Team “Canard” September 19th, 2006

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
February 17, Aerodynamics 2 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason Tang.
Advertisements

Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones
AAE 451 Aircraft Design Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review #2 Team Members Oneeb Bhutta, Matthew Basiletti, Ryan Beech, Mike Van Meter.
What is engineering? Engineering - The branch of science and technology concerned with the design, building, and use of engines, machines, and structures.
Propulsion PDR 1 Team 1 September 21, 2006.
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.
The Black Pearl Design Team: Ryan Cobb Jacob Conger Christopher Cottingham Travis Douville Josh Johnson Adam Loverro Tony Maloney.
Guidelines Presentation. Aircraft Aim & Judging The aircraft needs to transport the mirror segments of the ESO European Extremely Large Telescope, being.
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
Aerodynamic Shape Optimization in the Conceptual and Preliminary Design Stages Arron Melvin Adviser: Luigi Martinelli Princeton University FAA/NASA Joint.
Keith Hout Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Jong Soo Mok Stability Control and Flight Performance PDR October 24, 2000.
AAE 451 Aircraft Design Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review #1
AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Critical Design Review Team 1.
Aerodynamics PDR #1. Objective To examine airfoil choices To examine wing shape choices Structural and Manufacturing Concerns.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1.
ME403 Chapter 3 Wing Aerodynamics
Team 5 Aerodynamics QDR Presented By: Christian Naylor Charles Reyzer.
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Team 1: Structures 1 PDR Team “Canard” October 12th,
March 1, Aerodynamics 3 QDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason Tang Joe.
November 6, 2003QDR1 Team 5 Aerodynamics QDR #2 Scott Bird Mike Downes Kelby Haase Grant Hile Cyrus Sigari Sarah Umberger Jen Watson.
Lesson 13 Airfoils Part II
Aerodynamics QDR AAE451 – Team 3 October 9, 2003 Brian Chesko Brian Hronchek Ted Light Doug Mousseau Brent Robbins Emil Tchilian.
Team 5 Aerodynamics PDR Presented By: Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer.
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Team 1: Propulsion QDR 2 Team 1 October 3, 2006.
Flight Performance, Stability and Control PDR Brian Barnett Rob Benner Ryan Srogi John Keune Alex Fleck.
Justin DeStories Aircraft Design. Objective/Requirements  The UAV team at Arizona State University is designing, optimizing, and building an autonomous.
Introduction Aerodynamic Performance Analysis of A Non Planar C Wing using Experimental and Numerical Tools Mano Prakash R., Manoj Kumar B., Lakshmi Narayanan.
Team 5 Critical Design Review Trent Lobdell Ross May Maria Mullins Christian Naylor Eamonn Needler Charles Reyzer James Roesch Charles Stangle Nick White.
AAE 450 Spring 2008 Aerothermal 1 Brian Budzinski March 27, 2008 Aerothermal Group Contact Lifting Body Overview.
Dane Batema John Tapee Audrey Serra Patricia Roman Kyle RyanCarlos Vergara Benoit BlierDrew Capps Team 1: Lessons Learned and Vehicle Summary Team “Canard”
The Lumberjacks Team /16/12 Brian Martinez.
Group 10 Dimitrios Arnaoutis Alessandro Cuomo Gustavo Krupa Jordan Taligoski David Williams 1.
1 Lecture 4: Aerodynamics Eric Loth For AE 440 A/C Lecture Sept 2009.
AAE 451 Aircraft Design First Flight Boiler Xpress November 21, 2000
Bridget Fitzpatrick Patrick Dempsey Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Aerodynamics Preliminary Design Review #2 October 23, 2000.
AAE 451 AERODYNAMICS PDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah November 18, 2003.
Team 5 Aerodynamics QDR 2 Presented By: Christian Naylor Charles Reyzer.
February 24, Dynamics & Controls 1 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review October 3, 2000 German National Holiday Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis Chris.
Airfoils. Airfoil Any surface that provides aerodynamic force through interaction with moving air Moving air Airfoil Aerodynamic force (lift)
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Aerodynamics Preliminary Design Review #1 October 3, 2000.
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Team 1: Prototype Fabrication, Economic, & Test Plan.
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Team 1: Propulsion QDR 3 Team 1 October 17, 2006.
Transportation Unit 3 - Flight. Introduction Fixed Wing Heavier than air, atmospheric transportation vehicles sustain flight by utilizing the scientific.
Dynamics & Controls PDR 2
AAE 451 AERODYNAMICS QDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah November 6, 2003.
Vehicle Sizing AAE 451: Team 2 Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin
Team “Canard” September 28th, 2006
Aerodynamics PDR AAE451 – Team 3 October 21, 2003
Dynamics & Controls PDR 1
Project Plan Review Team “Canard” September 14th, 2006 Team 1:
Team 5 Final Design Review
Aerodynamics QDR 1 AAE 451: Team 2 Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin
Congratulations…Welcome to UTHM PARIT RAJA….A Place To Be..
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 27, 2006
Vehicle Sizing PDR Team “Canard” September 14th, 2006 Team 1:
Team “Canard” September 19th, 2006
DYNAMICS & CONTROL QDR 1 TEAM 4
Congratulations…Welcome to UTHM PARIT RAJA….A Place To Be..
UAV Wing Design For Efficiency At Low Reynolds Numbers
Team 5 Aerodynamics PDR #2
Aerodynamics PDR # 2 AAE451 – Team 3 November 18, 2003
Team 5 Aerodynamics QDR #1
PROPULSION QDR 2 AAE 451 TEAM 4
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 19, 2006
Dynamics & Controls PDR 2
Dynamics and Control PDR 1
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 6, 2006
Presentation transcript:

Team “Canard” September 19th, 2006 Aerodynamics 1 QDR Team “Canard” September 19th, 2006

Overview Aircraft Geometry: Aerodynamic Mathematical Model: Summary - Airfoil selection for wing and tail - Wing and tail configuration - Aspect ratio and wetted area - 3-View drawing Aerodynamic Mathematical Model: - CL - CD - CLMax Summary AAE 451 Team 1

Preliminary Airfoil Selection Wing Airfoil: - Looked at pylon racers - MH 43 common airfoil - Low Reynolds number airfoil Tail Airfoil: - NACA 0009 common in tail surfaces - Thin, lower induced and parasite drag MH 43 NACA 0009 AAE 451 Team 1

Wing Geometry METHOD Fixed thanks to historical data: Aspect ratio = 10 Taper ratio = 0.45 To be determined: Sweep angle Dihedral angle Wing span AAE 451 Team 1

Wing Geometry Top View s a b Wing span = 6.45 ft C a b s Swing = 4.16 ft2 Wing span = 6.45 ft Too much for structure Wing span = 6 ft Aspect ratio = 8.65 Sweep angle = = 9.3 degrees AAE 451 Team 1

Same airfoil all along the wing Wing Geometry Front View d troot ttip Chordtip = 0.4 Chordroot ttip = 0.4 troot Same airfoil all along the wing From the airfoil section, we know : troot = 0.0846 Chordroot troot = 0.0753 ft ttip = 0.0846 Chordtip ttip = 0.0338 ft Dihedral angle = = 0.73 degrees AAE 451 Team 1

Tail Geometry Top View Horizontal tail : Vertical tail : 11.4 deg Taper ratio : 0.6 Aspect ratio : 10 Sweep angle : 11.4 deg No dihedral 0.47 ft Shtail = 0.36 ft2 0.28 ft 1.88 ft Swing = 4.16 ft2 AAC = 0.65 ft D = 2.25 ft with Vertical tail : 0.7 ft 0.65 ft Degrees of freedom on the size for control and stability AAE 451 Team 1

Wing and Tail Geometry Wing Horizontal Tail Span 6 ft 1.88 ft Sweep Angle 9.3° 11.4° Taper Ratio 0.45 0.6 Dihedral Angle 0.73° 0° AAE 451 Team 1

Aircraft Wetted Area (Historical data) AAE 451 Team 1

Aircraft Wetted Area Fuselage wetted area estimate : Wing/tail wetted area estimate : Fuselage : Swet-fuselage = 2.88 ft2 Wing : Sexposed-wing = 3.92 ft2 Swet-wing = 7.92 ft2 Horizontal tail : Sexposed-htail = 0.33 ft2 Swet-htail = 0.67 ft2 Vertical tail : Sexposed-vtail = 0.196 ft2 Swet-vtail = 0.39 ft2 AAE 451 Team 1

3-View Drawing AAE 451 Team 1

Mathematical Model CL: - CD: CLMax: - CL at αstall AAE 451 Team 1

Mathematical Model 2D Estimation from XFOIL 2D Coefficients Clo = 0.151 Clα = 0.104/° Clmax = 1.082 AAE 451 Team 1

Mathematical Model 2D Estimation Cont… 2D Drag Coefficients Cdo = 0.00589 AAE 451 Team 1

2D to 3D Calculations Find CL from lifting line : Find e : Find k : Find CD for 3D : Find CDo : AAE 451 Team 1

2D/3D Comparison 2D plotted in blue 3D plotted in red AAE 451 Team 1

Summery Aircraft Geometry: Aerodynamic Mathematical Model: - Airfoil selection for wing and tail - Wing and tail configuration - Aspect ratio and wetted area - 3-View drawing Aerodynamic Mathematical Model: - CL - CD - CLMax AAE 451 Team 1

Questions Any Questions? AAE 451 Team 1