LUNAR ROVER Concept proposal meeting Dr. Ashish Dutta Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Kanpur, INDIA ( *** for private circulation only)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Robotics? A robot is a machine that can be programmed.
Advertisements

Georgia Tech Aerial Robotics Dr. Daniel P Schrage Jeong Hur Fidencio Tapia Suresh K Kannan SUCCEED Poster Session 6 March 1997.
POLICY Space Export Controls Update Since Delivering the 1248 Report to Congress - April 2012 −Congress added language into the FY13 National Defense Authorization.
6 th International Planetary Probe Workshop, Atlanta, Georgia Short Course on Extreme Environments Technologies 06/ Preliminary - For Discussion.
March 13, 2006 Location Tracking System & Sensor Based Communications For Mining Response to RIN 1219-AB44.
ROVER EGRES S DESIGN Hahna Alexander Anton Galkin Zack Morrison Mobile Robot Design – Fall 2011.
Autonomous Quadrocopter Proposal Brad Bergerhouse, Nelson Gaske, Austin Wenzel Dr. Malinowski.
The Lander is at a 25 km Lunar altitude and an orbital period of approximately 110 minutes. After separation occurs the Lander is completely self sufficient.
Project X pedition Spacecraft Senior Design – Spring 2009
UNC ROVERSAT IV University of Northern Colorado Critical Design Review Friday, June
Intelligent Ground Vehicle Competition 2006 Brigham Young University.
A Self-Supervised Terrain Roughness Estimator for Off-Road Autonomous Driving David Stavens and Sebastian Thrun Stanford Artificial Intelligence Lab.
Field Navigational GPS Robot Final Presentation & Review Chris Foley, Kris Horn, Richard Neil Pittman, Michael Willis.
Settlement Site Selection and Exploration Through Hierarchical Roving Gregory Konesky SGK Nanostructures, Inc. Rutgers Symposium on Lunar Settlements Rutgers.
Team GPS Rover Alex Waskiewicz Andrew Bousky Baird McKevitt Dan Regelson Zach Hornback.
Delivery Systems Joseph T. Wunderlich, Ph.D.. APOLLO 11 SATURN V ROCKET LUANCH VIDEO :
Dr. Shankar Sastry, Chair Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences University of California, Berkeley.
Mobile Environmental Sensing Platform for Autonomous Environmental Data Acquisition Introduction: The earth has many different surfaces, each with their.
1 Scheduling Mapping of tasks to time slots  Computation  Communication Mapping of power usage to time slots  Mechanical devices  Thermal subsystems.
University of Kansas Sensing and Actuation for Polar Mobile Robot Eric L. Akers, Hans P. Harmon, Richard S. Stansbury (Presenter), and Arvin Agah ITTC,
Autonomous Robotics Team Autonomous Robotics Lab: Cooperative Control of a Three-Robot Formation Texas A&M University, College Station, TX Fall Presentations.
NASA’s Flexible Range Exploration Device - FRED(aka LER; aka SPR)
S/C System Design Overview Robert G. Melton Department of Aerospace Engineering.
Dual Degree Project ( ) Remote Operated Vehicle (ROV) for Underwater Ultrasonic Non Destructive Testing Project Guide: Dr. Prabhu Rajagopal Students:
Control Engineering Lecture #2 15 th March,2008. Introduction to control systems Reference: Phillips and Habor The first applications of feedback control.
Dr. Jennifer Rochlis. Overview Build a technology testbed for future rover concepts Develop and demonstrate operations and mission concepts.
Challenging Environment
Modularly Adaptable Rover and Integrated Control System Mars Society International Conference 2003 – Eugene, Oregon.
Smart Grid- An Introduction
Design of Automatic Guided Vehicles. Automatic Guided Vehicle Industrial material transportation Unmanned transportation vehicle Optical,wired or laser.
SAILSaR Safe Autonomous Intelligent Landed Sample Return Joseph P. Martin Equinox Interscience.
LITERATURE SURVEY 1.EFFICIENT PATH PLANNING IN SEMI- FAULT TOLERANT ROBOTICS 2. Caesar robot.
M E T ROVER MSCD Engineering Technology Critical Design Review Metropolitan State College of Denver April 2004.
ROVER EGRESS DESIGN PROGRESS REPORT 9/26/2011 Anton Galkin Zack Morrison Hahna Alexander 1.
TEAM INITECH DARPA Grand Challenge. TEAM INITECH Context Currently an OSU team is involved in creating an autonomous off road vehicle to be used in the.
Lunar Drilling and Driving Carnegie Mellon December 2007 Red Whittaker.
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS) MAE 491 / IPT Design Competition Instructors: Dr. P.J. Benfield and Dr. Matt Turner Team Frankenstein.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Final Slide Concepts March 26, 2009 [Cory Alban] [Mission Ops] [Locomotion] 1.
Ground Robotics Reliability Center Andrew Niedert, Yazan Aljeroudi, Dr. Nassif Rayess, and Dr. Richard Hill Department of Mechanical Engineering, University.
1 Robotics Challenge Overview. 2 Why? -Viking was tested at the Dunes -Develop intelligent robots -Explore Robotics.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Slide 1 of 8 Final Presentation Back-up Slides Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Power and Thermal Control Ian Meginnis Ian Meginnis Power.
Problem Statement Overview of tasks Requirements for selection test.
Control Systems Engineering
Team 6 DOODLE DRIVE Alexander Curtis Peachanok Lertkajornkitti | Jun Pan | Edward Kidarsa |
Autonomous Soil Investigator. What Is the ASI? Designed to complete the 2013 IEEE student robotics challenge Collects "soil" samples from a simulated.
Universal Chassis for Modular Ground Vehicles University of Michigan Mars Rover Team Presented by Eric Nytko August 6, 2005 The 2 nd Mars Expedition Planning.
DemoSat II Colorado Space Grant Consortium Design (EPICS) Division Colorado School of Mines Golden Colorado Critical.
Gas Line Rover Noah Baker Douglas Maxey Ken Mentasti N. Alex Scott Matthew Stewart BP Gas Line Rover 1/ 27/ 04 British Petroleum Brandon McNerlin.
Space Robotics Presented by Mahesh Babu.S IV-Btech Electronics and Communication Engineering,SVIST 123seminarsonly.com.
Crew Mobility for Lunar Surface Exploration Dr. Rob Ambrose NASA-JSC May 2008.
Robotics and Autonomy Test Facility - Hardware Verification needs Elie Allouis HRAF Workshop – 28/02/2012.
Autonomous Silicon Microrobots
[Date] Dr. Yang Gao Robotics & Autonomy Test Facilities: In Support Micro Space Vehicle Research.
Scarab Autonomous Traverse Carnegie Mellon December 2007 David Wettergreen.
Space Robotics Seminar On
A Modular Robotic Concept for Human/Robot Interaction and Planetary Exploration Issa A.D. Nesnas, Ph.D. Daniel Helmick Ayanna Howard Mobility Concept Development.
Introduction to control systems
Spacecraft Technology Structure
Skid (Tank) Steering.
ME512: Mobile Robotics Last Lecture
Ball-shaped robots to Inspect nuclear power plants
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Human-Powered Transportation
Rover Components.
Starting Student Space Hardware Programs IV
100 g Locomotion Thursday March 26, Ryan Lehto Propulsion Group
Patent Liability Analysis
Natural Sciences and Technology Grade 6
Quanser Robotic Product Line 2015
The Lunar Lion By: Hannah Flick.
Presentation transcript:

LUNAR ROVER Concept proposal meeting Dr. Ashish Dutta Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Kanpur, INDIA ( *** for private circulation only)

Chandrayan 1: mapping the moon Chandrayan 2: landing a mobile robot for experiments on moon

1. Introduction: Chandrayan 2 PSLV-Lander-Rover LANDER ROVER

Lunar surface :dust, rocks, ash, craters,

Rocks, craters

Many Challenges Lunar gravity Cosmic radiation Extreme temperature -180 to 220 C Difficult terrain : dust, craters, rocks Time lag in control 2 secs Flying dust, clouds cameras Communication with earth

DIFFERENT SUB-SYSTEMS INVOLVED IN THE COMPLETE DESIGN

1. Rover structure Structural design (frame) Materials for construction Wheels & Legs? How many wheels? Electronics enclosure and insulation Vibration suppression Position of arm, cameras

2. Drive system Motors (DC brush less ) Sensors (position, acceleration?) Leg/wheel mechanism Steering motor system: located at wheel base Tyres : rubber, Ti wire based

3. Control System Motor controllers – PID ? Processor requirements I/O considerations Memory Considerations Power requirements. Central controller.

4. Sensor System for Navigation Vision based navigation Path planning Obstacle detection (laser, ultrasonic ) Self localization based on Lander coordinates

5. Communication System – Antenna Design – Transceiver 6. Thermal System – Passive thermal system. – Active thermal System. 7. Power system – Solar batteries. – Recharging and monitoring. – Power regulation. – Batteries: Nickel-Cd, Silver-Zn ?

8. Lander interface – Mechanical interface ( to hold rover in position ) – Electrical interface. 9. Arm Manipulator – DOF (5 DOF ?) – Requirements (Cleaning solar panels, digging, etc.) – Structure

10. Rover Operations – Start up procedures – Motor and arm initialization procedures – Rover deployments – Robot arm cleaning – Sample collecting + testing 11. Failure diagnostics and recovery – Possible modes of failure – Recovery – Back up

Main focus based on our strengths in IITK Robot design and vision based control Vision based control of rover Coordinated wheel control with slip Vision based navigation Thermal management using – heat pipes

IITK WORK SCHEDULE Design of rover with robot arm and its fabrication. Multi wheel coordination control with active slip compensation Visual map generation of lunar surface and navigation. Visual control of arm and rover. Development of test set up at IITK. Development of a virtual reality simulation of rover and lunar terrain. Experimental evaluation of developed rover

Future directions Possible route for developing indigenous strength in this area. Design of advanced future rovers. - Legged vehicles. - Hybrid : leg and wheels based rovers.

Strengths of IIT Kanpur Vision based navigation and robot control. Hardware development. Large number of systems developed : both wheeled and legged. Computational aspects of robotics. Sensor development and integration.

Functional specifications from VSSC 1.MOBILE ROBOT STRUCTURE: ACCEPTABILITY / TESTING a. kinematic alternativessimulation b. minimum clearance test bed with obstacles c. wheel assembly unit: * traction, control, payload wheel assembly test bed * steering accuracy test under load d. control system response measurement e. power budget subunits / total power testing f. solar panels: deployment+cleaning e. payload / stability ramped terrain 2. VISION-BASED NAVIGATION: a. design validationsimulation b. path planning testing ground truth comparison c. terrestrial testing trajectory measurement test bed d. accuracy / reliability repeated path point testing e. contingency / recovery

Further testing at VSSC – Level 2 : integrated functional testing / terrestrial robustness – Level 3 : thermal testing / radiation test – Level 4 : fully space qualified system

Thank you