Statistical Physics of the Transition State Ensemble in Protein Folding Alfonso Ramon Lam Ng, Jose M. Borreguero, Feng Ding, Sergey V. Buldyrev, Eugene.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Time averages and ensemble averages
Advertisements

Transfer FAS UAS SAINT-PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS Introduction Physical basis Molecular dynamics Temperature and thermostat Numerical.
Computational methods in molecular biophysics (examples of solving real biological problems) EXAMPLE I: THE PROTEIN FOLDING PROBLEM Alexey Onufriev, Virginia.
By Guang Song and Nancy M. Amato Journal of Computational Biology, April 1, 2002 Presentation by Athina Ropodi.
Protein Threading Zhanggroup Overview Background protein structure protein folding and designability Protein threading Current limitations.
A COMPLEX NETWORK APPROACH TO FOLLOWING THE PATH OF ENERGY IN PROTEIN CONFORMATIONAL CHANGES Del Jackson CS 790G Complex Networks
Protein Rigidity and Flexibility: Applications to Folding A.J. Rader University of Pittsburgh Center for Computational Biology & Bioinformatics.
CISC667, F05, Lec21, Liao1 CISC 467/667 Intro to Bioinformatics (Fall 2005) Protein Structure Prediction 3-Dimensional Structure.
Collaborators : In silico study of amyloid - protein folding and oligomer formation Brigita Urbanc Boston University Center for Polymer Studies H. Eugene.
Protein folding kinetics and more Chi-Lun Lee ( 李紀倫 ) Department of Physics National Central University.
Graphical Models for Protein Kinetics Nina Singhal CS374 Presentation Nov. 1, 2005.
Stochastic roadmap simulation for the study of ligand-protein interactions Mehmet Serkan Apaydin, Carlos E. Guestrin, Chris Varma, Douglas L. Brutlag and.
Stochastic Roadmap Simulation: An Efficient Representation and Algorithm for Analyzing Molecular Motion Mehmet Serkan Apaydin, Douglas L. Brutlag, Carlos.
Protein Structure Prediction Samantha Chui Oct. 26, 2004.
Protein Dynamics Studies of Structure-Switching in Lymphotactin By Max Shokhirev Final Project for PHAR201 Fall 2008.
Modeling molecular dynamics from simulations Nina Singhal Hinrichs Departments of Computer Science and Statistics University of Chicago January 28, 2009.
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Plaque Fibril Entanglement 100nm 10nm Fibril AβAβ In Silico Study of an Alzheimer’s disease protein (Aβ) AEDVGSNKGA.
Using Motion Planning to Study Protein Folding Pathways Susan Lin, Guang Song and Nancy M. Amato Department of Computer Science Texas A&M University
Chem. 860 Molecular Simulations with Biophysical Applications Qiang Cui Department of Chemistry and Theoretical Chemistry Institute University of Wisconsin,
Conformational Entropy Entropy is an essential component in ΔG and must be considered in order to model many chemical processes, including protein folding,
Conformational Space.  Conformation of a molecule: specification of the relative positions of all atoms in 3D-space,  Typical parameterizations:  List.
A Technical Introduction to the MD-OPEP Simulation Tools
Protein Folding and Modeling Carol K. Hall Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering North Carolina State University.
Protein Structure Prediction
Shouyong Peng Shouyong Peng Physics Department, Boston University Feb. 24, Clark University Molecular Dynamics Observation of A  Peptide Aggregation.
Molecular Modelling - Lecture 2 Techniques for Conformational Sampling Uses CHARMM force field Written in C++
Protein folding dynamics and more Chi-Lun Lee ( 李紀倫 ) Department of Physics National Central University.
ChE 452 Lecture 25 Non-linear Collisions 1. Background: Collision Theory Key equation Method Use molecular dynamics to simulate the collisions Integrate.
MINRMS: an efficient algorithm for determining protein structure similarity using root-mean-squared-distance Andrew I. Jewett, Conrad C. Huang and Thomas.
Molecular Dynamics Arjan van der Vaart PSF346 Center for Biological Physics Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Arizona State.
Motif Search and RNA Structure Prediction Lesson 9.
1 Molecular Simulations Macroscopic EOS (vdW, PR) Little molecular detail Empirical parameters (  ) Seeking understanding of complex systems Surfactants.
Brigita Urbanc, Luis Cruz, Shouyong Peng, Jose Borreguero, Alfonso Lam
Mean Field Theory and Mutually Orthogonal Latin Squares in Peptide Structure Prediction N. Gautham Department of Crystallography and Biophysics University.
Go MODEL: coarse grained description based on the experimentally determined native structure. Potential energy of the Hamiltonian is given by, Tethering.
Protein Structure Prediction: Threading and Rosetta BMI/CS 576 Colin Dewey Fall 2008.
Protein Structures from A Statistical Perspective Jinfeng Zhang Department of Statistics Florida State University.
A Computational Study of RNA Structure and Dynamics Rhiannon Jacobs and Dr. Harish Vashisth Department of Chemical Engineering, University of New Hampshire,
A Computational Study of RNA Structure and Dynamics Rhiannon Jacobs and Harish Vashisth Department of Chemical Engineering, University of New Hampshire,
Modeling molecular dynamics from simulations
Young Min Rhee, Vijay S. Pande  Biophysical Journal 
Protein dynamics Folding/unfolding dynamics
Computational Analysis
Volume 108, Issue 5, Pages (March 2015)
Ching-Hsing Yu, Samuel Cukierman, Régis Pomès  Biophysical Journal 
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
Giovanni Settanni, Antonino Cattaneo, Paolo Carloni 
Transconformations of the SERCA1 Ca-ATPase: A Normal Mode Study
Understanding protein folding via free-energy surfaces from theory and experiment  Aaron R Dinner, Andrej Šali, Lorna J Smith, Christopher M Dobson, Martin.
Meng Qin, Jian Zhang, Wei Wang  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Binding of the Bacteriophage P22 N-Peptide to the boxB RNA Motif Studied by Molecular Dynamics Simulations  Ranjit P. Bahadur, Srinivasaraghavan Kannan,
Experimental Overview
Nonadditivity in Conformational Entropy upon Molecular Rigidification Reveals a Universal Mechanism Affecting Folding Cooperativity  Oleg K. Vorov, Dennis.
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Li Sun, Jeffrey K. Noel, Herbert Levine, José N. Onuchic 
Universality and diversity of the protein folding scenarios:a comprehensive analysis with the aid of a lattice model  Leonid A Mirny, Victor Abkevich,
Histone Acetylation Regulates Chromatin Accessibility: Role of H4K16 in Inter- nucleosome Interaction  Ruihan Zhang, Jochen Erler, Jörg Langowski  Biophysical.
The Dynamic Basis for Signal Propagation in Human Pin1-WW
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Yuguang Mu, Lars Nordenskiöld, James P. Tam  Biophysical Journal 
Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations Provide Insight into Substrate Recognition by Small Heat Shock Proteins  Sunita Patel, Elizabeth Vierling,
Multiple Folding Pathways of the SH3 Domain
Volume 103, Issue 10, Pages (November 2012)
Feng Ding, Sergey V. Buldyrev, Nikolay V. Dokholyan 
Volume 111, Issue 11, Pages (December 2016)
Atomic Detail Peptide-Membrane Interactions: Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Gramicidin S in a DMPC Bilayer  Dan Mihailescu, Jeremy C. Smith  Biophysical.
Hydrophobic Core Formation and Dehydration in Protein Folding Studied by Generalized-Ensemble Simulations  Takao Yoda, Yuji Sugita, Yuko Okamoto  Biophysical.
Yang Zhang, Jeffrey Skolnick  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

Statistical Physics of the Transition State Ensemble in Protein Folding Alfonso Ramon Lam Ng, Jose M. Borreguero, Feng Ding, Sergey V. Buldyrev, Eugene Shakhnovich and H. Eugene Stanley 2004

The Protein Folding Problem UnfoldedFolded Transition State Ensemble (TSE) Intermediate States Set of Protein Conformations located at the top of the free energy barrier that has the same probability to fold or unfold. (Du et al.,1998) Protein Folding Process At the Protein Folding Temperature T F: FoldedUnfolded What is TSE?

Purpose: Characterize the structure of the TSE at the amino acid level. Why?: Provide a guidance for amino acid substitution in experiments.(*) Our Results: 1.- The calculated TSE agrees with experimental data. 2.- The TSE can be divided into a discrete set of folding pathways. (*): Martinez and Serrano, Nature Structural Biology,1999. Riddle et al, Nature,1999, Gsponer et al, PNAS,2002, Vendruscolo et al, Biophysical Journal.,2003

Our Protein: SH3 1.- Small Protein: 56 amino acids. 2.- Folds quickly. 3.- Well studied by experiments. (*) (*) Riddle et al, Nature,1999. Martinez and Serrano, Nature Struct. Bio.,1999.

The Two-Bead Representation 1 Amino Acid From its atomic structure to a coarse grained model

The Two-Bead Model Covalent Bonds Backbone Effective Bonds Feng Ding et al., Biophysical Journal,2001 a) C  - C  and C  - C  Interactions: r

b) C  - C  Interactions: : Native contact between amino acids Cutoff = 7.5 Å 7.5 Å Native Contact Map

Obtaining the TSE Run Long Time DMD Simulation at T F =0.91. Select the Potential Energy as the approximate Path of Reaction. Energy window between -90 and -80 to locate the TSE (*). Record conformations within the energy window Unfolded Folded TSE (*) Feng Ding et al., Biophysical Journal, Candidate Conformations obtained.

Calculating Folding Probability P F 1.- TSE conformation has P F ~ Run N runs of DMD simulations for each candidate conformation at T = Calculate P F with: P F = N Folded /N runs 1525 Members of TSE obtained out of 5200 candidates. Filtering the TSE Candidates TIME E Folded Unfolded Example: N runs = 4, P F = 2/4 =1/2 N Folded =

1 2(*) (*) 7(*) 8 Amino Acid Index 0 1 Frequency (*) (*): Martinez and Serrano, Nature Structural Biology,1999 The TSE Average Contact Map

Root Mean Square Distance (rmsd) 1.- Take two protein conformations C1 and C2 and superpose the centers of mass. C1C2 2.- Find the rotationthat minimizes the function: y x z

The Clustering Algorithm(*) 1.- Find pair of clusters with minimal root mean square distance (rmsd). 2.- Join them. Go to next stage and repeat procedure. (*): Sneath,P.H.A., Numerical Taxonomy,1973 c1c5c4c3c2 c1c4c3c2 c5 c1 c2 c5 c3c4. Until obtained 1 cluster of 5 members

Clustering Tree (*)Two similar Folding Pathways when we have 5 Clusters. 5(*) A B B A TSE

The Clusters Set of TSE for T=0.91 The TSE can be divided into a discrete set of Folding Pathways

Changing Pathways Preferences 1.- Increase the intensity of contacts for cluster 4 and reduce the intensity of contacts for cluster 1 by using E’ = E(1-  ). 2.- The new conformations are used as starting point in our analysis. 3.- Repeat all steps to get the TSE members and make clustering. Results: The majority of the conformations changes their pathways

Summary TSE structure can be described through a finite number of folding pathways. The preference of a conformation to follow a folding pathway can be manipulated by changing the intensity of the contacts present in a pathway.

When distance between these two particles becomes R ij, a collision happens and the collision time t ij satisfies: (r ij + t ij v ij ) 2 = R ij 2 Discrete Molecular Dynamics (DMD) t ij These quantities are conserved: E i + E j, P i + P j and L i + L j Two particles moves with velocities v i and v j with relative position r ij. vivi vjvj i j R ij Select the pair with minimum t ij and repeat.

Why 4 Clusters? 4 Clusters Two similar Folding Pathways when we have 5 Clusters.

42.0% 57.4% 48.4% 17.2% 29.0% Unfolded State 9.42% 11.8% 7.60% 29.7% 40.5% 3.48% 3.50% Folded State Temperature