1 BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT TRB Planning Applications Conference Monday, May 7, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WP5 – Chapter 7. Harmonisation Harmonisation of geometry, data definitions, data models, naming ISSUES: MS deliveries are described in WP 4.1 in an enhanced.
Advertisements

Geometric Networks in ArcGIS
JTX Overview Overview of Job Tracking for ArcGIS (JTX)
Concepts of Maintaining Your Data Simple Ways to Edit Your Data By Lorne Woods.
ARCHITECTURE ● ENGINEERING ● COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AVIATION | CIVIL | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES | DATA SYSTEMS | ENVIRONMENTAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING |
GIS at PSRC GIS data collection & travel demand modeling ESRM 250 February 4, 2010.
From portions of Chapter 8, 9, 10, &11. Real world is complex. GIS is used model reality. The GIS models then enable us to ask questions of the data by.
NCTCOG And “Next Generation” Modeling Ken Cervenka, P.E., AICP North Central Texas Council Of Governments For AMPO Travel Modeling Work Group Meeting Kansas.
GI Systems and Science January 30, Points to Cover  Recap of what we covered so far  A concept of database Database Management System (DBMS) 
A GIS Approach to Pedestrian Level of Service Natalia Domarad 14th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Columbus, Ohio May 5-9, 2013.
Agenda Overview Why TransCAD Challenges/tips Initiatives Applications.
Texas A & M University Department of Civil Engineering CVEN689 Applications of GIS to Civil Engineering Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Application of.
1 Lei Xu Term Project Presentation – CVEN 689 – Spring 2005 CVEN 689 – SPRING 2005 LEI XU May 2th, 2005 hide A GIS-BASED STUDY OF HOW THE HOT LANE IMPLEMENTATION.
Conflating Multiple Trueshape Networks for an Enterprise GIS Qiang Li, Daniel Consulting, Inc. Subrat Mahapatra, Maryland State Highway Administration.
TRB Applications Conference Wednesday May 20 th, 2015 DATA DEVELOPMENT FOR A FULLY DYNAMIC TRANSPORTATION DEMAND AND SUPPLY MODEL.
Month XX, 2004 Dr. Robert Bertini Using Archived Data to Measure Operational Benefits of ITS Investments: Ramp Meters Oregon Department of Transportation.
1 Introducing Scenario Network Data Editing and Enterprise GIS January 27, 2010 Minhua Wang, Ph.D. Citilabs, Inc.
WVDOT GTI SECTION Status Update for Districts. AGENDA Introduction. Introduction. Status Update. Status Update. How to Spatially Enable Database. How.
WVDOT GTI SECTION Status Update for Miss Utility.
Parcel Data Models for the Geodatabase
Cube Enterprise Database Solution presented to MTF GIS Committee presented by Minhua Wang Citilabs, Inc. November 20, 2008.
Implementing Geodatabase Technology
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Integrated Corridor Analysis Tool (ICAT) William W. Stoeckert I-95 Corridor Coalition.
Creating a GIS Based Traffic Control Planning Tool for the Dallas District Andrew Karl Dr. Maidment CE 394K.3 GIS in Water Resources Term Project Due:
Feasibility Study of Integrating WVDOT LRS Centerline With Statewide Addressing And Mapping Data.
GEODATABASE Lower Adirondack GIS Users Group Meeting March 2, 2005 Lower Adirondack GIS Users Group Meeting March 2, 2005.
SCOHTS Meeting Robert Pollack - FHWA April 28, 2010.
GIS Display and Analysis of Crash Data Gautam Mistry University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa Prepared for: 29 th International Traffic Records Forum July 15,
Introduction In ArcGIS, there are three basic data structures:
A Case Study in the Deployment of a Web-based Service as a Stakeholder Involvement Tool to Support the Development of a Travel Demand Model 14 th Annual.
TRANSIMS Version 5 Application Concepts January 20, 2011 David Roden – AECOM.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Model Information Exchange System - MIXS Florida Model Task Force GIS Subcommittee.
A collaborative partnership between the State of Kansas Department of Revenue – Property Valuation Division (KDOR/PVD), the Kansas GIS Policy Board’s Data.
Enhanced Parcel Queries in Kansas Kristen Jordan.
CHAPTER TEN AUTHORING.
Esri UC 2014 | Technical Workshop | Esri Roads and Highways: Integrating and Developing LRS Business Systems Tom Hill.
MOBILITY 2030: THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE DALLAS-FORT WORTH METROPOLITAN AREA North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation.
Using GIS Networks to Represent Model Networks May 19, 2009 Hoyt Davis & Chunyu Lu Gannett Fleming, Inc.
UNSD-CELADE Regional Workshop on Census Cartography for the 2010 Latin America’s census round Use of geographic databases (maps) and other geospatial tools.
Traffic Management Transit Management Emergency Management Fixed Point-to-Fixed Point Communications Roadway Toll Administration Remote Traveler Support.
Calibrating Model Speeds, Capacities, and Volume Delay Functions Using Local Data SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting February 6, 2009 Dean Lawrence.
Enterprise Data Model for Transportation Planning Presentation to 2009 TRB Planning Application Conference Minhua Wang, Ph.D. Citilabs, Inc.
S.H. 121 – Dallas, Texas Case Study Presentation National Summit on Future Transportation Funding and Finance Strategies April 11, 2007 Michael Morris,
Leveraging Web-Based GIS for Managing Transportation Model Network Information TRB Planning Applications Conference May 10 th, 2011 Reno, Nevada Steve.
Thursday, May 10th, 2007 Automatic Transfer of GPS Travel Time Data to a Roadway Network 1 AUTOMATIC TRANSFER OF GPS TRAVEL TIME DATA TO A ROADWAY NETWORK.
Creating a Statewide Modeling System in Virginia Presentation for the 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 7, 2007.
Krystal Zwinggi Project Manager John McClintock GIS Analyst Lance English Webmaster Michael Stanley GIS Analyst.
Jessica D. Perkins GIS Programmer Analyst 2 Geospatial Transportation Information Section Program Planning & Administration Division of Highways West Virginia.
GIS TRANSIT NETWORK CODING SYSTEM 2 nd National GIS in Transit Conference Tampa, Florida May , 1999 (TRANCOS) Gustavo A. Baez Jingke Chen Chunxi.
NCTCOG Status Report: Multi-Year Network Coding And Integrated Databases Ken Cervenka, P.E., AICP North Central Texas Council Of Governments For AMPO Travel.
22 Copyright © 2008, Oracle. All rights reserved. Multi-User Development.
Preparing VDOT’s GIS data for the Implementation of Bentley Superload Brian Young – GIS Technical Lead (ARS) Paul Bucher – Quality Assurance Officer Jean.
Data Storage & Editing GEOG370 Instructor: Christine Erlien.
GIS Project1 Physical Structure of GDB Geodatabase Feature datasets Object classes, subtypes Features classes, subtypes Relationship classes Geometric.
TUGIS March 15, 2016 Next Generation 911 Data Management TUGIS 2016.
Transportation Modeling Options for City Departments LSA Associates, Inc. City of Fort Collins January 2001.
Chapter 13 Editing and Topology.
Network Attributes Calculator
Physical Structure of GDB
Chapter 14 Geodatabases.
Lower Adirondack GIS Users Group Meeting March 2, 2005
Introducing Scenario Network Data Editing and Enterprise GIS
Introducing Citilabs’ Scenario Based Master Network Data Model
Kimberly Sparks, GISP and Evan O’Keefe
Chapter 2: Building a System
Building a “System” Moving from writing a program to building a system. What’s the difference?! Complexity, size, complexity, size complexity Breadth.
Esri Roads and Highways An Introduction
Presentation transcript:

1 BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT TRB Planning Applications Conference Monday, May 7, 2007

2 BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT Prepared by: Francisco Torres and Ken Cervenka

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 3 Travel Roadway Networks at NCTCOG 5,000 square-mile of the metropolitan planning area 5,000 square-mile of the metropolitan planning area 32,000 roadway links 32,000 roadway links 14,000 miles 14,000 miles Roadway networks associated to the several planning years. Roadway networks associated to the several planning years. Maintained as separate GIS layers in TransCAD Maintained as separate GIS layers in TransCAD

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 4 North Central Texas Region

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 5 Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan Planning Area

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 6 Multi-Year Network Tasks Setting Guidelines Improving existing data Merging of current networks Designing a user interface

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 7 Source of Existing Networks Base Network

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 8 Current Network Updates Process Base Network

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 9 Drawbacks of Maintaining Several Versions Modifications of alignment and attributes are done independently Modifications of alignment and attributes are done independently Updates should be propagated to future planning years Updates should be propagated to future planning years Amount of maintenance work is proportional to the number of versions Amount of maintenance work is proportional to the number of versions Failure to propagate updates results in inconsistency of versions Failure to propagate updates results in inconsistency of versions

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT Multi-Year Concept 2005 Base Network 1999

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 11 Benefits of Multi-Year Network Modifications of alignment and attributes are done at once for several years. Modifications of alignment and attributes are done at once for several years. Easier to maintain. Updates are propagated automatically to future planning years Easier to maintain. Updates are propagated automatically to future planning years Amount of maintenance work is reduced considerably Amount of maintenance work is reduced considerably The network of a specific year can be defined as a subset of the comprehensive line layer The network of a specific year can be defined as a subset of the comprehensive line layer Improved consistency among years Improved consistency among years

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 12 Improving Existing Layers 1.Re-Alignment. Reshape based on All- Streets network and aerials photos 2.Rectification. Check topology, redesign ramps, identify medians and add access roads to transit. 3.Verification of Current Attributes. Number of lanes, signalized intersections, horizontal signage.

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 13 Re- alignment of network

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 14 Compatibility with detailed All-Streets network

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 15 Intersection of 4 Roads with Medians

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 16 Rectification of Ramps

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 17 Access to Train/Rail stations

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 18 Multi-Year Network Basic Features Only one file is used Only one file is used Need of additional editing tools to identify overlapping links Need of additional editing tools to identify overlapping links Start and ending years must be defined Start and ending years must be defined

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 19 Example of Future Interchange

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 20 Example of Railroad Crossing

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 21 Treatment of future alignments

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 22 Storing Attribute Data

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 23 Merging Year Networks

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 24 Merging Existing Networks

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 25 Comparing 2005 & 2030

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 26 Comparing 2005 & 2030

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 27 Spatial Similarity of Networks

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 28 Tasks to Merge Year Networks Identify common alignments Identify common alignments Consider future alignments Consider future alignments Assign a life cycle to every alignment (start and end year) Assign a life cycle to every alignment (start and end year) Fix inconsistencies of attributes for similar alignments Fix inconsistencies of attributes for similar alignments Identify life cycle of attributes Identify life cycle of attributes

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 29 Master Network Interface

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 30 Improvements to Existing Network Editing Tools Multi-User environment for coders Multi-User environment for coders Automatic error checking of attribute data Automatic error checking of attribute data Keeping a log of changes made to master multiyear network (who, when & what) Keeping a log of changes made to master multiyear network (who, when & what)

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 31 Merging Networks from Coders Track Updates Check Connectivity Fix Errors

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 32 Multi-User Environment Prevent Errors Prevent Errors Prevent Errors Prevent Errors Track Updates

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 33 Future Steps Multi-Year and Multi-User network coding interface Multi-Year and Multi-User network coding interface Automatic communication of network changes from regional agencies Automatic communication of network changes from regional agencies Integration with Other Datasets (TIP and transportation infrastructure geodatabases) Integration with Other Datasets (TIP and transportation infrastructure geodatabases) Display/Update of Year Information on the Web Display/Update of Year Information on the Web Extending coverage of roadway network to the full 16-county NCTCOG area Extending coverage of roadway network to the full 16-county NCTCOG area

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 34 Network Updates Alternatives Final recommendations Corridor Study NCTCOG All-Streets Layer Multi-Year Network Updates Checks NCTCOG All-Streets Layer Multi-Year Network Updates Checks Alternatives Final recommendations Corridor Study NCTCOG All-Streets Layer Multi-Year Network Updates Checks 2009

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 35 GIS Database Integration Multi- Year Network Multi-Year Transportation Geodatabase Infrastructure Demand Accidents Demand

BENEFITS OF A MULTI-YEAR TRAVEL MODEL NETWORK CODING ENVIRONMENT 36 Questions? Thank You!