1 Digital Spark 2010 2 September 2010 Remedies and Sanctions under the IP Enforcement Directive Enrico Bonadio - Lecturer in Law Dundee Business School.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHINA - IP Issues Silas Brown Briffa East Midlands International Trade Association Wednesday 12 July 2006.
Advertisements

The civilian consequences of competition law violations Copenhagen 28 September European Commission, DG Competition How can we construe a European.
Financial Services and Consumer redress Unit DG SANCO The Commission‘s initiative on Collective Redress.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Dispute Settlement and Effective Enforcement of IP.
1 Patent Practice and Litigation in China John Huang Partner of AllBright Law Offices.
Damages! Civil law.
Activity Workshops and Trainings on “Enforcement of Industrial Property Rights” October 2014.
Enforcement Directive and Software Protection Joost Verbeek Partner ULYS Law Firm Brussels, 26th of April 2006.
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević Session 8, 7 May 2014.
National Remedies for the purposes of communication under the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Janka.
Liability and Procedure in European Antitrust Law The EU Damages Directive Does the European Union overstep the mark again?
The AMA Code of Ethics Could Egyptian Marketing Professionals Agree on a List of Rules, Perhaps Similar to This? The IMI Journal. Members of the AMA are.
International Experiences in Respect of Civil Remedies in IPR Litigation International Academic and Practical Conference on Current Issues Concerning Case.
DATA PROTECTION and Research University Research Ethics Committee – David Cauchi Office of the Data Protection Commissioner.
EEMAN & PARTNERS The Gathering of Evidence and Evidentiary Hurdles in the Judicial Process WIPO seminar for judges and enforcement institutions Sofia,
FEDERAL ANTIMONOPOLY SERVICE. Government regulation on banking market in Russia Competition aspects.
Breach of Contract and Remedies
Consumer Collective Actions in Cross-Border Claims LAURA CARBALLO PIÑEIRO (USC) 1.- Consumer collective actions: diversity 2.- Problems on recognition.
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević G10, room 6, Tue 15:30-16:30 Session 9, 16 Dec 2014.
Agustin Del Rio CalNet ID: Date: October 27th, 2008.
Les Dommages- Interêts et la Cour Unifiée des Brevets Damages and the Unified Patent Court.
- november STATUS OF THE HARMONIZATION OF MEASURES RELATING TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF IP RIGHTS - EU DIRECTIVE OF RIGHT OF INFORMATION DAMAGES.
Data Protection Overview
Trademark II Infringement. Article 57 Infringement Article 57 Any of the following conduct shall be an infringement upon the right to exclusively use.
IPR enforcement in the EU Evidence of impact of on the access to generics Johanna von Braun University of Cape Town, South Africa Kiev, 21/22 nd June 2010.
DOMESTICATION OF TRIPS FLEXIBILITIES IN NATIONAL IP LEGISLATION FOR STRENGTHENING ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN ZAMBIA PROPOSED PATENT BILL AND ITS RELEVANCY.
Overview +Recap +Legal framework - points of interest +Next steps +Questions.
The world leader in industrial and medical gases SPEEDY AND PROPER LITIGATION ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY The 3rd JIPA INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY SYMPOSIUM Thierry.
ENFORCEMENT OF IP RIGHTS – INFRINGEMENT SEIZURE IN FRANCE Didier Intès French & European Patent attorney AIPPI – November 7, 2013.
CAPACITY BUILDING TRAINING PROGRAMME ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND RELATED WTO ISSUES April 28-May 2, 2008 Session 3 Enforcement under the TRIPS.
Ioannis Iglezakis Infosociety Directive. Objectives of the Directive on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information.
1 INTRODUCTION OF THE LAWS ON ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION AND ABUSE OF MONOPONY POSITION IN VIETNAM Speaker: Mr. Trinh Anh Tuan Official Vietnam Competition.
Patents and Trade Marks: Belgian Law on injunctive relief Eric Laevens.
U.S. Copyright Enforcement Benjamin Hardman Attorney / Advisor Office of Intellectual Property Policy & Enforcement, USPTO.
Preliminary and Interim Relief in IP-cases Workshop III Chair: Prof. Charles Gielen NautaDutilh, Amsterdam.
November Lovells Trademark and Design Right Enforcement in the European Union Part I France Marie-Aimée de Dampierre, Paris.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
ENFORCEMENT OF PATENT RIGHTS IN EUROPE The Hungarian way Zsolt SZENTPÉTERI S.B.G.&K. Patent and Law Offices, Budapest International Seminar Intellectual.
ENFORCEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK Prof. Dr. Dr. M. Buydens lawyer, professor at the University of.
Infringement Claims and Defenses Professor Todd Bruno.
1 FRAND COMMITMENTS AND EU COMPETITION LAW Thomas Kramler European Commission, DG Competition (The views expressed are not necessarily those of the European.
1 A National Approach to the EU Enforcement Directive: Major Compliance Issues in the Hungarian Legislation Eszter Kabai ProArt Hungarian Copyright Alliance.
Michael Fruhmann Dr. Michael Fruhmann EBRD Project Ukraine 29/30th March /31/ Procedural fairness and the EU Remedies Directive – an overview.
DOMESTICATION OF TRIPS FLEXIBILITIES IN NATIONAL IP LEGISLATION FOR STRENGTHENING ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN ZAMBIA PROPOSED PATENT BILL AND ITS RELEVANCY.
Corporate Social Responsibility 3 Compliance control.
Defining and applying mitigating and aggravating circumstances. Relevant changes to the amount of fine. Defining and applying mitigating and aggravating.
© Borenius & Kemppinen 1. 2 Property, encumbrances on property: problems, solutions and opportunities Provisional Measures of civil procedure.
1 WIPO-KIPO-KIPA IP Panorama Business School, October 6 to 10, 2008 IP Strategies in Standards Setting Tomoko Miyamoto Senior Counsellor, Patent Law Section.
Regional Seminar on Enforcement of IP rights Enforcement of IPR Hungarian implementation László Vass Legal and International Department HIPO.
Legal Remedies or damages are monetary awards granted to an injured party in a contractual dispute whenever money would be an appropriate method of rectifying.
The Directive on Enforcement and The Customs Regulation Warsaw May 2006 Martin Ekvad Community Plant Variety Office Head of Legal Affairs.
Remedies in IP Infringement Litigation – The German approach presented at the International Conference on Judicial Protection of IPR 9-11 July 2008, Shanghai.
Patent Enforcement & Forum Shopping in China Liu, Shen & Associates: Jun Qiu September 2014.
THE ROLE OF COURTS AND TRIBUNALS IN ENHANCING ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION SEVENTH ANNUAL COLLOQUIUM OF THE IUCN ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL.
Judicial System in Germany for IPR Protection presented at the 2009 International Conference on Judicial Protection of IPR 10 September 2009, Chengdu,
7/3/ Practical Problems and Issues of Applying the Review Mechanism Foreseen by the Legislation of Ukraine Kyiv, March 2012 Olexander Shatkovsky.
Data Protection Laws in the European Union John Armstrong CMS Cameron McKenna.
ICC roundtable Istanbul, 30 April 2010 Procedural Fairness: Update on Recent OECD Activities Antonio Capobianco OECD Competition Division
The Disposal of the IP Infringing Goods
The Protection of Confidential Commercial or Industrial Information in Environmental Law: Analysis and Call for a Graded Concept of Protection Prof. Dr.
PRINCIPLE 10 OF THE RIO DECLARATION WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE BARBADOS PROGRAMME OF ACTION (BPOA) AND THE MAURITIUS FOR THE FURTHER IMPLEMENTATION OF.
ANTI-COUNTERFEITING TRADE AGREEMENT
ENFORCEMENT OF PATENT RIGHTS IN EUROPE The Hungarian way
Damages in Patent Infringement Litigation
The interaction between public and private enforcement of EU competition rules Helena Penovski European Competition Network and Private Enforcement Unit.
Arbitration Proceedings II
Audiovisual Sector Social Dialogue Committee
CIPIL conference: Mens Rea in Intellectual Property Intention and Knowledge in Remedies for Infringement of IPRs David Stone Cambridge, 9 March 2019.
The International Legal Framework
Article 9 of theAarhus Convention: overview
Presentation transcript:

1 Digital Spark September 2010 Remedies and Sanctions under the IP Enforcement Directive Enrico Bonadio - Lecturer in Law Dundee Business School Universty of Abertay Dundee

2 Enforcement of IPRs n EC Directive 2004/48: “Enforcement Directive” n First Directive aiming at harmonising all IPRs n Form of horizontal harmonisation n Earlier directives on IP: vertical harmonisation

3 Enforcement of IPRs n Subjects entitled to ask for remedies n Art. 4 Dir: subjects entitled are n (a) the IPR holders n (b) the persons authorised by the said holders (e.g. licensees) n (c) collective rights management bodies n (d) professional defence bodies

4 Enforcement of IPRs n It is often difficult to gather evidence of IPRs violation n Art. 6.1 Dir: courts may order that an evidence (in control of the opposing party) be presented in court by defendant n Art. 6.2 Dir: in case of infringement committed on a commercial scale, courts may order the defendant to communicate banking/financial/commercial docs under his control n Bank accounts records/invoices/delivery notes/warehouse receipts n Subject to protection of confidential information

5 Enforcement of IPRs n Gathering evidence is not enough n It is also important to preserve evidence n Art. 7 Dir: court may order provisional measures to preserve evidence in respect of the alleged infringement n Application of the injured party n Subject to protection of confidential information

6 Enforcement of IPRs n Eg: “description” of the infringing goods (similar to UK Anton Pillar orders) n It is carried out by a court bailiff n It is often necessary when it is not possible to buy a sample of the infringing product (eg trade fair) n … and in case of infringement of process patents (and the violation is not detectable by examining the final product)

7 Enforcement of IPRs n Obtaining information on (i) involvement of third parties and (ii) origin of infringing goods n Art. 8 Dir: info on origin of goods and distribution networks used by defendant n Eg: name/address of producers, distributors, suppliers, wholesalers, retailers, etc. n Eg: information on quantities produced, delivered, received or ordered and on price of goods/services

8 Enforcement of IPRs n Provisional measures to stop infringing activities (Art. 9) n a) Interlocutory injunctions and b) seizures n a) Interlocutory injunctions prevent any imminent infringement of IPR or forbid the continuation n Rapid and cheap way of procuring temporary redress

9 Enforcement of IPRs n b) Seizures aims at seizing/delivering up goods suspected of infringing IPR n Purposes: n preventing the entry into channel of commerce of infringing goods n therefore avoiding further circulation of infringing products n Carried out by a court bailiff n Right holders can participate to seizure operations

10 Enforcement of IPRs n Art. 9.3 Dir: to obtain provisional measures, right owners must show evidence: n (i) they are right holders n (ii) their IPRs are being infringed (or infringement is imminent)

11 Enforcement of IPRs n Provisional measures may be ordered inaudita altera parte (without the other party having been heard) n … where delay is likely to cause irreparable harm to IPR holder (Art. 9.4 Dir) n so-called ex parte orders (eg UK Anton Piller orders) n After execution of the measure, the parties effected must be given notice … n … and a review (including a right to be heard) should take place … n … to give the respondent a chance to challenge the lawfulness of the injunction/seizure

12 Enforcement of IPRs n Remedies at the end of a proceedings on the merit n “Corrective measures” (Art. 10 Dir): n (i) recall from the channels of commerce of infringing products n (ii) definitive removal from the channels of commerce n (i) destruction n The aim is to “correct” the infringement and eliminate infringing products

13 Enforcement of IPRs n Art. 11 Directive n Final injunction: n one of the most important measures obtainable by IPR holders … n … as it prevents the continuation of the infringing activity n Non compliance with injunction orders is subject to penalties … n … with a view to ensuring compliance n Penalties aim at strenghtening the injunction order

14 Enforcement of IPRs n Damages are awarded with the decision on the merits of the case n Money damages are the most important n Art Dir: just infringers who knowingly engaged in infringing activities may be ordered by courts to pay damages n Damages can be invoked in case of wilful and/or negligent acts

15 Enforcement of IPRs n Compensation based on objective criteria n Overriding principle: an injured party must be restored to the position it would have been in before its IPR was infringed

16 Enforcement of IPRs n When quantifying damages, all factors must be taken into account: n (i) Negative economic consequence which the injured party has suffered n (ii) Any unfair profits made by the infringer n (iii) Reasonable royalty rate n (iv) Moral prejudice caused to IPR holder by the infringement

17 Enforcement of IPRs n (i) Negative economic consequence which the injured party has suffered – (a) Damnus emergens: actual loss suffered by the injured party – (b) Lucrum cessans: lost profits suffered by right holder

18 Enforcement of IPRs n (ii) Any unfair profits made by the infringer n It is possible that IPR owners has not recorded lost profits n Nonetheless, they are entitled to damages compensation n Art. 13.1: any unfair profits made by the infringer must be taken into consideration

19 Enforcement of IPRs n (iii) Reasonable royalty rate n Royalties which would have been due if the infringer had requested authorization to use IPR n Such method may be a successful approach … n … if the right holder shows in court to have granted licences in the past

20 Enforcement of IPRs n (iv) Moral prejudice caused to IPR holder by the infringement n Art Dir: also moral damage should be compensated n Such damages are usually requested by companies renowed for quality/reliability of goods/services

21 Enforcement of IPRs n Publication of judicial decisions n Art. 15 Dir: courts may order – at the request of applicant and expenses of infringer – appropriate measures for dissemination of information concerning the decision … n … including displaying the decision and publishing it (in full or in part) on newspapers or specialized magazines n It aims at giving a message to trade and avoiding market distortions

22 Enforcement of IPRs n Thanks for your attention!