Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers Development Group Leadership Seminar on Mathematics Professional Development February 13, 2009 Learning to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Advertisements

Mathematics Instruction: Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting
Welcome to Day 3 Please be seated in groups of 4.  Like grade bands  Mixed schools  New faces Introduce yourself to your table members.
Exploring the Math Content of the Iowa Core Curriculum…
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
Learning and Teaching Linear Functions Video Cases for Mathematics Professional Development, 6-10.
1. Principles Learning Assessment Technology 3 Teaching Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality.
Implementing the Mathematics Nevada Academic Content Standards Talking about mathematical terminology, symbols, and definitions Liz Carter and Shayla Taylor.
High Leverage Practices. Developing Teachers’ Capacity to Reflect on and Learn From Teaching Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers Development Group.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Student Engagement through the use of High-Level Tasks Presented by: Raven Hawes iZone Mathematics.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of the Expressions and Equations Standards via a Set.
Measured Progress ©2011 ASDN Webinar Series Spring 2013 Session Four March 27, 2013 New Alaska State Standards for Math: Connecting Content with Classroom.
Orchestrating Productive Discussions of Cognitively Challenging Tasks Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers Development Group Leadership Seminar.
The Power of Teacher Response Experienced with NTI Teachers/Coaches Session 2.
Exploring Cognitive Demands of Mathematical Tasks Milwaukee Public School Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialist
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Selecting and Sequencing Students’ Solution Paths to Maximize Student Learning Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching.
Providing All Students with Access to High Quality Mathematics Instruction: The Role of Tasks in Achieving Equity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’
Mathematical Processes. 2 What We are Learning Today Mathematical Processes What are they? How do we teach through these processes? How do students learn.
Engaging Learners and Realizing the Development of Mathematical Practices ALM Conference July 15, 2015 Trena L. Wilkerson Professor, Mathematics Education.
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT LESSONS Region 5 Mathematics Network Conference September 16, 2013.
Managing Effective Student Discourse
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
Educator Effectiveness Academy STEM Follow-Up Webinar December 2011.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
Algebraic Reasoning Content Academy—Grade 5 Round Rock ISD Learning by Doing® Sami Briceño.
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Study Group 7 - High School Math (Algebra 1 & 2, Geometry) Welcome Back! Let’s.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
01.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 16 SEPTEMBER 2015 EMBARKING ON A LEADERSHIP JOURNEY.
Meaningful Mathematics
Session 2 Objective You will synthesize your knowledge of Mathematical Practice Standard 4 Model with Mathematics.
Universal Access/SDAIE Session 3: Lesson Planning Protocol - Language Objectives Title III Access to Core Professional Development Office of.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing.
Based on the work of Dr. M.S. Smith, University of Pgh. Key Ingredients to Developing Mathematical Understanding: Anticipating, Monitoring, Selecting,
Math Fellows January 22, Setting Goals and Selecting Tasks 1.Anticipating 2.Monitoring 3.Selecting 4.Sequencing 5.Connecting The Five Practices.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of Education High School Mathematics Algebra 2 Illuminating Student Thinking:
Purposeful Questioning 6-8 September 24, 2015
Amy Jones Lewis November 2010 Green River Regional Educational Cooperative MathPLUS Content Day 1: Student-Centered Problem Solving.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Purposeful Questioning K-5 September 25, 2015 Vickie Inge The Virginia Council of Mathematics Specialist Conference.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Module 2: Engaging in Rigorous CTE Lessons Tennessee Department of Education CTE High School Supporting Rigorous CTE Teaching.
Learning Target Cycles Chris Coombes
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
Grade 7 & 8 Mathematics Reporter : Richard M. Oco Ph. D. Ed.Mgt-Student.
Effective mathematics instruction:  foster positive mathematical attitudes;  focus on conceptual understanding ;  includes students as active participants.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
Manipulatives and Technology. Minds On – Activities While the music plays, find your musical pattern partner. Choose a table (6 people per table) and.
This module was developed by Amy Hillen, Kennesaw State University; DeAnn Huinker, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; and Victoria Bill, University of.
This module was developed by Margaret Smith at the University of Pittsburgh. Video courtesy of Pittsburgh Public Schools and the Institute for Learning.
Five Tools & Processes for NGSS Tool 3: Using the 5E instructional model to develop a conceptual flow.
This session is based on the module entitled, “The Case of Shalunda Shackelford and the Bike and Truck Task”, developed by Melissa Boston at Duquesne University.
This module was developed by Lynn Raith, Mathematics Curriculum Specialist K-12. Video courtesy of NYC District 2 and the Institute for Learning. These.
Principles to Actions Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices The Case of Wobberson Torchon and the Calling Plans 1 Task Algebra I Principles to Actions.
Teaching for Understanding: Discourse and Purposeful Questioning
Helping Students Examine Their Reasoning
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Welcome!! Please sit in teams of 4
Review of TTLP Insert comments for another assigned group within their Google doc (be certain to include your name) Read the comments made on your TTLP.
Productive Mathematical Discussions: Working at the Confluence of Effective Mathematics Teaching Practices Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical.
Alison Borthwick & Alan Cross
Discourse Measurement
Discourse Measurement
Discourse Measurement
Shake, Rattle, and Roll: Using Games in Math Workshop, Grades 3-5
Presentation transcript:

Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers Development Group Leadership Seminar on Mathematics Professional Development February 13, 2009 Learning to Ask Good Questions

2 Why Focus on Questioning? Teachers provoke students’ reasoning about mathematics through the tasks they provide and the questions they ask (NCTM, 1991). Asking questions that reveal students’ knowledge about mathematics allows teachers to design instruction that responds to and builds on this knowledge (NCTM, 2000). Questions are one of the only tools teachers have for finding out what students are thinking (Michaels, 2005).

3 Why Focus on Questioning? Teachers’ questions are crucial in helping students make connections and learn important mathematics and science concepts. Teachers need to know how students typically think about particular concepts, how to determine what a particular student or group of students’ thinks about those ideas, and how to help students deepen their understanding. Weiss & Pasley, 2004

4 Overview of Activities Solve and discuss the Calling Plans task Watch an excerpt of a classroom discussion and identify “good questions” asked by the teacher. Identify the characteristics of good questions. Read the Boaler & Brodie article and discuss the categories of questions identified therein. Discuss the value of considering the types of questions that teachers ask and of planning specific questions to ask in preparation for teaching. Brainstorm ways that teachers could practice in situations of reduced complexity

Calling Plans (blue version 1) Long-distance company A charges a base rate of $5 per month, plus 4 cents per minute that you are on the phone. Long-distance company B charges a base rate of only $2 per month, but they charge you 10 cents per minute used. How much time per month would you have to talk on the phone before it would save you money to subscribe to company A?

The Calling Plans Task Work on the task individually for about five minutes (Private Think Time). Continuing working on the task in your group. Once you have a solution, discuss what you see as the key mathematical ideas that you would want to emerge from work on this task.

Number of Minutes Plan APlan B 0$5.00$ $5.40$ $5.80$ $6.20$ $6.60$ $ $7.40$ $7.80$ $8.20$ $8.60$ $9.00$12.00 Plan A C =.04m + $5 Plan B C =.10m + $2

Consider… Will any two phone plans (that are linear functions) have a shared point (i.e., the same cost for the same number of minutes)? Why or why not?

9 Identifying Good Questions Watch a clip from a classroom discussion facilitated by Cheryl Anderson featuring the Calling Plans task (see the yellow transcript) Identify a question (or two) that Cheryl Anderson asked during the lesson that you consider good Discuss the questions identified by folks at your table and come to agreement on 2 or 3 questions that you think are good. (Mark your selections on the group transcript.) Create a list of the characteristics of a good question

10 Identifying Good Questions What makes a question “good”?

11 Considering the Questions Teachers Ask During Instruction Read the Boaler and Brodie article ( ). Identify the findings of the Boaler and Brodie study that you found most intriguing and discuss these briefly at your table. Consider how the Boaler and Brodie categories match the characteristics of questions we identified (see page 776 of the article). white

Teacher Questioning Exploring mathematical meaning and relationships (type 3) Probing (type 4) Generating discussion (type 5)

13 All Question Types Are Not Equally Important … the question type that is arguably the most important of all - type 3, targeting key concepts - was observed very rarely…Such questions orient students to the central mathematical ideas. They do not necessarily follow up on students’ ideas; they often come from the teacher, and they serve a very particular and deliberate purpose: challenging students to consider a critical mathematical concept. Boaler & Humphreys, 2005, p.38

Importance of Questions The questions teachers ask guide students through particular pathways in the mathematical environment…We find that some teachers ask surface questions that do not take students deeper into mathematical issues; we think of those students as walking on a path that surrounds a beautiful forest without ever stepping into the forest to look at the trees. Other teachers ask questions that are more probing but that do not build carefully toward key concepts. We think of these students as stepping in and out of the forest, catching glimpses of trees and flowers but not learning where they are in relation to each other or how they may navigate their way through the forest. Other teachers ask questions that target key concepts and build carefully to enable students to find their way around. Those students experience the forest fully – they walk through, looking at the trees and flowers, and they also climb some trees and look at the whole terrain, getting a sense of where they are….the questions that teachers use to guide students become the pathways that students walk along and that shape their experience of the terrain. Boaler & Humphreys, 2005

15 Are Good Questions Enough? We have been focusing our attention so far on the types of questions a teacher asks during instruction. Does the task that forms the basis for instruction matter? Why or why not?

16 The Value of Asking a Range of Question Types What value, if any, do you see in thinking about the types of questions teachers ask using the Boaler and Brodie categories? How can you help teachers expand their questioning repertoire to include a broader range of question types?

Building Teachers’ Capacity to Ask Good Questions Engage in an activity similar to the one we just did where teachers first identify questions, discuss characteristics of good questions, and then consider a questioning framework Create a record of practice from their own teaching and analyze the questions they ask (pink sheet). [The Karen Zigmond example I gave the other night is one version of how this could play out.] Analyze student work and create questions that you would ask the students who produced the work that would probe their thinking and help make the mathematics salient.

Using Student Work to Generate Questions Analyze the responses produced by the two groups of students in Cheryl Anderson’s class (green). Create questions that you would ask the students who produced the response that would clarify and extend their thinking.

Questioning: Is it a High-Leverage Practice? I SAY YES!!!

Calling Plans Plan A C =.04m + $5 Plan B C =.10m + $2

Number of Minutes Plan APlan B 0$5.00$ $5.40$ $5.80$ $6.20$ $6.60$ $ $7.40$ $7.80$ $8.20$ $8.60$ $9.00$12.00

Graph of Companies A and B