Shaping the Future of Transition Office of Transition Services NC Department of Correction May 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
Advertisements

Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Virginia Juvenile Justice Association EFFECTIVE PAROLE TRANSITION & RE-ENTRY: WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN & HOW November 2, 2006 David M. Altschuler, Ph.D.
Ex-Offenders and Housing
National Best Practices for Prisoner Reentry Effective Transition Planning: Reducing Reentry Barriers and Establishing System and Returning Citizen Accountability.
Select Committee on Homelessness Hearing, The Road Home: Step Two Mental Health Systems Laura V. Otis-Miles, Ph.D., CPRP Vice President.
What is the term that defines the men and women we supervise? Parolee Probationer Offender Supervised Releasee Restored Citizen Returning Citizen Client.
Presented by: Elana M. Parker, M.Ed., M.L.A.P. Reentry Coordinator/Public Health Liaison Alabama Prisoner Reentry Initiative and Family Reintegration.
Evidence-Based Intervention Services Community Corrections Partnership October 27, 2011.
Ojjdp.gov T L O A Tribal Law and Order Act Overview of the Law’s Impact on Tribal Youth and Discussion on Juvenile Detention Centers with Laura Ansera,
HUD-VASH Case Management System Paul Smits, MSW Associate Chief Consultant, Roger Casey, PhD Director, Grant and Per Diem Program.
State Administrative Agency (SAA) 2007 Re-Entry Grant Training Workshop The Governor’s Crime Commission Re-Entry Grants and Federal Resource Support Programs.
Offender Re-Entry: One Jail’s Perspective Montgomery County Department of Correction and Rehabilitation Wendy Miller-Cochran, LCSW-C Re-Entry Unit Social.
VA Programs for Justice-Involved Veterans
PROJECT FUNDING PROVIDED BY R e-entering O ffenders A chieving R ecovery ROAR offers reintegration and recovery services to male adult offenders transitioning.
Funding the Work of Reentry Julie Boehm, Reentry Manager Missouri Department of Corrections.
DOC REENTRY SERVICES TEAM Reentry Services Director Gary Johnson Reentry Program Manager Tim Lanz Community Reentry Coordinator Farris Bell Facilities.
Transition from Prison to the Community/Transition Model Initiative ARC Presentation May 14, 2015 Presenters: Dan Chesnut, DOC Gordon Swensen, USOR.
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community Section 6: Reentry.
Reentry: A Community Based Strategy. Overview Brief History of Community Programs Over the last two decades there has been substantial growth in community.
THE COALITION OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PROVIDERS OF NEW JERSEY The Role of Community Resource Centers in Offender Re-entry.
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
Welcome to the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation Orientation for Transition. Facilitator Notes: Welcome to the orientation for Vocational Rehabilitation.
Chapter 40 Rehabilitation. Objectives Identify the major factors that affect criminal behavior Explain the role of correctional treatment programs in.
1 THE MINISTRY OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL Office of the Correctional Investigator Royal Canadian Mounted Police Solicitor General Department National Parole.
CJPAC Cross-Training August 2010 State of Connecticut Department of Correction.
Presentation Outline Why we need a prisoner reentry program What is happening with MPRI statewide What is happening locally How you can help Questions.
Department of Correctional POSITION PAPER ON SOCIAL REINTEGRATION DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Services.
An Age of hope: a National Effort for Corrections, Rehabilitation and Social Re-integration of Offenders THE OFFENDER REHABILITATION PATH (ORP) THE OFFENDER.
NAMI Conference February 10, 2015 “Changing Lives: Changing Futures” Operating Rehabilitative Detention Facilities NAMI Conference February 10, 2015 “Changing.
North Carolina TASC Clinical Series Training Module One: Understanding TASC.
Housing Matters Michael Nail Executive Director Board Members: Albert R. Murray, Chair; Terry E. Barnard, Vice-Chair; James E. Donald; James W. Mills &
Housing: A Significant Reentry Barrier Nicole E. Sullivan NC Department of Correction Office of Research and Planning.
The Coalition of Community Corrections Providers of New Jersey A Partnership Responding to Prisoner Re-entry.
Housing Ex-Offenders: Identifying Barriers and Proposing Solutions Angela Lee ODRC Reentry and Family Program Administrator.
Canadian Criminal Justice Association Congress October, 2011 COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES A PARTNERSHIP APPROACH TO PUBLIC SAFETY David Pisapio, Correctional.
The Ohio Parole Board’s implementation of Select Strategies Presented by: Cynthia Mausser Chair.
Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 10 – Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Kansas Youth Vision Team: Serving Our Neediest Youth Atlanta, GA September, 2006.
Missouri Reentry… It’s a Process! George A. Lombardi, Director Missouri Department of Corrections.
Borallon will be the leading centre for rehabilitating young male offenders in Australia, to keep communities safe and break the costly cycle of crime.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
John Beatty Division of Prisons Inmate Work Programs.
Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Mental Hygiene Administration Office of Special Needs Populations MHA: Office of Special Needs Populations.
National Center for Youth in Custody First Things First: Risk and Needs Assessment Data to Determine Placement and Services Alternatives.
Assessing Housing Barriers Donna Harrison Community Placement Coordinator Virginia Department of Corrections Welcome Home: Addressing Today’s Challenges.
Public Safety and Offender Rehabilitation Services Act of 2007 (AB 900) Implementation and Impact on County Mental Health Robin Dezember Chief Deputy Secretary.
BOP REENTRY STRATEGY Inmate Skills Development & Offender Workforce Development Harley G. Lappin Director Federal Bureau of Prisons Washington, DC December.
Connecticut Department of Correction Parole & Community Services Division Assessments Overview.
Transition Services in the Division of Community Corrections
Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015.
CONTINUITY OF CARE IN A RE-ENTRY CONTEXT
SSVF Best Practice Standards. Background 2 Released April Developed by SSVF TA team and VA SSVF Program Office, in consultation with SSVF grantees,
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
Michigan Prisoner ReEntry Initiative (MPRI) Creating safer neighborhoods and better citizens.
Earl F. Warren, MBA, LADC1 Spectrum Health Systems, Inc. Jackie Chowaniec, MS Massachusetts Department of Correction.
Reentry: A Successful Return Home TDCJ Reentry and Integration Division.
Department of Corrections Joint Judiciary Hearing July 25, 2013.
DONNA HARRISON COMMUNITY RELEASE UNIT SUPERVISOR VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ACADEMY FOR STAFF DEVELOPMENT MAY.
Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation
Department of Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Community Corrections Alternative Program
RSAT History, Best Practices and Future
Marion County Re-Entry Coalition Presentation to CWF coaches
Priorities Discussed in July
Presentation transcript:

Shaping the Future of Transition Office of Transition Services NC Department of Correction May 2007

Office of Transition Services The Office of Transition Services (OTS) was created in September 2006 by Secretary Theodis Beck OTS is responsible for the coordination of all internal activities related to transition and reentry. OTS provides assistance to internal and external stakeholders in developing policies and procedures, shaping new programs and providing training for staff in effective transition and reentry

Goals of OTS Ensure all transition and reentry efforts within the department are unified and coordinated Provide education & training to internal divisions and external partners/stakeholders on the needs and barriers offenders face when returning to the community Promote programs & services that address barriers to successful offender reentry (i.e. employment, housing, treatment, etc) Provide education, training, technical assistance, and support for local partnerships and networks designed to support offender transition and reentry

What is Transition?

Transition is the process of reentry made by incarcerated individuals from jail or prison to the community. (Report of the Re-entry Policy Council/ Transition is the process of implementing a defined plan of action from incarceration to reentry into the community.

Why Transition? Structured Sentencing Laws require 100% completion of sentence Transition is a better use of tax dollars and community resources During incarceration offenders obtain marketable skills for today’s labor market

Best Practices in Transition Collaborative- active integration among parties Person Centered Plan-inclusive and progressive steps with realistic goals Modifiable- as behavior changes and goals are met the team assess plan Plan is centered on seamless transition Sustainable in the community

Best Practices cont. Informal social controls (such as family, peer, and community influences) have a more direct effect on offender behavior than formal social controls Duration of the intervention is critical to offender outcomes. Behavior change is a long process that requires a minimum of 12 to 24 months. Dosage of the intervention is critical to change. Intensity and frequency are important to assist the offender in making critical decisions that affect the likelihood of success. Comprehensive, integrated, and flexible programs are effective when they meet the individual’s multiple needs

Best Practices Cont. Continuity, Interventions, either in prison or in the community, should build upon each other Continuity, Interventions, either in prison or in the community, should build upon each other Communication of offender responsibility and expectations is necessary Support mechanisms are critical to long-term success. Support mechanisms can involve the family, community, and informal agencies Offender accountability and responsibility is key. A system of sanctions and incentives must ensure that the offender understands expectations and rules

NC Department of Correction: Transition Goal NC Department of Correction goal for transition is to lessen recidivism and to restore offenders to being productive members of society.

The Current Need Prison Inmates 38,497 –Male Inmates 35,730 –Female Inmates 2,767 Probationers 114,104 Parolees 2,851 Total 155,452 (figures based on data from ) 53% of current inmates are re-admissions

Overview 79 prisons, 3 contract facilities Male/female, adult/youth, minimum/medium/close >38,000 inmates Estimates of >45,000 incarcerated by 2016 Releases: – = 20,228 – = 24,618 – = 26,457 –1/ /2007= 6,651

Offender Management Model (OMM) The Offender Management Model states each inmate will have one plan created by a single inmate will have one plan created by a single team that includes wrap around services team that includes wrap around services designed for achieving the goals of designed for achieving the goals of incarceration and successful reentry. incarceration and successful reentry.

Phase I Intake & Stabilization Phase II Supervision & Monitoring Phase III Structured Transition Phase IV Reintegration Maintenance & Sustainability AssessmentClassification Treatment referrals Address Risk & Criminogenic Needs Change thinking & behavior Treatment participation Skill Development Re Develop pro social networks Sense of Self Efficacy Engage external supports Discharge planning Coordinate Aftercare services Accountability & Ownership Integrated Case Planning & Case Management NCDOC Office of Transition Services Reentry Model (under construction)

PHASE I Assessment, Classification & Treatment Referrals Assessment, Classification & Treatment Referrals Phase I Intake & Stabilization

Phase I Team Members: Team Members: –Prison Divisions –Community Volunteers –Family Members –Community Resource Council –Community Colleges –Vocational Rehabilitation –Vital Records –Social Security Administration/ DMV –Faith partners

Phase I Process Ensure the use of validated instruments for consistent results that are reliable and address static and dynamic factors. Ensure the use of validated instruments for consistent results that are reliable and address static and dynamic factors. - DOP uses the OTI for static factors such as previous incarceration, childhood abuse - DCC is creating a dynamic assessment for factors such as substance abuse and risk assessments

PHASE II Address Risk and Criminogenic Needs; Change thinking, and behavior; treatment participation; Skill development Phase II Supervision and Monitoring

PHASE II Team Members: Team Members: –Community Corrections -DMV –Victim Services - Employment Services –Parole Commission - Treatment Providers –Community Volunteers -Business Community –Community Colleges -Vocational Rehabilitation –Family Members - Faith Based Community –Housing Providers –Criminal Justice Partnership Program

Phase II Process Create an informed individualized program plan geared toward release Create an informed individualized program plan geared toward release Person centered assignments are better than arbitrary assignments –Use data from assessments to provide targeted and comprehensive program –Use multidisciplinary team as described above –Incorporate the plan into the daily life of the inmate

PHASE III (Re) Develop pro-social networks; Sense of self efficacy; Engage external Supports (Re) Develop pro-social networks; Sense of self efficacy; Engage external Supports PHASE III Structured Transition

PHASE III Team Members: Team Members: –Community Volunteers –Mentors –Faith Partners –Employment Services –Family Members –Treatment Providers

Phase III Process Convene transition planning team to review inmates preparedness for release Assess progress of assigned programs Perform risk assessment for criminogenic factors Gauge community of release for its preparedness to accept ex-offender Keep information and communication open

Preparation for Release TDE (Transition Document Envelope) Confirmed Home Plan 30 day supply of Medication (If required) 30 day supply of Medication (If required) Substance abuse treatment appointment scheduled Mental health treatment appointment scheduled (if required) Acquire employability skills, job leads, educational opportunities Strengthen ties to Mentor and Community resources

PHASE IV Discharge planning, coordinating aftercare services, accountability and ownership Phase IV Reintegration, Maintenance & Sustainability

PHASE IV Team Members Team Members –Faith Partners –Treatment Providers –Family Members –Established Support System

Phase IV Process Use collaborative network to obtain: Use collaborative network to obtain: –Meaningful employment –Adequate housing –Treatment needs –Mentor –Continual network of support –Clear path to accountability and ownership of new life

Gaps in the Process The decision making processes by which individuals are sent to prison. The preparation of prisoners for release. The process by which prisoners exit prisons so that key supports and services are in place during the initial transition. Developing reentry initiatives that build on key social relationships-such as family, friends, and the faith community-and improve access to other community- based supports and services. Targeting and supporting high-risk communities to which the majority of prisoners return.

Gaps Cont. Raising the profile of prisoner reentry as a public safety issue and not solely a corrections issue. Availability of therapists for; substance abuse, anger management and sex offences. Mentors that are committed to long term involvement

Barriers to Successful Transition The stigma the community has toward ex-offenders Housing policies continue to be a major barrier to affordable safe living Employability beyond “offender friendly” fields to meet the demands of growing occupations and workforce shortages The cost of appropriate treatment. Criminal record active until ex-offender reaches 80 or dies Resources are often untapped or hard to access without community collaboration

Office of Transition Services Contact Information: Monica L. Artis, Community Development Specialist (919) Vincent Gaddy, Community Development Specialist (919) Anthony Reggi, Community Development Project Manager Anthony Reggi, Community Development Project Manager (919) Roshanna S. Parker, Research and Evaluation Analyst (919)