1 Research Governance in Social Care Where to next? Paul Dolan,Birmingham City Council SSRG Annual Workshop, Manchester 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Establishing a New Accreditation Program in the U.S.
Advertisements

Ethics of Mental Health Research. Q1: ways in which mental health differs Definition of mental illness is problematic. Terminology is very broad and inconsistent.
What, when and how?: The context for User-Led Organisations Rich Watts Department of Health January 2010.
Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
Honorary Research Contracts and the Research Passport Julia Miller Assistant Director of Research and Development NW SHA.
Research involving adults lacking the capacity to consent Legal, ethical and practical issues Dr Mikey Dunn Senior Research Associate in Health and Social.
Research Governance Resource Pack 2010 Paul Dolan Birmingham City Council on behalf of ADASS Standards & Performance Network Chairs: Paul Najsarek & Sarah.
Towards a New R&D Strategy A blueprint for R&D in Health and Social Care Noreen Caine Deputy Director of R&D, DH NHS R&D Forum Annual Conference May 2005.
PRESENTATION ON MONDAY 7 TH AUGUST, 2006 BY SUDHIR VARMA FCA; CIA(USA) FOR THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS – INDIA, DELHI CHAPTER.
Research Ethics for adult social care in practice John Woolham Research Fellow, with contributions from Paul Dolan, Birmingham City Council.
LINks Local Involvement Networks. An introduction Joy Tweed, health scrutiny support programme 18/02/08.
Child Safeguarding Standards
Representing Central Government in the South East Monday, 27 April 2015 Vivien Lines DCSF Safeguarding Adviser VCS Safeguarding Seminar 17 December 2009.
A Research Active Hospice
Regulatory Frameworks in OECD countries and their Relevance for India Nick Malyshev Senior Counsellor Public Governance and Territorial Development OECD.
Integrated Personal Commissioning The NHS getting serious about personalisation 30 th October 2014.
Health and Safety - an update Ian Gillett Safety Director.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Update: Operational Delivery Networks Denise McLellan Transitional Lead, Networks and Senates, Midlands and East November 2012.
Responsible Sponsorship A case study Dr Birgit Whitman, Head of Research Governance.
AUDIT COMMITTEE FORUM TM ACF Roundtable IT Governance – what does it mean to you as an audit committee member July 2010 The AUDIT COMMITTEE FORUM TM is.
Research Ethics-Integrity-Governance. University Initiative:The Catalyst? ‘02 Good Research Practice Standards & Procedure to Investigate Potential Research.
Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.
Care Act Norfolk Older Peoples Strategic Partnership Board 18 June 2014 Janice Dane, Assistant Director Prevention and Transformation.
Westminster City Council and Westminster Primary Care Trust Voluntary Sector Funding 2009/10 Voluntary Sector Funding Eligibility, Application Form Funding,
The role of Audit Scotland in monitoring police performance Miranda Alcock Portfolio Manager – Public Reporting Group.
Safeguarding Adults at Risk in the new commissioning landscape Stephan Brusch Professional Safeguarding Adult Advisor.
Governor Introductions How long since your appointment? What type of governor and school? How many meetings attended so far? What do you hope to get out.
Open Data Platform Supplier Forum 13 January 2012.
Social Value – a Norfolk commissioning perspective Mick Sanders Head of Integrated Commissioning Norfolk CC and Norwich CCG.
Strategic Commissioning
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland Experience and new arrangements Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Poland Athens,
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
CO2403 and CO3808 – Quality Management Systems Quality process definition, administration and accreditation.
TWO PROPOSALS (1) Scaling up WASH from the Start with UNICEF (2) OMEP’s CRC Monitoring Initiative.
Assessment for improvement [Name] [Title] [Date / Event] V4.5.
Thriving Third Sector: Vision for Civil Society Les Hems GuideStar Data Services.
ADASS SPRING SEMINAR SECTOR LED IMPROVEMENT A new approach to excellence in Adult Social Care.
What does the future hold for commissioners of child placement services? Andrew Cozens Strategic Adviser (Children, Adults & Health Services) 3 July 2007.
Helping to make care better Cynthia Bower, CEO National Care Association Conference 11 November 2009.
MERTON LOCAL INVOLVEMENT NETWORK MEETING 27 March 2008 Richard Poxton Centre for Public Scrutiny National Team.
R&D – a perspective Dr Nana Theodorou Research Coordinator Sheffield Clinical Research Office.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation – possible approaches and lessons learned from MS/NMS SEVESO II transposition and implementation – possible.
Joint Reviews of Local Authority Social Services JOINT REVIEW OF SALFORD COUNCIL 17 th June 2003.
Governance and Commissioning Natalie White DCSF Consultant
Role of NHS England in protecting and maintaining patient/service user dignity Arden, Herefordshire & Worcestershire Area Team.
Presented at the Arthritis Advisory Committee meeting on July 15, 2003 by Hugh Davies, M.D.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
User Led Organisations (ULOs)
4 Countries Project: Modernising Learning Disability Nursing Dr Ben Thomas Director of Mental Health & Learning Disability Nursing 16 December, 2011.
Accessing the NHS for Research – NHS R&D Permissions Jemma Hughes R&D Manager ABMU Health Board.
R&D Annual Report SLaM Board, Sept 2004 Graham Thornicroft Gill Dale.
Safeguarding Adults Care Act 2014.
DEVELOPING ADULT SAFEGUARDING ON THE ISLE OF MAN 9 th December, 2013 Barrool Suite, Douglas noon – 4.30 p.m.
8 th November 2007 Research: ethics and research governance Rossana Dowsett Research and Regional Development Division [Pre Award Support] University of.
Presentation By L. M. Baird And Scottish Health Council Research & Public Involvement Knowledge Exchange Event 12 th March 2015.
AssessPlanDo Review QuestionYesNo? Do I know what I want to evaluate and why? Consider drivers and audience Do I already know the answer to my evaluation.
1 Emerging Issues in Internal Audit Charles Ndegwa.
Workshop on social services for vulnerable groups Social Care Governance in Scotland Alexis Jay, Chief Social Work Adviser October 2011, Ukraine.
Middle Managers Workshop 2: Measuring Progress. An opportunity for middle managers… Two linked workshops exploring what it means to implement the Act.
HELPING THE NATION SPEND WISELY David Corner Director Regions, Regeneration & Renewal Globalisation of Homeless Policies: FEANTSA Seminar Homelessness.
Effective Board Governance & role of the Audit Committee Presentation by Cluster Audit Committee – July / August 2012.
SOCIAL CARE RESEARCH AND NHS RECs Professor Jan Pahl University of Kent Contact:
IIASA Governance Review
Research Governance - the Local Authority context
Tracking development results at the EIB
Lynne MacRae Research Practice Governance Manager
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
Taking the STANDARDS Seriously
Main recommendations & conclusions (1)
Presentation transcript:

1 Research Governance in Social Care Where to next? Paul Dolan,Birmingham City Council SSRG Annual Workshop, Manchester 2008

2 Where have we come from? Research governance – some definitions Research governance – some definitions RESEARCH. systematic attempt to obtain soundly based generalisable knowledge, through rigorous methods RESEARCH. systematic attempt to obtain soundly based generalisable knowledge, through rigorous methods GOVERNANCE. arrangements for ensuring activity is ethically legally and methodologically sound, and conforms to clear standards of accountability & quality GOVERNANCE. arrangements for ensuring activity is ethically legally and methodologically sound, and conforms to clear standards of accountability & quality

3 Comments on these definitions Broad idea of research: quantitative, qualitative; desk; field; survey; audit; evaluation. Broad idea of research: quantitative, qualitative; desk; field; survey; audit; evaluation. Governance implies external appraisal of soundness of research, independent of researcher views Governance implies external appraisal of soundness of research, independent of researcher views Broad range of risks associated with research, dependent on context Broad range of risks associated with research, dependent on context Predictive judgments: Absence of harm/= Benefit? Predictive judgments: Absence of harm/= Benefit?

4 Social Services Research Regulation: Long Term Context Duty of care to vulnerable people Duty of care to vulnerable people ADSS national advisory system on multi- site projects: usually academic, never DH or CSCI surveys ADSS national advisory system on multi- site projects: usually academic, never DH or CSCI surveys Seen as more than advice system by researchers, despite ADASS disclaimer Seen as more than advice system by researchers, despite ADASS disclaimer SSRG not a constituted quality review body SSRG not a constituted quality review body

5 Research Regulation Context in the NHS Local committees for Ethics Review of health research Local committees for Ethics Review of health research Methods to be reviewed by sponsor Methods to be reviewed by sponsor Drug trial/risk assessment model Drug trial/risk assessment model Research defined to exclude evaluative, audit activity- pragmatic because of vol. Research defined to exclude evaluative, audit activity- pragmatic because of vol. Evasion, malpractice in late 1990s Evasion, malpractice in late 1990s

6 Department of Health: formal Research Governance Framework Department of Health: formal Research Governance Framework RGF 2001, 2005: for the NHS RGF 2001, 2005: for the NHS DH Social Care Implementation Plan 2004, non-mandatory, after resistance DH Social Care Implementation Plan 2004, non-mandatory, after resistance Wider definition of research than NHS Wider definition of research than NHS Children & Adults social care Children & Adults social care implementation – DH/SSRG/ADSS resource pack, seminars; encouragement: no resources except one off start-up grant implementation – DH/SSRG/ADSS resource pack, seminars; encouragement: no resources except one off start-up grant

7 Nuts & Bolts of Social Care RG implementation Timetable on external, then own account research Timetable on external, then own account research Baseline assessment, then follow up survey of progress and intentions Baseline assessment, then follow up survey of progress and intentions No audit, inspection or formal target No audit, inspection or formal target Over half authorities report having or intending to have systems, but no quality assurance Over half authorities report having or intending to have systems, but no quality assurance

8 Meanwhile… COREC is reviewed by O’Higgins: becomes NRES Critics say COREC time-consuming and bureaucratic Critics say COREC time-consuming and bureaucratic Model retained after review: of academic plus student research Model retained after review: of academic plus student research Peer reviews of methods assumed, NRES model of ethics as preliminary to R & D gatekeeping – hon. contracts Peer reviews of methods assumed, NRES model of ethics as preliminary to R & D gatekeeping – hon. contracts No change to definition of research eg patient surveys excluded No change to definition of research eg patient surveys excluded Committee and meeting based approach in NRES [LRECs, MRECs] Committee and meeting based approach in NRES [LRECs, MRECs]

9 policy dynamics 2007 NHS, Academic & Council Anecdotal criticism of COREC from academic community, esp. on drug trials model of research Anecdotal criticism of COREC from academic community, esp. on drug trials model of research Criticism of culture of review excluding service users – “lay”= retired health professionals/vicars Criticism of culture of review excluding service users – “lay”= retired health professionals/vicars More recent drug trial disaster: not an ethical failure? More recent drug trial disaster: not an ethical failure? Desire from academics for as little review as possible, and specialised for Social Care Desire from academics for as little review as possible, and specialised for Social Care Low resource profile for social care and social care as site of research. Low resource profile for social care and social care as site of research.

10 Dynamics 2007 Research coverage Unresolved issue of non academic research review coverage. Unresolved issue of non academic research review coverage. Student research downgraded in new NHS networks Student research downgraded in new NHS networks Context of quasi-research activity CSIP;CSED;CSCI; new policy implementation “pilots”. Context of quasi-research activity CSIP;CSED;CSCI; new policy implementation “pilots”.

11 Dynamics 2007 Dept of Health – not Dept of Children, Schools, Families. Sponsors much academic research Sponsors much academic research Promotes a national social care research ethics body: negotiation with NRES Promotes a national social care research ethics body: negotiation with NRES Inserts element in Mental Capacity Act [MCA]2005: first statutory requirement for REC approval Inserts element in Mental Capacity Act [MCA]2005: first statutory requirement for REC approval National SC research register, separate from NHS research register National SC research register, separate from NHS research register

12 ADASS Position 2007 Reluctant to concede, after 5 years, on definitions and limiting to ethical review Reluctant to concede, after 5 years, on definitions and limiting to ethical review Especially as councils moving to consortia as well as own RG arrangements Especially as councils moving to consortia as well as own RG arrangements Reviving ADASS review system Reviving ADASS review system Acknowledge: no govt or researcher investment in infrastructure for social care research. Acknowledge: no govt or researcher investment in infrastructure for social care research.

13 ADASS Proposals 07 National forum for advice and review National forum for advice and review Standard-setting Standard-setting Regional structures inputting Regional structures inputting Involving wide range of stakeholders, incl SCIE, universities, RiP etc. Involving wide range of stakeholders, incl SCIE, universities, RiP etc. Support and capacity building not just review and not just ethics Support and capacity building not just review and not just ethics Fees: but these insufficient to support on own unless sponsors underpin Fees: but these insufficient to support on own unless sponsors underpin

14 Dept. of Health 2008 DH announcement of SCREC, located in SCIE, but operating within NRES definitions and procedures: DH announcement of SCREC, located in SCIE, but operating within NRES definitions and procedures: budget level: any one off start-up costs covered, or minimalist flagged committee? budget level: any one off start-up costs covered, or minimalist flagged committee? Multi-site projects for ethics review by new committee, recruited as per NRES Multi-site projects for ethics review by new committee, recruited as per NRES 2 nd ed of SSRG/DH Resource Pack 2 nd ed of SSRG/DH Resource Pack

15 Prospective Issues in the NRES context 1. Can the SCREC add value to both researchers and councils, while operating within GAFREC 2001,the NRES Standard Procedures and the definition of research? [or will it sidestep them?] 2. How far has NRES moved from COREC in its style/culture? [ user involvement] 3. SCREC/SCIE aware that RECs not legally competent?

16 Prospective Issues for SCIE standard operating procedures 1. Will non-traditional research projects be referred and accepted for ethics review - especially where Mental Capacity Act [MCA] issues emerge –CSCI,CSIP? 2. How far in practice will SCREC form and convey a view on methods and organisation of projects as well as ethical consideration?

17 Issues for SCIE as they take on role 1. Transparency of review and advice- giving process? 2. How much review for Committee meetings and how much delegated to chair [ as in COREC and current NRES]? 3. Automatic entry on national Social Care Research Register? and removal if later local ethics review negative?

18 Issues for the research communities & sponsors 1. The SCREC adds a layer of electronic application and review to that of ADASS,ADCS: costs as well as local “site- specific” review by Councils. 2. Reviewer competence, speed. 3. Is there a realistic opportunity to influence research review and practice in Councils, when academic researchers are the main direct users of the SCREC?

19 Issues for Councils 1. Will Councils refer [in] eligible projects for review to ADASS and SCREC, and in what order? 2. Specifically, MCA issues in multi-site and local/own account projects? 3. How much evidence of consideration of issues/research tools will Councils expect of SCREC via researchers?

20 Conclusions Assuring Quality in research v gate- keeping monitoring Assuring Quality in research v gate- keeping monitoring Changing social care terrain: meaningful duty of care? Changing social care terrain: meaningful duty of care? Where will the big research scandal be: local or multi-site? [compare NHS] Where will the big research scandal be: local or multi-site? [compare NHS] Where will the routine limits be? MCA? Where will the routine limits be? MCA? SCIE has an opportunity and faces threats… SCIE has an opportunity and faces threats…