Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Applications of Money-Time Relationships
Advertisements

Engineering Economy Practice Problems
ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Chapter 4-5 Comparison of Alternatives Annual Worth Analysis.
Cost Estimation for Engineering Projects CIVE 4312 Hanadi Rifai.
1 Dr. Lotfi K.GAAFAR Eng. Ahmed Salah RIFKY ENGR 345 Engineering Economy.
ENGINEERING ECONOMY DR. MAISARA MOHYELDIN GASIM Chapter 4-5 Comparison of Alternatives Annual Worth Analysis.
COMPARING ALTERNATIVES
Chapter 7 - Rate of Return Analysis Click here for Streaming Audio To Accompany Presentation (optional) Click here for Streaming Audio To Accompany Presentation.
Flash back before we compare mutually exclusive alternatives.
Dealing With Uncertainty
COMPARING ALTERNATIVES
(c) 2001 Contemporary Engineering Economics 1 Chapter 8 Annual Equivalent Worth Analysis Annual equivalent criterion Applying annual worth analysis Mutually.
(c) 2001 Contemporary Engineering Economics 1 Chapter 7 Present Worth Analysis Describing Project Cash Flows Initial Project Screening Method Present Worth.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 4 th edition, © 2007 Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives Lecture No.18 Chapter 5 Contemporary Engineering Economics.
Advanced Engineering Economy Contemporary Engineering Economics, 5th edition, © 2010.
FINAL EXAM REVIEW Spring Nominal and Effective Interest Rates Payment Period  Compounding Period Mortgages and Car Loans MARR and WACC Present.
Summary of Last Lecture Introduction to Stocks Stock Valuation.
FINAL EXAM REVIEW Fall Nominal and Effective Interest Rates Payment Period  Compounding Period Mortgages and Car Loans MARR and WACC Present Worth.
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill All Rights Reserved 11-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin Chapter 11 Replacement.
Present Worth Analysis Lecture slides to accompany
Lecture slides to accompany
MER1601 MER Design of Thermal Fluid Systems Engineering Economics – Comparing Alternatives Professor Bruno Winter Term 2005.
Comparing Projects Using Time Value of Money
Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Engineering Economy, Fifteenth Edition By William.
The second objective today is to evaluate correctly capital investment alternatives when the time value of money is a key influence.
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 6-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin.
Annual Worth Analysis An alternative to Present Worth (PW) and Future Worth (FW) analysis is Annual Worth (AW) analysis. Annual worth analysis will select.
Slide Sets to accompany Blank & Tarquin, Engineering Economy, 6 th Edition, 2005 © 2005 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 6-1 Developed.
AW involves converting all cash flows into an A value The AW for one life cycle is the same AW for 2,3,4, or or an infinite number of life cycles,as long.
Copyright ©2009 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. Engineering Economy, Fourteenth Edition By William.
Chapter 7 Annual Worth Analysis.
Exam 3 Practice Problems For Engineering Economy By Douglas Rittmann.
1 Reviewing Complex Flow Perpetuity If there is a mix of recurring and non-recurring or one-time cash flows that must be capitalized for perpetuity: 1.)
© 2012 by McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y All Rights Reserved 5-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin.
InvestmentWorth Investment Worth. Investment Worth MARR Suppose a company can earn 12% / annum in U. S. Treasury bills No way would they ever invest in.
Annual Worth Analysis An alternative to Present Worth (PW) and Future Worth (FW) analysis is Annual Worth (AW) analysis. Annual worth analysis will select.
1 1. Order alternatives from lowest to highest initial investment. 2. Let Alternative A 0 (do nothing) be considered the current best. 3. Consider next.
AW involves converting all cash flows into an A value The AW for one life cycle is the same AW for 2,3,4, or or an infinite number of life cycles,as long.
Lecture No.18 Chapter 5 Contemporary Engineering Economics Copyright © 2010 Contemporary Engineering Economics, 5 th edition, © 2010.
8-1 Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy 7 th edition Leland Blank Anthony Tarquin Chapter 8 Rate of Return Multiple Alternatives © 2012 by.
L16: Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives ECON 320 Engineering Economics Mahmut Ali GOKCE Industrial Systems Engineering Computer.
Contemporary Engineering Economics, 6 th edition Park Copyright © 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives.
Chapter 6 Annual Equivalent Worth Criterion. Chapter 6 Annual Equivalence Analysis  Annual equivalent criterion  Applying annual worth analysis  Mutually.
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Chapter 5: Evaluating a Single Project
APPLICATIONS OF MONEY-TIME RELATIONSHIPS
Lecture slides to accompany
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Comparing Mutually Exclusive Alternatives
Present Worth Analysis Lecture slides to accompany
Chapter 5: Evaluating a Single Project
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Annual Worth Analysis An alternative to Present Worth (PW) and Future Worth (FW) analysis is Annual Worth (AW) analysis. Annual worth analysis will select.
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Chapter 7 Present Worth Analysis
Example Problem A company is considering the purchase of a new piece of testing equipment that is expected to produce $8,000 additional income during the.
Present Worth Analysis Lecture slides to accompany
Present Worth Analysis Lecture slides to accompany
Lecture slides to accompany
Lecture slides to accompany Engineering Economy, 8th edition
Lecture slides to accompany
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
By Muhammad Shahid Iqbal
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
Lecture slides to accompany
Annual Worth Analysis An alternative to Present Worth (PW) and Future Worth (FW) analysis is Annual Worth (AW) analysis. Annual worth analysis will select.
Example Problem A company is considering the purchase of a new piece of testing equipment that is expected to produce $8,000 additional income during the.
Chapter 6: Comparison and Selection Among Alternatives
OUTLINE Questions? News? New homework due Wednesday
OUTLINE Questions? News? New homework due Wednesday
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions Chapter 5 Analysis of Engineering Business Decisions

Two kind of problems Cost Find the least cost machine; find the most economical way of doing something. Cash flows involve only cost, possibly with the exception of a salvage value at the end of an item’s useful life. Investment Find the most profitable investment = The investment that has the highest present worth. Cash flows involve both costs and revenues. Usually there are high initial costs (capital investment) followed later by revenues. This class will mostly concern repeatable cost problems.

Techniques PW Present worth AW Annual worth Capitalized Worth Present worth with an infinite time horizon and repeatability Incremental Investment Analysis IRR with delta method Used for cost-based or investment-based problems Used only for investment problems

Repeatability: Does the problem repeat? Cost problems (repeatability often useful) Are the cash flows necessary to provide essential equipment that must be replaced when no longer operational? If a machine must be purchased again and again at regular intervals, then the cash flows for purchase, O&M, and salvage repeat. Investment problems Usually does not apply.

Repeatability: analysis It will be easier to compare AW of costs than PW. The AW converts all the cash flows into a steady annualized cost. The AW can be used to take account of differences in life cycles and convert cash flows into common units. If PW must be used: The PW study period is critical and must be the same for each alternative studied. Otherwise the comparison is biased (example: you can not directly compare $5000 for 10 years service vs. $4000 for 7 years. You need common units first) The simplest way is to align the PW study period in years, with the life cycles of the equipment so that a whole number of life cycles is considered. If the PW study period does not match the life cycles of the alternatives, then end-of-study market values may be needed for the portions of analysis where the study period does not match the life cycle. CW or Capitalized Worth is PW with an infinite study period.

Cost-based example Company needs to buy an Industrial Drill MARR = 10% Drill must be kept running (Repeatability) Mitsubishi Life 4 years Initial Cost $200 000 O&M $40,000/year Salvage value $50,000 General Electric Life 6 years Initial Cost $250 000 O&M $50,000/year Salvage value $30,000

Compare different methods Annual worth method PW method with 12 year study period PW method with 5 year study period CW method

Annual worth method AW(Cost)= (Initial Cost)*(A/P,marr%,life) - (SalvageValue)*(A/F,marr%,life) +Annual O&M cost Mitsubishi AW = ($200,000)*(A/P,10%,4)-($50,000)*(A/F,10%,4)+$40,000 =($200,000)*(0.3155)-($50,000)*(0.2155)+$40,000 =$63,100-$10775+$40000=$92325 ($/year) GE AW = ($250,000)*(A/P,10%,6)-($30,000)*(A/F,10%,6)+$50,000 = ($250,000)*(0.2296)-($30,000)*(0.1296)+$50,000 =$57400-$3888+$50000=$103512 ($/year) The Mitsubishi unit has the lowest AW, and therefore the lowest cost.

PW method with 12 year study period In 12 years, the company will go through 3 life cycles of Mitsubishi drill vs. 2 life cycles of GE drill We’ll use an excel spreadsheet for this

PW method with 5 year study period Mitsubishi: Need to buy a 2nd drill at end of year 4, then sell it at end of year 5. GE drill: Need to buy only 1 drill, sell it at end of year 5 Do we know the market values of each drill when they are sold as used? If yes, use them. If no, estimate.

Estimation of Used Value The most accurate used “market values” are used market prices, at which a good actually sold. (example: prices from completed trades or auctions) This data can be difficult to find. Used “market values” are not: Ask prices in a newspaper. Asking prices are usually a bit too high. Historical prices. Used market prices change over time. Prices estimated from a formula (unless that formula comes from statistical research of the used market… and then it will be a different formula for every product)

Textbook Method Is only a rough estimate. You need the new price, the salvage value S, the Life L, and an interest rate to use the formula. Assume the item generates annual value A over the life L. Find A from A = (A/P, i%, Life) * New Price - (A/F,i%,L)*S This particular “A” value is often called the “Capital Recovery value” Suppose that N years are left in the Life. Then Used Value = A * (P/A,i%,N) + S*(P/F,i%,N)

CW method The company buy drills forever. Two ways to solve 1. Use AW for 1 life cycle;then CW=AW/i 2. Or use PW directly over an infinite study period Hint: Use (P/A,i%,)=1/i and the compounding-interval trick for adjusting i% (i*=(1+i)N-1)for non-yearly cash flows such as purchasing a new drill every 4 or 6 years.

Let’s switch problems and cover one last topic left over from last week.

Incremental Investment Analysis Procedure Sort investments from low to high by capital requirements Determine IRR, select investment with lowest capital requirement having IRR>MARR. Delete investments with IRR<MARR. Call this investment the current alternative Calculate deltas and IRR(deltas) of all remaining investments vs. current alternative. Eliminate any investments where IRR(delta)<MARR. If any of the remaining investments have IRR(delta)>MARR, then select the investment with lowest capital requirement as the “new” current alternative and go back to 3.

Summary Repeatable cost-based economic problems are common to equipment selection and certain public projects (choosing a road surface or hill slip cover) Common problem variables: MARR (I%) the lifetime for each alternative choice of equipment (L) Purchase price P for each alternative Salvage value F for each choice of equipment Annual O&M Cost for each choice of equipment Goal: find lowest cost alternative Techniques PW for N years – create an N year plan for each alternative. Compare the PW of each plan AW – Consider a single cycle (buy, use, salvage) of each alternative of equipment and calculate the AW of each alternative. CW – Consider plans involving an infinite stream of replacement purchases for each alternative. Calculate the PW of each alternative. In theory, these can all produce the same answers. In practice, concerns such as actual values for used equipment can produce differences.