1 Contracts, Competitive Bids 2004 USAC E-rate for Beginners 2004 USAC E-rate from the Service Provider Perspective FCC Orders.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. 2 Partners in Procurement Steve Hagar Deputy Director Central Purchasing Division Department of Central Services August 24th, 2009.
Advertisements

Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Determine Eligibility Chapter 4. Determine Eligibility 4-2 Objectives Search for Customer on database Enter application signed date and eligibility determination.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
The E-rate Program Road to Success Fall 2011 Applicant Trainings Washington, DC I Newark I Minneapolis I Portland I St. Louis I New Orleans I Los Angeles.
Addition Facts
Office of Purchasing and Contracts Research Funded Procurement Outreach Training Level III Procurements $50,000 and Above.
1 Florida Gulf Coast University Small Business Development Center (SBDC) Procurement Technical Assistance Center (PTAC) Reading Solicitations.
State Agency Contracts Considerations for Performance Reviews
HIT241 - PROCUREMENT & CONTRACT MANAGEMENT Introduction
IRD Procurement: BASIC October NOTE: The following provides guidance on IRDs Procurement process. This is not a policy document.
Welcome to MiCTA Learn about MiCTA’s National E- Rate Program.
Welcome to MiCTA Learn about MiCTA’s National E- Rate Program.
Where to Start. The E-rate Process ESL Utiliites Tools BEARs SPIs 471 Review Process Audits Site Visits Tech Plan RALs FCDL.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
© 2014 Universal Service Administrative Company. All rights reserved. E-rate Program Fall 2014 Applicant Trainings Program Compliance.
The Expenditure Cycle: Purchasing to Cash Disbursements
© 2014 Universal Service Administrative Company. All rights reserved. E-rate Program Fall 2014 Applicant Trainings Maximizing Cost Effectiveness and Simplifying.
Universal Service Administrative Company E-Rate and StateNets George McDonald and Cynthia Schultz Schools and Libraries Division Universal Service Administrative.
Tom Torlakson State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 CALNET 2.
Nutrition, Meal Planning, and Purchasing for the Child and Adult Care Food Program & DC Free Summer Meals Program.
04/26/20071 Documentation for E- Rate Audit Purposes Amber Prioleau E-Rate Manager/Network Technician.
1 Acronyms, Forms, Letters and Terminology Review.
The E-rate Program Understanding the Basics Fall 2011 Applicant Trainings Washington, DC I Newark I Minneapolis I Portland I St. Louis I New Orleans I.
E-rate Program Beginner’s Presentation: Understanding the Basics Fall 2010 Applicant Trainings.
E-rate Audits/Reviews Be prepared!! Prepared by Judy Jones, State Library of Iowa.
Openings, Closings, and Mergers Tutorial I 2013 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 Openings, Closings, and Mergers Tutorial Fall 2013 Applicant.
How Do I Run a Good Competitive Bidding Process? Back to the New Basics Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Orlando Boston New Orleans.
Understanding and Complying with Audits I 2013 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 E-rate Program Understanding and Complying with Audits.
Welcome to MiCTA Learn about MiCTA’s National E- Rate Program.
Intro Jeannene Hurley Michigan Department of Education 2006, Year 9 Funding Year.
Presented by: Bob Rice, President Triple R Consultants E-Rate Top 10 things you need to know! ©2011 Triple “R” Enterprises, Inc.
E-rate from the Service Provider Perspective Cynthia Schultz Train-the-Trainer Workshop September 27-29, 2004 Schools & Libraries Division.
Competitive Bidding Catriona Ayer Train-the-Trainer Workshop September 27-29, 2004 Schools & Libraries Division.
E-Rate Training for TASBO Members October 8, 2008 Presented by Susan Sullivan Director of Technology/Media.
Contracts Helping You Succeed Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Newark Atlanta Chicago Orlando Los Angeles Portland Houston September/October.
Ensuring Program Compliance I 2013 Schools and Libraries Fall Applicant Trainings 1 E-rate Program Ensuring Program Compliance Fall 2013 Applicant Trainings.
Program Compliance Training for Success September – October 2006 Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Boston Seattle St. Louis Atlanta.
© 2016 Universal Service Administrative Company. All rights reserved Applicant Training Audit Compliance September – November 2016.
Top 10 E-rate Myths and Facts for Service Providers
2017 Filing a Form 470 For Voice Step-by-Step for Creating and Submitting Your 470 Application in Your EPC Portal.
The E-Rate Program Tips for Success Fall 2011 Applicant Trainings.
E-RATE PROGRAM APPLICATION PROCESS, PART 2
E-rate Form 470 Filing Guide
Understanding and Complying with Audits
POST COMMITMENT.
After the FCC Form 471 E-rate Program Applicant Training
Contracts & Legally Binding Agreements
E-rate Filing Process Overview
Step 3: Legally Binding agreements and contracts
Sample Bid Evals and Best Practices
A YEAR IN THE LIFE OF AN E-RATE APPLICANT
Advanced Program Compliance
© 2017 Universal Service Administrative Co.
What happens after you receive an FCDL?
Process Overview for Service Providers
Advanced Program Compliance
E-Rate 101: Overview of the Program
Ensuring Program Compliance
E-rate Program Program Compliance September – November 2016.
Service Provider DO’s and DON’Ts Mel Blackwell and John Noran
STARTING FUNDING YEAR (FY) 2020
Presentation transcript:

1 Contracts, Competitive Bids 2004 USAC E-rate for Beginners 2004 USAC E-rate from the Service Provider Perspective FCC Orders

2 Competitive Bidding (1) Request for Proposal (RFP) –Not required under FCC Rules, but a good idea –Describes your project scope, location, other requirements in detail

3 Competitive Bidding (2) Competition –Goal is to have as many bidders as possible –Promotes better services and lower prices

4 Competitive Bidding (3) Fair and open process –All bidders treated the same, no advance knowledge of RFP information –No secrets in the process, all bidders know what is required of them

5 Competitive Bidding Process Obligation to Pay Non-discount Share –Applicants are required to pay their share of the cost (the non-discount portion or share) – cannot be donated, forgiven or ignored –Service providers cannot waive or credit the applicants share Offers to reduce price must be incorporated into the total pre- discount amount –Service providers must bill the applicant for non- discount share of services

6 Ysleta Order (1) State and local procurement rules –FCC Rules apply IN ADDITION TO state and local procurement laws and competitive bidding requirements –Example: State and local procurement law may permit an applicant to forego competitive bidding for products and services under a certain dollar threshold, but FCC rules require that applicants seek competitive bids on those products and services

7 Ysleta Order (2) Most cost-effect bid –Applicants must select the most cost-effect offerings –Price must be the primary factor, but need not be the exclusive factor –Price must be given more weight than any other factor

8 Third Report and Order Applicants will not receive support for contracts that provide only a single price for a package that bundles both eligible and ineligible services together Service provider and applicant should work together to create pricing terms in the contract that separate eligible services from ineligible services (see Cost Allocation and Ancillary)

9 Contract Signature and Date FCC Rules require applicant to sign a contract prior to the filing of a completed Form 471 (47 C.F.R. §54.504(c)) Fifth Report and Order requires both the applicant and service provider to sign the contract prior to the filing of a Form 471 –This rule does not apply to non-contracted tariffed or month-to- month services –Verbal agreements are not acceptable –Quotes are not acceptable –Purchase orders are acceptable if considered a contract pursuant to state and local procurement laws and state contract laws

10 Contract Dates Contracts cannot be signed before 28 days have elapsed for both the 470 and RFP (if applicable) The contract expiration date is the end date before contract extensions are executed

11 Contract Requirements (1) Service provider and applicant must comply with state contract law Service provider and applicant must comply with state and local procurement laws Legally binding agreement is another term used for contract

12 Contract Requirements (2) Applicant must provide signed and dated contracts for reviews and audits –Applicant must be prepared to prove its contract meets the requirements of state contract law Applicant certifies that it has signed a contract on its Form 486

13 Contract Requirements (3) Service provider is required to permit the applicant prior to the submission of the Form 471 to choose the Method of Payment – BEAR v. SPI – for discounted services –FCC Second Report and Order encourages the applicant and service provider to work together to determine the method of payment –FCC Second Report and Order encourages including the method of payment in the contract

14 Contract Requirements (4) Tariffed services provided under contract are contracted services Month-to-month and tariffed services do not need contracts Internal connections are presumed to be contracted services

15 Types of State Master Contracts Single winner –Applicants do not need to justify the selection of the winning bidder Multiple winners –Applicants must be able to document why they selected the specific provider off the master contract Multiple Award Schedules –Applicants must be able to document why they selected the specific provider off the multiple award schedule Only Terms and Conditions, not prices –These contracts do not meet FCC contract requirements

16 State Master Contracts (1) If the state filed a Form 470, then the applicant may cite the states Form 470 on its Form 471. –The applicant is required to follow the applicable provisions of the state master contract and local and state procurement laws –No separate bidding documents or contracts are required by the applicant citing the states Form 470, other than what is required by the state master contract and local and state procurement laws –The signed state master contract between the state and service providers meets the FCC signed contract requirement

17 State Master Contracts (2) If the applicant files a Form 470 and considers a state master contract as one of the bids: –The applicant is required to comply with all competitive bidding requirements Price must be the primary factor and must be weighted more heavily than any other factor If the applicant selects the state master contract: –The applicant is required to follow the applicable provisions of the state master contract and local and state procurement laws –The signed state master contract between the state and vendors meets the FCC signed contract requirements

18 State Master Contracts (3) If the state master contract requires the issuance of purchase orders or contains other requirements for applicants –The applicant must follow the applicable dates set forth in the state master contract For example, if a state master contract requires the applicant to issue a purchase order by July 1, then the applicant is required to meet that deadline

19 Memorialize If an applicant files its own Form 470 and chooses either a new or a pre-existing state master contract as the most cost effective bid, the applicant should (but is not required) –Memorialize its decision to purchase off the state master contract after the bidding process is complete and –Record the date of this memorialization as the relevant Contract Award Date in its submitted Form 471 application

20 Contract Amendments (1) Contract services may be amended if the contract allows for such an amendment, but if those services were not posted on the original Form 470, the applicant must post a new Form 470 If the original Form 470 or RFP did not include the newly-eligible services or entities, the applicant will be required to post a new Form 470 for those services

21 Contract Amendments (2) If the contract allows for service substitutions and there is a change on the Item 21 attachment, then the applicant or service provider should submit a service substitution, as applicable to SLD rules Contract dates may be amended if the contract allows for such amendments –If applicants and service providers extend the contract date, the applicant is required to file a Form 500

22 Contract With Voluntary Extensions A contract featuring voluntary extensions means that the contract expires at the end of its original term and may be voluntarily extended for one or more years pursuant to the provisions in the contract –The applicant should indicate in Item 7b on the Form 470 whether it is seeking a multi-year contract and/or voluntary extensions –The applicant may provide more detail in its RFP and/or Item 13 on the Form 470 about the length of the multi-year contract and/or voluntary extensions

23 References FCC Orders (Second, Ysleta, Third, Fifth) SLD Reference Area: Contract Guidance 2004 USAC E-rate for Beginners PowerPoint 2004 USAC E-rate from the Service Provider Perspective PowerPoint