Pathways to permanence for black, Asian and mixed ethnicity children Selwyn J., Harris, P. Quinton D., Nawaz, S., Wijedasa, D. and Wood, M.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Employment and the Labour Market for women from minority ethnic groups Angela Dale, University of Manchester Collaborators: Jo Lindley, Shirley Dex. Funders:
Advertisements

Secondary Analysis Research on Ethnicity Using Government Data & SARs Reza Afkhami ESDS Government & SARs 1 st November University of Bristol.
Building futures for our most vulnerable children What do we need to change in law, policy and practice? Professor Gillian Schofield School of Social Work,
The Impact and Avoidance of Delay in Decision Making.
“I could have died in there”: Narratives of Mental illness and the discourse of Structural Violence Rubina Jasani and Sarah Pemberton University of Warwick.
Managing the risks and benefits of contact. The Legal Context The Children Act local authorities must promote and support contact between LAC and.
George Hosking, WAVE Trust Primary Prevention – cheaper than cure, better outcomes for children Church House, Westminster, 21 st March 2013 The Case for.
Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) in Berkshire Community Partnership Forum February 2014 Sally Murray Head of Children’s Commissioning.
Assessment, Analysis and Planning Further Understanding the contribution of extended family P17 1.
1. Kinship Breakdowns: Causes and Prevention ACWA Conference 2-5 August 2010, Sydney Lynne McCrae Wendy Frayne 2.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548%
University of Hawai’i Integrated Pediatric Residency Program Continuity Care Program Medical Home Module Case 3.
Increasing Child Welfare Permanency Options: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley.
Reunification – Old and New Information Diana J. English PhD Child Welfare League of America May 30, 2007.
Ethnicity in education research on British born ethnic minorities Demetris Hadjigeorgiou City University.
Alison Teyhan, Maria Maynard, Melissa Whitrow, Seeromanie Harding MRC, Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Scotland Introduction.
Understanding Families
Public Adoption Information Event. What is Adoption? Adoption is a way of providing a permanent family for children who can no longer be brought up by.
The Role of Public Policy in Protecting Children from Violence.
FOSTER CARE: MODULE #3 The Foster Care Process. FOSTER PARENTING  They are licensed and receive specialized training.  Work collaboratively as a member.
Title: Identity and Ethnicity Starter: Share your homework with the person next to you (the 2 qs) then discuss these questions: -What were the TWO sources.
Quick Questions 1. 1.List statistics that highlight Glasgow’s special health problems. 2.Explain why it is important not to stereotype all people who live.
Using the Health Survey for England to examine ethnic differences in obesity, diet and physical activity Vanessa Higgins & Angela Dale Centre for Census.
Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation P17 Childhood Neglect: Improving Outcomes for Children Presentation Understanding the contribution.
Visual Impairment Co-ordination Service Royal London Hospital a service provided by the Metropolitan Society for the Blind.
Creating Racial Equity in Child Welfare: What Do We Know? Judith Meltzer, CSSP Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative Fall Convening November 16, 2010.
Is all contact between children in care and their birth parents ‘good’ contact? Stephanie Taplin PhD NSW Centre for Parenting & Research 2006 ACWA Conference.
Children Looked After and Placement Costs. Looked After Children Population.
Good morning! 2/3/14  Today we are:  Learning about families  Functions  Influences  Life Cycles  Wednesday or Friday:  Quiz on Studying childhood.
Data Management and Analysis Intergenerational Ethnicity: Evidence for London from the 2001 Census BSPS 6 July 2005 Baljit Bains & John Hollis Greater.
Yvonne Onyeka Business Manager Bromley SCB LCPP in Bromley.
Need for Change Change Future Change POLICY AND LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK – ADOPTION AND FOSTERING 1.
Seeing Around Corners: An Assessment Model For Families Who Parent From Permanent Care To Adoption ACWA Conference 2014.
NSF:Issues relating to early transfer for the surgical neonate RCN March 2006.
Early Motherhood in the UK: Micro and Macro Determinants Denise Hawkes and Heather Joshi Centre for Longitudinal Research Institute of Education University.
Data Management and Analysis Baljit Bains and Ed Klodawski Demography Team Data Management and Analysis Group Ethnic Group Fertility Rates for London using.
Common risk factors for children, young people and families at risk of poor outcomes Heather Eyre – Research and Information Manager, Education Leeds John.
The Scottish Government Briefing Young Runaways – Early Identification.
Bs 18 The family, culture and illness. Overview of the family Definition A group of people related by blood, adoption or marriage is a family The interpersonal.
Measures of immigrant stocks in the UK Emma Wright Office for National Statistics, UK.
Patterns of Prejudice Debbie Weekes-Bernard Head of Research.
Understanding Permanence Bruce Clark and Janet Boddy CAFCASS and University of Sussex.
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
Child Protection Services Department of Health and Human Services Maggie Crawford State Manager Child and Family Services 3 April 2006.
Matching 1. Research Does matching make a difference to outcomes? Limits to data / difficult to design studies that could accurately measure this. Variations.
Maternity services and fathers The NSF Working with Fathers conference April 2005.
The Social and Family Backgrounds of Infants in Care: Predicting Subsequent Abuse Dr. Paul Delfabbro School of Psychology University of Adelaide.
ACWA Conference 2010 Barnardos Find-a-Family Working Together – Promoting Positive Relationships to Enhance Permanency Lisa Velickovich and Laura Ritchie.
Improving Opportunities for South Tyneside’s BME communities.
Differences in drug use by ethnicity: Do they suggest inequity in access to drug treatment? March 2005 Peter Madden Senior Analyst, Matthew Hickman Senior.
Family Relationships Chapter 7. Types of Families ● Single-Parent: Families with one parent caring for the children; common in divorced families or those.
“Would this be good enough for my child?”. Why do children become 'looked after'? Affected by distressing and damaging experiences including physical.
Roles and Responsibilities of the IRO. Role and Responsibilities of IRO When consulted about the guidance, children and young people were clear what they.
Placement Stability & Permanence. What is Permanence 'a sense of security, continuity, commitment and identity a secure, stable and loving family.
Man-Yee Kan, University of Oxford Heather Laurie, University of Essex Who is doing the housework in multicultural.
International & Transracial Adoption
Safeguarding babies and very young children from abuse and neglect: experiences on entering education Harriet Ward, Georgia Hyde-Dryden, Rebecca Brown,
Analysing and using information
Information Session Maggie Davies.
Family Relationships Chapter 7.
Analysing and using information
POLICY AND LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK – ADOPTION AND FOSTERING
Placement Stability & Permanence
Neither likely or unlikely
Placement Stability & Permanence
Gender Total % Female Male
What will I learn? To identify the gender and racial inequalities that exist in relation to health. 1.
The Impact and Avoidance of Delay in Decision Making
Characteristics of the children we place – what does the data say?
Presentation transcript:

Pathways to permanence for black, Asian and mixed ethnicity children Selwyn J., Harris, P. Quinton D., Nawaz, S., Wijedasa, D. and Wood, M.

Minority ethnic children  Lack of research but strong statements often made.  Over-represented in LAC and children in need population ( 22% LAC v 14% pop).  Less likely than white children to be adopted ( 14% of all adoptions).  Processes- differential delay and social work activity, matching, availability of adopters, special needs?

Aims  Examine retrospectively whether SW decisions led to differences in the plans for white and minority ethnic children.  Examine prospectively decision-making, delays and placement histories for minority ethnic children with adoption recommendations.

Samples in three local authorities  All children under 10yrs who started to be looked after April 1 st 2002-March 31 st white and 54 minority ethnic children.  All minority ethnic children (n= 120) with an adoption recommendation made between  Social workers of all minority ethnic children (n=50) booked into an adoption panel between Nov 05-Dec 06

Census categories  Asian- includes Indian, Bangladeshi and Pakistani.  Black includes African and Caribbean (Black British).  Mixed  Not homogenous groups

Mixed Ethnicity ‘Other’ Category Mixed ‘other’ White/AsianWhite/VietnameseWhite/CaribbeanWhite/ChineseAfrican/CaribbeanWhite/Kosovan

Findings  No evidence of an initial differential service response because of ethnicity.  The differences that were apparent were because of the characteristics of each group.

Asian children  More likely than other children to be living in a two parent family.  Parents likely to be born outside the UK.  Entered care at a young age, particularly because of ‘family honour’ (izzat).  Decision making slower for these children  Unlikely to be placed for adoption over the age of 3 yrs.

Black children  Parents of African children likely to be born outside the UK.  Came to the attention of Children’s Services later.  Entered care later and this affected pathways

Mixed ethnicity children  Majority of children were of mixed ethnicity ( 69% (AR sample), 74% ( interview sample)  Majority of their mothers were white or of mixed ethnicity.  These mothers more disadvantaged and more adverse circumstances than other mothers.

Characteristics of white mothers by child’s ethnicity White mothers with white children n=32 % White mothers with mixed ethnicity children n=39 % Sig Any child with FAS/drug withdrawal 931P=0.04 Has a partner at home 4113P=0.013 Alcohol/substance abuse 4567P=0.064 Ever in care2842ns

Families  Mental health problems, domestic violence prevalent across all groups.  Mixed ethnicity children had least support from their extended families.

Referral and Assessment  More black and Asian children referred by education services or self/families and for abuse.  White and mixed children more often referred by SSD and health services and for neglect.  Assessment often poor but more likely to be poor for minority ethnic children.

Assessment  Large number of kin assessments, sequential and contributing to delay.  Child assessments – core missing for about 50%  Core, Form E and medical info poorer for minority ethnic children

Time to adoption  No differences by ethnicity on likelihood of having an adoption recommendation.  Delays in black and Asian children having an adoption recommendation.  White and mixed ethnicity children similar pathways through the care system.  But many children had a change of plan away from adoption.

Family finding  Promotion ad hoc.  Only three minority ethnic children had more than 3 potential adoptive families expressing interest.  Minority ethnic adopters had more choice, able to be more selective.

Female child, mixed ethnicity aged 2 yrs birth mother is of Ghanaian background (but born in Italy) and a putative father of African Caribbean background. T is of African Caribbean background. She has black skin, dark brown hair and brown eyes. T needs a family that will reflect her ethnic background and will also reflect her cultural identity.

Ethnicity and culture  Ethnicity as a category.  Ethnicity as a problem.  Culture not identified but assumed to be the same as ethnicity.

Who got adopted?  White 80%  Mixed 70%  Black 42%  Asian 36%

Adoption  Age and ethnicity biggest determinants of likelihood of adoption.  Infants 10x more likely to be adopted than a child older than 3yrs. Mixed ethnicity children 4x more likely to be adopted than an Asian child.

Issues  Initial placement with white foster carers who later applied to adopt.  Siblings with fathers of different ethnicity.  High turnover of social workers.  Kin assessments.