Fundamental Requirements for Patent Protection in the United States Chapter 3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MELISSA ASFAHANI Patent Attorney El Paso, TX
Advertisements

By David W. Hill AIPLA Immediate Past President Partner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Overview of the America Invents Act.
Patent Law Overview. Outline Effect of patent protection Effect of patent protection Substantive requirements for patent protection Substantive requirements.
Intellectual Property Fundamentals Ed Genocchio - Principal of Spruson & Ferguson - Mechanical Group Presentation to The Australian Technology Showcase.
EACCNJ European Union IP Forum Mark DeLuca Pepper Hamilton LLP September 27, 2012.
INTRODUCTION TO PATENT RIGHTS The Business of Intellectual Property
© 2013 Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP & Edwards Wildman Palmer UK LLP IP Issues in Transactions F.I.R.E. Series, University of Rochester May 14, 2013 Ralph.
The America Invents Act (AIA) - Rules and Implications of First to File, Prior Art, and Non-obviousness -
Patent Law Under the America Invents Act
© COPYRIGHT DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. The Leahy-Smith America Invents Act: Changes to United States Patent Law and Practice Charles.
Intellectual Property March 4, 2015 Don Keach Director, Intellectual Property Development and Technology Transfer Office Copyright University of Kentucky.
Patents Copyright © Jeffrey Pittman. Pittman - Cyberlaw & E- Commerce 2 Legal Framework of Patents The U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 8:
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 25, 2008 Patent - Utility.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 26, 2009 Patent – Defenses.
D ANIELS B AKER Introduction to Patent Law Doug Yerkeson University of Cincinnati Senior Design Class April 6, 2005.
Patent Overview by Jeff Woller. Why have Patents? Patents make some people rich – but, does that seem like something the government should protect? Do.
Patents 101 April 1, 2002 And now, for something new, useful and not obvious.
Applications for Intellectual Property International IP Protection IP Enforcement Protecting Software JEFFREY L. SNOW, PARTNER NATIONAL SBIR/STTR CONFERENCE.
® ® From Invention to Start-Up Seminar Series University of Washington The Legal Side of Things Invention Protection Gary S. Kindness Christensen O’Connor.
Lauren MacLanahan Office of Technology Licensing GTRC.
Patents and trade secrets 6 6 Chapter. Patents  Grant of property rights to inventors  Issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)  Permits.
The U.S. Patent System is Changing – A Summary of the New Patent Reform Law.
© 2010 Hodgson Russ LLP IEEE Southern Area Entrepreneur’s Day Overview Of The Patent Process R. Kent Roberts Hodgson Russ LLP (716)
1 Patent Harmonization: Substantive Patent Law Treaty (SPLT) aspect Kay Konishi Kay Konishi, Patents Committee APAA Japan Group APAA 50 th Council Meeting.
Chapter 4 Patents, Trademarks and Trade Secrets. Trademarks, Servicemarks Word, name, symbol or device Used in trade with goods to indicate the source.
Intellectual Property
MSE602 ENGINEERING INNOVATION MANAGEMENT
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION OF BIOTECH IN THE U.S. Marc S. Friedman Chair, Intellectual Property Practice Sills Cummis Epstein & Gross P.C. 30 Rockefeller.
PATENTS Introduction and International Regime Victor H. Bouganim WCL, American University.
Intellectual Property What is intellectual property? What is intellectual property? US IP protection- US IP protection- Patent application process Patent.
Impact of US AIA: What Really Changed? 1 © AIPLA 2015.
1 Patent Law in the Age of IoT The Landscape Has Shifted. Are You Prepared? 1 Jeffrey A. Miller, Esq.
Investing in research, making a difference. Patent Basics for UW Researchers Leah Haman Intellectual Property Associate WARF 1.
Patent Law Presented by: Walker & Mann, LLP Walker & Mann, LLP 9421 Haven Ave., Suite 200 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca Office.
Hot Issues in Patent Law Steven G. Saunders
Chapter 08.  Describes property that is developed through an intellectual and creative process  Inventions, writings, trademarks that are a business’s.
© 2008 International Intellectual Property June 22, 2009 Class 6 Patents: Multilateral Agreements (Paris Convention); Economics of International Patent.
Establishing a Robust Due Diligence Process: Tips for Finding the Warts before Finalizing the Deal Patents and Other Intellectual Property Issues: Coverage.
Class Seven: Intellectual Property Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights.
1 INTELECTUAL PROPERTY PATENTS. 2 A patent for an invention grants property rights of that invention to the inventor. It is issued by the Patent and Trademark.
© 2008 International Intellectual Property June 24, 2009 Class 8 Patents: Multilateral Agreements (WTO TRIPS); Global Problem of Patent Protection for.
New Sections 102 & 103 (b) Conditions for Patentability- (1) IN GENERAL- Section 102 of title 35, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: -`Sec.
6.1 Chapter 6 Patents © 2003 by West Legal Studies in Business/A Division of Thomson Learning.
6.1 Chapter 6 Patents © 2003 by West Legal Studies in Business/A Division of Thomson Learning.
© COPYRIGHT DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Post Grant Proceedings Before the USPTO and Litigation Strategies Under the AIA Panelists:David.
LAW OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY FALL 2015 © 2015 MICHAEL I. SHAMOS Patents Michael I. Shamos, Ph.D., J.D. Institute for Software Research School of Computer.
© 2008 International Intellectual Property June 16, 2009 Class 2 Introduction to Patents.
Intellectual Property Patent – Infringement. Infringement 1.Literal Infringement 2.The Doctrine of Equivalents 35 U.S.C. § 271 –“(a) Except as otherwise.
Welcome and Thank You © Gordon & Rees LLP Constitutional Foundation Article 1; Section 8 Congress shall have the Power to... Promote the Progress.
Prosecution Group Luncheon March, S.23: Patent Reform Act of 2011 Senate passed 95-5 (3/8); no House action as yet First to File Virtual (Internet)
Slide Set Eleven: Intellectual Property Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights 1.
Patents and the Patenting Process Patents and the Inventor’s role in the Patenting Process.
The Third Revision of the Chinese Patent Law State Intellectual Property Office of P.R.C Dec
Class 24: Finish Remedies, then Subject Matter Patent Law Spring 2007 Professor Petherbridge.
Recent Developments in Obtaining and Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in Nanocomposites Michael P. Dilworth February 28, 2012.
Nuts and Bolts of Patent Law presented by: Shamita Etienne-Cummings April 5, 2016.
INTELECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
Intellectual Property, Patents, Trademarks, Copyright, and Franchising
© 2006 Brett J. Trout Patent Reform Act of 2005 © 2006 Brett J. Trout
Patent application procedure (…and costs)
Options to Protect an Invention: the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and Trade Secrets Hanoi October 24, 2017 Peter Willimott Senior Program Officer WIPO.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND CYBER PIRACY
Nuts and Bolts of Patent Law
Chapter 4: Patents and Trade Secrets in the Information Age.
What are the types of intellectual property ?
What are the types of intellectual property?
What You Didn’t Know That You Didn’t Know About Patents
Dr. Achim Seiler, EU-Project” Support of Yemen’s Accession to the WTO”
Jonathan D’Silva MMI Intellectual Property 900 State Street, Suite 301
Presentation transcript:

Fundamental Requirements for Patent Protection in the United States Chapter 3

Why have Patents? Stimulates R&D. Protect the rights of the inventers. Encourage rapid disclosures. Create product improvements. Allow time to recover cost to create the product.

Protection requirements: Novel: Knowledge of the invention was not previously available to the public. Non-Obvious: Not obvious at the time of the invention to one skilled in the art. Proper Subject: Utility Patents: Useful: credible, specific, real-world use. Anything under the sun made by human ingenuity Design Patents: Primarily ornamental

Novelty

Non-obvious

Requirements for Patent Application at the Patent and Trademark office (PTO) 1.A description of the invention. 2.An illustration of best mode of carrying out the invention. 3.All known information relating to patentability of the invention. 4.The precise aspects of the invention claimed for patent protection.

Was the patent application filed in time? Date of invention = date of concept. – Drawings Models Working prototype are carried out with due diligence. – In practice or patent application is filed. 1 year grace period. – Inventor discloses information. – Public use or sale. Experimental use: controlled private studies.

Patent Duration It takes 1½ - 3 years for the PTO to issue a patent. Utility Patents: 20 years from date of filing. – Biotech Industry: 5-10 years before patent. Adjusted duration so it equals or exceeds 17 years. Design Patents: 14 years from date of patent issuance.

Patent Approved: Apple Now Owns "Slide to Unlock"

Pharmaceutical Patents Require approval from: PTO and FDA; Clinical trials approximately 5-10 years New Drug Application (NDA) 2-7 years Hatch-Waxman Act (1984) – Extended patents for pioneered drugs up to 5 years. – Made generics more quickly available after the patent ended. Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) 180-day hold for other generics.

Enforcement Issues Protecting your patent: Lawsuit – Requires lots of time, energy, and resources Forum-shopping: best location for the lawsuit. Anywhere they made, used, or sold the invention. Defenses – Invention does not infringe on the patent. – The patent was invalidly granted. Newegg and Overstock. Lose the patent. other manufacturers know how to make your invention. Take to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals – Prior use rights. Only covers for methods of doing business

First-to-Invent Priority

Why the United States is Adopting a First-to-File System Easier to determine priority. To decrease litigation expenses and time. Global consistency. 95% first to file = first to invent. Advantageous for inventor internationally. – Simultaneously file international application with the WIPO specifying protection in desired countries.

Obtaining and Defending patents rights in the United States and Globally Chapter 4

Patent applicaton process Who may file the Patent Application – Inventor Assignee to the patent * Employer might file if invention assignment agreement is filed. ( patent reform act) Procedural Requirements – Comprehensive, detailed,wittnessed and dated record keeping – Perform Prior Art search ( not mandatory but extremely helpful) – File as soon as possible (with in a year of certain events like sales or pubications)

Important components of the Patent Application Summary of the Invention (exhibit 4.2) Enablement Applicant must provide enough information about the invention to enable one skilled in art to practice it – Objectivity – Withholding Information – Breadth of Claim Case 4.1 White Consolidated Industries v. Vega Servo-Control, Inc.

Best mode Disclosure of best mode of carrying out the invention contemplated by the inventor at the time of the paten application. Information Disclosure Statement All information that bears upon patentability of an invention needs to be disclosed. must steer clear of the inequitable conduct. The Claims It defines the boundary of legal monopoly of the patent. Could be a mean- for or a means-plus-function claim.

PTO Procedures and Appeals Secrecy order Secrecy of information submitted to PTO Publication of patent file after 18 months of application with exception for inventor filing in US only Patent Examination Process Appeals Reexamination Oppositions (pre-grant v. post grant) Litigation

Infringement and Remedies Infringement Making, using or selling of any patented invention without authority within US during the term of patent Literal Infringement 1. Rule of exactness 2. Rule of Addition 3. Rule of Omission Doctrine of Equivalents item performs substantially the same function in substantially the same way to obtain same result Prosecution history Estoppel

Infringement of Process Patents Whoever without authority imports, sells or uses within the US a product which is made by a process patented in the US shall be liable as an infringer (Process Patent Amendments Act) Remedies for Patent Infringement – Damages Lost profits – Sales to customers not reached by patentee – Insufficient production capacity of Patentee – Sales due to features other than the patented technology

Reasonable Royalty – Established rates in Industry – Whether parties are competitors – The advantages of invention over prior techniques – Importance of invention to Infringer’s product

Penalty for Willful Infringement – The Infringer acted despite high likelihood that its actions constitute infringement – The infringer knew or obviously should have know of that objectively high risk of infringement – Injunctions Four factor test – The plaintiff has suffered irreparable damage – Traditional remedies are inadequate to compensate for injury – Public interest would not be disserved. – Hardships to plaintiff outweigh those to defendant from continued infringement

International Patent protection Issues Patent Law Treaty – The requirement for obtaining a filing date – Procedures for recording a change of address or patent ownership – Issues regarding reviews of patent Invalidation decisions. More Issues under consideration – Patent Term Measure term from date of filing At least a 20 year term from date of filing. – Patentable Subject Matter – First to File Priority – Grace Periods – Secrecy of Patent Application

Prior user Rights – Oppositions and Delays – Issues Regarding National Emergencies and Public health (compulsory license) The Paris Convention – Filing date of an Application filed in a signatory company will be considered the effective filing date of an application filed in an other country The European patent convention ( one application for Europe) Patent Cooperation Treaty – Search Report – International Preliminary Examination Authority

CASE FIRACT MONSANTO COMPANY AND MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC, v. VERNON HUGH BOWMAN MICROSOFT CORP. v. AT&T CORP.