Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation Math and Science Partnership (MSP) Program A Research and Development Effort Joyce B. Evans Senior.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Science Foundation Innovation Through Institutional Integration (I 3 ) Kathleen Bergin Program Director Directorate for Education and Human Resources.
Advertisements

The Common Core State Standards: Opportunities and Challenges for the Mathematical Education of Teachers.
Research and Impact The WaterBotics ® evaluation and research studies include two synergistic, but distinct, domains: educational impact and scale-up/sustainability.
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
Sunflower blank National Science Foundation Dan Maki Kathleen Bergin Math and Science Partnership Education and Human Resources Directorate Division of.
“NSF’s Division of Undergraduate Education: Funding Opportunities for Community Colleges” CUR November 18, 2011 Eun-Woo Chang Montgomery College.
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL REFORM PROGRAM (Obey-Porter) CSR Program Overview January 2002.
Barbara Miller Education Development Center Implementing a Teacher Leadership Program with Sustainability as a Goal: Lessons from Math/Science Partnerships.
ESTEEMS (ESTablishing Excellence in Education of Mathematics and Science) Project Overview and Evaluation Dr. Deborah H. Cook, Director, NJ SSI MSP Regional.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals: Fellowship Track Washington, DC January 9, 2014.
Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation FY’06 Institute Partnerships  Focus on:  Development of school-based intellectual leaders and.
Center of Excellence in Mathematics and Science Education Cooperative Partners College of Arts and Sciences College of Education Dr. Jack Rhoton East Tennessee.
1 Exploring NSF Funding Opportunities in DUE Tim Fossum Division of Undergraduate Education Vermont EPSCoR NSF Research Day May 6, 2008.
The Directorate for Education and Human Resources (EHR) Diana L. Burley, Ph.D. Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation.
1 CCLI Proposal Writing Strategies Tim Fossum Program Director Division of Undergraduate Education National Science Foundation Vermont.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
This work was supported in part by MSP grant # through the National Science Foundation. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily.
Teacher Professional Development Programs in Grades 3-8: Promoting Teachers’ and Students’ Content Knowledge in Science and Engineering Beth McGrath &
Funding Opportunities for Chemists at the National Science Foundation Division of Undergraduate Education Pamela Brown, NSF Program Director Division of.
1 Developing an Evaluation Plan _____________________ The Mathematically- Connected Communities MSP Developed for the February, MSP Conference Dr.
Aerospace Education Services Project (AESP) William S. Carlsen, Director Pennsylvania State University.
Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation Math and Science Partnership (MSP) Program A Research and Development Effort James E. Hamos Division.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
2012 Proposal Writing Workshop Co-sponsored by the: National Science Foundation & American Association for the Advancement of Science.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation Math and Science Partnership (MSP) Program A Research and Development Effort James Hamos Division.
Outreach to Districts and Schools ?Is there a drop down menu with three items, or does it go to a page on outreach, or both?
The National Science Foundation’s Math and Science Partnership (MSP) Program James E. Hamos, Ph.D., Elizabeth VanderPutten, Ph.D., Kathleen Bergin, Ph.D.
Innovation through Institutional Integration (I 3 ) National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Resources.
Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation Math and Science Partnership (MSP) Program A Research and Development Effort Kathleen Bergin James.
Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation Math and Science Partnership : A Research and Development Program at the NSF Math and Science.
Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation Math and Science Partnership (MSP) Program A Research and Development Effort Kathleen Bergin James.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Building a Successful Professional Development Model Presented by: Howard Landman Project Director “Eastern Connecticut Elementary Science Coaching Consortium”
THE DRAGON CONNECTION March Who are we?  Jefferson City Schools  Small, rural school district 60 miles north of Atlanta, 18 miles north of the.
Sharing in Leadership for Student Success DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod, UWM Beth Schefelker, MPS 18 April 2008.
National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.
Research Indicators for Sustaining and Institutionalizing Change CaMSP Network Meeting April 4 & 5, 2011 Sacramento, CA Mikala L. Rahn, PhD Public Works,
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
National Science Foundation Math and Science Partnership (MSP) Program A Research and Development Effort Joan Prival Division of Undergraduate Education.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
1 Historical Perspective... Historical Perspective... Science Education Reform Efforts Leading to Standards-based Science Education.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
Math and Science Partnership Program Approaches to State Longitudinal Evaluation March 21, 2011 San Francisco MSP Regional Meeting Patty O’Driscoll Public.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the FY2006 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Innovation through Institutional Integration (I 3 ) National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Resources National Science Foundation.
Math and Science Partnership (MSP) Program A Research and Development Effort in K-16 Teaching and Learning James E. Hamos Directorate for Education & Human.
Challenges and Trade-offs in Measuring the Outcomes of NSF’s Mathematics and Science Partnership Program: Lessons from four years on the learning curve.
DR K-12 Program PRESENTATION HBCU-UP LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE SPONSORED BY QEM Dr. Julia V. Clark Program Director August 13, 2009.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Innovation through Institutional Integration (I 3 ) Jody Chase, Tribal Colleges and Universities Program Sylvia James, Innovative Technology Experiences.
MSP Program Evaluation Carol L. Fletcher, Ph.D. TRC Project Director Meetings 1/27/09 and 2/5/09 Carol L. Fletcher, Ph.D. TRC Project Director Meetings.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Project Evaluation for MSP Targeted Partnerships Eric R. Banilower Horizon Research, Inc.
Carpe Diem Phase II Making the Case. Jot down 3 questions that you have related to Phase II (the one’s that you carried into the room today)
Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation MSP Project Description FY’06 Institute Partnerships  Vision, Goals and Outcomes  Vision, Goals.
THE APPALACHIAN MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP.
Research Opportunities in AMSP UK Mathematics Education Retreat October 15, 2005.
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Presentation transcript:

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation Math and Science Partnership (MSP) Program A Research and Development Effort Joyce B. Evans Senior Program Director

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation   A research & development (R & D) effort at NSF for building capacity and integrating the work of higher education with that of K-12 to strengthen and reform mathematics and science education   Launched in FY 2002 as a key facet of the President’s NCLB vision for K-12 education   Strongly reauthorized as part of the America COMPETES Act of 2007

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation Website for MSP: Click on Program Area – Education Click on Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) Click on Math and Science Partnership Program

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation New Solicitation: Math and Science Partnership (MSP ) NSF

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation Through the Math and Science Partnership program, NSF awards competitive, merit-based grants to teams composed of institutions of higher education, local K-12 school systems and supporting partners. At their core, Partnerships contain at least one institution of higher education and one K-12 school system.

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation   Seeks to improve student outcomes in mathematics and science for all students, at all K-12 levels   Is a coordinated effort between NSF and ED, who together have defined the program linkages necessary to manage investment for greatest effectiveness

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation What distinguishes NSF’s MSP Program?  Substantial intellectual engagement of mathematicians, scientists and engineers from higher education in improving K-12 student outcomes in mathematics and the sciences

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation “Unless we are willing to apply the same rigorous standards of scholarship to issues related to learning and teaching that we regularly apply to more traditional research, the present situation in …education is unlikely to change.” Lillian McDermott APS News 7 (1) 1998

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation What distinguishes NSF’s MSP Program?   Depth and quality of creative, strategic actions that extend beyond commonplace approaches   Breadth and depth of Partnerships – Partnerships between organizations, rather than among individuals only

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation What distinguishes NSF’s MSP Program?  Organizational/institutional change driven by Partnerships  Degree to which MSP work is integrated with evidence; degree to which the work of the Partnerships is itself the work of scholars who seek evidence for what they do

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation NSF In this solicitation, NSF seeks to support six types of awards:  Targeted Partnerships  Institute Partnerships  MSP-Start Partnerships  Phase II Partnerships  Research, Evaluation and Technical Assistance (RETA)  Innovation through Institutional Integration (I 3 )

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation FY’08 Targeted Partnerships Focus on:  Specific elements/issues in K-12 mathematics or science teaching and learning, where analysis of the data indicates that a concentrated effort would result in the greatest improvement.  Proposals that develop and study approaches which foster inventiveness and innovation in teaching and learning for K-12 students, clearly articulating what they will know and be able to do.

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation FY’08 Targeted Partnerships  Engage teachers and/or students studying to become teachers in a multi-year program, based on contemporary research findings on effective classroom practice and the science of learning, that provides in-depth study within a particular discipline.  Contribute evidenced-based findings to the knowledge base about teacher and student learning.

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation FY’08 Institute Partnerships  Institutes will be multi-year programs of coherent study within a particular discipline plus a leadership component.  Contribute evidenced-based findings to the knowledge base about teacher leadership and its impact on student learning.  K-12 core partners are:  Districts from which participants are selected, and  Required to grant sufficient non- classroom time for participants to carry out responsibilities

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation FY’08 MSP-Start Partnerships  Seeks to include institutions of higher education of varying scope, size, experience and perspectives emphasizing minority- serving institutions (e.g., Tribal Colleges, Historically Black Colleges and Universities, Hispanic Serving Institutions), community colleges and primarily undergraduate institutions.  Conduct the data collection, analysis, team building and evaluation necessary for developing a proposal for a full MSP Targeted or Institute Partnership.

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation FY’08 MSP Phase II Partnerships  From any institution of higher education partner in a previously funded Comprehensive or Targeted Partnership whose work began in 2002 or  Concentrate on analysis, adaptation, dissemination and use of existing innovative practices developed through prior MSP support.  Phase II Partnerships must include:  Some, but not necessarily all, of the original partners and the rationale for the new Partnership,  One or more research questions, in conjunction with appropriate research methodologies,  Detailed Evaluation Plan with benchmarks and measures that will demonstrate results, and  Plans to continue longitudinal analyses on aspects of the prior work and must continue to contribute data to the MSP Management Information System.

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation FY’08 Partnerships   The PI of each Partnership must be a faculty member in a mathematics, science or engineering department in a higher education core partner.   One or more co-Principal Investigators must be representative(s) from the K-12 core partner organization(s).

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation FY’08 Partnerships Core partners Core partners share responsibility and accountability for the MSP project, ARE REQUIRED to provide evidence of their commitment to undergo the institutional change necessary to sustain the partnership effort beyond the funding period. Core partners Core partners in each Partnership MUST include:  At least one institution of higher education (including 2-year and 4-year colleges and universities) AND  At least one K-12 local school district.

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation FY’08 Partnerships CORE partners CORE partners may include other stakeholders who are also expected to participate in the coordinated institutional changes SUPPORTING partners SUPPORTING partners include entities that are important contributors but are not required to commit to institutional change

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation Key Features  Partnership-driven, with significant engagement of faculty in mathematics, the sciences, and engineering  Teacher quality, quantity, and diversity  Challenging courses and curricula  Evidence-based design and outcomes  Institutional change and sustainability

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation Overarching Principles that Provide Guidance Throughout   NSF Merit Review Criteria: Intellectual Merit & Broader Impacts   Depth and quality of creative, strategic actions that extend beyond commonplace approaches   Emphasis on evidence-based design and outcomes throughout   Commitment to high quality scholarship in all aspects of proposed work

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation Additional Review Criteria Consider the following questions: Consider the following questions:   How well does the proposal address the MSP Key Features?   Is the proposed work strategic and innovative, and informed by the current research literature on teaching and learning?   Is the evaluation plan comprehensive in nature, including both formative and summative components, and to be conducted by objective experts external to the project?

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation Evidence-Based Design and Outcomes   Understanding the research literature on science and mathematics education pertinent to partnerships’ data-based needs and goals   Incorporating the research literature into projects in a manner informed by baseline data and developing benchmarks that build from that data   Investigating the factors that contribute to projects’ outcomes to learn more about what works, where it works, and why it works

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation A Guide for Proposal Writing: 16/nsf04016.pdf 16/nsf04016.pdf Additional Resources

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation Evidence: An Essential Tool Planning for and Gathering Evidence Using the Design- Implementation-Outcomes (DIO) Cycle of Evidence NSF 05-31

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation Website for MSPnet: Knowledge Management and Dissemination MSP Portfolio

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation RETA Developed Tools Design, Validation, and Dissemination of Measure of Content Knowledge for Teaching Mathematics [University of Michigan; PI - Heather Hill] – Design, Validation, and Dissemination of Measure of Content Knowledge for Teaching Mathematics [University of Michigan; PI - Heather Hill] –   Assessment items for mathematics teachers in the upper elementary and middle school grade levels   Approximately 300 items in number, operations, pre-algebra and algebra, and geometry   Disseminated to approximately eighty projects, including ten NSF MSPs and numerous U.S. Department of Education MSPs

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation Learning Mathematics for Teaching Event: LMT Measures Workshop offered at AERA pre-session Start: Mar 23, 2008 Location: New York City, NY Description: The Learning Mathematics for Teaching (LMT) measures training will be offered at AERA on Sunday March 23rd in New York City (register at The LMT training offers background on the study and measurement of mathematical knowledge for teaching and provides practical guidance on using the LMT measures to study teachers' mathematical knowledge and growth. For more information on the LMT project visit URL:

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation RETA Developed Tools Assessing Teacher Learning About Science Teaching (ATLAST) [Horizon Research, Inc., and AAAS; PI - Patrick Smith] Assessing Teacher Learning About Science Teaching (ATLAST) [Horizon Research, Inc., and AAAS; PI - Patrick Smith]   Instruments that measure change in knowledge needed by middle school teachers in three topics of science   Provides assessment materials, scoring and reporting as part of its technical assistance   Eight of ED’s State MSP sites, and a number of NSF MSPs, are using the assessments to gauge the impact of their professional development activities   Item-writing for more than 50 directors of ED’s State MSPs

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation RETA Developed Tools Misconception Oriented Standards-based Assessment Resource for Teachers (MOSART) [Harvard University; PI - Philip Sadler] x.html Misconception Oriented Standards-based Assessment Resource for Teachers (MOSART) [Harvard University; PI - Philip Sadler] x.html x.html x.html   Content instruments for K-12 physical science and earth science, based on the research literature on students' science misconceptions   A free, open web site that provides versions of its tests to any interested party, including an online tutorial that explains how the tests were developed and their intended uses   Expertise shared with state funded ED MSPs. e.g. MSP effort for the entire state of Georgia

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation MSP Outcomes Appalachian Math and Science Partnership (AMSP)- A Comprehensive partnership: 10 institutions of higher education and over 56 school districts in 4 states (KY, TN, VA and WV)   Preservice courses   Summer Institutes-Inservice   K-12 Excel Program   Undergraduate Explorers Program   CATS Busters   Partnership Enhancement Program (PEP) $1.3 million in individual grants to school district via competitive review process   Parent Component-Pritchard Affiliates   Research Component   Partners with 5 State MSP grants in VA, TN and KY.

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation MSP Outcomes Sample Results: 2005 Summer Algebra Institutes-Pre-and post-test scores for middle and high school algebra teachers.   Southwest Virginia-gains of 24% and 18% for reasoning/problem solving and pedagogical content knowledge, respectively.   Tennessee-gains of 20% and 13% in these same domains.   Kentucky, showed gains of 13% and 23% Access to Algebra - A small number of high school students enrolled in a distance learning section of the college course.   75% of the high school students received a grade of “C” or better,   58% of the high school students received a grade of “A” as compared to only 33% of the comparison group of college students in the course.   All students taking the online course performed better than students taking the regular college algebra courses documenting the effectiveness of this online algebra course

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation MSP Outcomes Preparing Virginia’s Mathematics Specialists - A Teacher Institute at Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU)   A master’s degree program to be institutionalized at VCU, Norfolk State University, the University of Virginia and elsewhere in the Commonwealth   Research component   Data from the two mathematics courses in VCU’s 2005 Summer Institute document substantial and positive impacts on participants’ knowledge of mathematics content, with differences in means that constitute very large effect sizes Additional Information about this project:

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation Other EHR Funding Opportunities DRK-12 ods_key=nsf ods_key=nsf08502 Full Proposals Due Jan 28, 2008 ITEST s_id=5467&org=EHR&from=homehttp://nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pim s_id=5467&org=EHR&from=home s_id=5467&org=EHR&from=home s_id=5467&org=EHR&from=home Full Proposals Due Apr 10, 2008

Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation Disclaimer The instructional practices and assessments discussed or shown in these presentations are not intended as an endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education.