Quality Through the Eyes of the Patient: State-of-the-Art Concepts Paul D. Cleary, Ph.D. April 10, 2001 Quality Through the Eyes of the Patient: State-of-the-Art.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Alex Y. Chen, M.D. UCLA Children’s Hospital LA
Advertisements

Patient Centered Care Saudi Arabia April 04, 2012 Hugh MacLeod.
Research Methodology Lecture No : 11 (Goodness Of Measures)
(CAHPS) Experience of Care Surveys From Design to Implementation
Outcome research 1 Satisfaction/ behavioral indices Wei-Chu Chie.
1 A Parsimonious Patient-Reported Measure of Care Coordination Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine September 27, 2013 Los Angeles, CA
Measuring the Patients’ Experience with Care Disclosure Project Discussion Forum July 12, 2007 Dale Shaller, MPA Shaller Consulting Managing Director,
Inpatient Survey 2007 Paul Reeves/Joy Wilk June 2008.
Race/Ethnic Differences in Reports and Ratings of Health Care Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. RAND.
Michigan Medical Home.
Holding Health Plans & Providers Accountable for High-Quality, Patient-Centered Care January 23, 2015.
[Hospital Name | Presenter name and title | Date of presentation]
1 Measuring Patients’ Experience of Hospital Care Angela Coulter Picker Institute Europe
Update on CAHPS ® Surveys AHRQ ANNUAL MEETING Lunch and Learn Session #46 SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 Judith Sangl, ScD AHRQ CAHPS Project Officer.
CAHPS Overview Clinician & Group Surveys: Practical Options for Implementation and Use AHRQ ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 18, 2011 Christine Crofton, PhD CAHPS.
Psychometric Properties of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician and Group Adult Visit Survey September 11, 2012.
1. Confirming and Supplementing CAHPS® Communication Items Using Feedback from High-Performing Physicians. Ron D. Hays, Ph.D., Professor of Medicine and.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Advancing Excellence in Health Care Developing CAHPS® for People with Mobility Impairments June.
Center for Children with Special Needs 1 Medicaid managed care for children with special health care needs: Which services need to improve? Jacquie Stock,
CAHPS® Survey to Evaluate the Patient’s Experience with the Medical Home Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine RAND Health Program November 18,
PATIENT SATISFACTION AND WHY IT MATTERS. Why It Matters  CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services), hospitals and insurance providers are using.
HCAHPS Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems.
1 Patient Reports and Ratings of the Quality of Care Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. February 12, 2003
Nursing Excellence Conference April 19,2013
Differences in Patient Reports and Ratings of Ambulatory Health Care by Race/Ethnicity Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. June 13, :45-11:45 (EPN 6021)
Four Corners Community Behavioral Health Center Presented by Aralias Research Aralias Research Ryan Jensen, Marcus Waite, and Nick Bell.
From Competencies to Outcomes: Nursing Care of Older Adults Christine Mueller, PhD, RN, FGSA, FAAN Professor, University of Minnesota, School of Nursing.
1 The Patient Perspective: Satisfaction Survey Presented at: Disease Management Colloquium June 22, 2005 Shulamit Bernard, RN, PhD.
HS /18/04 Patient Reports and Ratings of Health Care Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Patient Reports and Ratings of Health Care Ron D. Hays, Ph.D.
RANDRAND CAHPS® Relevance of CAHPS® for Workers’ Compensation Medical Care Donna Farley Senior Health Policy Analyst, RAND Workers’ Compensation Colloquium.
Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene WB&A Market Research Executive Summary THE 2003 MARYLAND MEDICAID MANAGED CARE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY.
Use of CAHPS® Database by Researchers: Findings Related to Differences by Race and Ethnicity Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. RAND.
Take Time to Plan Oklahoma Association of Homes and Services for the Aging.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 9 Continuity of Care.
Assessment of Emergency Medicine Residents’ Bedside Communication Skills: A Survey of Emergency Department Patients Amanda Keller York College of PA Biology.
Overview of CAHPS ® and the National CAHPS ® Database Assessing Patients’ Experiences with Care: Using CAHPS ® as a Standardized Quality Metric Dale Shaller,
There is a better way. Join Us.. The Facts. The nation is aging. »In 2030, nearly 1 in 5 US residents will be 65 or older The US health care system is.
Another Perspective on PRO Content in Clinical Practice Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. University of California, Los Angeles June 25, 2007.
Pediatric Healthcare Center of The Future Down the Rabbit Hole Of Healthcare September 4, 2007 Gerri Lamb, PhD, RN Emory School of Nursing.
Are Positive Experiences with Health Care Bad for Health? June 14, 2015 (AcademyHealth) Minneapolis Convention Center 1301 S. 2nd Avenue, Minneapolis,
HEALTH CARE REPORT CARDS UNLOCKING THE SECRET OF QUALITY CARE ILRU WEBCAST July 1, 2004 Peg Mastal, PhD, RN.
Changing Our Culture.
1 The Patient’s Perspective Angela Coulter Picker Institute Europe
Quality of care from the patients perspective; the CQI rehabilitation centres Herman Sixma / NIVEL ESCIF De Rijp - 19 May 2011.
Parent Beliefs Regarding Acceptability of Recruitment Methods in Pediatric Research Susan T. Heinze, M.S., Amy J. Majewski, B.A., Elaine C. Bennaton, B.A.,
Health Care Organization Customer Satisfaction Measures.
Right 1 - ACCESS Right to access health and community services Patient experience survey results support this right: fast access to reliable health advice.
Family Presence in Multidisciplinary Rounds
Assessing Patient-Centered Medical Homes from the Patient Perspective: Developing the CAHPS ® Clinician & Group PCMH Survey Patricia Gallagher, PhD Center.
Assessing Patient Satisfaction Ron D. Hays UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research RAND Health Program AUA Foundation Summer.
The John D. Stoeckle Center for Primary Care Innovation CAHPS Driven Quality Improvement: Primary Care Susan Edgman-Levitan,PA Executive Director Stoeckle.
Do continuity and co-ordination of care influence quality of care and health outcomes? Stephen Campbell, David Reeves, Elizabeth Middleton, Martin Roland.
CAHPS PATIENT EXPERIENCE SURVEYS AHRQ ANNUAL MEETING SEPTEMBER 2012 Christine Crofton, PhD CAHPS Project Officer.
CAHPS® Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Ernest Moy Center for Quality Improvement & Patient Safety.
1 Evaluation of Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) Initiatives Meredith B. Rosenthal, PhD February 24, 2009.
Quality of Care /18/04 Consumer Assessments of Health Care Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Consumer Assessments of Health Care Ron D. Hays, Ph.D.
Striving Towards Excellence in Comprehensive Care: What do Children Need? July 10, 2007 Christopher A. Kus, M.D., M.P.H.
Assessing Patient-Centered Medical Homes from the Patient’s Perspective: Developing the CAHPS ® PCMH Survey Patricia (Trish) Gallagher, PhD Center for.
Civility Among Healthcare Employees: The Impact on Patients AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting June 2005  Boston, MA Mark Meterko PhD 1, David Mohr.
Mount Auburn Practice Improvement Program (MA-PIP)
Warm-up List 5 influences on your choice of health care products or services. Circle the two that most often affect your decisions Remember yesterday we.
Can patients be satisfied to death? What was Joshua J. Fenton thinking? Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. July 21, 2015 UCLA Center for Maximizing Outcomes and Research.
Richard Siegrist Senior Vice President & General Manager HealthShare Technology, a WebMD company Adjunct Lecturer, Harvard School of Public Health Point-Counterpoint:
Readmissions Driver Diagram OHA HEN 2.0. Readmissions AIMPrimary Drivers Secondary DriversChange Ideas Reduce Readmissions Identify patients at high-risk.
 Friends and Family Test (FFT) -single question ‘would you recommend…’  The Adult National Inpatient Survey (AIPS) - AIPS uses validated questions based.
TEMPLATE AND PRINTING BY: GRMERC Consortium Members: Grand Valley State University, Michigan State University, Saint Mary’s.
Learning from patients’ experience Angela Coulter Picker Institute Europe Angela Coulter Picker Institute Europe
Physicians Delivering Services in a Second Language How that does and doesn’t happen at Contra Costa Health Services.
Use of Personal Assistance Services by Public Insurance Recipients with Tetraplegic Injuries: Policy Recommendations Advanced by Spinal Cord Injury Consumers.
Patient Experience of Care Surveys
Presentation transcript:

Quality Through the Eyes of the Patient: State-of-the-Art Concepts Paul D. Cleary, Ph.D. April 10, 2001 Quality Through the Eyes of the Patient: State-of-the-Art Concepts Paul D. Cleary, Ph.D. April 10, 2001

Perceived Problems With Patient Surveys  All patients are very “satisfied;” why measure that?  Satisfaction is not as important as “real” quality.  People don’t pay attention to quality data.  All patients are very “satisfied;” why measure that?  Satisfaction is not as important as “real” quality.  People don’t pay attention to quality data.

Major Advances in Patient Surveys  We know a great deal about how patients define quality.  We now ask about experiences related to quality; not just “satisfaction.  We know a great deal about how patients define quality.  We now ask about experiences related to quality; not just “satisfaction.

New Knowledge About Patient Surveys  The consequences of different aspect of quality.  Dimensions underlying multiple questions.  How to present results to consumers.  How to use results for quality improvement.  The consequences of different aspect of quality.  Dimensions underlying multiple questions.  How to present results to consumers.  How to use results for quality improvement.

How Do Hospital Patients Define Quality? Picker Dimensions of Patient Centered Care  Respect for patient preferences  Coordination of care  Information and education  Physical comfort  Emotional support  Involvement of family and friends  Continuity and transition  Respect for patient preferences  Coordination of care  Information and education  Physical comfort  Emotional support  Involvement of family and friends  Continuity and transition

How Do Ambulatory Patients Define Quality? Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS)  Getting needed care  Getting care when needed  Doctor communication  Courtesy, respect, and helpfulness of staff  Health plan service, information, paperwork  Getting needed care  Getting care when needed  Doctor communication  Courtesy, respect, and helpfulness of staff  Health plan service, information, paperwork

Satisfaction is Not Enough  People can be satisfied with bad care  People can be dissatisfied with good care  People can be satisfied with bad care  People can be dissatisfied with good care

Ratings Versus Reports Ratings Subjective Subjective Confounded With Attitudes Towards Caregiver Confounded With Attitudes Towards Caregiver Non-specific Non-specificReports More Objective More Objective Easier to Interpret Easier to Interpret Actionable ActionableRatings Subjective Subjective Confounded With Attitudes Towards Caregiver Confounded With Attitudes Towards Caregiver Non-specific Non-specificReports More Objective More Objective Easier to Interpret Easier to Interpret Actionable Actionable

Ratings of Hospital Care

Was There One Particular Doctor in Charge of Your Care? 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% INCOME $7,500-$15,000$15,001-$35,000more than $35,000 21% 17%13%12% % saying No less than $7,500

Construct Validity of Reports

Studies of Variability Support Validity of Different Dimension  Quality determined by providers (e.g. communication) does not vary as much between plans as quality determined by plans (e.g. access and customer service)

Patient Centered Care is Related to:  Trust  Doctor and plan switching  Health outcomes  Trust  Doctor and plan switching  Health outcomes

Relationship Between Number of Problems and Low Trust Lower tertile of trust Number of problems Source: Keating et al., 2001

What Predicts Lack of Trust in Hospital Patients? Source: Joffe et al., 2001  Treated with dignity and respect (OR - 3.7)  Enough say in treatment (OR - 1.7)  Regard for patients (OR - 1.3)  Coordination (OR - 1.6)  Information and Education (OR - 2.1)  Physical Comfort ( OR - 1.9)  Emotional support (OR - 2.2)  Continuity and Transition (OR - 1.3)  Courtesy and availability of staff (OR - 3.2)  Treated with dignity and respect (OR - 3.7)  Enough say in treatment (OR - 1.7)  Regard for patients (OR - 1.3)  Coordination (OR - 1.6)  Information and Education (OR - 2.1)  Physical Comfort ( OR - 1.9)  Emotional support (OR - 2.2)  Continuity and Transition (OR - 1.3)  Courtesy and availability of staff (OR - 3.2)

Percent of patients who say they have considered changing their physician by number of problems

Does Patient-Centered Care Result in Better Outcomes?

New Hampshire AMI Study  Design: prospective cohort study  Sample: AMI patients admitted to 20 new Hampshire hospitals in 1996  Data:  Surveys mailed 1,3, and 12 months post-mi  Hospital discharge abstracts  Design: prospective cohort study  Sample: AMI patients admitted to 20 new Hampshire hospitals in 1996  Data:  Surveys mailed 1,3, and 12 months post-mi  Hospital discharge abstracts

Angina (P=.002) (P=.02)(P=.0002) Worse Better Unadjusted Angina Score by Problem Group and Time

Angina (P=.0003) Better Worse Adjusted Angina Level by Problem Group and Time

Using Survey Data for Quality Improvement Providers, managers, and purchasers want information that is: ImportantInterpretableActionable Providers, managers, and purchasers want information that is: ImportantInterpretableActionable

Example of Short Term Issue What happened when you called for An appointment? Problem score = 19.3% Correlation with evaluation = 0.30 What happened when you called for An appointment? Problem score = 19.3% Correlation with evaluation = 0.30

Example of Long Term Issue Did You Get as Much Information About Your Condition and Treatment as You Wanted From Your Provider? Did You Get as Much Information About Your Condition and Treatment as You Wanted From Your Provider? Problem Score = 30.2% Problem Score = 30.2% Correlation With Satisfaction= 0.46 Correlation With Satisfaction= 0.46 Did You Get as Much Information About Your Condition and Treatment as You Wanted From Your Provider? Did You Get as Much Information About Your Condition and Treatment as You Wanted From Your Provider? Problem Score = 30.2% Problem Score = 30.2% Correlation With Satisfaction= 0.46 Correlation With Satisfaction= 0.46

Patient Based Quality Data Can Be Used For: Internal improvement Internal improvement Evaluation Evaluation Internal improvement Internal improvement Evaluation Evaluation

National Variation in Problem Scores by Hospital Type Academic Health Center Teaching Hospital Non- Teaching Hospital Range Median

Patient Safety Patients can report about processes Patients can report about processes that are related to safety and errors that are related to safety and errors Patients can report about processes Patients can report about processes that are related to safety and errors that are related to safety and errors

Examples of Issues Related to Safety  Participation in care  Communication about medications  Communication discharge and treatment  Care coordination  Understanding tests and treatments  Participation in care  Communication about medications  Communication discharge and treatment  Care coordination  Understanding tests and treatments

The Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) A National Model for Consumer Choice in the U.S.

Goals of CAHPS  Develop standardized surveys to assess consumer experiences with health plans and services  Develop and test report formats  Develop standardized surveys to assess consumer experiences with health plans and services  Develop and test report formats

Examples of Specialized Surveys Being Developed  Children with special needs  Disenrollee survey  Adult behavioral health survey (ECHO)  Pediatric behavioral health survey  Group level CAHPS  Nursing home CAHPS  Persons with mobility impairments  Children with special needs  Disenrollee survey  Adult behavioral health survey (ECHO)  Pediatric behavioral health survey  Group level CAHPS  Nursing home CAHPS  Persons with mobility impairments

Current Activities  Component of national accreditation program (NCQA)  Widely used by Medicaid (low income) programs  Used nationally for Medicare (over age 65)  National CAHPS benchmarking database  Component of national accreditation program (NCQA)  Widely used by Medicaid (low income) programs  Used nationally for Medicare (over age 65)  National CAHPS benchmarking database

Providing Quality Data to Consumers People will use information if it is People will use information if it is salient, reliable and valid, and salient, reliable and valid, and presented in a clear, simple format presented in a clear, simple format

Most Important Source of Information (State Employees; N = 1525) CAHPS Report.…………………………… % CAHPS Report.…………………………… % Other Print Material from Employer …………. 9.2 % Other Print Material from Employer …………. 9.2 % Benefit Fair …………………………………… 15.4 % Benefit Fair …………………………………… 15.4 % Internet ……………………………………… % Internet ……………………………………… % Print Materials from Plans ……………………. 7.4 % Print Materials from Plans ……………………. 7.4 % Talking with Co-Workers …………………… % Talking with Co-Workers …………………… % Newspapers or Magazines ……………………. 1.5 % Newspapers or Magazines ……………………. 1.5 % Other ….……………………………………… % Other ….……………………………………… % CAHPS Report.…………………………… % CAHPS Report.…………………………… % Other Print Material from Employer …………. 9.2 % Other Print Material from Employer …………. 9.2 % Benefit Fair …………………………………… 15.4 % Benefit Fair …………………………………… 15.4 % Internet ……………………………………… % Internet ……………………………………… % Print Materials from Plans ……………………. 7.4 % Print Materials from Plans ……………………. 7.4 % Talking with Co-Workers …………………… % Talking with Co-Workers …………………… % Newspapers or Magazines ……………………. 1.5 % Newspapers or Magazines ……………………. 1.5 % Other ….……………………………………… % Other ….……………………………………… %

Helpfulness of CAHPS Report When Deciding About Health Plans  Very helpful ……..…………… %  Somewhat helpful ……..…… %  Not very helpful ….…..……… %  Not at all helpful ….………… %  Very helpful ……..…………… %  Somewhat helpful ……..…… %  Not very helpful ….…..……… %  Not at all helpful ….………… %

 Patients are the only source of information about selected aspects of their medical care Patients can provide information that is: Reliable and valid ImportantInterpretableActionable  Patients are the only source of information about selected aspects of their medical care Patients can provide information that is: Reliable and valid ImportantInterpretableActionable ConclusionsConclusions

ConclusionsConclusions Addressing Patient-Centered Concerns can : Meet patient needs Build loyalty and reputation Improve outcomes Identify system problems Addressing Patient-Centered Concerns can : Meet patient needs Build loyalty and reputation Improve outcomes Identify system problems