Review of Judicial Branch Activities in “Raise the Age” Presented by the Judicial Branch, Court Support Services Division June 28, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STANDARDS OF CARE IN CUSTODY, AFTERCARE AND SOCIAL REINTEGRATION OF CHILD OFFENDERS.
Advertisements

Department of State Health Services (DSHS) House Human Services Committee August 8, 2006.
1 NM Behavioral Health Collaborative New Mexico Behavioral Health Plan for Children, Youth and Their Families March 2007.
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
What is the term that defines the men and women we supervise? Parolee Probationer Offender Supervised Releasee Restored Citizen Returning Citizen Client.
Research Insights from the Family Home Program: An Adaptation of the Teaching-Family Model at Boys Town Daniel L. Daly and Ronald W. Thompson EUSARF 2014/
Overview of Connecticut’s Juvenile Justice System Hector Glynn Executive Director.
An Introduction To Grayson County’s Juvenile Problem Solving Court Honorable Brian Gary 397 th District Court.
Multisystemic Therapy (MST)
Stars Behavioral Health Group ART/EQUIP Groups Implementation Project.
Preventing and Intervening in Delinquency through Integration and Coordination of Services.
Oregon Youth Authority “Hillcrest Youth Correctional Facility” Presented by Jason Bratsouleas April 25, 2005.
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.
An Overview of the Mental Health Remedial Plan California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Division of Juvenile Justice REDEFINING MENTAL HEALTH.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Improving the Commonwealth’s Services for Children and Families A Framework.
Transforming the lives of Juveniles through raising the standards of practice: Justice for Our Youth: The JOY Project The Uninterrupted & Tailor-Made Routing.
Reentry Services Project Shelley Ford, MN Department of Corrections Sally Dandurand, Reentry Services Project June 2008, Connecting Youth to Success 1.
The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community Section 6: Reentry.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Idaho Department of Health and Welfare
THE COALITION OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS PROVIDERS OF NEW JERSEY The Role of Community Resource Centers in Offender Re-entry.
"The Changing Expectations of Juvenile Justice in Texas"
Hamilton County Mental Health and Recovery Services Board Provider Meeting Transforming the Hamilton County System of Care and Community for Transitional.
C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition
C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition
CT Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division.
Youth Accountability Planning Task Force : The Connecticut Experience Presenter: Toni Walker, State Representative and Deputy Majority Leader (CT) Raleigh,
Front End Juvenile Justice System Reform Population of Focus Offenders ages 7 through 15 who come into contact with the juvenile justice system through.
Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Michael Thompson, Director June 22,
Mayor’s Office of Homeland Security and Public Safety Gang Reduction Program Los Angeles.
Ohio Justice Alliance for Community Corrections October 13, 2011.
Ojjdp.gov Raise The Age Presented by Toni Walker.
Chapter 15 The Juvenile Offender.
Population Parameters  Youth in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System About 2.1 million youth under 18 were arrested in 2008 Over 600,000 youth a year.
1 The New Jersey Experience: The Stationhouse Adjustment Program Part II Presented by: Raymond Massi, Jr., Law Enforcement Coordinator, US Attorney’s Office.
Changing the Status Quo for Status Offenders: New York State’s Efforts to Help Troubled Teens Michael Lens, Vera Institute of Justice Annie Salsich, Vera.
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
What Constitutes Effective Intervention for Probationers?
State Of Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission District Strategic Plan Strategic Areas, Goals, and Objectives September 30 – October 1, 2014 Twin Falls,
A Systems Approach to Improving Substance Abuse Treatment for Latino Youth: Latino Caucus of the APHA Annual Meeting November 6, 2006 URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER.
Why Raise the Age? Keeping kids in the juvenile system prevents crime Lower recidivism vs. peers in adult system Juvenile system often holds kids more.
Raise the Age Lessons from the first 2 years. Background: CT added 16-year-olds to the juvenile system January 1, 2010.
Educational and Mental Health Needs of Juvenile Justice Youth What’s Wrong When We Know What’s Right? Ralph B. Thomas December 17, 2007.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
State of Connecticut Judicial Branch Court Support Services Division RBA Report Card – Adult Probation November 10, 2010 Update to the Criminal Justice.
National Center for Youth in Custody First Things First: Risk and Needs Assessment Data to Determine Placement and Services Alternatives.
Presented by: Michael Kennedy, MFT Director. Psychiatric Emergency Services 24/7 availability Access to  Crisis Stabilization  Crisis Residential Services.
HN 299 Welcome to our second Seminar. Review Review of first week Review of first week Second week Second week Projects ahead Projects ahead Discussion.
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
Juvenile Justice Planning and Oversight Coordinating Council: A joint presentation by: Connecticut Juvenile Justice Alliance Judicial Branch Department.
ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
CLASSIFICATION Risk Institutional violence/misconduct Institutional violence/misconduct Suicide Suicide Recidivism Recidivism A standardized assessment.
Disproportionate Minority Contact in Connecticut’s Juvenile Justice System  A presentation to the  Commission on Racial & Ethnic Disparity in the Criminal.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
Cleveland Municipal Drug Court: SAMHSA CSAT Adult Treatment Drug Court Grant Dr. Margaret Baughman Madison Wheeler, BS Paul Tuschman, BA Begun.
Fort Worth City Council May 12, 2009 Presenter: Randy Turner Chief Juvenile Probation Officer Tarrant County Juvenile Services Scott D. Moore Juvenile.
Legislative Enhancements to Behavioral Health. Recent Legislation Behavioral Health Enhancements HB 7019/SB 7068 (2015) SB 12/HB 7097 (2016) Housing Assistance.
Brent J. Cohen Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice.
Fixing Not Forcing Services: Outpatient Commitment as System Failure
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Department of Juvenile Justice
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Juvenile Justice Policy and Oversight Committee
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
JUVENILE COURT 2016 Empowering Youth Strengthening Families
Juvenile Justice Policy and Oversight Committee
Comprehensive Youth Services
Presentation transcript:

Review of Judicial Branch Activities in “Raise the Age” Presented by the Judicial Branch, Court Support Services Division June 28, 2012

Juvenile Justice System More Appropriate for Youth Individualized and a greater amount of supervision, care, and treatment provided pursuant to an individual case management plan that involves the family of the juvenile. School and community programs promoting prevention and reentry. A statewide system of community-based services designed to keep the juvenile in the home and community whenever possible. The juvenile justice system in Connecticut is grounded in the concepts of restorative justice, emphasizing protection of the community, offender accountability, and rehabilitation. The goals of the system include:

Hornby Zeller Associates’ Case for “Raise the Age” Fifty to seventy-five percent of 16 and 17 year olds were not getting any services Adult programs had no impact on recidivism for youth The Raise the Age movement could be anticipated to create a 10% reduction in recidivism.

Judicial Branch’s Four-Point Plan 1. Modify Probation Workforce 2. Adapt Existing Juvenile Service Delivery System 3. Create New Programs for Youth 4. Establish Infrastructure to Ensure Positive Outcomes (On-Going)

Existing Juvenile Programs Evidence-Based, In-Home Models Clinical Services Center-Based Services Educational and Vocational Services Community Residential Programs Juvenile Sex Offender Services

Court Intake 6 The number of juveniles referred to the court is down 27 percent since 2007

Court Intake – 16 Year Olds 7 The actual number of 16 year olds referred to Juvenile Court in CY 2010 was 13 percent less than projected

Detention Admissions 8 Detention admissions are lower than 2007

Detention Daily Population 9 Average daily population is down 31 percent due in part to greater investment in community-based alternatives

Wait Time for Riverview 10 RTA There has been an 74 percent reduction since 2003 in the number of days in detention while waiting for Riverview Placement

Wait Time for Placement 11 There has been a 24 percent reduction since 2001 in the number of days in detention while waiting for Residential Placement

DCF Commitments 12 Commitments have dropped 69% since 1999

12-Month Rearrest Rate – Juveniles on Supervision/Probation 13 Rearrest rates for juvenile probationers have dropped from 51% in 2007 to 45% in 2011

Raise the Age Probation Outcomes to Date 14

How will Service Continuum Reflect Unique Needs of 17s? More substance abuse and behavioral health intervention More educational and vocational supports New domestic violence programming Flex funds for basic needs and independent living skills Community service programs Mentoring

How will CSSD’s practices change to accommodate 17s? Manageable caseloads will be maintained Detention facilities will hold older adolescents All new staff will be trained in adolescent development and other related issues Quality assurance and evaluation will expand Return referrals will continue R.E.S.T.O.R.E. will be piloted in 3 cities

R.E.S.T.O.R.E. Pilot Project Criteria for inclusion Capped caseloads Specialized JPO training Longer probationary periods Increased client contact Aggression Replacement Training (ART) and vocational services Monthly case management meetings Graduation Specialized units within the Bridgeport, Hartford and New Haven Juvenile Courts responding to the needs and behaviors of juveniles “identified” as being gang-involved or having a history of violence. Key components include: