala. Background There is no specific Competition law in Nigeria at the moment. However there are laws or rules in.
1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association Apple v. Samsung Worldwide Litigation Overview Dewayne A Hughes AIPLA-CNCPI Meeting Paris, France.
American Intellectual Property Law Association Presentation for China State Administration for Industry and Commerce Based on a Presentation by William.
Friend or Foe: Section 337 IP Infringement Investigations at the United States International Trade Commission. Steven E. Adkins.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association ITC Pilot Program Domestic Industry Review Yuichi Watanabe IP Practice in Japan Committee.
Key trends in legislative regulation of Intellectual Property in China Miao Huang Dacheng (Ningbo) Law Offices July 29 th, 2015.
Recent Experience of the United States International Trade Commission: Caseload trends and the effects of the economic downturn Shara L. Aranoff Chairman.
Intro to Intellectual Property 05/13/2015. Exponential Inventor Intro to Intellectual Property 05/13/2015 Why is IP Important? Everyone makes a big deal.
Development of Competition Enforcement in Poland – 2009 Commitment Decisions Morvan Le Berre Competition Enforcement in.
BEIJING BRUSSELS CHICAGO DALLAS FRANKFURT GENEVA HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE SYDNEY TOKYO WASHINGTON, D.C. The.
Ministerstwo Gospodarki Counterfeiting and other problems in plant protection products marketing (presentation of ) Zbigniew Barszcz Department.
Observations on Trade Remedies at the USITC Daniel R. Pearson Chairman U.S. International Trade Commission 2007 Seoul International Forum on Trade Remedies.
STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF COMPETITION AGENCIES. GENERAL STRUCTURE OF CA CAs differ in size, structure and complexity The structure depicts power distribution.
Bradley Lecture International IP Law IM 350 – Fall 2012 Steven L. Baron November 15, 2012.
CAPACITY BUILDING TRAINING PROGRAMME ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND RELATED WTO ISSUES April 28-May 2, 2008 Session 3 Enforcement under the TRIPS.
Inventing the Future – The Role of Patents and Utility Models in Leveraging Technical Innovation in the Market Place Ron Marchant CB FRSA Implementation.
1 INTRODUCTION OF THE LAWS ON ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION AND ABUSE OF MONOPONY POSITION IN VIETNAM Speaker: Mr. Trinh Anh Tuan Official Vietnam Competition.
July 15, 2007 The Intellectual Property High Court of Japan1 Shigenori Matsui University of British Columbia Faculty of Law July 15, 2007.
Chapter 08.  Describes property that is developed through an intellectual and creative process  Inventions, writings, trademarks that are a business’s.
W.T.O TRIPs AND WIPO. Intellectual Property Imagination is more important than knowledge Albert Einstein.
CHAPTER 3 INTERNATIONAL LAW DAVIDSON, KNOWLES & FORSYTHE Business Law: Cases and Principles in the Legal Environment (8 th Ed.)
Chapter 43 Administrative Law and Regulatory Agencies
Introduction to Intellectual Property Class One: TYPES OF IP Prof. Susanna Frederick Fischer The Catholic University of America August 25, 2003.
Enforcing IP Rights Involving Foreign Companies Greg Vogler Chicago, Illinois May 2013.
Industrial Design Marco Marzano de Marinis SMEs Division.
© Haihong Liu, SISU Law School Nov Shan Zhai.
COPYRIGHT LAW 2003 Professor Fischer CLASS of April : PREEMPTION.
Protection of Trade Secrets; current issues WIPO-UKRAINE SUMMER SCHOOL ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – JULY 2011.
ANTI-DUMPING AND COUNTERVAILING DUTY
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 26 Antitrust and Monopoly.
12/16/07/10 – Preparatory Measures before Trade Fairs in DE HG Preparatory/Preventive Measures before Exhibiting at Trade Fairs in Germany Heinz.
Copyright Protection in Indonesia: General Information on the Implementation of Copyright Law in Indonesia; policies and planning Seoul, November 2007.
TRADE SECRETS workshop I © 2009 Prof. Charles Gielen EU-China Workshop on the Protection of Trade Secrets Shanghai June 2009.
Chapter 2: Court Systems and Jurisdiction
Overview of presentation
Intro to Intellectual Property 3.0
European Union Law Week 10.
European Court of Human Rights
International IP Roundtable UNLV, 8 April Seizure of Goods in Transit
Amazon. Amazon ADVERTISING LAW LIMITS What do you think should be the limits placed on advertisers? Should a particular audience be protected?
ITC and Trademark Infringement Cases
Don’t get Burned: How to Protect Your Intellectual Property
ITC Section 337 Investigations: An Alternative Battleground
Article III of the Constitution The Courts
Section 337 Actions at the ITC: Past, Present, and Future
The Judicial System Structure.
United States — Countervailing and Anti-dumping Measures on Certain Products from China Bijou, Promito, Vasily.
By Karwan dana Ishik university
The International Legal Framework
Chapter 43 Administrative Law and Regulatory Agencies
Article III of the Constitution The Courts
Presentation transcript:

1 SECTION 337 INVESTIGATIONS Managing Intellectual Property IP In China April 30, 2013 New York, New York

2 Summary of Section 337 Investigations The U.S. International Trade Commission conducts investigations under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 Section 337 counteracts any unfair act in the importation of goods in the U.S., typically intellectual property infringement ITC makes substantive determinations of patent infringement under section 337

3 Summary of Section 337 Investigations The complainant must have a domestic industry if the alleged violation involves a patent, trademark, copyright, mask work, or design; the complainant must establish injury for other types of unfair acts The unfair act -- typically patent infringement -- must involve an imported article The remedy consists of an exclusion order against imports of infringing or unfairly traded articles and a cease and desist order against named respondents--in other words the infringing imported article is totally knocked out of the market The remedy must be in the “public interest”--though this is not a major issue thus far

4 Section Substance - Prohibited Unfair Acts Section 337 counteracts any unfair act in the importation of goods in the U.S., including ― Acts that infringe U.S. patents, trademarks, copyrights, mask works, or designs ― Misappropriation of trade secrets ― Gray market goods ― Antitrust violations ― Possibly other kinds of unfair acts

5 Section 337 Investigations -- Substance -- Domestic Industry Domestic industry with respect to articles protected by a patent can be established by ― Significant investments in plant and equipment ― Significant employment of labor or capital ― Substantial investments in the exploitation of the patent through engineering, research and development, or licensing Sales and marketing alone do not constitute a domestic industry

6 Section Substance -- Remedies The ITC can issue General Exclusion Orders, Limited Exclusion Orders, and Cease and Desist Orders General Exclusion Orders direct U.S. Customs to exclude all infringing articles, even those of importers who are not respondents in the investigation--can be a very broad and helpful remedy The ITC can issue a General Exclusion Order if (a) it is necessary to prevent circumvention of an exclusion order limited to products of named persons; or (b) there is a pattern of violation and it is difficult to identify the source of infringing products

7 Section Substance -- Remedies, cont’d Limited Exclusion Orders direct U.S. Customs to exclude the infringing articles of named respondents in the investigation Cease and desist orders prohibit named respondents from importing, selling, marketing, or advertising infringing or unfairly traded articles--generally deals with conduct within the U.S. market rather than at the border No damages are available under section though many cases settle for significant payments

8 Section Substance -- Public Interest The Commission will not issue an exclusion order that is contrary to the public interest Under the public interest test, the Commission considers the effect of the exclusion order on ― the public health and welfare, ― competitive conditions in the United States economy, ― the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, and ― United States consumers

9 Section Procedure Investigations are conducted by Administrative Law Judges, who are experts in patent law, which are reviewed by the Commission Discovery is similar to discovery in the Federal Courts The ITC has nationwide jurisdiction and can compel international discovery Investigations are typically completed in 16 months Appeal is to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Exclusion orders are subject to presidential review within 60 days of the final Commission decision

10 Section 337- Enforcement Customs enforces ITC exclusion orders; it is not authorized to make substantive determinations of patent infringement Customs has seizure and forfeiture authority Parties frequently try to “design around” the infringed patent to avoid the exclusion order Customs can issue ruling letters on the design around claims The Commission can undertake enforcement proceedings The Commission can issue advisory opinions on the scope of its exclusion orders

11 For Further Information, contact Jeffrey M. Telep King & Spalding LLP 1700 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C (202)