Effects of Human Activity on Water Quality Studies on the Upper Paint Creek Watershed By Emily Daniels Mary Estock and Ashley Hooper.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experimental Design 9th Grade EIC September 28, 2010.
Advertisements

Process – Resource Evaluation Design and perform a set of geographically based resource assessments Develop a methodology for prioritizing land according.
Middle Eel River Initiative: A collaborative approach for ecological studies.
The Great Miami Loramie Watershed Neelu, Jasmine, and Cassie.
Watershed System Physical Properties Stream flow (cfs) Stream Channel Pattern Substrate Chemical Properties pH Dissolved Oxygen Temperature Nutrients Turbidity.
Upper Paint Creek By Group 3 : Tina Liu, Elli Schwartz, Bailey Eckerle.
Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1Landscape and Urban Planning Volume 79, Issue 1, 15 January 2007, Pages Biological integrity in.
“Habitat Assessment Using the QHEI “ Edward T. Rankin June 6 City of Columbus, Level 3 Training Course Columbus, Ohio Senior ResearchScientist
Detection and Monitoring
Ground Water and Ecosystems Restoration Division Assessing the Effectiveness of Restoration Technologies Elise Striz and Joe Williams.
Dry Run Creek: Urban vs. Rural Surficial Water Quality Variability Nick Bosshart and Austin Cox.
Future of the Big Darby Watershed Steven Gordon December, 2001.
Next The water that falls on the Chesapeake Bay watershed drains to local streams and rivers and then flows to the Chesapeake.
Water Quality Burroughs Wellcome 2008 Elyse Howdershell Taylor Dozier Chudney Hill Shauntavia Sawyer.
IMPACTS OF LAND DEVELOPMENT ON OREGON’S WATERS 2001 This slide show was borrowed from the internet but we added our own research when we presented it.
Impacts of Land Development on Oregon’s Waters 2001.
Coastal development impacts on biological communities in the Chesapeake Bay Examples from the Atlantic Slope Consortium R
The Great Miami River Created By: Vidya Misra, Ke’Avonna Williams, and Kristin Cummings.
By : Caroline Oldstone – Moore, Devina Mehta, Jillian Frost
Shell Creek Watershed Study Advisors – Mark Seier, Suzy Goedeken, & Karen Malmkar Researchers –Katie O’Brien, Jake Kaufman, Mark O’Brien, Aubrey.
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
Great Miami & Loramie Creek By: Dominique Cummings Meg Gulick Elizabeth Stein.
Stillwater River Watershed Paige Ruppel, Esther Wong, and Kelsie Keen YWSI 2003.
Watersheds What is a watershed? 93 watersheds in Ohio.
By Mary Carson, Valerie Du, and Abigail Jewell YWSI 2009 What is causing the Upper Hocking River watershed to be polluted?
Scioto Bokes Watershed By: Akanksha, Annalese, and Madison.
Volunteer-collected data can provide important baseline information to assist with decision making and improve watershed management. In this study, data.
 245 miles long  Area is mostly agricultural  Some urban land: Bellefontaine, Indian Lake  Has greatly improved over last few decades.
Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.
Water Quality in Tryon Creek Initial Results from Portland’s Revised Watershed Monitoring Approach.
By: Hannah, Natalie, and Brittany. Location  Western Ohio The Stillwater Watershed drains 673 square miles in Western Ohio (including 32 square miles.
R OCKY R IVER W ATERSHED Is this watershed healthy or unhealthy? If it is unhealthy, what are the main impairments? By: Laura Hagy, Lydia Gray, and Elizabeth.
Upper Scioto Watershed By: Nina Zalenski Alice Beckman-Jamison Kathryn Reilly.
By Emily, Veronica, and Shelby (Group #1). Assignment n To develop a few hypothesis about the Fourmile watershed, in order to demonstrate our knowledge.
Stillwater River Watershed Group 5 Deepthi Thumuluri Caitlyn Baird Sonia Pattisam.
Stream Health: biotic integrity variation in Owasco Lake watershed Susan F. Cushman Hobart and William Smith Colleges 2007 Finger Lakes Research Conference.
Lower Olentangy Watershed
Detecting Ecological Effects of Development in the Wappingers and Fishkill Watersheds Karin Limburg, Karen Stainbrook, Bongghi Hong SUNY College of Environmental.
Miami Loramie Watershed Our watershed is located in western Ohio north of Dayton.These areas are rural and have lots of agriculture. Our watershed has.
By Laura Pierce, Sarah Magness, and Morgan Black.
Did you know??? One of the most popular rivers in northeast Ohio. One of the most popular rivers in northeast Ohio. Has 112,144 acres and 664 stream miles.
Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index Bradley Hansen John Nieber Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering For BBE 4535/5535 Fall 2011.
Presented by: Julia: Marietta Area Liz: Bowling Green Sophia: Athens How healthy is the Rocky River Watershed?
Great Miami and Loramie Creek By: Kathryn Reed, Sarah Ambach, and Xiaojing Wu Great Miami Loramie Creek By: Kathryn Reed, Xiaojing Wu, and Sarah Ambach.
The Big Walnut Watershed By: Taylor Krebs Ariel Sims Holly Finchum.
Using Regional Models to Assess the Relative Effects of Stressors Lester L. Yuan National Center for Environmental Assessment U.S. Environmental Protection.
Record notes in your notebook  Record at least 5 facts/ideas in your notebook.  Write down and answer the following questions:  What are“benthic macroinvertebrates”?
Impacts of Livestock Waste on Surface Water Quality By the North Dakota Department of Health Division of Water Quality For the Livestock Manure Nutrient.
Michael Sorge Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources.
Dissolved Oxygen Pollution Types.
Effects of Stream Restoration: A Comparative Study of Pine Run in Felton, Pennsylvania Luke Mummert, Department of Biological Sciences, York College of.
*Stillwater watershed project* By: Group 2 Meah Kee Tiffany Yang Lesley Preece Teacher: Melanie.
Topic 4: Water and aquatic food production systems and societies Topic 4.4: Water Pollution Starter: 1) List as many sources of water pollution as you.
Tools for Tracking Healthy Watersheds
What Are the Problems of the East Fork Little Miami Watershed?
Water Watchers: What To Do In Your Watershed
5.2 Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
Eutrophication & Management
YO SYSTEMS STUDENTS! QUIZ (FRIDAY MAY 23rd) – HYDROSPHERE Syllabus Details A-J.
Eutrophication & Management
Sci 113: Watersheds And How They Work
Water Testing Project for the North Fork River
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
The Upper Paint Creek Watershed
Water Pollution.
The Index of Biotic Integrity (the BI or IBI)
Welcome to Jeopardy!.
Eutrophication & Management
Field Research The effect of Land use on nutrient levels.
Presentation transcript:

Effects of Human Activity on Water Quality Studies on the Upper Paint Creek Watershed By Emily Daniels Mary Estock and Ashley Hooper

Objective Our main objective was to identify how human activity (= agriculture and development) affect the aquatic life diversity in the Upper Paint Creek Watershed.

Upper Paint Creek Watershed

Upper Paint Creek Watershed (continued) Northern Area: Agricultural Southern Area: Forest and Agricultural Washington Courthouse

Methodology Biotic Index: –QHEI: Quantitative Habitat Evaluation Index –ICI: Invertebrate Community Index –IBI: Index of Biological Integrity Chemical measurements –Nutrients (N and P): Nitrate, Phosphate –BOD: Biochemical Oxygen Demand

Methodology The Ohio EPA went out and collected all of the data along the watershed, that we used in this project.

Hypothesis H1. The higher the QHEI the higher the ICI and the IBI, this is affected by the land use and amount of riparian. H2. When the nutrients are high, the ICI and the IBI are low. H3. When the BOD is high, the ICI and the IBI will be low.

H1: Does the QHEI effect the aquatic life in the Upper Paint Creek Watershed? QHEI IBI

H1: Does the riparian area effect the aquatic life in the Upper Paint Creek Watershed? ICI/IBI Value sample Riparian

Discussion on Hypothesis 1 Our first hypothesis was correct. The higher QHEI, the higher the IBI and the ICI. The land use and amount of riparian also can effect the aquatic life. `The QHEI, the IBI, and the ICI are usually higher in agricultural areas, and lower in urban areas. `The more riparian zone there is, the higher the IBI and ICI.

H2: Nutrients vs ICI and IBI

Discussion on Hypothesis 2 In the graphs, the data mainly shows that the hypothesis was correct. In one place on each graph, there was a point that did not support the hypothesis. This was the outlier. Other than those four points, the data supported the hypothesis.

H3: at each station: BOD vs. ICI and IBI

Effect on downstream: BOD vs. ICI and IBI

Discussion on Hypothesis 3 First, the hypothesis seemed incorrect. At the same spot, even with high BOD, the ICI and IBI were also high. BUT, the effect of high BOD was observed downstream with low ICI and IBI.

Conclusion In our study, we found that the Upper Paint Creek Watershed is a pretty clean watershed. The main problem in the watershed is the level of nutrients, which affects the level of habitat alterations.

Conclusion Effect of Human Activities: in a dense agricultural watershed, the city of Washington Courthouse has a bad impact on the stream habitat and water quality.

Special Thanks To... The Ohio EPA The Ohio Supercomputer Center The Ohio State University and all of our wonderful counselors, teachers and advisors.