Institute for Social Research University of Michigan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
3rd International Digital Curation Conference Washington, DC, Dec 2007 Paper Presentations: Interoperability, Metadata & Standards Data Documentation Initiative:
Advertisements

ICPSR-SRO Shared Data Model Project Mary Vardigan Director, DDI Alliance.
Chuck Humphrey University of Alberta RDC CFI Projects Building the next generation of metadata tools.
Data Documentation Initiative (DDI) Workshop Carol Perry Ernie Boyko April 2005 Kingston Ontario.
New Services for Data Creators and Providers Louise Corti, Head ESDS Qualidata/ Outreach & Training Alasdair Crockett, ESDS Data Services Manager.
Metadata Management at GESIS-ZA Reiner Mauer GESIS – Data Archive and Data Analysis CESSDA-Expert Seminar Odense, September 11th 2008.
Metadata at ICPSR Sanda Ionescu, ICPSR.
DDI 3 Comparison Test-Case at ICPSR
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style DDI Across the Life Cycle: One Data Model, Many Products IASSIST Meeting Tampere,
Developments in Data Discovery at ICPSR George Alter Director, ICPSR University of Michigan.
& Slovak Archive of Social Data “SASD” and DDI 3 IASSIST/IFDO Conference, Tampere, Juraj.
RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute The Joy of Developing a Web-based Survey System! Stuart Allen, Brandon Peele,
Meta Dater Metadata Management and Production System for surveys in Empirical Socio-economic Research A Project funded by EU under the 5 th Framework Programme.
Fitting a survey life cycle in the DDI Irene Wong Chuck Humphrey IASSIST Edinburgh May 2005.
NESSTAR Limitedw w w. n e s s t a r. c o m DDI-Publishing Made Easy- the Nesstar Way Jostein Ryssevik Nesstar Ltd.
Demonstration of a Blaise Instrument Documentation System “BlaiseDoc” Gina-Qian Cheung May 25, 2005 Institution for Social Research University of Michigan.
NIMH Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys
Survey Metadata Documentation Sue Ellen Hansen, Gina-Qian Cheung, Kirsten Alcser, Grant Benson, Ashley Bowers, Karl Dinkelmann, Youhong Liu, Beth-Ellen.
Documentation Tools in the Survey Lifecycle. Outline What is NSFG Webdoc? Instrument documentation != Survey documentation Data Cleaning/Processing in.
 Name and organization  Have you worked with DDI before? (2 or 3)  If not, are you familiar with XML?  What kind of CAI systems do you use?  Goals.
The International Household Survey Network IHSN IHSN Secretariat PARIS21 Steering Committee, 14 November 2007.
© 2014 by the Regents of the University of Michigan Metadata from Blaise and DDI 3.0/3.2 Gina Cheung Beth-Ellen Pennell North American DDI Conference April.
IPUMS to IHSN: Leveraging structured metadata for discovering multi-national census and survey data Wendy L. Thomas 4 th Conference of the European Survey.
Data Documentation Initiative (DDI): Goals and Benefits Mary Vardigan Director, DDI Alliance.
ESCWA SDMX Workshop Session: Role in the Statistical Lifecycle and Relationship with DDI (Data Documentation Initiative)
World Bank, Africa Region, Africa Household Survey Databank - The World Bank - Africa.
Curating and Managing Research Data for Re-Use Review & Processing Jared Lyle.
NSI 1 Collect Process AnalyseDisseminate Survey A Survey B Historically statistical organisations have produced specialised business processes and IT.
Case Studies: Statistics Canada (WP 11) Alice Born Statistics UNECE Workshop on Statistical Metadata.
Data Collection, Harmonisation and Storage (An international perspective) Jon Johnson (CLS, Senior Database Manager) Sub-brand to go here CLS is an ESRC.
Distributed Access to Data Resources: Metadata Experiences from the NESSTAR Project Simon Musgrave Data Archive, University of Essex.
DDI-RDF Discovery Vocabulary A Metadata Vocabulary for Documenting Research and Survey Data Linked Data on the Web (LDOW 2013) Thomas Bosch.
4 April 2007METIS Work Session1 Metadata Standards and Their Support of Data Management Needs Daniel W. Gillman Bureau of Labor Statistics Paul Johanis.
Chuck Humphrey Data Library Co-ordinator University of Alberta May 16, Capitalising on Metadata Tool development plans IASSIST 2007.
DLI Training April 2004 Kingston Ontario. DDI What, Why, How?
Metadata Portal Project: Using DDI to Enhance Data Access and Dissemination Mary Vardigan Assistant Director, ICPSR Director, DDI Alliance.
SERPent Project Secure Epidemiology Research Platform January – October 2010 Virtual Research Environment Rapid Innovation Project Funded.
Data documentation and metadata for data archiving and sharing Managing research data well workshop London, 30 June 2009 Manchester, 1 July 2009.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. ICT - a core management issue Part 1 Managing ICT resources Produced in Collaboration between.
United Nations Regional Seminar on Census Data Archiving for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, September, 2011 Documentation and Cataloguing in Data.
Colectica: A Platform for DDI 3 based Metadata Management Design. Collect. Share.
Anne K. Stratton National Center for Health Statistics Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Re-engineering.
Secure Epidemiology Research Platform (SERPent) Kick Start Meeting - April 15 th, 2010 Pascal Heus
DDI and the Lifecycle of Longitudinal Surveys Larry Hoyle, IPSR, Univ. of Kansas Joachim Wackerow, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences.
Colectica Feature Overview. Current Focus: Data Collection.
ILO Department of Statistics Edgardo Greising
DDI AND EXPERIENCES AT ICPSR Prepared for Expert Seminar Finnish Social Science Data Archive Tampere, Finland September 1-2, 2000.
Archiving microdata Standards and good practices United Nations Statistics Commission New York, February 26, 2009 Olivier Dupriez World Bank, Development.
The Data Documentation Initiative: more discussion Chuck Humphrey University of Alberta Atlantic DLI Workshop 2005, Acadia University.
The Data Documentation Initiative (DDI) Fostering Community Engagement and Adoption Breakout 9 RDA Sixth Plenary, Paris Mary Vardigan, ICPSR, University.
Assessing Patient-Centered Medical Homes from the Patient’s Perspective: Developing the CAHPS ® PCMH Survey Patricia (Trish) Gallagher, PhD Center for.
The Semantic Web. What is the Semantic Web? The Semantic Web is an extension of the current Web in which information is given well-defined meaning, enabling.
CoRD Meeting 12 March 2003 STIPES (Lot 4) STIPES = Statistical Inquiries from Popular European Software.
Metadata Driven Survey Research Jeremy Iverson. Open Standards.
Saving Time, Money, and Work: How to Do Secondary Data Analysis Vijay Singh, MD, MPH, MS, University of Michigan Arch Mainous III, PhD, Medical University.
Writing a HOWTO Guide for DDI An approach for getting started.
Data Stewardship Lifecycle A framework for data service professionals Protectors of data.
Metadata standards Using DDI to Inform, Organize, and Drive Survey Data Production.
Division of HIV/AIDS Managing Questionnaire Development for a National HIV Surveillance Survey, Medical Monitoring Project Jennifer L Fagan, Health Scientist/Interview.
System Overview Training on the use of the new countrystat
System Overview Training on the use of the new countrystat
Michigan Questionnaire Documentation System (MQDS)
What’s New in Colectica 5.3 Part 1
Questasy: Documenting and Disseminating Longitudinal Data Online with DDI 3 Edwin de Vet 11/14/2018.

Enhancing ICPSR metadata with DDI-Lifecycle
Database Connectivity and Web Development
Capitalising on Metadata
Questasy: Documenting and Disseminating Longitudinal Data Online with DDI 3 Edwin de Vet 5/21/2019.
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics
Presentation transcript:

Institute for Social Research University of Michigan The Use of Structured Survey Instrument Metadata throughout the Data Lifecycle Sue Ellen Hansen Institute for Social Research University of Michigan ESRA 2011

Presentation Outline Data Lifecycle Survey Lifecycle MQDS Moving through the data lifecycle Study example

Data Lifecycle (DDI) http://www.ddialliance.org/

Survey Lifecycle (CCSG) http://ccsg.isr.umich.edu/

MQDS Michigan Questionnaire Documentation System Documents Blaise™ survey instruments and datasets Produces relational and eXtended Markup Language (XML) question-level metadata that meet the Data Documentation Initiative (DDI) metadata standard Now available to licensed Blaise ™ users

MQDS Version 3 Relational database DDI compliant standardized tables Flexibility to add extensions that meet client and organizational needs Allows Automated documentation of any Blaise survey instrument Importing and documenting data produced by other software (e.g., SAS) Lower cost development of other tools that facilitate editing and disseminating data

MQDS V3 Relational Database

Using MQDS across the Data Lifecycle

From Concepts to Instrument Specifications Concepts → Constructs → Indicators → Measures Questionnaire design Focus groups, cognitive interviews, etc. Questionnaire Instrument design Instrument specifications → programming & screen layout → MQDS documentation (instrument and codebook)

Instrument Specifications

Blaise™ Programming

Blaise™ Screen

MQDS Instrument Documentation

Using MQDS across the Data Lifecycle Check programming against instrument specifications Compare versions of instruments Test programmed instruments Document preliminary datasets Document cleaned datasets Harmonize data Disseminate data for public use data

Study Example Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiological Surveys (CPES) National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R) National Survey of American Life (NSAL) National Latino and Asian American Study (NLAAS) – 5 languages U.S. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/CPES/

CPES Programming and data collection Harmonization project Survey Research Operations (SRO), Survey Research Center, (SRC), Institute for Social Research (ISR) Harmonization project SRO and the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICSPR), ISR Facilitated by MQDS standardized structured XML metadata for all three CPES surveys

CPES Harmonization Project Primary goals: Harmonize and merge CPES datasets Prepare codebooks and data for on-line analysis Develop Website Disseminate for public use

The Data ~ 6,000 variables ~ 20,000 Respondents NCS-R: 9,282 adults NSAL: 6,199 adults 3,570 African American 1623 Afro-Caribbean 891 non-Latino White NLAAS: 4,864 adults 1095 Asian 2,554 Latino 215 non-Latino, non-Asian White ~ 6,000 variables from 9,000 before harmonization and disclosure analysis

Process for Creating CPES XML

Process Repeated for NCS-R NSAL NLAAS NLAAS English NLAAS Spanish NLAAS Tagolog NLAAS Vietnamese NLAAS Chinese

CPES Website Development and Data Dissemination

CPES Interactive Codebook http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/CPES/

CPES Interactive Codebook

CPES Interactive Codebook

CPES Interactive Codebook

Summary MQDS

Questions? Data Documentation Initiative CPES Cross-Cultural Survey Guidelines MQDS http://www.ddialliance.org/ http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/CPES/ http://ccsg.isr.umich.edu/ http://www.blaise.com/Tools