METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June 2006 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Municipal Solid Waste Landfill NSPS/EG Requirements Illinois EPA Bureau of Air Mike Davidson 217/
Advertisements

The Wonderful World of HAP Regulations
MSW NESHAP Control Requirements Contains the same requirements as NSPS/EG. Requires gas collection and control system (GCCS) for same landfill as NSPS/EG.
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Municipal Solid Waste Landfills.
Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Surface Coating
METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART RRRR July 2006.
SUBPART N MACT AMENDMENTS QUESTIONS & ANSWERS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART N.
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006.
IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT OVERVIEW
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006.
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT QUESTION & ANSWERS
DRAFT IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT FACILITY INSPECTIONS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART EEEEE.
METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING MACT FACILITY INSPECTIONS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART RRRR July, 2006.
METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT FACILITY INSPECTIONS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May, CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May, 2006.
METAL COIL SURFACE MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006 May 2006.
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT FACILITY INSPECTIONS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June, CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June, 2006.
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT CLOSING METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT CLOSING 40 CFR PART 63 SUBPART KKKK June, CFR PART 63 SUBPART KKKK June,
Compliance Dates The final rule was published on January 25, 1995,
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT CLOSING METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT CLOSING 40 CFR PART 63 SUBPART SSSS May CFR PART 63 SUBPART SSSS May 2006.
METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING MACT QUESTION & ANSWERS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART RRRR July 2006.
IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT QUESTION & ANSWERS
IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT QUESTION & ANSWERS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June, CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June, 2006.
Alternative Test Method and Monitoring Approval Robin Segall Measurement Technology Workshop December 6 – 8, 2010.
Introduction to Records Management Policy
Harmonization of Parts 60 and 75
Landfills Air Pollution Air Compliance and Enforcement Jeff Meyer 1.
RICE MACT and Oil Analysis
Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) Panel Peter Westlin, EMC Barrett Parker, EMC.
New Federal Regulations for Internal Combustion Engines Doug Parce.
Louisiana Department of EnvironmentalQuality LDEQ CAM Plan Overview LDEQ’s 27 th Annual Conference on the Environment Cajundome Convention Center Lafayette,
Implementation and Management of Leak Detection and Repair Programs – New Rules and Other Considerations Nebraska Ethanol Safety & Environmental Coalition.
What options do states have? What is Georgia planning to do? What are some of the other states doing? What are the possible implications to permit fees?
2015 NCMA EPA Enforcement Policies and How They Affect Your Facility Michael Pjetraj, P.E. DAQ Stationary Source Compliance Branch Supervisor.
TITLE V COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION AND DEVIATION REPORTING Annette Maxwell and Erica Solis Office of Compliance and Enforcement May 5, 2015.
Compliance Update NCMA 2015.
Overview of the Tribal New Source Review (NSR) Rule U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) Research.
Secondary Aluminum NESHAP 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart RRR Example Malfunction Plan for Plant ABC Final April 3, 2003 Information Transfer and Program Integration.
Mustang Watchdog April 22, 2014
EPA Rule 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart HHHHHH “The Refinisher Rule”
Where to find Information About Facilities. Overview of Title V Permits.
Indiana New Source Review Reform Plantwide Applicability Limitations (PALs) IDEM/Office of Air Quality September 7, 2004.
FRANKLIN engineering group, inc. Start-up Shutdown Malfunction Plan Development and Implementation Duncan F. Kimbro
Our Vision – Healthy Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.
Georgia Environmental Protection Division Stage II Gasoline Vapor Recovery Decommissioning Workshop June 11, 2014 EPD Tradeport Training Room.
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of the Rules and Applications Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
CANDACE CARRAWAY OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY PLANNING AND STANDARDS US EPA JUNE 2013 General Permits and Permits by Rule 1.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC Boiler MACT Compliance Plans: Failure to Develop Plans Is Planning to Fail Susie Bowden|
Welcome Revisions of Chapter WAC Sections -035 and -036 Rule advisory committee workshop #5 Lacey, WA October 28, 2009.
Title V Operating Permit Program 1 Section 1: Intro to Title V Laura McKelvey U.S. EPA.
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of Rules and Permitting Issues Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
RECLAIM Seminar October 26, 2005 Judy B. Yorke, P.E., C.P.P. Yorke Engineering, LLC x25
Title V Operating Permits: A Compliance and Enforcement Tool Candace Carraway US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
The Paper and Other Web Coating (POWC) MACT – Executive Summary The executive summary is a power point presentation designed to be used for basic education.
Jessica Montanez Environmental Protection Agency NEW SOURCE REVIEW (NSR) PROGRAM.
Region 9 Title V Permit Review Guidelines Ray Vogel EPA/OAQPS.
Update on Methane Regulations Affecting Landfills Pat Sullivan Senior Vice President SCS Engineers Nov. 10, 2015.
2005 NSR Regulation Changes Dwight Wylie. Old Units vs. New Units  There is a broad disparity between air pollution control requirements and emissions.
1 Special Information Session on USEPA’s Carbon Rules & Clean Air Act Section 111 North Carolina Division of Air Quality Special Information Session on.
Kevin McLeod & Chris Horton OCE, Region 12 Houston 1.
Cooling Tower Audit Nathan Maple City of Marion. Why do we undertake an audit and sampling? Regulation 15 South Australian Public Health (Legionella)
SSM SIP Call Georgia’s Response
NSPS OOOOa Overview Photo from
EPA Options for the Federal Regulation of Coal Combustion Waste Lisa Evans Earthjustice October 22, 2010.
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Simple but Complicated Air Quality Permitting for Generators
EMC – Air Quality Committee March 9, 2016
15A NCAC 2D Start-up, Shut-down, Malfunction SSM SIP Call
RCRA Updates Larry L. Lamberth Enforcement and Compliance Branch
Presentation transcript:

METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June 2006

Compliance Timeline IMPORTANT COMPLIANCE INFORMATION SOURCE mcantimeline.pdf

Compliance Dates The final rule was published on November 13, 2003, under 68 FR 64432

Compliance Dates (contd.) Existing major sources must comply with: Emissions limitations; Emissions limitations; Work practices standard; Work practices standard; Operation & Maintenance requirement; Operation & Maintenance requirement; Major source status determination; Major source status determination;

Compliance Dates (contd.) New affected sources operating on or after January15, 2003 ( e) should have complied by November 13, 2003, or startup, whichever was later. Existing sources must comply by November 13, 2006.

Compliance Dates (contd.) If the METAL CAN COATING FACILITY is an area source, but becomes a major source of HAP, compliance of [§ (e)(1)] is required upon startup.

Compliance Dates (contd.) The affected sources must meet the notification and scheduling requirements in [§ (b)]. Some of these notifications must be submitted before the affected source compliance date.

Operations & Maintenance Requirements (§63.6(1)-(2) affected facilities must operate and maintain the sources, including air pollution control and monitoring equipment in a manner consistent with good air pollution practices that minimizes air emissions to the level required in Subpart KKKK.

O & M Requirements (contd.) affected sources must prepare and operate at all times according to a written operation and maintenance plan for each capture and collection control device controlling emissions subject to Subpart KKKK.

O & M Requirements (contd.) Each plan must contain the elements required in §63.6(e)(1)-(2) of the General Provisions. Equipment monthly inspections Equipment monthly inspections (contd. on next slide) Each plan must contain the elements required in §63.6(e)(1)-(2) of the General Provisions. Equipment monthly inspections Equipment monthly inspections (contd. on next slide)

O & M Requirements (contd.) Operating limits for each capture system Operating limits for each capture system Appropriate operating limit parameters and design scope, i.e., control of multiple emissions sources Appropriate operating limit parameters and design scope, i.e., control of multiple emissions sources Operating limits for each capture system Operating limits for each capture system Appropriate operating limit parameters and design scope, i.e., control of multiple emissions sources Appropriate operating limit parameters and design scope, i.e., control of multiple emissions sources

O&M Requirements (contd.) Preventative maintenance plan for each control device including the manufacturers recommended maintenance instructions

SSM Plan Requirements(§ (c) If the affected sources uses an emission capture system and add-on control device for compliance purposes with Subpart KKKK, the source must develop and implement a written startup, shutdown and malfunction plan (SSMP);

SSMP (contd.) SSMP must meet provisions in §63.6(e)(3). SSMP must address startup, shutdown and corrective actions in the event of a malfunction of the emissions capture system or the add-on device. SSMP must meet provisions in §63.6(e)(3). SSMP must address startup, shutdown and corrective actions in the event of a malfunction of the emissions capture system or the add-on device.

SSMP (contd.) The SSMP must also address any coating operation equipment that may cause increased emissions or that would affect capture efficiency if the process equipment malfunctions such as conveyors that move parts among enclosures. The SSMP must also address any coating operation equipment that may cause increased emissions or that would affect capture efficiency if the process equipment malfunctions such as conveyors that move parts among enclosures.

General Compliance Requirements (§ ) The affected source must be in compliance with the: emissions limitations Work practice standards Operations and maintenance; Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan

General Compliance (contd.) Maintain a log detailing the operation and maintenance of the process and emissions control equipment related to the initial performance test and the applicable operating limits for an affected source

Initial Compliance Requirements (§ ) Performance Test: A performance test must be conducted no later than 180 calendar days after the compliance date specific to an affected source using add-on equipment.(§ )

Initial Compliance (contd.) Notification of Compliance Status; For each work practice standard and operation and maintenance requirement that applies to an affected source where an initial performance (contd on next slide) Notification of Compliance Status; For each work practice standard and operation and maintenance requirement that applies to an affected source where an initial performance (contd on next slide)

Initial Compliance (contd.) test is not demonstrated, the affected source must demonstrate initial compliance no later than 30 calendar days after the specific compliance date for the affected source.

Initial Compliance (contd.) Notification of Intent to Conduct Performance Test; In the General Provisions [§63.9(e)]requiremnet if the affected source is required to conducts performance tests (e.g., those with add-on equipment), the affected source must submit a notification of intent to conduct a performance test 60 days prior to the test.

Initial Compliance (contd.) The affected source must install and maintain a CPMS specified in (§ ).

Test Methods Subpart KKKK clearly defines the test methods and other procedures in § & § used to demonstrate initial compliance with the emissions limitations

Test Methods (contd.) The procedures in Subpart KKKK are used to establish operating limits for: Each capture system Each Solvent Recovery System Each combustion device

Compliance with Work Practice Standards For any coating operation(s) for which a compliant material option or emissions rate without add-on controls option is chosen, the source is not required to meet any work practice standards. (§ ) For any coating operation(s) for which a compliant material option or emissions rate without add-on controls option is chosen, the source is not required to meet any work practice standards. (§ )

Work Practice Standards (contd.) If an emission rate with add-on controls or the control efficiency/outlet concentration option is used to comply with the emission limitations, the source must develop and implement a written work practice plan to minimize organic HAP emissions from the storage, mixing, and conveying of coatings, If an emission rate with add-on controls or the control efficiency/outlet concentration option is used to comply with the emission limitations, the source must develop and implement a written work practice plan to minimize organic HAP emissions from the storage, mixing, and conveying of coatings, (contd on next slide)

Work Practice Standards (contd.) thinners and cleaning materials used in and waste materials generated by the affected surface coating operations The affected source has submitted a written Plan and will operate at all times according to that plan. The affected source has submitted a written Plan and will operate at all times according to that plan. thinners and cleaning materials used in and waste materials generated by the affected surface coating operations The affected source has submitted a written Plan and will operate at all times according to that plan. The affected source has submitted a written Plan and will operate at all times according to that plan.

REPORTS Compliance reports are required by specific due dates; Compliance reports are required by specific due dates;

REPORTS (contd.) Performance Test Report [(§ (b)]; if the affected source is required to conduct a performance tests (e.g., those with add-on control equipment), the source must submit a performance test report within 60 days after completion of the performance test. Performance Test Report [(§ (b)]; if the affected source is required to conduct a performance tests (e.g., those with add-on control equipment), the source must submit a performance test report within 60 days after completion of the performance test.

REPORTS (contd.) SSM Reports [§ (c)]; An SSM Report must be submitted immediately if there is an SSM of the control device during the reporting period that is not consistent with the SSM Plan. If actions taken were consistent with the SSM Plan, the report must be submitted semi-annually. SSM Reports [§ (c)]; An SSM Report must be submitted immediately if there is an SSM of the control device during the reporting period that is not consistent with the SSM Plan. If actions taken were consistent with the SSM Plan, the report must be submitted semi-annually.

REPORTS (contd.) Semiannual Compliance reports [ (e)}; After the initial compliance period, each affected source must submit semiannual compliance reports. Semiannual Compliance reports [ (e)}; After the initial compliance period, each affected source must submit semiannual compliance reports.

Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction Reports [§ (c)] A Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction (SSM) report must be submitted immediately if there was a startup, shutdown, or malfunction of the control device during the reporting period that is not consistent with the SSM Plan. A Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction (SSM) report must be submitted immediately if there was a startup, shutdown, or malfunction of the control device during the reporting period that is not consistent with the SSM Plan.

Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction Reports (contd.) If actions were consistent with the SSM Plan, the report must be submitted during the required reporting period. If actions were consistent with the SSM Plan, the report must be submitted during the required reporting period.

Records [§ & ] An affected source is required to keep records of reported information and all other information necessary to document compliance with the rule for 5 years. There may be additional requirements depending on the compliance option that the affected source may choose.

Records (contd.) An affected facility is required to keep records of reported information and all the other information necessary to document compliance with the final rule for 5 years An affected facility is required to keep records of reported information and all the other information necessary to document compliance with the final rule for 5 years There may be additional requirements depending on the compliance option that is chosen. There may be additional requirements depending on the compliance option that is chosen.

Title V Connect Check Facilities that have Federally Enforceable Limits Limited number of Major Facilities; who are they? Check Facilities that have Federally Enforceable Limits Limited number of Major Facilities; who are they?

Title V Connect (contd.) Section 112j, T5 connection (<>3 years) on T5 Permit Section 112j is no longer factor on surface coaters Section 112j, T5 connection (<>3 years) on T5 Permit Section 112j is no longer factor on surface coaters

Title V Issues Each affected source that has obtained a title V operating permit required by 40 CFR part 70 or 71 must report all deviations as defined in the regulation for the semiannual monitoring report required by Sec. 70.6(a)(3)(iii)(A) or Sec. 71.6(a)(3)(iii)(A).

Title V Issues (contd.) If an affected source submits a compliance report required by Subpart KKKK along with, or as part of, the semiannual monitoring report required by Sec. 70.6(a)(3)(iii)(A) or Sec. 71.6(a)(3)(iii)(A), and the compliance report includes all required information concerning deviations from any organic HAP (contd. on next slide)

Title V Issues (contd.) emissions limitation (including any operating limit) or work practice requirement in subpart KKKK, submission of the compliance report shall be deemed to satisfy any obligation to report the same deviations in the semiannual monitoring report. In other words, no double jeopardy.

TITLE V Issues (contd.) ) However, submission of a compliance report shall not otherwise affect any obligation the affected source may have to report deviations from permit requirements to the permitting authority. (THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT )

Title V Compliance Report Example For each affected source that is subject to permitting requirements required by 40 CFR part 70 or 71, and if the permitting authority has established dates for submitting semiannual reports required by Section 70.6 (a)(3)(iii)(A) or Section For each affected source that is subject to permitting requirements required by 40 CFR part 70 or 71, and if the permitting authority has established dates for submitting semiannual reports required by Section 70.6 (a)(3)(iii)(A) or Section (contd. on next slide)

Title V Compliance Report Example (contd.) 71.6(a)(3)(iii)(A), you may submit the first and subsequent compliance reports according to the dates the permitting authority has established instead of according to the dates in paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section. (NOTE WELL)

New Source Review/PSD Implications NSR requires stationary sources of air pollution to apply for permits before they can construct/pre-construct/reconstruct. There are three types of NSR permit requirements: PSD permits require for new major sources, or major modification to an existing source in attainment areas;

NSR/PSD Implications (contd.) Non-attainment NSR permits for new or modifications to existing sources; Non-attainment NSR permits for new or modifications to existing sources; Minor source permits Minor source permits These permits must be included in the Title V permit issued to an affected facility. These permits must be included in the Title V permit issued to an affected facility.

Section 112j Implications Most States allow the Initial Notification requirements under Subpart KKKK to be satisfied by the Section 112j Notification.

Pollution Prevention Options Remove HAP organic COMPONENTS from coating operation, Reduce the development of waste surface coatings, excess thinners and surface coating repair items. Remove HAP organic COMPONENTS from coating operation, Reduce the development of waste surface coatings, excess thinners and surface coating repair items.