Class 3 : Booth 42201: The Legal Infrastructure of Business Market Power: Antitrust Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law Senior Fellow,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 SPORT AND COMPETITION LAW AT EU LEVEL Madrid, february 2007 MICHELE COLUCCI
Advertisements

Why competition law? Economic performance Social welfare Well being of consumers.
Monopolies and Antitrust Laws
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Legal Background.
Chapter 46 Antitrust Law Copyright © 2009 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. Jentz Miller Cross BUSINESS.
Chapter 10 Market Power: Monopoly. ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 102 Review of Perfect Competition P = LMC = LRAC Normal profits or zero economic.
Competition Theory and Policy Economic Issues Miguel Fonseca
13 Monopoly and Antitrust Policy PART III MARKET IMPERFECTIONS AND THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT C H A P T E R O U T L I N E Monopoly and Antitrust.
LUMSA – International Commercial Law COMPETITION LAW – GENERAL PRINCIPLES Competition law is law that promotes or seeks to maintain market competition.
EU Competition Policy. Internal Market One of the activities of the Community: “an internal market characterised by the abolition, as between member States,
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy
Administration in International Organizations PUBLIC COMPETITION LAW Class I, 6th Oct 2014 Krzysztof Rokita.
Georgetown University. The Efficiency Properties of Competitive Markets Q $/q S D MC ATC P P=MC Allocative efficiency P=minAC Productive efficiency IndustryFirm.
1 Competition Policy Development, Objectives and the Law This presentation is based on Motta (2004), Competition Policy, Cambridge University Press.
Government Regulation of Industry ESD 11 November 13, 2000 Richard Tabors.
Administration in International Organizations PUBLIC COMPETITION LAW Class V, 3rd Nov 2014 Krzysztof Rokita.
Chapter 47 Antitrust Law McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Antitrust Kim C. Stanger Compliance Bootcamp (5/15)
When you have completed your study of this chapter, you will be able to C H A P T E R C H E C K L I S T Explain the effects of regulation of natural monopoly.
Märt Ots Estonian Competition Authority Baltic Electricity Market Fora Vilnius Latest developments in Estonia.
Lesson 1 - Pricing.  Pricing is a vital concern for business owners  It is crucial for merchandise to sell, so the price of an item must project value.
The University of Chicago
1 C H A P T E R 14 1 © 2001 Prentice Hall Business PublishingEconomics: Principles and Tools, 2/eO’Sullivan & Sheffrin Market Power and Public Policy:
1 The common law Sherman Act (1890) Clayton Act (1914) § 1 Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 Trusts, etc., in restraint of trade illegal; penalty Every contract,
Antitrust Policy and Regulation ECO 2023 Chapter 18 Fall 2007.
When you have completed your study of this chapter, you will be able to C H A P T E R C H E C K L I S T Explain the effects of regulation of natural monopoly.
Administration in International Organizations PUBLIC COMPETITION LAW Class IV, 27th Oct 2014 Krzysztof Rokita.
1 INTRODUCTION OF THE LAWS ON ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION AND ABUSE OF MONOPONY POSITION IN VIETNAM Speaker: Mr. Trinh Anh Tuan Official Vietnam Competition.
Chapter 10 Market Power: Monopoly Market Power: Monopoly.
Antitrust. “Is there not a causal connection between the development of these huge, indomitable trusts and the horrible crimes now under investigation?
 “Market power” is the power of company to control the market for its product.  The law does allow for market monopolies when a patent is issued. During.
Chapter 10Slide 1 Perfect Competition Review of Perfect Competition P = LMC = LRAC Normal profits or zero economic profits in the long run Large number.
Competition Policy and Law Presentation to Study Tour for Russian Member Universities of the Virtual Institute Network 26 March 2009.
Practical application of industrial economics: Antitrust Law November 24, 2008 By Kinga Guzdek.
© 2009 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Essentials of Economics Hubbard/O’Brien, 2e. Fernando & Yvonn Quijano Prepared by: Chapter 9 Monopoly and Antitrust.
International & Foreign Law Search, Liu 1 Separation of Powers? Commission—executive? Council—Legislative? Parliament—Legislative? Court--Judiciary.
Chapter 20 Antitrust and Regulation of Competition Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without.
© 2009 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Essentials of Economics Hubbard/O’Brien, 2e. Fernando & Yvonn Quijano Prepared by: Chapter 9 Monopoly and Antitrust.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license.
What is a monopoly? What is market power? How do these concepts relate to each other? What is a monopoly? What is market power? How do these concepts.
For use only with Perreault and McCarthy texts. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1999 Irwin/McGraw-Hill Chapter 4: Evaluating Opportunities in the Changing.
Legal Environment for a New Century. Click your mouse anywhere on the screen when you are ready to advance the text within each slide. After the starburst.
Business Law and the Regulation of Business Chapter 43: Antitrust By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts.
Chapter 23 Antitrust Law and Unfair Trade Practices.
Monopoly and Antitrust Policy. Imperfect Competition and Market Power An imperfectly competitive industry is an industry in which single firms have some.
Law and Economics EU/EC Competition Law Professional Career Programme (PCP) Yoshiharu, ICHIKAWA 2011/12/10.
Law and Economics EU/EC Competition Law Professional Career Programme (PCP) Yoshiharu, ICHIKAWA 2011/12/17.
© 2005 West Legal Studies in Business, a division of Thompson Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 PowerPoint Slides to Accompany The Legal, Ethical, and International.
COPYRIGHT © 2011 South-Western/Cengage Learning. 1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears,
1 Chapter 13 Practice Quiz Tutorial Antitrust and Regulation ©2000 South-Western College Publishing.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business, a Division of Thomson Learning 20.1 Chapter 20 Antitrust Law.
1 of 25 PART III Market Imperfections and the Role of Government © 2012 Pearson Education CHAPTER OUTLINE 13 Monopoly and Antitrust Policy Imperfect Competition.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 8: Pure Monopoly Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
49-1 Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Law and Economics EU/EC Competition Law Professional Career Programme (PCP) Yoshiharu, ICHIKAWA 2012/01/14.
1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
LEB Slide Set 14 Competition Law Matti Rudanko. LEB Slide Set 14 2 A Constitution of Market Economy Well-functioning markets – an unwritten fundamental.
Markkinoiden juridinen toimintaympäristö Kalvot 15
Latest developments in Estonia
European Union Law Week 10.
Chapter 37 Antitrust Law.
Lear - Laboratorio di economia, antitrust, regolamentazione
Time Warner Rules Manhattan
What is the Sherman Anti-Trust Act?
The competition enforcement in regulated sectors
Monopolies and Antitrust Laws
Dr. Rajesh Kumar Lecture-1
SPORT AND COMPETITION LAW AT EU LEVEL beyond the White Paper on Sport
SPORT AND COMPETITION LAW AT EU LEVEL beyond the White Paper on Sport
Class 1 Whiteboard Antitrust, Fall, 2012 Monopoly Power
Presentation transcript:

Class 3 : Booth 42201: The Legal Infrastructure of Business Market Power: Antitrust Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial Law Senior Fellow, The Computation Institute The Law School The University of Chicago Copyright © Randal C. Picker. All Rights Reserved.

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.2 Sherman Act Sec. 1 n Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal.

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.3 Sherman Act Sec. 2 n Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolize any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony,and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding $101,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person, $1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding 10 years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the court.

4 P = 10 – Q P Q Demand Curve 10 Monopoly Outcome: Marginal Revenue = Marginal Cost Marginal Cost QCQC PCPC MC = 4 MR = 10 – 2Q QMQM PMPM CS Profits DWL TC Marginal Revenue

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.5 Twombly Complaint

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.6 Twombly Complaint ¶ 51 Plaintiffs allege upon information and belief that Defendants have entered into a contract, combination or conspiracy to prevent entry in their respective local telephone and/or high speed internet service markets and have agreed not to compete with one another and otherwise allocated customers and markets to one another.

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.7 Increase in Post-Merger Concentration Revised DOJ-FTC Grid Unconcentrated: < 1500 Moderately Concentrated: 1500 to 2500 Highly Concentrated: > 2500 No challenge Scrutiny Presumed to raise mkt power Post- Merger HHI < to 200> 200 Scrutiny

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.8 US Complaint (31 Aug 2011)

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.9 US Complaint (31 Aug 2011)

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.10 Gov’t Ex. 20 A new competitor “born” on the Internet is Netscape. Their browser is dominant, with 70% usage share, allowing them to determine which network extensions will catch on. They are pursuing a multi-platform strategy where they move the key API into the client to commoditize the underlying operating system. They have attracted a number of public network operators to use their platform to offer information and directory services.

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.11 Gov’t Ex. 20 One scary possibility being discussed by Internet fans as whether they should get together and create something far less expensive than a PC which is powerful enough for Web browsing. This new platform would optimize for the data types on the Web. Gordon Bell and others approached Intel on this and decided Intel didn’t care about a low cost device so they started suggesting that General Magic or another operating system with a non-Intel chip is the best solution.

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.12 Article 101 (81) n 1. The following shall be prohibited as incompatible with the common market: u all agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices which may affect trade between Member States and which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within the common market, and in particular those which:

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.13 Article 101 u (a) directly or indirectly fix purchase or selling prices or any other trading conditions; u (b) limit or control production, markets, technical development, or investment; u (c) share markets or sources of supply;

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.14 Article 101 u (d) apply dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage; u (e) make the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject of such contracts.

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.15 Article 102 (82) n Any abuse by one or more undertakings of a dominant position within the common market or in a substantial part of it shall be prohibited as incompatible with the common market insofar as it may affect trade between Member States.

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.16 Article 102 n Such abuse may, in particular, consist in: u (a) directly or indirectly imposing unfair purchase or selling prices or other unfair trading conditions; u (b) limiting production, markets or technical development to the prejudice of consumers;

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.17 Article 102 u (c) applying dissimilar conditions to equivalent transactions with other trading parties, thereby placing them at a competitive disadvantage; u (d) making the conclusion of contracts subject to acceptance by the other parties of supplementary obligations which, by their nature or according to commercial usage, have no connection with the subject of such contracts.

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.18 Microsoft (CFI 2007)

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.19 XP N sales represent percent (1/20,000th of one percent) of overall XP sales in Europe. No PC manufacturers have ordered or preinstalled Windows XP N on PCs. Only 1,787 copies of Windows XP N have been sold to retailers and distributors in Europe. Microsoft Factsheet, Apr 2006

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.20 Screen Capture Slide Link European Commission, 27 Feb 2008

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.21 European Commission, 17 Jan 2009

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.22

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.23

October 9, 2015The Legal Infrastructure of Business. Copyright © Randal C. Picker.24

October 9, 2015Copyright © 2012 Randal C. Picker25 21 May 2012

October 9, 2015Copyright © 2012 Randal C. Picker26 FTC Search Engine Guidelines, 27 June 2002

October 9, 2015Copyright © 2012 Randal C. Picker27 “The Federal Trade Commission responded to a complaint filed by Commercial Alert requesting that the agency investigate whether certain search engines are violating Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act ("FTC Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 45(a)(1), by failing to disclose that advertisements are inserted into search engine results lists.” FTC, 27 June 2002

October 9, 2015Copyright © 2012 Randal C. Picker28 “Finally, the staff recommends that you review your Web sites to ensure that: any paid ranking search results are distinguished from non-paid results with clear and conspicuous disclosures; the use of paid inclusion is clearly and conspicuously explained and disclosed; and no affirmative statement is made that might mislead consumers as to the basis on which a search result is generated.” FTC, 27 June 2002

October 9, 2015Copyright © 2012 Randal C. Picker29 Google HP Restaurants Search, 25 June Organic Search Competition (no $) 2. Auctions (all $) 3. No Competition: Hardwired in favor of Google 4. Onebox result: hardwired Google reviews; organic competition? FTC Deceptive practice? Tying? DG Comp Tying ala Microsoft (Media player and IE)

October 9, 2015Copyright © 2012 Randal C. Picker30 Google HP Restaurants Search: IE6 25 June 2012 Visiting as IE6 shows design possibilities: alternate third-party homepage sites presented on first page of search results.