NO A Experiment Jarek Nowak University of Minnesota For NOvA Collaboration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TAUP 2007 R. Plunkett 14 September,2007 Status of the NOvA Experiment Robert Plunkett Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia, IL, USA TAUP 2007.
Advertisements

Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
MINOS sensitivity to dm2 and sin2 as a function of pots. MINOS sensitivity to theta13 as a function of pots Precision Neutrino Oscillation Physics with.
Karol Lang, University of Texas,NOvA, XII International Workshop on “Neutrino Telescopes”, Venice, March 6-9, Karol Lang University of Texas at.
Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February The NO A Experiment P5 Meeting SLAC 21 February 2008 Gary Feldman.
Leon Mualem — NNN07 The NO A Experiment Status Leon Mualem California Institute of Technology (for the NO A collaboration) Workshop on Next Generation.
How to Build a Neutrino Oscillations Detector - Why MINOS is like it is! Alfons Weber March 2005.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
Searching for Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations at MINOS Andy Blake Cambridge University April 2004.
1 Neutrinos: Past, Present and Future Robert C. Webb Physics Department Texas A&M University Robert C. Webb Physics Department Texas A&M University.
T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.
The Status of the NOvA Experiment Sarah Phan-Budd Argonne National Laboratory Miami 2011 December 16, 2011.
July 19, 2003 HEP03, Aachen P. Shanahan MINOS Collaboration 1 STATUS of the MINOS Experiment Argonne Athens Brookhaven Caltech Cambridge Campinas Dubna.
A long baseline neutrino oscillation search - MINOS Reinhard Schwienhorst School of Physics and Astronomy University of Minnesota.
NO A goals & physics NO A goals & physics NO A sites & detectors NO A sites & detectors NO A now & future NO A now & future.
NEW RESULTS FROM MINOS Patricia Vahle, for the MINOS collaboration College of William and Mary.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Sampling Detectors for e Detection and Identification Adam Para, Fermilab NuFact02 Imperial College Interest de jour: what is sin 2 2  13  oscillations.
NuMI NuMI Overview NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) 14 March ‘02 NuMI / MINOS Overview.
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
F Axis The NO A Experiment: Phase 2 of the Fermilab NuMI Program Workshop on Physics with Atmospheric Neutrinos and Neutrinos from Muon Storage Rings Maury.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
Latest Results from The MINOS Experiment
The NO A Experiment Status Leon Mualem California Institute of Technology (for the NO A collaboration) Fermilab Users’ Meeting 2009.
 Leslie Camilleri CERN, PH November 23, NO A is a Long Baseline experiment using the NUMI beam from Fermilab Now being used for MINOS (732km)
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
Future Neutrino Physics Mitch Soderberg Fermilab Institutional Review June 6-9, 2011.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Monday, Feb. 19, 2007PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #7 Monday, Feb. 19, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino Oscillation Experiments 2.Long.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
MINOS/NO A Deborah Harris Fermilab NuFact’04 Osaka University July 28, 2004.
NuMI Off-Axis Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EPS2003, Aachen July 19, 2003.
Gary Feldman MINOS in Cambridge 24 March NO A Update MINOS Collaboration Meeting Cambridge, England 24 March 2009 Gary Feldman.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
,,,,, The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment Liangjian Wen On behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics Daya Bay Detectors.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Θ 13 and CP-Violation in the Lepton Sector SEESAW25 Institut Henri Poincaré, Paris Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg SEESAW25 Institut Henri Poincaré, Paris.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
E. W. Grashorn and A. Habig, UMD, for the MINOS Collaboration The Detectors of The Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search (MINOS) Experiment The MINOS.
Harvard Neutrino Group DoE Review August 21, 2006.
MINER A Main INjector ExpeRiment for v-A Active segmented scintillator detector: 5.87 tons Nuclear targets of C, Fe and Pb, Water, Helium.
Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
NO A Zebulun Krahn University of Minnesota NNN2009 Estes Park, CO October 8-10 th 2009.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
NOvA in light of non-zero θ 13 Gavin S. Davies Iowa State University for the NOvA Collaboration nuTURN Workshop Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Italy.
Status of the NOνA Experiment Satish Desai - University of Minnesota For the NOνA Collaboration APS Meeting - April 2013 Denver, Colorado.
The Latest MINOS Results Xinjie Qiu Stanford University (for the MINOS Collaboration) International Symposium on Neutrino Physics and Beyond Sept
Status of the NO A Experiment Kirk Bays (Caltech) on behalf of the NO A collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute Saturday, Feb 22, 2014.
The NO A Near Detector: An overview Jose A. Sepulveda-Quiroz For the NO A Collaboration Iowa State University and Argonne National Laboratory APS April.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
MINOS/NOvA and Future LBNOE Alfons Weber University of Oxford STFC/RAL NExT Neutrino Meeting, Southampton 4-May-2011.
1 Status of the NO A Experiment Sarah Budd Argonne National Lab On behalf of the NO A Collaboration Fermilab Users’ Meeting 2010 June 2, 2010.
New Results from MINOS Matthew Strait University of Minnesota for the MINOS collaboration Phenomenology 2010 Symposium 11 May 2010.
Measuring Nuclear Effects with MINERnA APS April Meeting 2011 G. Arturo Fiorentini Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas On behalf of the MINERnA collaboration.
5/31/2006Fermilab Users Meeting1 Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University MiniBooNE, NO A, MINER A.
Neutral Current Interactions in MINOS Alexandre Sousa, University of Oxford for the MINOS Collaboration Neutrino Events in MINOS Neutrino interactions.
NOnA NuMI Off-axis ne Appearance
Neutrino factory near detector simulation
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Peter Litchfield Minnesota University For the NOA collaboration
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
6. Preliminary Results from MINOS
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February
Presentation transcript:

NO A Experiment Jarek Nowak University of Minnesota For NOvA Collaboration

140 Collaborators 24 Institutions 4 Countries NOvA Collaboration 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

NuMI off-axis e Appearance Experiment 810 km long baseline. Two detectors 14 mrad off the beam axis. Near detector at fermilab 1 km from target. Far detector in Ash River, MN. NuMI beam upgraded to 700 kW. Search for e appearance and  survival to measure: θ 13 Mass hierarchy Constrain CP violation phase Θ 23, Δm km Fermilab Ash River Soudan mine 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

April 2010 Beam: Accelerator shutdown to install upgrades for 700kW beam: March 2012 Horn1 and target design complete Kicker for Booster-Recycler in use First recycler injector magnet installed FD: Start construction: Jan block ready by start of shutdown 50% detector by end of shutdown Complete by early 2014 ND: Cavern excavation during shutdown Prototype in operation at FNAL on the surface July 2011 Project Timeline 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

NO A Detectors Side-by-Side Far Detector 930 Planes (15.6 m x 15.6 m) 14kTon cells Cosmic Ray Muon Rate: ~200 kHz (2-3 m overburden) In-Spill Rate 1400 e beam events/year Near Detector 196 Planes (3m x 4m) + 10 Steel/Scint Plane Pairs (“Muon Catcher”) 220 Ton cells Cosmic Ray Muon Rate: ~50 Hz (105 m overburden) In-Spill Rate: 10  s duration every 1.33 s 30 neutrino events/spill Beam Direction 63 m 15.6 m 14.3 m 2.9 m 4.2 m 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

Detector Technology 6 Detectors composed of highly reflective PVC extrusions Filled with liquid scintillator (mineral oil + 5% pseudocumene) Each cell readout by a wavelength shifting fiber onto one pixel of a 32-pixel avalanche photodiode (APD) – – 30 PE from far end of cell into APD for MIP Num cells: (Far), (Near) 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

NuMI Off-axis Beam Enhanced 700 kW NuMI beamline Reduce cycle time from 2.2 to 1.3 seconds. Increased intensity/cycle with additional Booster batch. New horn and target. 10  s beam pulse every 1.3 seconds 4.9e13 POT/pulse or 6e20 POT/year Placing detectors 14 mrad off the beam axis results in 2GeV narrow band beam. Close to the oscillation maximum. protons target Decay Pipe ++  ND FD 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

e Appearance Neutrinos(-) Antineutrinos(+) ‘solar’ term is less < 1% 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

ν e Appearance with MSW effect With 810 km baseline neutrinos will travel through the Earth crust. Due to flavor content of the surrounding matter there is an additional term in the Hamiltonian only for v e. Oscillation probability depends on sign of Δm 2 From S. Parke, “Neutrino Oscillation Phenomenology” in Neutrino Oscillations: Present Status and Future Plans Oscillation probability modified by about 30% for NOvA 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

Sensitivity Sensitivity to sin 2 (2 θ 13 ) after 3 years each of neutrino beam and antineutrino beam in case of normal and inverted hierarchy 18e20 PoT in each neutrino and antineutrino mode 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

Comparing to recent results 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

Resolution of the mass hierarchy Resolution of the mass hierarchy after 3 years (18e20 PoT) each of neutrino beam and antineutrino beam in case of normal and inverted hierarchy. Comparing results from neutrino and antineutrino beams. 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

Neutrino and antineutrino parameters Minos reported 2  difference between best fit values for neutrinos and antineutrinos. NOvA will be able to test this discrepancy at 3  (5  ) CL after 1(3) year of running in each neutrino and antineutrino mode. NULL HIPOTHESIS Difference between neutrino and Antineutrino MINOS results. 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

NO A Near Detector Prototype (NDOS) Prototype Near Detector on Surface (NDOS) – Taking Data Now! Identical to future Near Detector NDOS Near Det Veto Target Shower containment Muon catcher 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

Prototype detector Main goals are: Test detector design and prepare for far detector production. Develop DAQ system on custom design hardware Tune calibration procedures. NDOS collects data from NuMI and BNB beams Show electron neutrino selection and e\  0 separation. Verify cosmic background suppression. Study nuclear hadronization models and multinucleon production. Quasi-elastic cross section at 2 GeV. 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

Lessons Learned Redesign of module manifolds to improve its structural integrity A few new quality assurance stages in the module production and installation. New installation procedures. Identification and fixing of DAQ performance issues. APDs and electronic redesign. Top View Side View 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

MC Events in NOvA ν μ p+p+ e Small shower from 2 nd γ V  Charged-current Long well-defined muon track, proton is a short track with large energy deposition at the track end. V e Charged –current Single shower with characteristic e-m shower development. NC with  0 in final state Possible gaps near event vertex, multiple displaced e-m showers. 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

Neutrinos 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

Neutrinos 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

Finding Neutrinos Neutrino candidates selection cuts bring clear peak of beam events. 110 mrad off NuMI axis NDOS nearly on Booster axis, but detector rotated wrt axis NuMI BNB events/1  sec events/2  sec 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

Neutrino candidates NuMI BNB 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC mrad off NuMI axis PoTNuMICosmic Bg Neutrino5.6e Antineutrino8.4e NDOS nearly on Booster axis, but detector rotated wrt axis PoTBNBCosmic Bg Antineutrino3e

Michel Electrons Use Michel electrons for electro-magnetic energy calibration PRELIMINARY Random coincidences. These are clusters that are matched to muons recorded 20 seconds prior to event. q>300 ADC counts t>40 μsec into the spill cluster to be within 30 cm of muon end point 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

Summary NOvA is on track to make many important contributions to neutrino physics. Measurement of θ 13 Determination of mass hierarchy More precise measurements of Δ m 2, sin 2 (2 θ 23 ) Far detector construction coming soon. NuMI beam upgrade has started. Near detector on the surface taking neutrino data now. 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

BACKUP SLIDES 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

Calibration Cosmic muons provide intra-detector calibration source for every cell ADC (calibrated) EXAMPLE CELL 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

Neutrino Mixing Massive neutrinos  mass eigenstates  weak interaction eigenstate Neutrino is produced in flavor  and can be detected in different flavor   depending on distance (L) travelled and neutrino energy (E)  L/E  parameters: mixing angles (  ij ) and mass differences Δm 2 ij =m 2 i -m 2 atmospheric and accelerator L/E~500km/GeV Reactor + Solar L/E~15,000 km/GeV Indications of oscillation From MINOS and T2K 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

Comparisons to MC Early look at contained events indicates NuMI MC event rate agrees with data POT normalized PRELIMINARY 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

Case Study Consider ν e appearance at the CHOOZ limit: Before cuts, signal is 4 σ above background Cuts on summed event pulse height, event length: 7 σ Sophisticated selection based on event topology: 18 σ Compare to ~4 σ of MINOS analysis Interaction TypeEvents in 3 years ν μ CC2500 NC2200 ν e CC beam120 ν e CC signal270 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

Sensitivity to Hierarchy 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

Example of Constraining CP 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

POT Accumulated 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

NDOS Energy Spectrum 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

ND Manifold Architecture 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

Raceway Functionality Face of optical connector Threading fibers into opt conn Registers fibers in optical connector Guarantees acceptable bend radius Shields fibers from events in manifold Facilitates assembly 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11

Module Construction Process 2 to 1 gluing preparation stringing threading flycutting Inner seal plasma prep 7/26/2011 J. Nowak (UofM), PANIC11