H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL Part 1: ______________________________ Computational.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SEMANTICALLY RICH EDUCATIONAL WORD GAMES ENHANCED BY SOFTWARE AGENTS Boyan Bontchev, Sergey Varbanov, Dessislava Vassileva INFOS 2011 Rzeszów - Polańczyk,
Advertisements

Workpackage 2: Norms
Sharif University of Technology Session # 2.  Contents  Structured analysis and design  Information system development  Systems Analysis and Design.
SECOND MIDTERM REVIEW CS 580 Human Computer Interaction.
Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers 2006/11/9 Taylor,Ruby,Sain.
From Digital Libraries and Multimedia Archives Towards Virtual Information and Knowledge Environments supporting Collective Memories Technology Platforms.
Using the Semantic Web to Construct an Ontology- Based Repository for Software Patterns Scott Henninger Computer Science and Engineering University of.
Learning Object Metadata From the locally prescribed to the socially derived (or, a look back at 4 years of LORNET at the University of Saskatchewan Scott.
0 General information Rate of acceptance 37% Papers from 15 Countries and 5 Geographical Areas –North America 5 –South America 2 –Europe 20 –Asia 2 –Australia.
Spring 2007COMP Design Teams Team Structure Interdisciplinary Teams.
Aug 24, Fall 2005ITCS4010/50101 Design Teams Team Structure Interdisciplinary Teams.
L4-1-S1 UML Overview © M.E. Fayad SJSU -- CmpE Software Architectures Dr. M.E. Fayad, Professor Computer Engineering Department, Room #283I.
Advanced Topics COMP163: Database Management Systems University of the Pacific December 9, 2008.
The Semantic Web Week 18: Part 4 Introduction to Web Services and Intelligent Web Agents Module Website: Practical.
The WSMO / L / X Approach Michael Stollberg DERI – Digital Enterprise Research Institute Alternative Frameworks for Semantics in Web Services: Possibilities.
Intelligent User Interfaces Research Group Directed by: Frank Shipman.
Marakas: Decision Support Systems, 2nd Edition © 2003, Prentice-Hall Chapter Chapter 7: Expert Systems and Artificial Intelligence Decision Support.
Sep 14, Fall 2006IAT 4101 Design Teams Team Structure Interdisciplinary Teams.
Models of Human Performance Dr. Chris Baber. 2 Objectives Introduce theory-based models for predicting human performance Introduce competence-based models.
© Copyright Eliyahu Brutman Programming Techniques Course.
1 Software Requirements Specification Lecture 14.
02 -1 Lecture 02 Agent Technology Topics –Introduction –Agent Reasoning –Agent Learning –Ontology Engineering –User Modeling –Mobile Agents –Multi-Agent.
The Future Of AI What’s Possible, What’s Not, How Do We Get There? Adam Cheyer Co-Founder, VP Engineering Siri Inc.
Chapter 7 Requirement Modeling : Flow, Behaviour, Patterns And WebApps.
Dr. Ken Hoganson, © August 2014 Programming in R STAT8030 Programming in R COURSE NOTES 1: Hoganson Programming Languages.
* SRA Division CoopIS- September Extending Multi-Agent Cooperation by Overhearing Floriano Zini SRA Division - ITC-irst, Povo (Trento) - Italy Joint.
1COM6030 Systems Analysis and Design © University of Sheffield 2005 COM 6030 Software Analysis and Design Lecture 4 - System modelling Dr Richard Clayton.
QUALITATIVE MODELING IN EDUCATION Bert Bredweg and Ken Forbus Yeşim İmamoğlu.
Adaptive Collaboration Support for the Web Amy Soller Institute for Defense Analyses, Alexandria, Virginia, U.S.A. Jonathan Grady October 12, 2005.
International Workshop on Web Engineering ACM Hypertext 2004 Santa Cruz, August 9-13 An Engineering Perspective on Structural Computing: Developing Component-Based.
Geovisualization for Constructing and Sharing Concepts Alan M. MacEachren, Mark Gahegan, & Bill Pike GeoVISTA Center Geography, Penn State
Conducting Situated Learning in a Collaborative Virtual Environment Yongwu Miao Niels Pinkwart Ulrich Hoppe.
Situated Design of Virtual Worlds Using Rational Agents Mary Lou Maher and Ning Gu Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition University of Sydney.
25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria1 D11.22 DIP Project Presentation V5 Oct 2006 Presented at Final Review Innsbruck, Oct, 2006.
Argumentation and Trust: Issues and New Challenges Jamal Bentahar Concordia University (Montreal, Canada) University of Namur, Belgium, June 26, 2007.
Learning Science and Mathematics Concepts, Models, Representations and Talk Colleen Megowan.
Reviewing Recent ICSE Proceedings For:.  Defining and Continuous Checking of Structural Program Dependencies  Automatic Inference of Structural Changes.
Domain Modeling In FREMA David Millard Yvonne Howard Hugh Davis Gary Wills Lester Gilbert Learning Societies Lab University of Southampton, UK.
Software Architecture in Practice Architectural description (The reduced version)
Aude Dufresne and Mohamed Rouatbi University of Montreal LICEF – CIRTA – MATI CANADA Learning Object Repositories Network (CRSNG) Ontologies, Applications.
An Ontological Framework for Web Service Processes By Claus Pahl and Ronan Barrett.
Unified Modeling Language* Keng Siau University of Nebraska-Lincoln *Adapted from “Software Architecture and the UML” by Grady Booch.
Modeling Component-based Software Systems with UML 2.0 George T. Edwards Jaiganesh Balasubramanian Arvind S. Krishna Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN.
L6-S1 UML Overview 2003 SJSU -- CmpE Advanced Object-Oriented Analysis & Design Dr. M.E. Fayad, Professor Computer Engineering Department, Room #283I College.
Group-oriented Modelling Tools with Heterogeneous Semantics Niels Pinkwart COLLIDE Research Group University of Duisburg, Germany.
SEMANTIC AGENT SYSTEMS Towards a Reference Architecture for Semantic Agent Systems Applied to Symposium Planning Usman Ali.
Ontology-Based Computing Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University and Jarg.
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
1 1. Representing and Parameterizing Agent Behaviors Jan Allbeck and Norm Badler 연세대학교 컴퓨터과학과 로봇 공학 특강 학기 유 지 오.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Principles and Standards for grades pre-K-2.
Of 33 lecture 1: introduction. of 33 the semantic web vision today’s web (1) web content – for human consumption (no structural information) people search.
Computer supported cooperative work -Basic concepts
1 The Structure of Collaborative Problem Solving in a Virtual Math Team Gerry Stahl the Drexel.
Lecture 18: Object-Oriented Design
Chapter 1. Cognitive Systems Introduction in Cognitive Systems, Christensen et al. Course: Robots Learning from Humans Park, Sae-Rom Lee, Woo-Jin Statistical.
Issues in Ontology-based Information integration By Zhan Cui, Dean Jones and Paul O’Brien.
Thinking behind the environment for Making Construals (MCE)
April, 2005 ebSOA Based on FERA Reference Model Vasco Drecun Collaborative Product Development Associates, LLC Goran Zugic ebXMLsoft Inc.
Requirement Engineering with URN: Integrating Goals and Scenarios Jean-François Roy Thesis Defense February 16, 2007.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. SOA-RM Overview and relation with SEE Adrian Mocan
Artificial Intelligence Knowledge Representation.
University of Duisburg, Germany
Technologies: for Enhancing Broadcast Programmes with Bridgets
Visual Information Retrieval
Cognitive Language Comprehension in Rosie
CIS 375 Bruce R. Maxim UM-Dearborn
Ekaterina Prasolova-Førland
CIS 375 Bruce R. Maxim UM-Dearborn
Architecture Issue in the New Disciple System
Presentation transcript:

H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL Part 1: ______________________________ Computational Tools....

H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL Co-constructive tools _______________________________________

H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL Co-constructive tools _______________________________________

H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL CardBoard - a platform for shared visual languages _________________________________________ Private and public workspaces flexibly definable visual languages content cards connectors representing relations Creation of workspaces Record & Replay Visual language framework

H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL [Description] SemanticType = ´Conflict´ MenuEntry = ´Conflict´ Type = connector_card Style = bitmap Content = ´contra2.bmp´ ReadOnly = true Shape = circle ShapeColor = 0,0,0 Link = ´reference´, ´Reference´,1,´´,0,0,0 Link = ´contradiction´, ´Contradiction´,-1,´´,0,0,0 External representation:Specification: Internal representation: Card hierarchy Interpretation of attributes Syntax definition as a parameter _________________________________________

H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL Example: “turtle puzzle” ____________________________________ n Flexible mix of shared and private workspaces n Replicated architecture: synchronisation of fully functional autonomous applications (no master!) n “Jigsaw design” n plug-in interface for internal virtual agents (see below ->... ) Example: Turtle puzzle with virtual player

H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL “Jigsaw design” _________________________________________ from NIMIS classroom (-> later)

H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL teacher control + teacher students Cooperation modes ________________________________________

H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL teacher control + teacher students “Animation”: how local results are propagated to the publicly visible result workspace Cooperation modes ________________________________________ x o x x o o o x o x x x o x x o o o o x o

H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL CSCL - contributions to “C” ______________________________________ n n Architectures: replication, internal agents n n Designing for collaboration (jigsaw -> Aronson, 1978) n n Designing for flexible use -> evolving patterns of usage (Gassner) n n “representational engineering” -> mixed semantics in visual languages ->meta-level: analysis of “representational bias” (Suthers, 1999)

H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL Part 2: ______________________________ Modeling and Understanding....

H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL _______________________________________

H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL _______________________________________

H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL The scenario ________________________________________ face-to-face situation shared and private workspaces visual languages

H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL Semantic interpretation and action analysis ________________________________________ n Workspace(s) u cards, card networks n Mediator u declarative reconstruction u graph structure (cycles, hierarchy) u spatial structure (topology, adjacency) u temporal structure (sequence) n Interpreter(s) u logical model u arithmetical model u problem solving analysis workspace mediator interpreter

H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL Analysis of cooperative problem solving (Mühlenbrock) ________________________________________ constructionconflict Protocol revision User 1 User 2 Problem solving phases

H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL Example analysis ________________________________________ create_object(o4, Type, Pos, Dim, actor2) create_object(o3, Type, Pos, Dim, actor1) constructive action constructive phase mismatch of objects conflict between strategies create_object(o3, Type, Pos, Dim, actor1) constructive action modify_pos(o3, Pos, actor1) modify_pos(o4, Pos, actor2) deconstructive action deconstructive phase constructive action modify_pos(o4, Pos, actor2) modify_pos(o3, Pos, actor1) constructive action joint arranging coordination modify_pos(o3, Pos, actor1) deconstructive action other actor’s object removed conflict create_object(o4, Type, Pos, Dim, actor2)

H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL Visualisation ________________________________________ revision aggregation User 1User revision aggregation User 1User 2

H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL Evaluation schema ______________________________________ action-based indicators dialogue scenes prediction? indexing If we put this here that will fit there. Hmm.

H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL H.U. Hoppe: About the relation between C and C in CSCL Formal analysis and modeling of group interactions ________________________________________ n n Open: validate an ontology of group interactions n n Discourse analysis vs. action-based analysis? n n Background: -> AI work on plan recognition & “reasoning about action” -> “computational mathetics” (Self, 1995) -> formal analysis of human communication (Watzlawick et al., 1967)