ONCOLOGY Drug Development Fadi Sami Farhat, MD ONCOLOGY Drug Development Fadi Sami Farhat, MD Hematology Oncology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Drug Discovery Process
Advertisements

A Proposal for BMS (Dasatinib) in GIST Jon Trent, MD, PhD Assistant Professor Dept. of Sarcoma Medical Oncology The University of Texas, M. D. Anderson.
Anticancer Agents Antibiotics Classification of Antibiotics:
Clinical Trial Design Considerations for Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch, NCI
Clinical developmentDiscovery Typical development timeline Typically – 8 yearsTypically 7 years.
S TRUCTURAL B IOINFORMATICS. A subset of Bioinformatics concerned with the of biological structures - proteins, DNA, RNA, ligands etc. It is the first.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Working with FDA: Biological Products and Clinical Development Critical Path.
Title, in bold style Subtitle, in regular Max 3 lines of text totally NB! The graphic outside the slide will not show in “Slide Show” or on print WntResearch.
Efficacy and Safety of Conatumumab Plus AMG 479 in Patients With Advanced Sarcoma S Chawla,1 AC Lockhart,2 N Azad,3 E Elez,4 F Galimi,5 N Baker,6 YJ.
Cancer Nanotechnology: New Opportunities for Targeted Therapies FDA Public Meeting October 10, 2006 Piotr Grodzinski, Ph.D. Director, Nanotechnology for.
Re-Examination of the Design of Early Clinical Trials for Molecularly Targeted Drugs Richard Simon, D.Sc. National Cancer Institute linus.nci.nih.gov/brb.
Clinical Division of Oncology Department of Medicine I Medical University of Vienna, Austria Drug Development.
Food and Drug Administration Preclinical safety data for “first in human” (FIH) clinical trials in healthy volunteer subjects Oncology Drug Advisory Committee.
INVESTIGATIONAL DRUG SERVICES IN THE HOSPITAL Sheree Miller, Pharm.D. University of Washington Medical Center
Successful treatment of pediatric desmoid tumors using hydroxyurea Naomi Balamuth, M.D. Richard Womer, M.D. November 13, 2008.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Provider of Global Contract Research Services Accelerating Preclinical Research, Drug Discovery & Therapeutics Altogen Labs 4020 S Industrial Dr Suite.
CS-1 Results of the Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Abraxane vs. Taxol in Metastatic Breast Cancer William J. Gradishar, MD, FACP Professor of Medicine Northwestern.
Evaluating Potential Drug Therapies Mike Shuler Biomedical Engineering.
Stefan Franzén Introduction to clinical trials.
Xeloda ® plus oxaliplatin: rationale in colorectal cancer (CRC)  Oxaliplatin is active in CRC, especially when combined with 5-FU/leucovorin (LV)  Superior.
Annual prostate cancer symposium February 23, 2013 The Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 2nd “ Novel Therapeutic Strategies for Prostate Cancer ”
Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) upregulation Dose- and time-dependent upregulation of TP in human colon cancer xenografts PaclitaxelDocetaxel.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
Drug - Device Combination Issues : Oncology Perspective Ramzi Dagher, M.D. DODP/CDER/FDA.
Metals in Medicine Consortium Sydney Cancer Centre.
Preclinical Guidelines: Development of Radioprotective/Mitigative Agents Departments of Dermatology & Radiation Oncology University of Rochester Medical.
European Statistical meeting on Oncology Thursday 24 th, June 2010 Introduction - Challenges in development in Oncology H.U. Burger, Hoffmann-La Roche.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
1 Statistics in Drug Development Mark Rothmann, Ph. D.* Division of Biometrics I Food and Drug Administration * The views expressed here are those of the.
Developing medicines for the future and why it is challenging Angela Milne.
The New Drug Development Process (www. fda. gov/cder/handbook/develop
The FDA: Basic Facts It takes 12 to 15 years to develop a single drug Only 1 in 10,000 potential medications makes it completely through the process Only.
Ruan J et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 247.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
Updated Results of a Phase I First-in-Human Study of the BCL-2 Inhibitor ABT-199 (GDC-0199) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
Rationale for Developing New Drugs 25% of children with cancer will not survive 5 years25% of children with cancer will not survive 5 years The acute toxicity.
A Phase 3 Prospective, Randomized, International Study (MMY-3021) Comparing Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration of Bortezomib in Patients with.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
Phase II Study of Sunitinib Administered in a Continuous Once-Daily Dosing Regimen in Patients With Cytokine-Refractory Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
NCI Initiatives to Develop Non-Clinical Models for Pediatric Oncology Malcolm A. Smith, MD, PhD 17 March 2004.
Agency Review of sNDA SE-006 DOXIL for Ovarian Cancer Division of Oncology Drug Products Office of Drug Evaluation 1 Center for Drug Evaluation.
Postęp w onkologii - nowe techniki, nowe leki Radosław Mądry Katedra i Klinika Onkologii Uniwersytety Medycznego im. K. Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu.
A UNIQUE IN VIVO ASSAY FOR YOUR ONCOLOGY DRUG CANDIDATES Target Validation Efficacy and Toxicity Evaluation Arnaud Peyronnier Business Development Manager.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
MM-005: A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose for the Combination of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib,
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
XXIV Riunione Nazionale MITO Ginecologia Oncologica: dai geni alla terapia Cristiana Sessa Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland Bellinzona MECCANISMI.
The process of drug development. Drug development 0,8 – 1 mld. USD.
Pharmacology Science that studies interactions of drugs with organism on different levels (subcellular, cellular, organ, systemic) Studies: - relationship.
Drug Development Process Stages involved in Regulating Drugs
Phase I/II CheckMate 032: Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab in Advanced SCLC
The Stages of a Clinical Trial
Drug Discovery &Development
Reeder CB et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Poster)
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Presented By Luca Malorni at 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting
Biotechnology Objectives: At the end of this lecture we will be able to identify and describe the uses of biotechnology in society.
Intervista a Angelo Delmonte
Clinical Trials in STS Shreyaskumar Patel, M.D.
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Krop I et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 5090.
Jakubowiak AJ et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 862.
PREDICT.
Seymour JF et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 872.
Efficacy of BSI-201, a PARP Inhibitor, in Combination with Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (GC) in Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer (mTNBC): Results.
Presentation transcript:

ONCOLOGY Drug Development Fadi Sami Farhat, MD ONCOLOGY Drug Development Fadi Sami Farhat, MD Hematology Oncology

Identify Candidate Compounds Screening Preclinical Evaluation Production and Formulation Phase I, II, III, IV Clinical Trials General Medical Practice ToxicologyPharmacologyBiochemistry ONCOLOGY Drug development Steps in cancer drug development

ONCOLOGY Drug development Identification of candidate compounds: Natural products Drug TypeSource Antitumor antibiotic (daunorubicin, doxorubicin)Streptomyces fungus Vinca alkyloid (vincristine, vinblastine)Vinca rosea plant TaxaneYew tree Camptothecin (topotecan, CPT-11)Camptotheca accuminata tree Podophyllin (etoposide, teniposide)Podophyllum peltatum plant Bryostatin, dolastatin, halichondrinMarine organisms Chu E, et al. Cancer: Principles & Practice of Oncology. 6th ed. 2001; Haskell CM. Cancer Treatment. 1995;35-36.

Chu E, et al. Cancer: Principles & Practice of Oncology. 6th ed. 2001; Identification of candidate compounds: Molecular-targeted screening ONCOLOGY Drug development Computer-aided construction of molecules Mutant oncogenes (BCR-ABL) Aberrant tumor suppressor genes (RB) Protein kinases Transcription activators

Prostate IN VITRO HUMAN TUMOR CELL LINE PANELS OvarianMelanomaCNSBreastColonLung Preclinical development followed by broad-based clinical trials In Vivo “tumor panel” human tumor xenograft studies Specific “disease-oriented” Phase I/II trials Targeted preclinical development “Nonspecific” antitumor activity“Highly specific” antitumor activity Adapted from NCI drug screening strategy,1985. ONCOLOGY Drug development Screening for anticancer activity

ONCOLOGY Drug development IN VITRO IN VIVO Preclinical evaluation of cytotoxic agents Mechanism of actionStage IStage II Target level Maximum tolerated dose Spectrum of activity Cellular level Dose-limiting toxicities Schedule dependency Efficacy Route of administration Cross resistance Combination therapies

ONCOLOGY Drug development Preclinical studies in mice, rats, and dogs provide an important bridge from in vitro studies to clinical studies Objectives –Define major toxicities –Identify initial safe starting dose for clinical trials Use of animal models in evaluation of cytotoxic agents

Study Phase Objectives Patient Population Phase I Phase I Identify maximum tolerated dose Small (3-6 patients/dose level) Define key toxicities Various tumor types Phase II Phase II Evaluate tumor response Larger than Phase I (10-50 Determine whether drug patients/treatment group) warrants Phase III study More uniform disease characteristics Phase III Phase III Compare new treatment with Larger than Phase II (100s of standard patients/treatment group) Support marketing approval Same tumor type Broader patient pool Phase IV Phase IV Integrate clinical study experience Very large cohorts (100s-1000s) into general clinical practice Represent general patient Monitor safety after approval population ONCOLOGY Drug development Clinical evaluation of cytotoxic agents

ONCOLOGY Drug development Response rate Survival Disease-free survival Time to disease progression Duration of response Quality of life Pharmacoeconomics Clinical trials: Efficacy endpoints

Adapted from World Health Organization, Clinical endpoints: Complete remission ONCOLOGY Drug development PrimaryTumorNodesMetastases Disappearance of all clinical, radiologic and biologic signs of tumor Treatment

Treatment Decrease of the multiple of two tumor diameters by at least 50% ONCOLOGY Drug development Clinical endpoints: Partial remission Adapted from World Health Organization, 1980.

Increase of the multiple of two tumor diameters by at least 25% ONCOLOGY Drug development Clinical endpoints: Disease progression Adapted from World Health Organization, Treatment

ONCOLOGY Drug development Major toxicities –Adverse effects –Need for dose/schedule modifications –Discontinuation of therapy during study Clinical trials: Safety analyses

ETHICSCOMMITTEEINVESTIGATORPATIENTS PREPARATIONOFDOCUMENTS CLINICALSUPPLIES DATA ON ADVERSEEVENTS DATAPROCESSING WRITTENACCOUNTS MONITORING STUDY REPORT ONCOLOGY Drug development Summary of organization and reporting of clinical studies