Demand Response – Is There Anything More Important? Scott Miller New England Conference of Public Utilities Commissioners June 18, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Grids Involvement in New Englands Forward Capacity Market Helping to Bring Demand Resources into the Supply Mix Tim Roughan Director, Distributed.
Advertisements

Demand Response Commissioner Suedeen Kelly June 3, 2008.
The Regulatory Assistance Project 110B Water Street Hallowell, Maine USA Tel: Fax: State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier,
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
The Midwest ISO from a Transmission Owner Perspective.
© 2004 Dominion Dominion Proposal January 24, 2005.
NAESB Strawman January 24-25, Problem Statement Enough generators must have fuel to meet peak load New England Cold Snap crisis heightened interest.
Definition of Firm Energy and Interruptible Transmission Two Issues Causing Problems for Business in the Western Interconnection.
The Regulatory Assistance Project web: 50 State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, Vermont Tel:
R&D 1 Demand Response and Pricing in France EDFs experience New regulation Main goals 10/11 th April 2007.
1 WHY WE NEED AN ICAP MARKET IN NEW ENGLAND Presentation By: Dr. Richard A. Rosen Tellus Institute Boston, MA To: Massachusetts Electric Restructuring.
Standard Market Design (SMD) in New England Federal Energy Regulation Commission Conference on Standard Market Design January 22, 2002 David LaPlante Vice.
Summary of Proposed Market Rules For Transition Period Price-Responsive Demand and Active Demand Resources in the Forward Capacity Market Henry Yoshimura,
1 Market Multiplier. 2 Comments Does the price effect of demand exist? Why include when CA is working hard to establish resource adequacy? Price elasticity.
A Federal View of the Interface of Natural Gas and Electricity Prices Moving Toward Greater Reliance on Wholesale Energy Markets November 30, 2006 Crowne.
New England Developments in Demand Response and Smart Grid 2010 National Town Meeting on Demand Response and Smart Grid Henry Yoshimura, Director, Demand.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
03/11/2013 MARKETS COMMITTEE Aleks Mitreski MARKET DEVELOPMENT (413) Overview of Market Rule revisions.
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
1 Resource Adequacy and Market Power Mitigation via Option Contracts Hung-po Chao and Robert Wilson EPRI and Stanford University Presentation at POWER.
Robert G. Ethier Market Monitoring March 18, 2005 A Review of the Monitoring of Market Power: Discussion.
Energy supply forecast Presentation to Connecticut’s Energy Future Conference by Bridgett Neely, London Economics International LLC December 2, 2004 Hartford,
Electric Utility Basics An overview of the electric industry in New England and the operation of consumer-owned utilities 1.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
Background Recent Experience draws from two white papers co-authored for the Peak Load Management Alliance ( “Demand Response: Principles.
Economic Demand Response Sheldon Fulton Executive Director, IPCAA November 4, 2008.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
Pat Wood III, Chairman Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Bringing Power to California Customers Silicon Valley Manufacturing Group May 27, 2004.
George A. Godding, Jr. Director, Management and Communications Office of Market Oversight and Investigations Comments are the speakers and do not necessarily.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
Joe Polidoro, Sr. Engineer PJM Interconnection, LLC Grid of the Future: Integrating Load Response into the Markets.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N NEET Work Group 6 Update: BPA Demand Response April 21 st Karen Meadows Pam Sporborg.
1 Electricity System and Energy Market Basics David J. Lawrence Manager, Auxiliary Market Products Prepared for: RGGI I&L Workshop June 15, 2006.
Making the Wholesale Market Work for Retail Customers: Connecticut Municipal System Experiences November 11, 2007 Anaheim, California Presented by: Brian.
Structuring Electricity Markets Lester B. Lave Electricity Industry Center Carnegie Mellon University January 10, 2008.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Why Should Retail Customers Care About the MISO Market? WIEG Board Meeting November 8, 2007 WIEG Board Meeting November 8, 2007 Submitted by: Kavita Maini,
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Its Revisions to PURPA November 11, 2005 Grace D. Soderberg Assistant General Counsel National Association of Regulatory.
1 Market Evolution Program Long-Term Resource Adequacy Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee Meeting May 14, 2003.
FERC Perspective on Demand Response David Kathan FERC Midwest Demand Response Initiative Chicago, IL February 9, 2007 The author’s views do not necessarily.
Demand Response in Energy and Capacity Markets David Kathan FERC IRPS Conference May 12, 2006.
PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
Working Paper on Standardized Transmission Services and Wholesale Electric Market Design Alice Fernandez, Derek Bandera, Connie Caldwell, Jignasa Gadani,
Illinois Wholesale Market Update December 10, 2003.
Market Monitoring: The Role of OMOI and MMUs Presented to: Energy Markets at the Crossroads Springfield, Illinois December 12, 2002 By: Lisa L. Carter.
©2003 PJM North American Markets Status APEx Seoul, Korea October 29-31, 2006 Kenneth W. Laughlin.
PacifiCorp & CAISO Regional Transmission Organization Presented by Scott Gutting President, Energy Strategies, LLC Independent Energy Producers Annual.
Conference on Standard Market Design Issues Alice Fernandez, FERC Staff January 22-23, 2002.
G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND T H E P E O P L E B E H I N D N E W E N G L A N D ’ S P O W E R. Southwest Connecticut RFP Markets Committee November 14, 2003.
New Incentives for Pursuing Demand Response Scott Strauss and Sean Flynn Spiegel & McDiarmid APPA Legal Seminar San Francisco – November 2004.
Recommendation on DACP SE-22 Presentation to the SAC Darren Finkbeiner, Manager – Market Entry and Analysis November 1, 2006.
AES NewEnergy To The Institute For Regulatory Policy Studies May 18, 2000 By David L. Townley.
Utility owned generator Federal Power Project Distribution System Residential users Commercial users Industrial users Municipal Utility Residential users.
1 Market Evolution Program Day Ahead Market Project Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee Meeting May 14, 2003.
FERC Standard Market Design Working Papers
New England States Committee on Electricity (NESCOE)
North American Markets Status
Massachusetts Electric Restructuring Roundtable
Lorenzo Kristov, Ph.D. Principal, Market & Infrastructure Policy
Transmission: the Critical Link
Massachusetts Electric Restructuring Roundtable
The Future of Demand Response in New England
Benefits of New England’s Proposed Capacity Market
Utility Owned Generation? (UOG)
Vice President, Markets Development
Assuring Resource Adequacy: Concepts, Options and the SMD
DISTRIBUTED GENERATION in Massachusetts
MA DG Collaborative – Year 1
10 Years Later: Rethinking the Role of Distribution Utilities
Presentation transcript:

Demand Response – Is There Anything More Important? Scott Miller New England Conference of Public Utilities Commissioners June 18, 2002

DR – The Long Wait Much has been said about demand response but not much has been done Much has been said about demand response but not much has been done Demand Response has become a motherhood and apple pie issue Demand Response has become a motherhood and apple pie issue Discussion seems to stop with yes, we must do that Discussion seems to stop with yes, we must do that Feds and states have a role that needs to compliment each other Feds and states have a role that needs to compliment each other

DR – The Promise Demand Response benefits Demand Response benefits –Mitigation of Market Power –Mitigation of Load Pocket Issues (Boston, etc) –Environmental Benefits –DR should lead to innovative Distributed Generation (DG) such as fuel cells –Enhance Reliability –Reduce Retail costs relating to ICAP, gen adequacy standards

Supply/Demand Whether states have retail access or not, a market needs an elastic demand curve Whether states have retail access or not, a market needs an elastic demand curve –This is critical ISOs, States have tried some demand programs but mostly placeholders ISOs, States have tried some demand programs but mostly placeholders FERC has told ISOs to accommodate demand bidding but little else FERC has told ISOs to accommodate demand bidding but little else Standard Market Design and state programs must mesh… but how? Standard Market Design and state programs must mesh… but how?

What SMD Will Do Requirement that load (demand) has to be treated the same as supply for bidding Requirement that load (demand) has to be treated the same as supply for bidding Day ahead market requirement should facilitate some demand bidding Day ahead market requirement should facilitate some demand bidding What else do we need on the wholesale side to make to meet state requirements? What else do we need on the wholesale side to make to meet state requirements? We could use some help here… We could use some help here…

Proposal for New England Need to get real demand response going real soon Need to get real demand response going real soon New England region has a generally homogeneous interest in DR New England region has a generally homogeneous interest in DR Need a regional approach, not a single state Need a regional approach, not a single state Unique position to work as a group to advise FERC on SMD helping to make make demand responsive Unique position to work as a group to advise FERC on SMD helping to make make demand responsive

Proposal (2) Goal: Get 5-10% of NE load into a stable DR program that has longer than a summer peak lifespan Goal: Get 5-10% of NE load into a stable DR program that has longer than a summer peak lifespan –for 3-4 year period FERC would provide $50,000 for consultant work (collaborate on selection) to help FERC would provide $50,000 for consultant work (collaborate on selection) to help –DoE will provide $40,000 and national lab experts Timeline: Results needed by mid-November to be included in SMD final rule Timeline: Results needed by mid-November to be included in SMD final rule FERC personnel work with NE effort after NOPR FERC personnel work with NE effort after NOPR

Proposal (3) Need NE group to come up with a business plan that details what states are going to do and what they need SMD to do Need NE group to come up with a business plan that details what states are going to do and what they need SMD to do DoE will look to provide funding in FY 2003 ($200K) to support program implementation for states DoE will look to provide funding in FY 2003 ($200K) to support program implementation for states EPA looking to fund complimentary programs & possible help on SIP offset EPA looking to fund complimentary programs & possible help on SIP offset

Caveat DR in the past has suffered from stop-gap, one year pilot programs DR in the past has suffered from stop-gap, one year pilot programs Nothing done on a regional basis that really gets demand response other than during emergencies Nothing done on a regional basis that really gets demand response other than during emergencies Effort needs to get to real tariff results, not more consultant platitudes Effort needs to get to real tariff results, not more consultant platitudes Plan needs implementation follow through, stability, and occasional tweaks Plan needs implementation follow through, stability, and occasional tweaks

Benefits for New England You get to tell Feds what to do… who wouldnt love that? You get to tell Feds what to do… who wouldnt love that? NE could become the experts on DR and the national lab on the subject NE could become the experts on DR and the national lab on the subject Get the promise of DR earlier than everyone Get the promise of DR earlier than everyone –Environmental –Real market driven mitigation –Congestion relief –Others

Benefits for FERC Help from a region with a corresponding interest Help from a region with a corresponding interest If successful, will help market oversight as markets become more competitive If successful, will help market oversight as markets become more competitive Help connecting SMD to the missing element… responsive demand Help connecting SMD to the missing element… responsive demand Markets will not work as hoped without real demand response Markets will not work as hoped without real demand response