Prof. Valeria Termini AEEGSI Commissioner CEER Vice-President CEER DSO WG co-Chair The Future Role of European DSOs 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2 nd Workshop MFG, , Bucharest The current status on the Market Design of the SEE REM and the way forward.
Advertisements

Development and Operation of Active Distribution Networks: Results of CIGRE C6.11 Working Group (Paper 0311) Dr Samuel Jupe (Parsons Brinckerhoff) UK Member.
RIIO-T1 impact on allowed revenues and network charges 6 September 2012.
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/ ) under grant agreement.
The work of European energy regulators on generation adequacy FTS-CEER workshop on Regulatory Aspects of Power Capacity Markets 7 February 2012.
Does the Third Package provide the European TSO associations with the tools necessary to find solutions to the European energy challenge ? Pierre BORNARD.
Albanian power market Sokol RAMADANI Chairman ERE- Albania 1 FEBRUARY 2012 Electricity market design and regulatory issues in Albania and South East Europe.
TARIFF REGULATION IN THE NIGERIAN ELECTRICITY SUPPLY INDUSTRY
EStorage First Annual Workshop Arnhem, NL 30, Oct Olivier Teller.
Walter Boltz, Vice-President CEER 20 th Madrid Forum September 2011 Gas Target Model State of play.
Towards Regional Independent Operators – a main driver for successful market integration.
Madrid Forum 15 October 2014 Massimo Ricci Chairman.
RETHINKING THE ELECTRICITY GRID RETHINKING THE ELECTRICITY GRID 14 May 2012 Presented by: PATRICIA DE SUZZONI ADVISOR TO THE CHAIR OF CRE (French Energy.
1 Citizens' Energy Forum 2013 and Energy Retail in 2014 Jan Panek, Head of Unit ENER B3.
DIVISION Landstingsdirektörens stab Coral Interreg Europe proposal Project proposal addresses objective 1.2 of the Interreg Europe Programme: Improve the.
Regulatory Transparency and Interaction with the Government Dr. Konstantin Petrov Head of Section, Policy and Regulation.
World Forum on Energy Regulation IV Athens, Greece October , 2009 "Reducing Regulatory and Technological Barriers to Demand Side Participation“
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 ENEL Group Italian core European base Worldwide strategy Italy’s largest power company. Europe’s second listed utility.
Valeria Termini Member of the CEER GA FTS-CEER bilateral meeting, Florence 06 th February 2012 Investment planning rules in Europe.
Regulatory Approaches to Managing Investment Uncertainty Gülefşan Demirbaş ICER VWG2 Co-Chair.
Rome Energy Meeting 2008 Rome, November 2008 Investments Opportunities and Project Finance in the Energy Market Luigi Marsullo President Finpublic.
Achieving a sound investment climate – the role of regulators Boaz Moselle Joint-Chair, CEER Gas Working Group Managing Director – Corporate Strategy Ofgem.
ENTSO-E’s Network Development Plans and Network Codes: How a strong European grid supports security of supply, affordable electricity prices through market.
Consumer Empowerment Consumer Empowerment May 15, 2012 Presented by: Alparslan Bayraktar Commissioner Energy Market Regulatory Authority of Turkey (EPDK)
Samordningsrådet med kunskapsplattform för smarta elnät Smart Grid and Smart Metering - Swedish Experiences Karin Widegren, Director Swedish Coordination.
Jeroen de Joode (ECN/Delft University of Technology) Michiel van Werven (ECN) An analysis of potential bottlenecks Optimal Design of Future Electricity.
Brussels Workshop Use case 3 11/09/2015 Mario Sisinni.
Role of Smart Grids in the Italian Energy Policy Strategy Marcello Capra General Directorate for Electricity Market, Renewables, Energy Efficiency and.
DISTRIBUTED GENERATION, RENEWABLE ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY. IMPACT ON POWER QUALITY AND NETWORK PLANNING “Inauguration of the 6th Framework Programme”
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June INFRAX 2. Regulatory framework 3. Role of DSO in an open electricity market 4. Role of DSO in Smart Grids 5. Experiences.
Increasing integration of variable RES-E: Policy and regulatory measures for T&D networks Luis Olmos Pontificia Comillas University Madrid / Spain
1 This project is co-financed by the European Union STATUS OF RENEWABLE ENERGY IN THE MEDITERRANEAN AND CURRENT CHALLENGES; MedReg Perspective By Prof.
Framework Guideline on gas balancing Martin Crouch, Ofgem 20th Madrid Forum September 2011.
Outline The key findings What the SGA Summit did Smart City Amsterdam Some more detail on the disrupters – Ecosystem of the Grid – Distributed Generation.
Draft of Terms Of Reference For Hiring a Consultant “Study for establishing the regulation and tools in implementing of DG connection to distribution network”
1 Vienna Economic Forum –VEF- ERE AND THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR THE PRIVATISATION OF DSO Bujar Nepravishta Chairman of ERE Tirana-8 th and 9 th June.
Implications of regulatory changes of the market model on the distribution business.
Pamela Taylor, Head of European Strategy, Ofgem Madrid Forum, March 2011 ERGEG’s draft framework guideline for gas balancing.
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 EUROPEAN REGULATORS’ VIEWS ON REGULATING SMART DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS Authors - Gareth Evans (Ofgem), Riccardo Vailati(AEEG),
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 PAATERO – SE – S6 – Paper 0485 Adopting a general regulatory approach on the European electricity market Noona Paatero.
International Association of Oil and Gas Producers Stakeholder view of EFET R_ISO Proposal Prague – 21 January 2008.
ETSO-GTE Supporting a secure and liberalized European energy market A Joint Presentation by Mr Geert Joosten, GTE Mr Juha Kekkonen, ETSO 22 January 2003.
Economic Benchmarking vs Financial Incentives – an alternative to incentivising performance in the gas industry? Ashley Muldrew, Gas Speak 2015.
The Role of TSO. Madrid, 7-8 Feb The Role of TSO2 The roles of industry players First vision of role of TSO in GTE position paper Industry players.
CARILEC. An Association of Electric Utilities CARILEC An Association of Electric Utilities The Caribbean Electric Utility Service Corporation (CARILEC)
Eric Peirano, Ph.D., TECHNOFI, COO
Role of NRAs to incentivise DSOs
Presentation at REEEP Regulatory Forum, 28 September 2004
Eric Peirano, Ph.D., TECHNOFI, COO
Eric Peirano BRIDGE Support Team, Technofi
Empowering consumers in retail and wholesale markets
Regulatory ‘Do’s’ and ‘Don’ts’ for DSOs to serve consumers’ interests Garrett Blaney co-chair, CEER Distribution Systems Working Group CEER Annual Conference.
Integrated Management System and Certification
Engaging Energy Consumers Energy Action, Fuel Poverty & Climate Action Conference - March 2017 Aoife MacEvilly Commissioner for Energy Regulation Regulating.
Agenda Context Motivation Scope Main expected results.
Promoting consumer engagement and demand response – The DSO Role
RealValue H2020 Overview RealValue project funded under H2020 LCE 8 – 2014: Local / small-scale storage Commenced 1st June 2015 (duration 36 months) EU.
WG1: RELIABLE, ECONOMIC AND EFFICIENT SMART GRID SYSTEM
Towards a Future-proofed EU Energy Market Design 23 – 24 January 2017
Internet Interconnection
Powering Towards Clean Energy in Europe
HOLISDER Integrating Real-Intelligence in Energy Management Systems enabling Holistic Demand Response Optimization in Buildings and Districts Project presentation.
Transmission As Enabler
Role of DER in the EU and current status in the Baltic States
The work of European energy regulators on generation adequacy
Regulation for Smart Grids
Incentives for electricity infrastructure – ERGEG view
The Role of DSOs in Smart Grid environment
Electricity Distribution and Energy Decarbonisation
Albanian power market ERE- Albania Sokol RAMADANI Chairman E R E
Presentation transcript:

Prof. Valeria Termini AEEGSI Commissioner CEER Vice-President CEER DSO WG co-Chair The Future Role of European DSOs 1

Index Perimeter and roles of DSOs in Europe How to promote innovation Italian case study Evolving towards «smart distribution systems» 2

Main differences among DSOs in EU Member States NO one-size-fits-all model for the regulation of DSOs DSO size and number (in some countries only one DSO, in other local fragmentation) DSO activity profile (in some countries metering and data management activities are not carried out by DSOs) Characteristics of distribution networks (in some countries high-voltage, meshed electricity networks are not included in distribution) Level of RES penetration (still very different among MSs) Tariff design (in some countries regulator does not approve tariffs applied to customers but only allowed revenues) 3

Three principles for DSOs No one size fits all approach  need for principles and overall framework 1.Meet the reasonable expectations of users and stakeholders 2.Act as neutral market facilitators in undertaking core functions 3.Act in the public interest (CBA analysis) 4

New role of DSOs. The overall logical framework DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION. Still pending approval 5

New roles of DSOs call for many regulatory changes Key issues in CEER paper: Innovative investments and related risks “Total expenditure” approach Output-based incentive regulation for smart grid developments More economic signals for customers but low complexity for retail market Deferral of grid development with Tariff structure (Capacity vs Consumption) and possibly Time-of-use distribution network tariffs (via supplier) although there are difficulties in coordinating them with hourly system marginal prices Which commercial arrangements for procuring flexibility are needed (further investigation is needed) 6

Where CEER is heading Regulators should encourage smart and flexible solutions to reduce capital investment where this delivers efficient outcomes for consumers. Regulators should avoid undue bias towards capital investment over operating expenditure (TOTEX approach). Though many stakeholders across Europe agreed that network tariffs should change, or that they may be inadequate in the future. There was no consensus on the extent as to in which direction network tariffs should change. Action point: regulators will carry out further analysis on the benefits of different approaches including, service related tariffs, capacity based charges and discounts etc. 7

The Italian case. Regulator’s approach to innovation pilots Demonstration pilot: real operations on real grid (no lab) Transparency of the rules: procedures, evaluation methods and project selection criteria, known ex-ante Knowledge development with the involvement and the support of the best expertise (RSE and University like Politecnico MI) Continuous monitoring in the medium and long term: cost benefit analysis for the whole life-time of the new components Input-based incentives: selected projects are awarded with extra-WACC (+2% on top on ordinary WACC for 12 years) Replicability and dissemination of the best-practices Output disclosure: because demonstration pilots are paid by all customers > results must be public (no patents) 8

The Italian case. From pilots to Smart distribution system After the pilot phase, AEEGSI recognizes the need to move towards a roll out of «smart distribution system» to cope with he RES penetration (30 GW) The results of the pilot projects are the basis of the orientations for a public consultation (due by next month) Basic infrastructure will become a platform for further developments (RES participation in ancillary service market) and must ensure interoperability New rules for grid users and market participants will need to be identified There will be focus on two main smart functionalities: – Observability of power flows and connected resources – Ability to regulate voltage on MV lines Both smart functionalities will be regulated through an output based mechanism; further smart functionalities may be developed in the future Cyber security will become more central as more “smart devices” are connected to grids 9

The Italian case. New economic signals - proposals  The introduction of a totex approach will be explored: in order to avoid incentives to over-invest given by the current hybrid approach (price cap applied to operating cost and cost of service regulation applied to capital cost); neutrality between make or buy solutions;  The introduction of a menu of regulatory options will be discussed in future specific consultation papers  The (tariff and quality) regulatory options combine different levels of yield and different levels of risk 10

Thank you for the attention 11