Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board— AiM, Achievement in Motion for Student Success Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment FOR Learning in theory
Advertisements

June 20, Your Presenters  Ken Mattingly – Rockcastle County  Jessica Addison – Todd County/KDE.
A Guide to Implementation
PORTFOLIO.
Transforming lives through learning Learner Dialogue & Profiling.
 Leadership For Student Learning Sharon Friesen, Candace Saar, Jim Brandon.
1 Introduction to the Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle (PTLC)
Learning Teaching Enhancing Supporting Sharing Social Studies Leadership Network October 24, 2014.
E FFECTIVE CURRICULUM COACHING Meredith Dunn Principal, Northern Elementary Melody Gallenstein Curriculum Coach, Northern Elementary September 2010.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Goal Understand the impact on student achievement from effective use of formative assessment, and the role of principals, teachers, and students in that.
Session Materials  Wiki
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION FOR IMPROVED STUDENT LEARNING:
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Overall Teacher Judgements
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board— AiM, Achievement in Motion for Student Success Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board Assessment.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
SEISMIC Whole School and PLC Planning Day Tuesday, August 13th, 2013.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
LITERACY PROFESSIONAL LEARNING RESOURCE Primary Schools Program Session 4: Professional Learning.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Connecting the Dots PLC AfL DI Higher Order Thinking TLCP Multi- Literacies Arts Technology Inquiry BIP SEF SIP.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Authentic Learning and Assessment Erin Gibbons Five Standards of Authentic Instruction  Higher-Order Thinking  Depth of Knowledge  Connectedness to.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
NEASCNEASC Standards Committees Kick-off Today’s Topic: Overview of the NEASC Game Plan and instructions for today’s work.
Development Team Day 4c Disseminating Practice April/May 2009.
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Fall, 2013 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
EPCI Early Primary Collaborative Inquiry Maple Leaf Public School Teston Village Public School Sixteenth Ave Public School Bond Lake Public School R.L.
Los Angeles New Administrators Leadership Program Unit of Study 2 CPSEL 1 & Reflective Leadership October 1, 2015.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
Teacher Leader Network Connection Robin Hebert - ELA Renee’ Yates - Math.
Hannah Love LSIS 5645 Core Assessment IV. Why is information literacy necessary?  To fulfill the goals of education by preparing students for The workplace.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP Supporting Common Assessments (Time for Common Assessments) © AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, 2012.
TEACHER LEADERSHIP AND COMPENSATION SYSTEM OVERVIEW.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
GAPSS ANALYSIS REPORT Lindley Sixth Grade Academy A T T H E B A R N E S C E N T E R ANALYSIS REVIEW “In the Pursuit of Excellence”
PIIC/PLN UPDATES AIU3 Coaches’ Workshop September 11, 2014.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
Hosted by Julie Milder Unpacking the Classroom Environment and Culture and Professional Collaboration and Communication Dimensions of 5D+
The School Effectiveness Framework
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
Professional Learning Project Update: Winter 2011.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Director of Mathematics, Coppell ISD Mary Kemper.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Implementation Training
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Norwalk Community School District Instructional Rounds October 26, 2010.
Supporting Regional AfL in K-12 Mathematics through Networked Professional Learning Panel: Eleanor Newman, Tammy Billen, Danielle LaPointe-McEwan, Sharon.
21st Century Pilot for System Learning
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Collaborative Inquiry and Professional Learning Communities
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Teacher Evaluator Student Growth Retraining Academy
Presentation transcript:

Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board— AiM, Achievement in Motion for Student Success Hastings and Prince Edward District School Board Assessment Informing Practice OFIP Network November 29, 2010

Success for Each Student

Caring Cooperation Honesty Humour Integrity Respect Responsibility Trustworthiness BIPSASIPSA

Targeted Evidenced Based Strategies

Professional Learning for all Staff Networks

School Effectiveness Framework Indicators 1.1 Students and teachers share a common understanding of the learning goals and related success criteria. 1.2 During learning, students receive ongoing, descriptive feedback based on the success criteria from the teacher and from peers. 2.1 Collaborative instructional leadership builds capacity to strengthen and enhance teaching and learning. 2.4 Job-embedded and inquiry-based professional learning builds capacity, informs instructional practice and contributes to a culture of learning. 4.3 Teaching and learning incorporates 21 st Century content, global perspectives, learning skills, resources and technologies. 4.4 Learning is deepened through authentic, relevant and meaningful student inquiry, (at the school inquiry based teaching and strategies support student inquiry).

OFIP Network Agenda 9:00Opening Messages 9:15Assessment for and as learning 9:45Collaborative Teacher Inquiry 10:30Break 10:45 Developing the Inquiry Question 12:00 Lunch 12:45 Co-Teaching, Co-Learning Models – Setting the Conditions 1:45School Team Inquiry Planning 3:00Closing Messages 3:30Administrators’ Meeting

School Effectiveness Framework Indicator SEF 1.1 Students and teachers share a common understanding of the learning goals and related success criteria. SEF 1.2 During learning, students receive ongoing, descriptive feedback based on the success criteria from the teacher and from peers.

Assessment for and as Learning “ Learning is easier when learners understand what goal they are trying to achieve, the purpose of achieving the goal, and the specific attributes of success.” Chappuis, 2002 “When we invest time up front to build the vision [of what students are to learn], we gain it back later in increased student motivation and the resulting higher quality work.” Chappuis

Assessment Embedded in Inquiry As teachers we continually adjust and modify instruction based on student need. We gather this information continuously, through a variety of assessment practices. We need to always be keeping in mind where and how we embed opportunities for students to self-monitor, and self-assess.

Assessment for and as Learning

Learning Tasks What is Assessment for learning and Assessment of learning? Review the descriptions of classroom activities and decide whether each reflects assessment for learning, as learning, or of learning. View Rethinking Classroom Assessment with Purpose in Mind and accompanying “Pyramid of Assessment” graphic and consider the following: How can teachers empower students to self-monitor, self- assess and direct their own learning?

Assessment Pyramid

School Effectiveness Framework Indicator SEF 2.4 Job-embedded and inquiry-based professional learning builds capacity, informs instructional practice and contributes to a culture of learning.

Collaborative Teacher Inquiry

Learning Task Number off 1-7 at your table Move to corresponding table number All read p. 1 & 2 of the Seven Principles of Teacher Inquiry and your corresponding ‘Principle’ Discuss the characteristics of the principle to develop a common understanding Generate and chart If…then… statements to share your common understanding of the principle. If collaborative teacher inquiry is reasoned, then participants will analyze data to understand the evidence collected.

Talk Time Half of table talk to each other about possible areas of focus for the inquiry Other half of the table listen and record what is heard Switch roles Use information gathered to help develop inquiry question / statement

Developing Inquiries Purpose: Narrowing our focus: developing the inquiry question / statement How does it align with school needs as recognized through SIPSA planning and SEF self-assessment? How does it meet the needs of your students? Is it subject-specific? Is it strategy-focused (i.e., student learning through collaborative group work)? How does our inquiry facilitate student learning? How is assessment embedded (success criteria and feedback)? How might you measure impact?

Drafting an Inquiry Question / Statement What is the impact of _____________________ ( teacher practice based on evidence-informed instructional approaches ) on ___________________ ? ( student learning linked to curriculum expectations ) If ______________________________________ (teacher practice based on evidence-informed instructional approaches) then ____________________________________. (student learning linked to curriculum expectations)

OFIP Inquiry Framework

School Effectiveness Framework Indicator SEF 2.1 Collaborative instructional leadership builds capacity to strengthen and enhance teaching and learning.

Learning Tasks Explore the possibilities: What are the benefits of co-learning, co-teaching? What are possible models of co-learning, co-teaching?

Learning Tasks Sample models

Co-Teaching: Planning for Success Brainstorm at your table what factors are required to set the conditions for a successful co-teaching day. Record your ideas on a flip chart under the headings student, teacher, classroom.

Learning Tasks Student Observations : What are students saying? What are students doing? Questions that I have. Other observations…

School Team Inquiry Planning:

School Team Inquiry Planning Planning for the task requires careful consideration. Refer to placemat questions around: Connections to curriculum Determining a learning goal Student engagement through authentic thinking tasks Embedding assessment Multiple entry points (based on student need/ readiness) Connection to inquiry question / statement Time factors Once a team has decided on their learning goal, their task, and methods of assessment (all related to their inquiry), they need to decide on the opportunities for student observation.

Collaborative Inquiry Poster

Next Steps… Please send your Co-Teaching session dates to Tammy Billen via